¹ Galilei, Galileo, On motion and On mechanics, trs. Drabkin, I. E. and Drake, Stillman (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1960).Google Scholar

² SirNewton, Isaac, Mathematical principles of natural philosophy, trs. Motte, (University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1962), i, 28.Google Scholar

³ Turnbull, H. W., The correspondence of Isaac Newton, 1688–1694 (Cambridge, 1961), iii, 354.Google Scholar

⁴ Parent, A., “Sur la plus grande perfection possible des machines”, Histoire de l'Académie Rayale des Sciences, Année 1704 (and ed. 1722), 116, 323.Google Scholar

⁵ Parent in fact assumed that the “effort” P in the expression PV for the effet naturel was equal to gHp so that the effet général was gHpV. But P should equal 2gHp so that the effet général is gHpV or MgH. Dr. J. R. Ravetz has pointed out to me how the vital factor “2” was necessarily obscured by the “geometrical” language of mechanics when relationships were expressed in proportionalities. This practice lasted a long time in England.

⁶ MacLaurin, Colin, A treatise on fluxions (London, 1749)Google Scholar, Art. 907.

⁷ They assumed that the relationship: force is proportional to (V—v)² is true for all motive agents.

⁸ Even James Watt assumed the correctness of Parent's theory when, in 1784, he used it in an analysis of Kempelen's impulse steam engine (letter in Boulton and Watt Collection in the Birmingham Reference Library).

⁹ Maclaurin, Colin, An account of Sir Isaac Newton's philosophical discoveries (2nd ed., London, 1750), 124.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Smeaton, John, “An experimental enquiry concerning the natural powers of water and wind”, Phil. Trans., li (1759), 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Ewart, Peter, “On the measure of moving force”, Memoirs of Manchester Literary & Philosophical Society, ii (New Series, 1813), 105.Google Scholar Also Nicholson's Journal, xxxvi (1913).Google Scholar

¹² Atwood, George, A treatise on the rectilinear motion and rotation of bodies (London, 1784), 380.Google Scholar

¹³ For a brief discussion of some aspects of this problem see the writer's Organization of science in England (London, 1957), Chapter 2.

¹⁴ See, for example, Agricola, , De re metallica (1556), trs. , H. C. and Hoover, L. H., New York, 1950.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Cardwell, D. S. L., “Power technologies and the advance of science, 1700–1825”, Technology and Culture, vi (no. 2, Spring 1965), 188.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Bridgman, P. W., The nature of thermodynamics (Cambridge, Mass., 1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Carnot, Sadi, Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu (Paris, 1824).Google Scholar

¹⁸ de Borda, J. C., “Mémoire sur les roues hydrauliques”, Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, 1767, 149, 270.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Dugas, R., A history of mechanics, trs. Maddox, J. R. (London, 1955), 305.Google Scholar

²⁰ Carnot, N. L. M., Essai sur les machines en général (Paris, 1783).Google ScholarPrincipes fondamentaux de l'équilibre et du mouvement (Paris, 1803).Google Scholar

²¹ Carnot, N. L. M., Principes fondamentaux, 145–146.Google Scholar

²² Hachette, J. N. P., Traité élémentaire des machines (Paris, 1811), 1–2.Google Scholar

²³ Coriolis, G., Du calcul et de l'effet des machines (Paris, 1829), Introduction.Google Scholar

²⁴ Petit, A. T., “On the use of the principle of living forces in the calculation of the power of machines”, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, viii (1818), 287.Google ScholarLagrange, J. L., Journal de l'École Polytechnique, iii, cahier 9 (1813).Google Scholar

²⁵ de Prony, R., “A method of measuring the dynamic power of rotative machines”, Bulletin des Sciences Technologiques, vi (1826), 173.Google Scholar

²⁶ Wollaston, W. H., “On the force of percussion” (Bakerian Lecture), Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1806, Part 1, 13.Google Scholar

²⁷ [Playfair, John], Edinburgh Review, xii (1808), 120.Google Scholar

²⁸ Ewart, , op cit.(11).Google Scholar

²⁹ From a letter in the Boulton and Watt Collection, Birmingham Reference Library. I am grateful to Dr. A. J. Pacey for bringing this to my attention.

³⁰ Farey, John, A treatise on the steam engine (London, 1827), 19.Google Scholar

³¹ Holtzmann, C., “On the heat and elasticity of gases and vapours, and on the principles of the theory of the steam engine”, Richard Taylor's Scientific Memoirs, iv (London, 1846), 189.Google Scholar

³² Clausius, R., The mechanical theory of heat, trs. Browne, W. R. (London, 1879), 337–339.Google Scholar

³³ Whewell, W., The mechanics of engineering (London, 1841), 145 et seq.Google Scholar

³⁴ Gilbert, Davies, “On the expediency of … a new term in mechanics …” Phil. Trans., 1828, Part 1, 25.Google Scholar

³⁵ See, for example, the very penetrating observations on this topic in the opening discussion of Sadi Carnot's Réflexions.

³⁶ Hodgkinson, Eaton, “Account of Mr. Ewart's paper”, Manchester Memoirs, 2nd series, viii (1846), Part 2, 137.Google Scholar

³⁷ Hachette, , op. cit., Preface xiv–xvii.Google Scholar

³⁸ Whewell, , op. cit., Chapter X.Google ScholarFirst principles of mechanics (Cambridge, 1832), 53 et seq.Google Scholar