Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Honenberger, Phillip 2015. Grene and Hull on types and typological thinking in biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 50, p. 13.


    Ladyman, James 2012. Science, metaphysics and method. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 160, Issue. 1, p. 31.


    Lascar, Claudia and Mendelsohn, Loren D. 2011. The Evolution–Intelligent Design Debate: A Meaningful Context for Teaching the Nature of Science in Information Literacy. Part 1: Historical Background and Philosophical Considerations. Science & Technology Libraries, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 354.


    Mallet, James 2010. Why was Darwin’s view of species rejected by twentieth century biologists?. Biology & Philosophy, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 497.


    Nilssen, J. P. 2009. Problems of subspecies recognition in freshwater cyclopoid copepods. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 285.


    Kassler, Jamie C. 1995. Edmund Gurney'sThe Power of Sound(1880): II. Reception. Musicology Australia, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 13.


    Reig, Osvaldo A. 1982. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI, Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.


    Fawns, Rod 1979. Aspects of change associated with the concept of evolution in the Australian science education project. Research in Science Education, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 119.


    ×
  • The British Journal for the History of Science, Volume 3, Issue 4
  • December 1967, pp. 309-337

The Metaphysics of Evolution*

Abstract

Extreme variation in the meaning of the term “species” throughout the history of biology has often frustrated attempts of historians, philosophers and biologists to communicate with one another about the transition in biological thinking from the static species concept to the modern notion of evolving species. The most important change which has underlain all the other fluctuations in the meaning of the word “species” is the change from it denoting such metaphysical entities as essences, Forms or Natures to denoting classes of individual organisms. Several authors have taken notice of the role of metaphysics in the work of particular biologists. An attempt will be made in this paper to present a systematic investigation of the role which metaphysics has played in the work of representative biologists throughout the history of biology, especially as it relates to their species concepts.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Carolus Linnaeus , Systema Natura, facsimile of the first edition, trans, by M. S. J. Engel-Lederboer and Engel Nieuwkoop (Leyden, 1964).

R. R. Sokal and P. H. A. Sneath , Principles of Numerical Taxonomy (San Francisco, 1963).

Marjorie Grene , “Two Evolutionary Theories”, Brit. Jour. Phil. Sci., ix (1959), 110127, 185193

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×