Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T18:28:47.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The True Inventors of the Keratoscope and Photo-Keratoscope*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

John R. Levene
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

As early as 1670 Isaac Barrow and Isaac Newton, at Cambridge, were aware of the production of astigmatism by oblique pencils of rays on a spherical lens. Thomas Young (1800) and G. B. Airy (1825) independently discovered ocular astigmatism. By viewing the image of objects reflected on the anterior surface of the cornea, the cornea may be examined for any defects of its surface (including astigmatism). The corneal “reflex” had been examined as early as 1619 by Christoph Scheiner, and as a “clinical” test, by using a candle flame, by David Brewster (1808). An instrument (the keratoscope) for examining the anterior surface of the cornea for the detection of abnormality was first invented by Henry Goode (1847) of Cambridge University. Antonio Plácido, formerly credited with the invention, independently invented a keratoscope in 1880. Correspondence of Plácido and Emile Javal (Paris) reveals that Placido invented the photo-keratoscope, formerly attributed to Allvar Gullstrand (1896) in Sweden. Javal is credited with the first description of the application of a photo-keratoscope (independently invented by him) in a specific case of ocular abnormality.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 1965 , pp. 324 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Supplementary Bibliography

Amsler, Marc, “Observations Kératographique De Greffons Cornéens”, Annales d'Oculistique, clxxx (1947), 746.Google Scholar
Amsler, Marc, “Les Traitements des Keratocones”, Annales d'Oculistique, clxxxix (1956), 129–136.Google Scholar
Bier, N., Contact Lens Routine and Practice (2nd ed.London, 1950), p. 138.Google Scholar
Blair, W. A., “Photo-electronic Keratoscopy Testing”, Contacto, iv (1960), 7.Google Scholar
Bonnet, R., “Stéréophotogrammétrie de la Cornée Humaine”, Revue d'Optique, xxxviii (1959), 447–462.Google Scholar
Bonnet, R., and Cochet, P., “Topographical Ophthalmometry”, Bulletin et Mémoires de la Société Française d'Ophthalmologie, lxxiii (1960), 687–716, trans. E. Eagle, American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, xxxix (1962), 227–251.Google Scholar
Bronstein, L., “Keratoscopy and Contact Lenses”, Optometric Weekly (10 1958), 2029–2030.Google Scholar
Ellerbrock, V. J., “Variables in Corneal Topography”, American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, xxxviii (1961), 562.Google Scholar
Hall, K. C., “A Comprehensive Study of Keratoconus”, British Journal of Physiological Optics, xx (1963), 215–256.Google Scholar
Hansell, P., A System of Ophthalmic Illustration (Illinois, 1957), 69–73.Google Scholar
Hansell, P., “Illustration in Ophthalmology”, Medicine Illustrated, vi (1952), 344–351.Google Scholar
Jessen, G. N., and Wesley, N. K., “Blurred Vision with Contact Lenses: The Implications, Consequences, and Colutions”, in Transactions of the International Ophthalmic Optical Congress, 1961 (New York, 1962), 181–197.Google Scholar
Knoll, H. K., “Corneal Contours in the General Population as Revealed by the Photokeratoscope”, American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, xxxviii (1961), 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokott, W., “Stereoskopische Photokeratoskopie”, Klinische Monatsblätten für Augenheilkunde, c (1938), 192.Google Scholar
Le Grande, Y., “Studies on the Human Cornea: Application to the Aphakic Eye”, in Transactions of the International Ophthalmic Optical Congress, 1961 (New York, 1962), 67–86.Google Scholar
Mandell, R. B., “Profile Methods of Measuring Corneal Curvature”, Journal of the American Optometric Association, xxxii (1961), 627–631.Google Scholar
Roth, A., “Das Astigmoskop eine Vervollstandigung des Plácido'schen Keratoskops”, Centralblatt für praktische Augenheilkunde, xxix (1905), 13–15.Google Scholar
Sabell, A. G., “Surface Distortions of the Cornea Resulting from the Wearing of Contact Lenses”, Transactions of the International Ophthalmic Optical Congress, 1961 (New York, 1962), 159–180.Google Scholar
Sakiko, N., “Studies on the Shape of the Cornea”, Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology, xiv (1960), 1600–1635.Google Scholar
Strieff, E. B., “Adaptation de l'appareil de Nordenson à la Keratoscopie et à la photographie du segment anterior de l'oeil”, Ophthalmologica, Basel, xcvi (1938), 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulzer, E., “La Correction Optique du Kératocone De l'Astigmatism Irrégulier et de l'Astigmatism Cicatriciel”, Annales d'Oculistique, cvii (1892).Google Scholar
Thomas, C. I., The Cornea (Springfield, U.S.A., 1955), p. 197.Google Scholar
Tscherning, M., Physiologic Optics, trans. Weiland, C. (3rd ed.Philadelphia, 1920), pp. 74–76, p. 213.Google Scholar
Uhtoff, M. W., “Beitrag zur Keratoskopie”, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, xxv (1896), 219; see also Annales d'Oculistique, cxvii (1897), 147.Google Scholar
Zingurian, M., and Rivara, A., “Syndrome Bradytrophique Kératopathie et onychopathie de courbure”, Ophthalmologica, cxlv (1963), 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar