Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Teaching composing in secondary school: a case study analysis

  • Benjamin Bolden (a1)
Abstract

This article reports a case study of an experienced teacher of composing working with secondary school students in a large urban centre in Ontario, Canada. Results suggest authentic assignments connect student composing to the ‘real world’, and so have meaning and life beyond the music classroom. Teachers can facilitate the development of theoretical music knowledge by supporting and enhancing the experiential learning that students accomplish on their own, through composing. Offering suggestions for change to compositions-in-progress, and cultivating a classroom ethos where students exchange this service amongst themselves, serves to enhance composing potential. By helping students infuse their work with personal knowledge, experiences, and interests, teachers can increase students’ meaningful involvement in classroom composing.

Copyright
References
Hide All
AIRY, S. & PARR, J. (2001) ‘MIDI, music and me: students’ perspectives on composing with MIDI’, Music Education Research, 3 (1), 41–9.
BARRETT, M. (2001) ‘Constructing a view of children's meaning-making as notators: a case-study of a five-year-old's descriptions and explanations of invented notations’, Research Studies in Music Education, 16 (1), 3345.
BARRETT, M. (2003) ‘Freedoms and constraints: constructing music worlds through the dialogue of composition’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 327). Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education.
BERKLEY, R. (2001) ‘Why is teaching composing so challenging? A survey of classroom observation and teachers’ opinions’, British Journal of Music Education, 18 (2), 119–38.
BERKLEY, R. (2004) ‘Teaching composing as creative problem solving: conceptualising composing pedagogy’, British Journal of Music Education, 21 (3), 239–63.
BURNARD, P. & YOUNKER, B. A. (2004) ‘Problem-solving and creativity: insights from students’ individual composing pathways’, International Journal of Music Education, 22 (1), 5976.
CARBON, J. (1986) ‘Toward a pedagogy of composition: exploring creative potential’, College Music Symposium, 26, 112–21.
CRESWELL, J. W. (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DOGANI, K. (2004) ‘Teachers’ understanding of composing in the primary classroom’, Music Education Research, 6 (3), 263–79.
FAUTLEY, M. (2004) ‘Music teacher intervention strategies in the composing processes of lower secondary school students’, International Journal of Music Education, 22 (3), 201–18.
FAUTLEY, M. (2005a) ‘A new model of the group composing process of lower secondary school students’, Music Education Research, 7 (1), 3957.
FAUTLEY, M. (2005b) ‘Baseline assessment of pupil composing at Key Stage 3: an investigation’, British Journal of Music Education, 22 (2), 155–66.
FOLKESTAD, G., LINDSTROM, B. & HARGREAVES, D. (1997) ‘Young people's music in the digital age: a study of computer based creative music making’, Research Studies in Music Education, 9, 112.
GOULD, E. (2006) ‘Dancing composition: pedagogy and philosophy as experience’, International Journal of Music Education, 24, 197207.
KASCHUB, M. (1997) ‘A comparison of two composer-guided large group composition projects’, Research Studies in Music Education, 8, 1528.
KRATUS, J. (1989) ‘A time analysis of the compositional processes used by children ages 7 to 11’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 520.
MAJOR, A. E. (2007) ‘Talking about composing in secondary school music lessons’, British Journal of Music Education, 24 (2), 165–78.
MELLOR, L. (1999) ’Language and music teaching: the use of personal construct theory to investigate teachers’ responses to young people's music compositions’, Music Education Research, 1 (2), 147–58.
MILLER, B. (2004) ‘Designing compositional tasks for elementary music classrooms’, Research Studies in Music Education, 22, 5971.
MUNBY, H., RUSSEL, T., & MARTIN, A. K. (2001) ‘Teacher knowledge and how it develops’, in Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th edition) (pp. 877904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
NILSSON, B. & FOLKESTAD, G. (2005) ‘Childrens’ practice of computer-based composition’, Music Education Research, 7 (1), 2137.
ODAM, G. (2000) ‘Teaching composing in secondary schools: the creative dream’, British Journal of Music Education, 17 (2), 109–27.
PATERSON, A. & ODAM, G. (2000) Composing in the Classroom: The Creative Dream. High Wycombe, UK: National Association of Music Educators.
PAYNTER, J. (2000) ‘Making progress with composing’, British Journal of Music Education, 17 (1), 531.
PITTS, S. (2005) ‘Twenty-nine world premiers in two hours: the story of powerplus’. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 6 (11). Retrieved June 11, 2006 from http://ijea.asu.edu/v6n11/.
REESE, S. (1994) ‘Music technology: extending and sharing minds’, American Music Teacher, 43 (6), 1215, 90.
REESE, S. (2001) ‘Integration of on-line composition mentoring into music teacher education’, Contributions to Music Education, 28 (1), 926.
REESE, S. (2003) ‘Responding to student compositions’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 211–32). Reston, VA: MENC.
RUSINEK, G. (2007) ‘Students’ perspectives in a collaborative composition project at a Spanish secondary school’, Music Education Research, 9 (3), 323–35.
SENYSHYN, Y. (2004) ‘Popular music and the intolerant classroom’, in Bartel, L. (Ed.), Questioning the Music Education Paradigm (pp. 110–20). Toronto, ON: Canadian Music Educators Association.
STAUFFER, S. (1999) ‘Beginning assessment in elementary general music’, Music Educators Journal, 86 (2), 2530.
STAUFFER, S. (2002) ‘Connections between the musical and life experiences of young composers and their compositions’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 50 (4), 301–23.
STAUFFER, S. (2003) ‘Identity and voice in young composers’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 91112). Reston, VA: MENC.
STAKE, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
UPITIS, R. (1992). Can I Play You My Song? The Compositions and Invented Notations of Children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational.
WEBSTER, P. (2002) ‘Creative thinking in music: advancing a model’, in Sullivan, T. & Willingham, L. (Eds), Creativity and Music Education (pp. 1634). Edmonton, Alberta: Canadian Music Educators’ Association.
WEBSTER, P. (2003) ‘‘What do you mean, make my music different?’ Encouraging revision and extensions in children's music composition’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 5568). Reston, VA: MENC.
WIGGINS, J. (1999) ‘Teacher control and creativity’, Music Educators National Journal, 85 (5), 30–5.
WIGGINS, J. (2003) ‘A frame for understanding children's compositional processes’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 141–66). Reston, VA: MENC.
WIGGINS, J. (2006) ‘Compositional process in music’, in Bresler, L. (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education (pp. 451–67). Amsterdam: Springer.
YOUNKER, B. A. & SMITH, W. H. (1996) ‘Comparing and modelling musical thought processes of expert and novice composers’, Bulletin for the Council for Research in Music Education, 128, 2537.
YOUNKER, B. A. (2003) ‘The nature of feedback in a community of composing’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How to Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 233–41). Reston, VA: MENC.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Music Education
  • ISSN: 0265-0517
  • EISSN: 1469-2104
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-music-education
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed