Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:50:16.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Harmony of Human Life: An exploration of the ideas of Pestalozzi and Froebel in relation to music education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Extract

Pestalozzi and Froebel were innovatory educators whose influence has spread widely and stood the test of time. They believed education to be a process of drawing out and exercising a child's own powers in order to achieve the fullest possible development of the whole person. Physical, intellectual, emotional and aesthetic capacities would only be developed effectively in interdependence rather than isolation, the child being essentially an active participant in his/her own education. In this article the principles and values which Pestalozzi and Froebel believed to befundamental to sound education are related to the task of teaching in general, to the teaching of music in particular, and to music as a unique medium of education through which those principles may be demonstrated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, H. C. (1893) Froebel and Education by Self-activity. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Curtis, S. J. & Boultwood, M. E. A. (1953) A Short History of Educational Ideas. London: University Tutorial Press.Google Scholar
De Guimps, R. (1903) Pestalozzi, His Life and Work. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Froebel, R. (1826) Translated Hailmann, W. N. (1906). The Education of Man. London: Sidney Appleton.Google Scholar
Green, J. A. (1907) The Educational Ideas of Pestalozzi. London: University Tutorial Press.Google Scholar
Green, J. A. (1912) Pestalozzi's Educational Writings. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gutek, G. L. (1968) Pestalozzi and Education. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Heafford, M. (1967) Pestalozzi, His Thought and Its Relevance Today. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lilley, I. (1967) Friedrich Froebel, a Selection from His Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. (1975) Grandmasters of Educational Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Michaelis, E. & Moore, H. K. (1903) Autobiography of Friedrich Froebel. London: Swan Sonnenschein. (Translation made from the 1862 edition of Froebel's works published by Lange in Berlin.)Google Scholar
Pestalozzi, J. H. (1894) Trans. Holland, & Turner, . How Gertrude Teaches Her Children. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Quick, R. H. (1894) Essayson Educational Reformers. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Silber, K. (1960) Pestalozzi, the Man and His Work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar