Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hemmens, Susan 2015. Crow's Nest and beyond: Chymistry in the Dublin Philosophical Society, 1683–1709. Intellectual History Review, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Thell, Anne M. 2015. “[T]he reall truth; in testimony whare of I have hereunto set my hand”: Robert Hooke, Robert Knox andAn Historical Relation of the Island Ceylon(1681). Studies in Travel Writing, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 291.

    Dobre, Mihnea 2013. On Glass-Drops: a Case Study of the Interplay Between Experimentation and Explanation in Seventeenth-Century Natural Philosophy. Journal of Early Modern Studies, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 105.

    Leoni, Simona Boscani 2013. Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Geschichte des Wissens im Dialog - Connecting Science and Knowledge.

    Feola, Vittoria 2012. Elias Ashmole’s collections and views about John Dee. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 43, Issue. 3, p. 530.

    FOX, ADAM 2010. PRINTED QUESTIONNAIRES, RESEARCH NETWORKS, AND THE DISCOVERY OF THE BRITISH ISLES, 1650–1800. The Historical Journal, Vol. 53, Issue. 03, p. 593.

    PRATT, DAVID SCHOFIELD, P. R. FRENCH, HENRY KIRBY, PETER FREEMAN, MARK GREAVES, JULIAN and PEMBERTON, HUGH 2009. Review of periodical literature published in 2007. The Economic History Review, Vol. 62, Issue. 1, p. 153.

    Songsasen, Nucharin and Comizzoli, Pierre 2009. Preservation of Human Oocytes.

    Hale, Matthew Hawkins, Richard and Wright, Catherine 2008. List of publications on the economic and social history of Great Britain and Ireland published in 2007. The Economic History Review, Vol. 61, Issue. 4, p. 949.

  • The British Journal for the History of Science, Volume 40, Issue 1
  • March 2007, pp. 1-23

Robert Boyle and the early Royal Society: a reciprocal exchange in the making of Baconian science

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2007

This paper documents an important development in Robert Boyle's natural-philosophical method – his use from the 1660s onwards of ‘heads’ and ‘inquiries’ as a means of organizing his data, setting himself an agenda when studying a subject and soliciting information from others. Boyle acknowledged that he derived this approach from Francis Bacon, but he had not previously used it in his work, and the reason why it came to the fore when it did is not apparent from his printed and manuscript corpus. It is necessary to look beyond Boyle to his milieu for the cause, in this case to the influence on him of the Royal Society. Whereas the Royal Society in its early years is often seen as putting into practice a programme pioneered by Boyle, this crucial methodological change on his part seems rather to have been stimulated by the society's early concern for systematic data-collecting. In this connection, it is here shown that a key text, Boyle's influential ‘General Heads for a Natural History of a Country, Great or small’, published in Philosophical Transactions in 1666, represents more of a shared initiative between him and the society than has hitherto been appreciated.

Hide All
This paper is a revised version of a guest lecture given to the British Society for the History of Science at its extraordinary general meeting at the Royal Society on 8 June 2005. I am grateful to Janet Browne, Peter Bowler and Philip Crane for inviting me to give the lecture and for their assistance on that occasion. For comments on a draft of the paper I am grateful to Peter Anstey, Mordechai Feingold, Guido Giglioni and Tina Malcolmson. Earlier versions of part of it were given (and have been cited) under different titles at the 2nd International Bacon Seminar at Queen Mary, University of London, in September 2001; at Johns Hopkins University and Vanderbilt University in March 2002; and at a European Science Foundation workshop at the Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel, in March 2004. I am grateful to Graham Rees, Lawrence M. Principe, Matthew Ramsay, Sachiko Kusukawa and Ian Maclean for hosting me on those occasions, and to the audiences for their comments. I have also benefited from comments by Harriet Knight, Daniel Carey and Ken Brown, and I am grateful to Joanna Corden and the archive staff at the Royal Society for their assistance.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *