Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11–18 years

  • Salwa A. Albar (a1) (a2), Nisreen A. Alwan (a3), Charlotte E. L. Evans (a1), Darren C. Greenwood (a4) and Janet E. Cade (a1)...
Abstract

myfood24 Is an online 24-h dietary assessment tool developed for use among British adolescents and adults. Limited information is available regarding the validity of using new technology in assessing nutritional intake among adolescents. Thus, a relative validation of myfood24 against a face-to-face interviewer-administered 24-h multiple-pass recall (MPR) was conducted among seventy-five British adolescents aged 11–18 years. Participants were asked to complete myfood24 and an interviewer-administered MPR on the same day for 2 non-consecutive days at school. Total energy intake (EI) and nutrients recorded by the two methods were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland–Altman plots (using between and within-individual information) and weighted κ to assess the agreement. Energy, macronutrients and other reported nutrients from myfood24 demonstrated strong agreement with the interview MPR data, and ICC ranged from 0·46 for Na to 0·88 for EI. There was no significant bias between the two methods for EI, macronutrients and most reported nutrients. The mean difference between myfood24 and the interviewer-administered MPR for EI was −230 kJ (−55 kcal) (95 % CI −490, 30 kJ (−117, 7 kcal); P=0·4) with limits of agreement ranging between 39 % (3336 kJ (−797 kcal)) lower and 34 % (2874 kJ (687 kcal)) higher than the interviewer-administered MPR. There was good agreement in terms of classifying adolescents into tertiles of EI (κ w =0·64). The agreement between day 1 and day 2 was as good for myfood24 as for the interviewer-administered MPR, reflecting the reliability of myfood24. myfood24 Has the potential to collect dietary data of comparable quality with that of an interviewer-administered MPR.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11–18 years
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11–18 years
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11–18 years
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: S. A. Albar, fax +44 113 343 2982, email ml09saa@leeds.ac.uk; salbar1@kau.edu.sa
Footnotes
Hide All

The myfood24 consortium members are listed in the Appendix.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1. Willett, W (2013) Nutritional Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Boushey, C, Kerr, D, Wright, J, et al. (2009) Use of technology in children’s dietary assessment. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, S50S57.
3. Livingstone, MBE, Robson, PJ & Wallace, JMW (2004) Issues in dietary intake assessment of children and adolescents. Br J Nutr 92, S213.
4. Vereecken, C, Dohogne, S, Covents, M, et al. (2010) How accurate are adolescents in portion-size estimation using the computer tool Young Adolescents’ Nutrition Assessment on Computer (YANA-C)? Br J Nutr 103, 18441850.
5. Ngo, J, Engelen, A, Molag, M, et al. (2009) A review of the use of information and communication technologies for dietary assessment. Br J Nutr 101, Suppl. 2, S102112.
6. Illner, A-K, Freisling, H, Boeing, H, et al. (2012) Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 41, 11871203.
7. Brener, ND, Billy, JOG & Grady, WR (2003) Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health 33, 436457.
8. Subar, AF, Kirkpatrick, SI, Mittl, B, et al. (2012) The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 11341137.
9. Roberts, K (2010) Dietary Surveillance and Nutritional Assessment in England: What Is Measured and Where Are the Gaps?. Oxford: National Obesity Observatory.
10. Touvier, M, Kesse-Guyot, E, Méjean, C, et al. (2011) Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr 105, 1055.
11. Liu, B, Young, H, Crowe, FL, et al. (2011) Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies. Public Health Nutr 14, 19982005.
12. Carter, M, Burley, V & Cade, J (2013) Development of ‘My Meal Mate’ – a smartphone intervention for weight loss. Nutr Bull 38, 8084.
13. Hillier, FC, Batterham, AM, Crooks, S, et al. (2012) The development and evaluation of a novel internet-based computer program to assess previous-day dietary and physical activity behaviours in adults: the Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program for Adults (SNAPATM). Br J Nutr 107, 12211231.
14. Baranowski, T, Islam, N, Douglass, D, et al. (2012) Food Intake Recording Software System, version 4 (FIRSSt4): a self‐completed 24‐h dietary recall for children. J Hum Nutr Diet 27, Suppl. s1, 6671.
15. Vereecken, CA, Covents, M, Matthys, C, et al. (2005) Young adolescents’ nutrition assessment on computer (YANA-C). Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 658667.
16. Vereecken, C, Covents, M, Sichert-Hellert, W, et al. (2008) Development and evaluation of a self-administered computerized 24-h dietary recall method for adolescents in Europe. Int J Obes (Lond) 32, S26S34.
17. Vereecken, C, Covents, M, Maes, L, et al. (2014) Formative evaluation of the dietary assessment component of Children’s and Adolescents’ Nutrition Assessment and Advice on the Web (CANAA-W). J Hum Nutr Diet 27, 5465.
18. Moore, HJ, Ells, LJ, McLure, SA, et al. (2008) The development and evaluation of a novel computer program to assess previous-day dietary and physical activity behaviours in school children: the Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program™ (SNAP™). Br J Nutr 99, 12661274.
19. Food Standards Agency (2013) Development of a web-based 24-hour dietary recall tool for use by 11–24 year olds: INTAKE24. Newcastle University. http://www.food.gov.uk
20. Carter, M, Albar, S, Morris, M, et al. (2015) Development of a UK online 24-hour dietary assessment tool: myfood24. Nutrients 7, 40164032.
21. Bates, B, Lennox, A, Prentice, A, et al. (2012) National diet and nutrition survey; headline results from year 1, 2 and 3(combined) of the rolling programme (2008/2009–2010/11). http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_128166 (accessed January 2013).
22. Altman, DG (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall.
23. Cade, J, Hancock, N, Carter, M, et al. (2014) PP38 development of a new UK food composition database. J Epidemiol Community Health 68, A62A63.
24. Carter, M, Wark, P, Alwan, N, et al. (2013) Development of a UK online 24-hour dietary recall assessment tool: myfood24. In European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, pp. S50 [A Hofman, editor]. Aarhus, Denmark: European Journal of Epidemiology, Springer.
25. Foster, E, Hawkins, A & Adamson, A (2010) Young Person’s Food Atlas Secondary. London: Food Standards Agency Publications.
26. Carter, M, Albar, S, Morris, M, et al. (2015) Development of a UK online 24-hour dietary assessment tool: myfood24. Nutrients 7, 40164032.
27. Conway, JM, Ingwersen, LA & Moshfegh, AJ (2004) Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 595603.
28. StataCorp (2009) Statistical Software Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
29. Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327, 307310.
30. Bland, JM & Altman, DG (2007) Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 17, 571582.
31. Rabe-hesketh, S & Skrondal, A (2012) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: A Stata Press Publication StataCrop LP.
32. Viera, AJ & Garrett, JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37, 360363.
33. Baxter, SD, Smith, AF, Litaker, MS, et al. (2004) Children’s social desirability and dietary reports. J Nutr Educ Behav 36, 8489.
34. Albar, SA, Carter, MC, Alwan, NA, et al. (2015) Formative evaluation of the usability and acceptability of myfood24 among adolescents: a UK online dietary assessments tool. BMC Nutr 1, 29.
35. Baranowski, T, Baranowski, JC, Watson, KB, et al. (2010) Children’s accuracy of portion size estimation using digital food images: effects of interface design and size of image on computer screen. Public Health Nutr 14, 418.
36. Zoellner, J, Anderson, J & Gould, SM (2005) Comparative validation of a bilingual interactive multimedia dietary assessment tool. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 12061214.
37. Arab, L, Tseng, C-H, Ang, A, et al. (2011) Validity of a multipass, web-based, 24-hour self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites. Am J Epidemiol 174, 12561265.
38. Foster, E, Delve, J, Simpson, E, et al. (2014) Comparison study: INTAKE24 vs Interviewer Led Recall Final Report, https://www.food.gov.uk/scotland/news-updates/news/2014/13135/intake24 (accessed October 2015).
39. Diep, CS, Hingle, M, Chen, T-A, et al. (2015) The automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall for children, 2012 version, for youth aged 9 to 11 years: a validation study. J Acad Nutr Diet 115, 15911598.
40. Kirkpatrick, SI, Subar, AF, Douglass, D, et al. (2014) Performance of the automated self-administered 24-hour recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr 100, 233240.
41. Loranger, H & Nielsen, J (2005) Teenagers on the Web: Usability Guidelines for Creating Compelling Websites for Teens. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.
42. Gross, EF (2004) Adolescent internet use: what we expect, what teens report. J Appl Dev Psychol 25, 633649.
43. Baranowski, T, Islam, N, Baranowski, J, et al. (2012) Comparison of a web-based versus traditional diet recall among children. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 527532.
44. Yan, Z (2006) What influences children’s and adolescents’ understanding of the complexity of the Internet? Dev Psychol 42, 418428.
45. Hebert, JR, Clemow, L, Pbert, L, et al. (1995) Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol 24, 389398.
46. Crandall, VC, Crandall, VJ & Katkovsky, W (1965) A children’s social desirability questionnaire. J Consult Psychol 29, 27.
47. Taren, D, Tobar, M, Hill, A, et al. (1999) The association of energy intake bias with psychological scores of women. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 570578.
48. Gleason, PM, Harris, J, Sheean, PM, et al. (2010) Publishing nutrition research: validity, reliability, and diagnostic test assessment in nutrition-related research. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 409419.
49. Lennernas, M (1998) Dietary assessment and validity: to measure what is meant to measure. Food Nutr Res 42, 6365.
50. Rankin, D, Hanekom, SM, Wright, HH, et al. (2010) Dietary assessment methodology for adolescents: a review of reproducibility and validation studies: review article. S Afr J Clin Nutr 23, 6574.
51. Forrestal, SG (2011) Energy intake misreporting among children and adolescents: a literature review. Matern Child Nutr 7, 112127.
52. Kruger, R, Kruger, H & MacIntyre, U (2006) The determinants of overweight and obesity among 10- to 15-year-old schoolchildren in the North West Province, South Africa – the THUSA BANA (Transition and Health during Urbanisation of South Africans; BANA, children) study. Public Health Nutr 9, 351358.
53. Lytle, LA, Nichaman, MZ, Obarzanek, E, et al. (1993) Validation of 24-hour recalls assisted by food records in third-grade children. J Am Diet Assoc 93, 14311436.
54. Johnson, RK, Driscoll, P & Goran, MI (1996) Comparison of multiple-pass 24-hour recall estimates of energy intake with total energy expenditure determined by the doubly labeled water method in young children. J Am Diet Assoc 96, 11401144.
55. Rankin, D, Hanekom, SM, Wright, H, et al. (2010) Dietary assessment methodology for adolescents: a review of reproducibility and validation studies. S Afr J Clin Nutr 23, 6574.
56. Albar, S, Alwan, N, Evans, C, et al. (2014) Adolescents’ preferences in developing a UK online dietary assessment tool (myfood24): focus group study. Proc Nutr Soc 73, E100.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Albar supplementary material
Supplementary Table

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed