1 Van Helden Albert, ‘The Birth of the Modern Scientific Instrument’, in The Uses of Science in the Age of Newton, (ed. by Burke John), Berkeley, 1983, pp. 49–84.
2 The men who in 1645 began meeting regularly, often at Gresham College, demanded of each other ‘a weekly Contribution for the Charge of Experiments’. In a similar vein, Hooke was appointed Curator of Experiments at the Royal Society in 1662. Samuel Sorbiere in Paris was referring to similar objects when, in the early 1660s, he mentioned ‘an arsenal of machines to carry out all sorts of experiments’.
3 Webster Charles, The Great Instauration, New York, 1976.
4 Hartlib's letter is quoted in Weld Charles, A History of the Royal Society, London, 1848, vol. i, p. 53. Grew Nehemiah, Musaeum Regalis Societatis. Or a Catalogue & Description of the Natural and Artificial Rarities Belonging to the Royal Society And preserved at Gresham Colledge, London, 1681, p.357.
5 Sprat Thomas, History of the Royal Society, London, 1667, pp. 71, 121. Note that Sprat's famous frontispiece depicts such practical instruments as quadrants and sectors along with such philosophical instruments as telescopes and air pumps behind the figures of Lord Brouncker, Charles II, and Francis Bacon.
6 Quoted in Taylor E. G. R., The Mathematical Practitioners in Tudor and Stuart England, Cambridge, 1954, p. 4.
7 Webster, op. cit. (3), p. 486.
8 Bennett J. A., ‘The Mechanicians and the Mechanical Philosophy’, History of Science. (1986), 24, 1–28.
9 Hunter Michael, Science and Society in Restoration England, Cambridge, 1981, p. 58.
10 Shapin Steven and Schaffer Simon, Leviathan and The Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and The Experimental Life, Princeton, 1985.
11 Boyle Robert, Some Considerations Touching the Usefulnesse of Experimental Natural Philosophy, Oxford, 1664, Book II, pp. 18–29.
12 Porter Roy et al. , Science and Profit in 18th-Century London Cambridge, 1985.
13 Quoted in Millburn John R., Benjamin Martin. Author, Instrument-Maker, and ‘Country Show man’, Leyden, 1976, p. 38. See also Desaguliers J. T., Lectures of Experimental Philosophy, London, 1719, Whiston William, A Course of Mechanical, Optical, Hydrostatical, and Pneumatical Experiments, (n.d.), Nollet J. A., Leçons de Physique, Expérimentale, Paris, 1745, and Gravensande G. J.'s, Physices Elementa Mathematica Exerperimentis Confirmata, Leyden, 1721.
14 Schaffer Simon, ‘Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century’, History of Science, (1983), 21, pp. 1–43. Daumas Maurice, Scientific Instruments of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, New York, 1972, especially Part Two, chapter IV, ‘The Collections of Philosophical Instruments’.
15 According to a private communication from Michael Crawforth of Project Simon, Glynne's advertisement is in Gordan G., An Introduction… to Geography, London, 1726, and Hickman's advertisement is in the Daily Advertiser, 27 06 1747.
16 Warner Deborah Jean, ‘Astronomers, Artisans and Longitude’, in Tekniska Museet Symposium, Transport Technology and Social Change, Stockholm, 1980, pp. 133–140.
17 Hunter, op, cit. (9), p. 68. Turner Anthony, Early Scientific Instruments. Europe 1400–1800. London, 1987, chapter VI, ‘Contrasting Collections’.
18 [Whewell William] review of Mrs Somerville, ‘On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences’ in Quarterly Review, 03, 1834. Whewell, Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, London, 1840, introduction. Whewell, History of the Inductive Sciences, London, 1837, vol. i, preface. Ross Sydney, ‘Scientist: The Story of a Word’, Annals of Sciences, (1962), 18, pp. 65–85.
19 Bennett J. A., Science at the Great Exhibition, Cambridge, 1983.
20 First Report of the Department of Science and Art, London, 1854.
21 Home & Thornthwaite, A Guide to the Purchase and Use of Scientific Instruments, London, 1857. Murray & Heath advertised as ‘Manufacturers of Scientific, Chemical and Physical Apparatus to Her Majesty the Queen’ in The Photographic News, 1858. R. and Beck J., An Illustrated Catalogue of Scientific Instruments, London, 1865. Casella L. P. is listed as ‘Scientific Instrument Maker to the Admiralty’ on the title page of his Illustrated and Descriptive Catalogue of Surveying, Philosophical, Mathematical, Optical, Photographic, and Standard Meteorological Instruments, London, 1871.
22 Holbrook's Scientific Apparatus, Berea, Ohio, 1857. See also the evaluation of ‘Common School Apparatus, consisting of Juvenile Instructor, Numeral Frame, Geometrical Forms, Arithmetical Solids, Geological Cabinet, Globe, Tellurion, Orrery, Thermometer, &c.’ by various County School Superintendents in New York State: ‘This is to certify, that after a careful examination of the Scientific School Apparatus …’ cited in Pike Benjamin Jr., Illustrated Descriptive Catalogue of Optical, Mathematical, and Philosophical Instruments, New York, 1856, i, p. 386.
23 Daumas Maurice, ‘Le corps des Ingénieurs brevetés en instruments scientifiques (1787)’, Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, (1952), 5, pp. 86–96. ‘Liste Generale des Membres’ appended to Bulletin de la Société d'Encouragement pour l'Industrie Nationale, 1824, 23.
24 Lerebours et Secretan, Catalogue et Prix des Instruments d'Optique, Physique, de Chimie, de Mathématiques, d'Astronomie et de Marine, Paris, 1853, advertissement.
25 ‘Maihat’ and ‘Ducretet’ in Syndicat des Constructeurs en Instruments d'Optique & de Précision, L'Industrie Française des Instruments de Précision, Paris, 1901–1902.
26 Doggett's New York City Directory for 1850–51.
27 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mechanik und Optik, Special Catalogue of the Collective Exhibition of Scientific Instruments and Apparatus, Berlin, 1893.
28 Brachner A., ‘German Nineteenth-Century Scientific Instrument Makers’, in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Instruments and Their Makers, (ed. by de Clerq P. R.) Leiden & Amsterdam, 1985, p. 119Payen Jacques, ‘Les Constructeurs d'Instruments Scientifiques en France au XIXe Siècle’, Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, (1986), 36, pp. 84–161, excerpted in de Clerq (ed.), vide supra pp. 159–182.
29 Jungnickel Christa and McCormmach Russell, Intellectual Mastery of Nature, Chicago, 1986, vol. i, p. 63.
30 Arenstein, Austria at The International Exhibition of 1862, Vienna, 1862, p. 57.
31 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mechanik und Optik, op. cit. (27)German Educational exhibition, Scientific Instruments, Berlin, 1904.
32 J. W. Queen & Co., Catalogue of Physical Instruments, Chemical Apparatus, Chemicals and School Apparatus Generally, Philadelphia, 1881, preface.
33 Cannon Susan Faye, Science in Culture, New York, 1978, p. 145.
34 Schaffer Simon, ‘Scientific Discoveries and the End of Natural Philosophy’, Social Studies of Science, (1986), 16, pp. 387–420.
35 Graham is quoted in Turner Gerard, Nineteenth-Century Scientific Instruments, London, 1983, preface. Herschel John, A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, London, 1830, p. 125. Whewell William, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. London, 1840, ii, book xii.
36 Harman P. M., (ed.) ‘Introduction’, in Wranglers and Physicists, Manchester, 1985. The quote is from Morrell J. B. and Thackray Arnold, Gentlemen of Science, Oxford, 1981, p. 481.
37 Maxwell J. C., ‘General Considerations Concerning Scientific Apparatus,’ pp. 1–21 in Handbook to the Special Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus, South Kensington Museum London, 1876, pp. 1–21.
38 For some, however, scientific referred to instruments used for original investigation and professional training, while philosophical referred to those used for ‘demonstrating the laws, principles and facts of physical science’. see J. W. Queen & Co., Priced and Illustrated Catalogue of Physical Instruments, Philadelphia, 1882, preface.
39 ‘Report on Customs Duty on Philosophical and Scientific Apparatus’, Report, National Academy of Sciences, 1884, pp. 65–67.
40 Whewell, Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, London, 1840, p. 513.
41 Quoted in Lehrburger Egon, The Cavendish Laboratory, London, 1962, p. 16.
42 Jungnickel and McCormmach, op. cit. (29), pp. 89–90.
43 Gieryn Thomas F., ‘Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’, American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, pp. 781–795.
44 For an American example see Molella Arthur and Reingold Nathan, ‘Theorists and Ingenious Mechanics: Joseph Henry Defines Science’, Science Studies, (1979), 3, pp. 323–351.
45 Great Exhibition Report of Juries, p. 316. see also Catalogue of the Philosophical Instruments, Models of Inventions, Products of National Industry, &c. &c. Contained in The First Exhibition of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1838, and Patent Office of Great Britain, Abridgement of Specifications Relating to Optical, Mathematical, and Other Philosophical Instruments, London, 1875.
46 Cannon Susan Faye, op. cit. (33), chapter I, ‘Science as Norm of Truth’. For a later example see Paul Forman, ‘The Self-Image of the American Physicist Before and Since the Second World War’, paper presented at Joint Atlantic Seminar for the History of Science, 22 April 1988.
47 Sviedrys Romuldas, ‘The Rise of Physics Laboratories in Britain’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, (1976), 7, pp. 405–436. Thomson William, ‘The Structure of Matter and the Unity of Science’, 1871 presidential address to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, quoted in Victorian Science, (ed. by Basalla G., Coleman W. and Kargon R.) Garden City, 1970, p. 103.
48 Cattemole M. J. G. and Wolfe A. F., Horace Darwin's Shop: A History of The Cambridge Scientific Instrument Company, 1878 to 1968, Bristol & Boston, 1987. Ladd William in Nature, (1869), 1, p. 38. Buff and Berger, Catalogue of the Engineers' and Surveyors' Instruments, Boston, 1889, noted that, in addition to their regular work, ‘We have made and do make scientific instruments’. By the 1920s in England there was also the Endicott Scientific Instrument Co., and Heath & Co., Ltd at the New Eltham Scientific Instrument Works, while in the U.S.A. there were such companies as the Central Scientific Co.
49 ‘List of Apparatus Available for Scientific Researches Involving Accurate Measurements’, Harvard College Library Bulletin, (1879), 11, pp. 301–4, 350–4.
50 U.S. Patent Office, Subject Matter Index of Patents for Invention… Granted in France, Washington, D.C., 1883. Paris Universal Exposition, Reports of the U. S. Commissioners, Washington, D.C., 1867, iii, p. 469. Paris exposition Universelle Internationale, Rapport Général, Paris, 1889, iv, p. 532. At the Centennial Exhibition held at Philadelphia in 1876, Group XXV comprised ‘Instruments of Precision, Research, Experiment, and Illustration’.
51 Francoeur, ‘Rapporth… sur le théodolite de M. Gambey, fabricant d'instrumens de précision’, Bulletin de la Société d'Encouragement pour l'Industrie Nationale, (1822), 21, p. 151.
52 Harman P. M., op. cit. (36).
53 Daumas Maurice, Scientific instruments of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, New York, 1972, p. 289. Middleton W. E. K., History of the Barometer, Baltimore, 1964, pp. 89–90.
54 Pixii, Catalogue des Principaux Instruments de Physique, Chimie, Optique, Mathématiques, et Autres a l'Usage des Sciences, Paris, 1832. Lerebours et Secretan, Catalogue et Prix des Instruments d'Optique, de Physique, de Chimie, de Mathématique, d'Astronomie et de Marine, Paris, 1853. Chevalier Maison Charles, Catalogue… des Instruments de Physique Expérimentale, Paris, 1861.
55 Marbach Oswald, Physikalisches Lexicon, Leipzig, 1850, pp. 244–78, offered as examples the physics apparatus of Emil Stohrer in Leipzig and Meyerstein in Göttingen, the optical instruments of Merz, Utzschneider & Fraunhofer in Munich, the microscopes of Schief in Berlin, and the mathematical instruments of Ertel & Sohn in Munich and Boller in Leipzig.
56 Gerhardt C., Preis-Verzeichnis uber Physikalische Apparate, Bonn, 1893. Kohl Max, Physikalische Apparate, Chemnitz, 1904. Leybold E., Catalogue of Physical Apparatus, Cologne, after 1905.
57 Ritchie E. S., Catalogue of Physical Instruments, Boston, 1880. J. W. Queen & Co., Catalogue of Physical Instruments, Chemical Apparatus, Chemicals and School Apparatus Generally, Philadelphia, 1881. Knott L. E., Physical Instruments, Boston, 1912.
58 South Kensington Museum, Handbook to the Special Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus, London, 1876, introduction. Chicago, Columbian Exposition, Katalog der Universitats Ausstellung, Berlin, 1893. German Educational Exhibition, Scientific instruments, Berlin, 1904, historical remarks p. 97.
59 Field J. V., ‘What is Scientific About a Scientific Instrument?’ Nuncius, (1988), 3, pp. 3–26.
60 Simcock A. V. (ed.), Robert T. Gunther and the Old Ashmolean, Oxford, 1985.
61 Gunther Robert T., Early Science in Oxford, Oxford, 1923–1945, and Early Science in Cambridge, Oxford, 1937.
62 Von Bezold G., Wissenschaftliche Instrumente im Germanischen Museum, Nürnberg, 1899. Rohde Alfred, Die Geschichte der Wissenschaftlichen Instrumente vom Beginn der Renaissance bis zum Ausgang des 18. Jahrhunderts, Leipzig, 1923.
63 Turner Gerald L'E., Ninteteenth-Century Scientific Instruments, London, 1983, and de Clercq P. R. (ed.) Ninteteenth-Century Scientific Instruments and Their Makers, Leiden & Amsterdam, 1985, begin to rectify this situation.
64 Robischon Mary M., Scientific Instrument Makers in London During the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, 1983), especially chapter 11.
65 Bryden David, Scottish Scientific Instrument Makers, 1600–1900, Edinburgh, 1972, p. 33. Hackmann W. D., ‘The Ninteenth Century Trade in Natural Philosophy Instruments in Britain’, in de Clercq (éd.), op. cit. (63), p. 77.
66 Thompson Silvanus P., Life of Lord Kelvin, London, 1901, p. 239.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.