Skip to main content
×
×
Home

‘A machine for recreating life’: an introduction to reproduction on film

  • JESSE OLSZYNKO-GRYN (a1) and PATRICK ELLIS (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Reproduction is one of the most persistently generative themes in the history of science and cinema. Cabbage fairies, clones and monstrous creations have fascinated filmmakers and audiences for more than a century. Today we have grown accustomed not only to the once controversial portrayals of sperm, eggs and embryos in biology and medicine, but also to the artificial wombs and dystopian futures of science fiction and fantasy. Yet, while scholars have examined key films and genres, especially in response to the recent cycle of Hollywood ‘mom coms’, the analytic potential of reproduction on film as a larger theme remains largely untapped. This introduction to a special issue aims to consolidate a disparate literature by exploring diverse strands of film studies that are rarely considered in the same frame. It traces the contours of a little-studied history, pauses to consider in greater detail a few particularly instructive examples, and underscores some promising lines of inquiry. Along the way, it introduces the six original articles that constitute Reproduction on Film.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      ‘A machine for recreating life’: an introduction to reproduction on film
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      ‘A machine for recreating life’: an introduction to reproduction on film
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      ‘A machine for recreating life’: an introduction to reproduction on film
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All

1 For a recent exploration of reproduction as it relates to communication technologies see Hopwood Nick, Jones Peter Murray, Kassell Lauren and Secord Jim (eds.), Communicating Reproduction, a special issue of the Bulletin of the History of Medicine (2015) 89, pp. 379556 . For a broader survey of the field see Hopwood Nick, Flemming Rebecca and Kassell Lauren (eds.), Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2018 .

2 Julien Duvivier and Henry Lepage's French film was first released in 1924, and rereleased as an updated version in 1933. In French, the title is La machine à refaire la vie; the standard translation in English has refaire as ‘re-create’.

3 On genetics and eugenics in film see Pernick Martin, The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of ‘Defective’ Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures since 1915, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 ; Kirby David A., ‘The new eugenics in cinema: genetic determinism and gene therapy in GATTACA ’, Science Fiction Studies (2000) 27, pp. 193215 ; Kirby , ‘The devil in our DNA: a brief history of eugenics in science fiction films’, Literature and Medicine (2007) 26, pp. 83108 ; Stacey Jackie, The Cinematic Life of the Gene, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010 ; and Smith Angela M., Hideous Progeny: Disability, Eugenics, and Classic Horror Cinema, New York: Columbia University Press, 2011 . On sex education in film see Eberwein Robert, Sex Ed: Film, Video, and the Framework of Desire, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1999 ; Schwarz Uta, ‘ Helga (1967): West German sex education and the cinema in the 1960s’, in Sauerteig Lutz D.H. and Davidson Roger (eds.), Shaping Sexual Knowledge: A Cultural History of Sex Education in Twentieth-Century Europe, London: Routledge, 2009, pp. 197213 ; Elisabet Björklund, ‘The most delicate subject: a history of sex education films in Sweden’, PhD thesis, Lund University, 2012; Parry Manon, Broadcasting Birth Control: Mass Media and Family Planning, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2013 ; Anita Winker, ‘Biology, morality and gender: East and West German sex education in films, 1945–70’, PhD thesis, Durham, 2014; and Bonah Christian and Laukötter Anja (eds.), Screening Diseases: Films on Sex Hygiene in Germany and France in the First Half of the 20th Century, a special issue of Gesnerus (2015) 72, pp. 593 .

4 See, for example, Nash Meredith, Making ‘Postmodern’ Mothers: Pregnant Embodiment, Baby Bumps and Body Image, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 ; and Peterson Joyce, ‘Baby M: American feminists respond to a controversial case’, Journal of Women's History (2016) 28, pp. 103125 .

5 See Modleski Tania, ‘Three men and Baby M’, Camera Obscura (1986) 6, pp. 6881 ; Desjardins Mary, ‘ Baby Boom: the comedy of surrogacy in film and television’, Velvet Light Trap (1992) 29, pp. 2130 ; and Kaplan E. Ann, ‘Look who's talking, indeed: fetal images in recent North American visual culture’, in Glenn Evelyn Nakano, Chang Grace and Forcey Linda Rennie (eds.), Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency, New York: Routledge, 1994, pp. 121137 .

6 Petchesky Rosalind Pollack, ‘Fetal images: the power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction’, Feminist Studies (1987) 13, pp. 263292 ; and Taylor Jennifer, ‘The public foetus and the family car: from abortion politics to a Volvo advertisement’, Public Culture (1992) 4, pp. 6780 .

7 See Parenting and Reproduction, a special issue of Velvet Light Trap (1992) 29, pp. 165 ; Kaplan E. Ann, Motherhood and Representation: The Mother in Popular Culture and Melodrama, London: Routledge, 1992 ; Bassin Donna, Honey Margaret and Kaplan Meryle Mahrer (eds.), Representations of Motherhood, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994 ; and Fischer Lucy, Cinematernity: Film, Motherhood, Genre, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996 . A somewhat earlier influential example is Williams Linda, ‘“Something else besides a mother”: Stella Dallas and the maternal melodrama’, Cinema Journal (1984) 24, pp. 227 .

8 See Addison Heather, Goodwin-Kelly Mary Kate and Roth Elaine (eds.), Motherhood Misconceived: Representing the Maternal in U.S. Films, Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009 ; Nusser Tanja, ‘Wie sonst das Zeugen Mode war’: Reproduktionstechnologien in Literatur und Film, Berlin: Rombach, 2011 ; Oliver Kelly, Knock Me Up, Knock Me Down: Images of Pregnancy in Hollywood Film, New York: Columbia University Press, 2012 ; Boswell Parley Ann, Pregnancy in Literature and Film, Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2014 ; and Jenkins Claire, Home Movies: The American Family in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema, London: I.B. Tauris, 2015 .

9 On the history of film, models and images as visual technologies of science communication see de Chadarevian Soraya and Hopwood Nick (eds.), Models: The Third Dimension of Science , Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004 ; Pauwels Luc (ed.), Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication , Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2006 ; Boon Timothy, Films of Fact: A History of Science in Documentary Films and Television, London: Wallflower, 2008 ; Kirby David A., Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists, and Cinema, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011 ; Curtis Scott, The Shape of Spectatorship: Art, Science, and Early Cinema in Germany, New York: Columbia University Press, 2015 ; Gaycken Oliver, Devices of Curiosity: Early Cinema and Popular Science, New York: Oxford University Press, 2015 ; Hopwood Nick, Haeckel's Embryos: Images, Evolution, and Fraud, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015 ; and Sappol Michael, Body Modern: Fritz Kahn, Scientific Illustration, and the Homuncular Subject, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017 .

10 See Tosi Virgilio, Cinema before Cinema: The Origins of Scientific Cinematography, London: British Universities Film and Video Council, 2005 .

11 For postcards as they relate to early film see Rabinovitz Lauren, Electric Dreamland: Amusement Parks, Movies, and American Modernity, New York: Columbia University Press, 2012, pp. 96134 .

12 See Véron Jacques and Rohrbasser Jean-Marc, Bébés, familles et cartes postales de 1900 à 1950, Paris: Ined, 2015 ; for an analysis of the German tradition see Benninghaus Christina, ‘“No, thank you, Mr Stork!”: voluntary childlessness in Weimar and contemporary Germany’, Studies in the Maternal (2014) 6, pp. 136 , available at http://doi.org/10.16995/sim.8.

13 For postcard landscapes and scenes as they relate to film see Peterson Jennifer Lynn, Education in the School of Dreams: Travelogues and Early Nonfiction Film, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013 .

14 Gaines Jane M., ‘Of cabbages and authors’, in Bean Jennifer M. and Negra Diane (eds.), A Feminist Reader in Early Cinema , Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002, pp. 88118 ; and Gaines , ‘First fictions’, Signs (2004) 30, pp. 12931317 .

15 See McMahan Alison, Alice Guy Blaché: Lost Visonary of the Cinema, New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014, p. 39. For essays on Guy and other women pioneers of early cinema see Gaines Jane, Vatsal Radha and Dall'Asta Monica (eds.), Women Film Pioneers Project , Center for Digital Research and Scholarship, New York: Columbia University Libraries, 2013 , available at https://wfpp.cdrs.columbia.edu.

16 See, for example, Braun Marta, Keil Charles, King Rob, Moore Paul and Pelletier Louis (eds.), Beyond the Screen: Institutions, Networks, and Publics of Early Cinema , New Barnet: John Libbey, 2016 . For a recent review of early cinema as it relates to science see Olszynko-Gryn Jesse, ‘Film lessons: early cinema for historians of science’, BJHS (2016) 49, pp. 279286 .

17 See Gunning Tom, ‘“Primitive” cinema: a frame-up? Or the trick's on us’, Cinema Journal (1989) 28, pp. 312 ; and Higgins Scott, ‘The silent screen, 1895–1927: editing’, in Keil Charlie and Whissel Kristen (eds.), Editing and Special/Visual Effects , New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2016, pp. 2236 .

18 The film Artistic Creation and dozens more as well as ‘Robert Paul: time traveller’, a historical essay by Ian Christie, are included with the DVD RW Paul: The Collected Films, 1895–1980, London: BFI, 2006. See also Christie Ian, ‘The visible and the invisible: from “tricks” to “effects”’, Early Popular Visual Culture (2015) 13, pp. 105112 ; and Cook Malcolm, ‘The lightning cartoon: animation from music hall to cinema’, Early Popular Visual Culture (2013) 11, pp. 237254 .

19 Pernick, op. cit. (3), p. 51; Doan Laura, ‘Sex education and the Great War soldier: a queer analysis of the practice of “hetero” sex’, Journal of British Studies (2012) 51, pp. 641663 . Whatsoever a Man Soweth is available on DVD in the landmark collection of British sex education films, The Birds and the Bees, London: BFI, 2009 (originally titled The Joy of Sex Education).

20 See Shail Andrew (ed.), Cinema's Second Birth , a special issue of Early Popular Visual Culture (2013) 2, pp. 97177 .

21 Pernick, op. cit. (3), p. 123.

22 See Pernick, op. cit. (3), p. 130. On Porter, who made films for the prolific Edison company, see Musser Charles, Before the Nickelodeon: Edwin S. Porter and the Edison Manufacturing Company, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991 .

23 On incubator shows see Silverman William A., ‘Incubator-baby side shows’, Pediatrics (1979) 2, pp. 127141 ; Pernick, op. cit. (3), pp. 54, 112. On hydrotherapy see Weisz George, ‘Spas, mineral waters, and hydrological science in twentieth-century France’, Isis (2001) 93, pp. 451483 .

24 See Dym Jeffrey A., Benshi, Japanese Silent Film Narrators, and Their Forgotten Narrative Art of Setsumei: A History of Japanese Silent Film Narration, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2003 .

25 See Graffy Julian, Bed and Sofa, London: I.B. Tauris, 2001 . On abortion in Soviet Russia see Goldman Wendy Z., ‘Women, abortion and the state, 1917–36’, in Clements Barbara Evans, Engel Barbara Alpern and Worobec Christine D. (eds.), Russia's Women: Accommodation, Resistance, Transformation, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991, pp. 243266 . On the history of abortion in film and television see Press Andrea L. and Cole Elizabeth R., Speaking of Abortion: Television and Authority in the Lives of Women, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999 ; von Keitz Ursula, Im Schatten des Gesetzes: Schwangerschaftskonflikt und Reproduktion im deutschsprachigen Film 1918 bis 1933, Marburg: Schüren, 2005 ; Heather MacGibbon, ‘The abortion narrative in American film: 1900–2000’, PhD thesis, New York University, 2007; Fran Bigman, ‘“Nature's a wily dame”: abortion in British literature and film, 1907–1967’, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2014; Megan Lynn Minarich, ‘Hollywood's reproduction code: regulating contraception and abortion in American cinema, 1915–1952’, PhD thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, 2014; Sisson Gretchen and Kimport Katrina, ‘Telling stories about abortion: abortion-related plots in American film and television, 1916–2013’, Contraception (2014) 89, pp. 413418 ; and Kinoshita Chika, ‘Something more than a seduction story: Shiga Akiko's abortion scandal and late 1930s Japanese film culture’, Feminist Media Histories (2015) 1, pp. 2963 .

26 Roberts Graham, The Man with the Movie Camera, London: I.B. Tauris, 2000, p. 70 .

27 Eisenstein Sergei, Disney, Berlin: Potemkin Press, 2013 .

28 See Laukötter Anja, ‘Listen and watch: the practice of lecturing and the epistemological status of sex education films in Germany’, Gesnerus (2015) 72, pp. 5676 .

29 Quoted in Nesbet Anne, Savage Junctures: Sergei Eisenstein and the Shape of Thinking, London: I.B. Tauris, 2003, p. 140 .

30 Nesbet, op. cit. (29), p. 142.

31 Eisenstein, op. cit. (27), p. 117. In Ernst Haeckel's then widely discussed theory of evolution, initially formless embryos climbed the ‘ladder of evolution’ in the womb. See Hopwood, op. cit. (9).

32 See, for example, Beckmann Karen (ed.), Animating Film Theory, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014 .

33 Michaelis Anthony R., Research Films in Biology, Anthropology, Psychology, and Medicine, New York: Academic Press, 1955, p. 85 . For the classic critique of the ‘male’ sperm as active and the ‘female’ egg as passive see Martin Emily, ‘The egg and the sperm: how science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male–female roles’, Signs (1991) 16, pp. 485501 .

34 Michaelis, op. cit. (33), p. 117. For time-lapse as it relates to botanical research and Darwinism see Gaycken Oliver, ‘The secret life of plants: visualizing vegetative movement, 1880–1903’, Early Popular Visual Culture (2012) 10, pp. 5169 ; Gaycken , ‘Early cinema and evolution’, in Lightman Bernhard V. and Zon Bennett (eds.), Evolution in Victorian Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 94120 .

35 Hopwood Nick, ‘Visual standards and disciplinary change: normal plates, tables and stages in embryology’, History of Science (2005) 43, pp. 239303 . See also the online resource: Tatjana Buklijas and Nick Hopwood, Making Visible Embryos (2008–2010; last reviewed 2014), at www.hps.cam.ac.uk/visibleembryos.

36 See Braun Marta, Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992 ; Prodger Philip, Time Stands Still: Muybridge and the Instantaneous Photography Movement, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003 ; Solnit Rebecca, River of Shadows: Eadweard Muybridge and the Technological Wild West, New York: Viking, 2003 ; and Braun Marta, Eadweard Muybridge, London: Reaktion Books, 2010 .

37 See Landecker Hannah, ‘The life of movement: from microcinematography to live-cell imaging’, Journal of Visual Culture (2012) 11, pp. 378399 ; and Oliver Gaycken, ‘“A living, developing egg is present before you”: animation, scientific visualization, and modeling’, in Beckmann, op. cit. (32), pp. 68–81.

38 Ries quoted in translation in Kelty Christopher and Landecker Hannah, ‘A theory of animation: cells, L-systems, and film’, Grey Room (2004) 17, pp. 3063 , 37.

39 See Landecker Hannah, ‘The Lewis films: tissue culture and “living anatomy,” 1919–1940’, in Maienschein Jane, Glitz Marie and Allen Garland E. (eds.), Centennial History of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, vol. 5: The Department of Embryology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 117144 ; and Ostherr Kirsten, ‘Animating informatics: scientific discovery through documentary film’, in Jahusz Alexandra and Lebow Alisa (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Film, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2015, pp. 280297 .

40 Michaelis, op. cit. (33), pp. 115–117.

41 Michaelis, op. cit. (33), p. 117.

42 Morgan Lynn M., Icons of Life: A Cultural History of Human Embryos, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009, p. 200 . See further Wilson Emily K., ‘Ex utero: live human fetal research and the films of Davenport Hooker’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine (2014) 88, pp. 132160 . Hooker's 1952 film is available via the Wellcome Library's ‘reproduction’ playlist at www.youtube.com/user/WellcomeFilm/playlists.

43 Maverick surgeon Eugene Louis Doyen began filming in the operating theatre as early as 1898. See Thierry Lefebvre, La chair et le celluloïd: Le cinéma chirurgical du docteur Doyen, Paris: J. Doyen, 2004.

44 Foreign letters: Paris’, Journal of the American Medical Association (December 1921) 77(24), pp. 20712072 .

45 Our discussion builds on the analysis of wax models as they relate to print media and pedagogy in Nick Hopwood, ‘Plastic publishing in embryology’, in de Chadarevian and Hopwood, op. cit. (9), pp. 170–206. See further Hopwood, Embryos in Wax: Models from the Ziegler Studio, with a Reprint of ‘Embryological Wax Models’ by Friedrich Ziegler, Cambridge: Whipple Museum of the History of Science, 2012 .

46 See Orgeron Devin, Orgeron Marsha and Streible Dan (eds.), Learning with the Lights Off: Educational Film in the United States, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 ; and Wasson Haidee, ‘Electric homes! Automatic movies! Efficient entertainment! 16 mm and cinema's domestication in the 1920s’, Cinema Journal (2009) 48, pp. 121 .

47 New York University Film Library, A Catalogue of Selected 16 mm. Educational Motion Pictures, New York: NYU, 1950, pp. 8081 .

48 NYUFL, op. cit. (47), p. 139.

49 On British film censors and contraception see Kuhn Annette, ‘The “Married Love” affair’, Screen (1986) 27, pp. 521 ; Kuhn , Cinema, Censorship and Sexuality, 1909–1925, New York: Routledge, 1988 ; and Borge Jessica, ‘Propagating progress and circumventing harm: reconciling references to contraceptives in British television and cinema of the 1960s’, in Maierhofer Waltraud and Capo Beth Widmaier (eds.), Reproductive Rights Issues in Popular Media: International Perspectives, Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2017, pp. 1128 .

50 Schaefer Eric, “Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!”: A History of Exploitation Films, 1919–1959, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999, p. 8 . On stag films and pornography see Williams Linda, Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and ‘Frenzy of the Visible’, London: Pandora, 1990 .

51 Schaefer, op. cit. (50), pp. 2–5.

52 Schaefer, op. cit. (50), p. 6.

53 Schaefer, op. cit. (50), pp. 106–107.

54 Schaefer, op. cit. (50), p. 188.

55 Schaefer, op. cit. (50), p. 190.

56 Sartain Geraldine, ‘The cinema explodes the stork myth’, Journal of Educational Sociology (1938) 12, pp. 142146, 144. The Birth of a Nation (1915), a controversial landmark of American cinema, dramatized the origins of the KKK. See Stokes Melvyn, D.W. Griffith's The Birth of a Nation: A History of ‘The Most Controversial Motion Picture of All Time’, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 .

57 Schaefer, op. cit. (50), p. 190. See also Strassfeld Benjamin, ‘A difficult delivery: debating the function of the screen and educational cinema through The Birth of a Baby (1938)’, Velvet Light Trap (2013) 72, pp. 4457 .

58 Schaefer, op. cit. (50), p. 191.

59 Ostherr Kirsten, Medical Visions: Producing the Patient through Film, Television, and Imaging Technologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 117 .

60 Schreiber Flora Rheta, ‘New York: a cinema capital’, Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television (1953) 7, pp. 264273, 266.

61 On Hammid, Deren and their cat film see Anděl Jaroslav, Alexandr Hackenschmied, Prague: Torst, 2000 ; Rhodes John David, Meshes of the Afternoon, London: BFI and Palgrave, 2011 ; and Galt Rosalind, ‘Cats and the moving image’, in Lawrence Michael and McMahon Laura (eds.), Animal Life and the Moving Image, London: BFI and Palgrave, 2015, pp. 4257 .

62 Omasta Michael and Hammid Alexander, ‘“The rest is more or less routine stuff”: Michael Omasta in correspondence with Alexander Hammid, Vienna/New York (Sept. 2001–Jan. 2002)’, in Omasta Michael (ed.), Tribute to Sasha: Das filmische Werk von Alexander Hammid, Vienna: Synema, 2002, pp. 157176, 171.

63 Amos Vogel, ‘Program notes (Cinema 16, September 1948)’, in Omasta, op. cit. (62), p. 209.

64 Vogel, op. cit. (63), p. 209.

65 ‘The private life of a cat’, Popular Photography (April 1947) 20, p. 130.

66 Amos Vogel, Film as a Subversive Art, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1976, p. 262.

67 Omasta and Hammid, op. cit. (62), p. 171.

68 See Osterweil Ara, Flesh Cinema: The Corporeal Turn in American Avant-Garde Film, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014 .

69 Brakhage's second of five childbirth films, Thigh Line Lyre Triangular (1961), was much more experimental and abstract. See Barr William R., ‘Brakhage: artistic development in two childbirth films’, Film Quarterly (1976) 29, pp. 3034 ; and Shira Segal, ‘Home movies and home birth: the avant-garde childbirth film and pregnancy in new media’, PhD thesis, Indiana University, 2011.

70 Ostherr, op. cit. (59), p. 120.

71 Ostherr, op. cit. (59), p. 124.

72 Mekas Jonas, ‘Recollections of Stan Brakhage’, in James David E. (ed.), Stan Brakhage: Filmmaker, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2005, pp. 107112, 107. The review was not, in fact, published at the time.

73 Mekas, op. cit. (72), p.107.

74 Carolee Schneemann, ‘It is painting’, in James, op. cit. (72), pp. 78–87, 83.

75 See Vogel, op. cit. (66), pp. 258–262; Robin Blaetz (ed.), Women's Experimental Cinema: Critical Frameworks, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007; and Segal, op. cit. (69).

76 Amiel Mireille, ‘Agnès Varda talks about cinema’, in Kline T. Jefferson (ed.), Agnès Varda: Interviews, Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2014, pp. 6477, 74.

77 MacDonald Scott, A Critical Cinema 3: Interviews with Independent Filmmakers, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998, p. 182 .

78 Hoberman J., ‘The Super-80s’, Film Comment (1981) 17, pp. 3943, 42. On sound recordings of childbirth see Michaels Paula, ‘The sounds and sights of natural childbirth: films and records in antenatal preparation classes, 1950s–1980s’, Social History of Medicine (2017), Advance Access, doi: 10.1093/shm/hkw119.

79 Taubin Amy, ‘Discussion between Marjorie Keller and Amy Taubin’, Idiolects (1978) 6, pp. 2831, 28; quoted in Samer Roxanne, ‘Re-conceiving Misconception: birth as a site of filmic experimentation’, Jump Cut (Summer 2011) 53 , at www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc53.2011/samerMisconception/text.html.

80 Schneemann, op. cit. (74), p. 83.

81 Interview with Haug Kate in Wide Angle (1977) 20, pp. 2049, 23; republished in Schneemann Carolee, Imaging Her Erotics: Essays, Interviews, Projects, Cambridge, MA: Press MIT, 2002 .

82 Ostherr, op. cit. (59), p. 125; and Jackson Lynne, ‘The production of George Stoney's film All My Babies: A Midwife's Own Story (1952)’, Film History (1987) 1, pp. 367392 .

83 On the history of film studies see Zryd Michael, ‘Experimental film and the development of film study in America’, in Grieveson Lee and Wasson Haidee (eds.), Inventing Film Studies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008 .

84 MacDonald Scott (ed.), A Critical Cinema 4: Interviews with Independent Filmmakers, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005, pp. 6263 .

85 Osterweil, op. cit. (68), pp. 101–102.

86 See Tyler Imogen and Clements Jessica, ‘The taboo aesthetics of the birth scene’, Feminist Review (2009) 93, pp. 134137 .

87 MacDonald, op. cit. (84), p. 68, original emphasis. For Jane's perspective see Brakhage Jane, ‘The birth film’, in Sitney P. Adams (ed.), Film Culture Reader, York New: Praeger, 1970, pp. 230233 .

88 See Reagan Leslie, Dangerous Pregnancies: Mothers, Disabilities, and Abortion in Modern America, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010 ; and Parker Clare, ‘From immorality to public health: thalidomide and the debate for legal abortion in Australia’, Social History of Medicine (2012) 25, pp. 863880 .

89 See Reed Richard K., Birthing Fathers: The Transformation of Men in American Rites of Birth, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2005 ; and Leavitt Judith Walzer, Make Room for Daddy: The Journey from Waiting Room to Birthing Room, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009 . For the British history see King Laura, ‘Hiding in the pub to cutting the cord? Men's presence at childbirth in Britain c.1940s–2000’, Social History of Medicine (2017) 30, pp. 389407 .

90 For example, Shapiro Jerome F., Atomic Bomb Cinema: The Apocalyptic Imagination on Film, London: Routledge, 2002 ; on ‘monster movies’ see Tudor Andrew, Monsters and Mad Scientists: A Cultural History of the Horror Movie, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989 .

91 Brakhage ‘always enjoyed going to the movies, sometimes explaining the recreation as a means of staying in touch with the culture at large’. David E. James, ‘Introduction’, in James, op. cit. (72), pp. 1–19, 15.

92 See, for example, Levine Elana, Wallowing in Sex: The New Sexual Culture of 1970s American Television, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007 ; Williams Linda, Screening Sex, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008 ; and Schaefer Eric, Sex Scene: Media and the Sexual Revolution, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014 .

93 See Lay Samantha, British Social Realism: From Documentary to Brit-Grit, London: Wallflower, 2002 ; Leigh Jacob, The Cinema of Ken Loach: Art in the Service of the People, London: Wallflower, 2002 ; and Bigman, op. cit. (25).

94 See Waltraud Maierhofer, ‘Finding humor in birth control: fiction and film from Hugh Mills to Matthias Schweighhöfer’, in Maierhofer and Capo, op. cit. (49), pp. 136–155. Artificial insemination inspired Test Tube Babies (1948), an American exploitation film, and A Question of Adultery (1958), an X-rated British film based on the stage play A Breach of Marriage (1948), as well as more recent films. See Schaefer, op. cit. (50), pp. 206–208; and Fitzpatrick Peter, The Two Frank Thrings, Victoria: Monash University Publishing, 2012, pp. 401403 .

95 Jülich Solveig, ‘The making of a best-selling book on reproduction: Lennart Nilsson's A Child Is Born ’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine (2015) 89, pp. 491525 .

96 On evolution in 2001 see Fry Carrol, ‘From technology to transcendence: humanity's evolutionary journey in 2001: A Space Odyssey ’, Extrapolation (2003) 44, pp. 331343 ; and Poole Robert, ‘ 2001: A Space Odyssey and the dawn of man’, in Ljujic Tatjana, Kramer Peter and Daniels Richard (eds.), Stanley Kubrick: New Perspectives, London: Black Dog Press, 2014, pp. 174197 .

97 Fischer Lucy, ‘Birth traumas: parturition and horror in Rosemary's Baby ’, Cinema Journal (1992) 31, pp. 318 ; Hoffman A. Robin, ‘How to see the horror: the hostile fetus in Rosemary's Baby and Alien ’, Literature Interpretation Theory (2011) 22, pp. 239261 ; and Oliver, op. cit. (8), pp. 117–126.

98 On the grassroots campaign against Z.P.G. (1972), a science fiction film about overpopulation that seemed to promote the right to procreate at any cost to the environment, see Jesse Olszynko-Gryn and Patrick Ellis, ‘Malthus at the movies: science, cinema, and activism around Z.P.G. and Soylent Green’, Cinema Journal, forthcoming 2018. On Histoires d'A (1973), an initially banned ‘militant’ documentary about abortion that sparked protest at Cannes, see Lecler Romain, ‘Le succès d’Histoires d'A, “film sur l'avortement”: Une mobilisation croisée de ressources cinématographiques et militantes (enquête)’, Terrains & travaux (2007) 2, pp. 5172 ; and Fleckinger Hélène, ‘ Histoires d'A: Un moment de la lutte pour la liberté de l'avortement’, La revue documentaire (2010) 22–23, pp. 181195 .

99 On Silent Scream see Dubow Sara, Ourselves Unborn: A History of the Fetus in Modern America, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 153, 159160 , 164. On IVF documentaries in the 1980s see Sarah Franklin, ‘Postmodern procreation: a cultural account of assisted reproduction’, in Faye D. Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp (eds.), Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995, pp. 323–345. Documentary footage of the birth of Louise Brown, the world's first child conceived by IVF, can be viewed at https://wellcomecollection.org/articles/first-test-tube-baby-louise-brown. See further Dow Katie, ‘Looking into the test-tube: the birth of IVF on British television’, in Olszynko-Gryn Jesse and Rusterholz Caroline (eds.), Reproductive Politics in France and Britain, a special issue of Medical History, forthcoming 2018.

100 Robbins Helen W., ‘“More human than I am alone”: womb envy in David Cronenberg's The Fly and Dead Ringers ’, in Cohan Steven and Hark Ina Rae (eds.), Screening the Male: Exploring Masculinities in Hollywood Cinema, London: Routledge, 1993, pp. 134150 .

101 O'Riordan Kate, ‘Human cloning in film: horror, ambivalence, hope’, Science as Culture (2008) 17, pp. 145162 . See further Haran Joan, Kitzinger Jenny, McNeil Maureen and O'Riordan Kate, Human Cloning in the Media: From Science Fiction to Science Practice, London: Routledge, 2007 ; and Franklin Sarah, Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007 .

102 Bodelson Amery, ‘Redemptive restrooms: moments of utopic possibility in Volker Schlöndorff's film version of The Handmaid's Tale ’, Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association (2006) 39, pp. 6372 ; Latimer Heather, “Bio-reproductive futurism: bare life and the pregnant refugee in Alfonso Cuarón's Children of Men ’, Social Text (2011) 29, pp. 5172 ; and Sparling Nicole L., ‘Without a conceivable future: figuring the mother in Alfonso Cuarón's Children of Men ’, Frontiers (2014) 35, pp. 160180 .

103 Leavitt, op. cit. (89), pp. 1–7; and Ziv Eisenberg, ‘The whole nine months: women, men, and the making of modern pregnancy in America’, PhD thesis, Yale University Press, 2013, pp. 262–331.

104 See Mamo Laura, Queering Reproduction: Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technoscience, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007 ; and Brooks Jodi, ‘ The Kids Are All Right, the pursuits of happiness, and the spaces between’, Camera Obscura (2014) 29, pp. 111135 . On earlier films about male pregnancy see Maher JaneMaree, ‘A pregnant man in the movies: the visual politics of reproduction’, Continuum (2008) 22, pp. 279288 ; and Hill Rodney, ‘Queering the New-Wave deal: gender and sexuality in Jacques Demy's A Slightly Pregnant Man ’, Post Script (2014) 34, pp. 5060 .

105 See Sears Camilla A. and Godderis Rebecca, ‘Roar like a tiger on TV? Constructions of women and childbirth in reality TV’, Feminist Media Studies (2011) 11, pp. 181195 ; Guglielmo Letizia (ed.), MTV and Teen Pregnancy: Critical Essays on 16 and Pregnant and Teen Mom , Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield, 2013 ; Bull Sofia, ‘Midwives, medicine and natural births: female agency in Scandinavian birthing shows’, Critical Studies in Television (2016) 11, pp. 177189 ; Horeck Tanya, ‘The affective labour of One Born Every Minute in its UK and US formats’, Critical Studies in Television (2016) 11, pp. 164176 ; and De Benedictis Sara, ‘Watching One Born Every Minute: negotiating the terms of the “good birth”’, in Moseley Rachel, Wheatley Helen and Wood Helen (eds.), Television for Women: New Directions, New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 110127 .

106 Ruoff Jeffrey K., ‘Home movies of the avant-garde: Jonas Mekas and the New York art world’, in James David E. (ed.), To Free the Cinema: Jonas Mekas and the New York Underground, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992, pp. 294312 , 301. See further Segal, op. cit. (69).

107 See Longhurst Robyn, ‘YouTube: a new space for birth?’, Feminist Review (2009) 93, pp. 4663 .

108 Roberts Julie, ‘“Wakey wakey baby”: narrating four-dimensional (4D) bonding scans’, Sociology of Health & Illness (2012) 34, pp. 299314 , 301. See further Roberts , The Visualised Foetus: A Cultural and Political Analysis of Ultrasound Imagery, Farnham: Ashgate, 2012 .

109 See Franklin Sarah, Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013, pp. 246254 ; and van de Wiel Lucy, ‘Cellular origins: a visual analysis of time-lapse embryo imaging’, in Lie Merete and Lykke Nina (eds.), Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions, New York: Routledge, 2017, pp. 288301 .

110 See Stramer Brian M. and Dunn Graham A., ‘Cells on film: the past and future of cinemicroscopy’, Journal of Cell Science (2015) 128, pp. 913 .

111 See Wolf Jacqueline H., ‘Film as the medium; reproduction, sex, and power as the message’, Journal of Women's History (2010), 22, pp. 173184 .

112 For example, Debra Pascali-Bonaro's Orgasmic Birth: The Best-Kept Secret (2009) and Rebecca Haimowitz and Vaishali Sinha's Made in India: A Film about Surrogacy (2010). Irene Lusztig's The Motherhood Archives (2013) makes the most effective use of archival footage, including from recently unearthed Soviet and French childbirth films; see http://motherhoodarchives.net. Earlier feminist documentaries notably interrogated coercive sterilization practices in Puerto Rico and India: Safford Kimberly, ‘ La Operación: forced sterilization’, Jump Cut (1984) 29, pp. 3738 ; and Sinha Madhumeeta, ‘Witness to violence: documentary cinema and the women's movement in India’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies (2010) 17, pp. 365373 . Certain of these films and many others are available from Women Make Movies at www.wmm.com/index.asp.

This special issue began as an annual series of public film screenings and discussions organised by Jesse Olszynko-Gryn, Francis Neary and Nick Hopwood and supported by the Wellcome Trust through a strategic award in the history of medicine on the theme Generation to Reproduction (088708) to Hopwood and colleagues in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge. The contributions were workshopped in September 2015 at the Reproduction on Film conference, which was organized by the editors (Jesse Olszynko-Gryn, Patrick Ellis and Caitjan Gainty) and funded by the same grant and by the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine at King's College London. We are grateful to all those who participated in the event, especially Tom Gunning and Kate O'Riordan for opening and closing comments respectively. Finally, we thank Sofia Bull, Caitjan Gainty, Nick Hopwood, David E. James and two anonymous reviewers for reading drafts of the introduction; Tim Boon, Scott Curtis, Oliver Gaycken, Sarah Franklin, John David Rhodes, Mark Sandberg and Angela Saward for advice along the way; Kathryn Schoefert for research assistance; Ian Bolton for preparing some of the images; and John Gaunt, Trish Hatton, Daniel Pierce and especially Charlotte Sleigh for editorial guidance and firm deadlines. Images were licensed with support from the Generation to Reproduction award; funding for the Open Access charge was provided by the Wellcome Trust.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 117
Total number of PDF views: 207 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 279 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th September 2017 - 19th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.