Skip to main content
×
Home

Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status

  • Stanley J. Ulijaszek (a1) and Deborah A. Kerr (a2)
Abstract

Anthropometry involves the external measurement of morphological traits of human beings. It has a widespread and important place in nutritional assessment, and while the literature on anthropometric measurement and its interpretation is enormous, the extent to which measurement error can influence both measurement and interpretation of nutritional status is little considered. In this article, different types of anthropometric measurement error are reviewed, ways of estimating measurement error are critically evaluated, guidelines for acceptable error presented, and ways in which measures of error can be used to improve the interpretation of anthropometric nutritional status discussed. Possible errors are of two sorts; those that are associated with: (1) repeated measures giving the same value (unreliability, imprecision, undependability); and (2) measurements departing from true values (inaccuracy, bias). Imprecision is due largely to observer error, and is the most commonly used measure of anthropometric measurement error. This can be estimated by carrying out repeated anthropometric measures on the same subjects and calculating one or more of the following: technical error of measurement (TEM); percentage TEM, coefficient of reliability (R), and intraclass correlation coefficient. The first three of these measures are mathematically interrelated. Targets for training in anthropometry are at present far from perfect, and further work is needed in developing appropriate protocols for nutritional anthropometry training. Acceptable levels of measurement error are difficult to ascertain because TEM is age dependent, and the value is also related to the anthropometric characteristics of the group or population under investigation. R > 0·95 should be sought where possible, and reference values of maximum acceptable TEM at set levels of R using published data from the combined National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys I and II (Frisancho, 1990) are given. There is a clear hierarchy in the precision of different nutritional anthropometric measures, with weight and height being most precise. Waist and hip circumference show strong between-observer differences, and should, where possible, be carried out by one observer. Skinfolds can be associated with such large measurement error that interpretation is problematic. Ways are described in which measurement error can be used to assess the probability that differences in anthropometric measures across time within individuals are due to factors other than imprecision. Anthropometry is an important tool for nutritional assessment, and the techniques reported here should allow increased precision of measurement, and improved interpretation of anthropometric data.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr Stanley J. Ulijaszek, fax +44 (0)1865 274699, email stanley.ulijaszek@bioanth.ox.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Becque MD, Katch VL & Moffatt RJ (1986) Time course of skin-plus-fat compression in males and females. Human Biology 58, 3342.
Benefice E & Malina RM (1996) Body size, body composition and motor performances of mild-to-moderately undernourished Senegalese children. Annals of Human Biology 23, 307321.
Blade L, Ward R & Martin A (1995) Dissociation between skinfold thickness changes and growth of adipose tissue volume in children and youth. American Journal of Human Biology 7, 529534.
Branson RS, Vaucher YE, Harrison GG, Vargas M & Thesis C (1982) Inter- and intra-observer reliability of skinfold thickness measurements in new born infants. Human Biology 54, 137143.
Brown KR (1984) Growth, physique and age at menarche of Mexican American females age 12 through 17 years residing in San Diego County, California. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Buschang PH (1980) Growth status and rate in school children 6 to 13 years of age in a rural Zapotec-speaking community in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Callaway CW, Chumlea WC, Bouchard C, Himes JH, Lohman TG, Martin AD, Mitchell CD, Mueller WH, Roche AF & Seefeldt VD (1988) Circumferences. In Anthropometric Standardization Manual, pp. 3954 [Lohman TG, Roche AF and Martorell R, editors]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
Cameron N (1984) The Measurement of Human Growth. London: Croom Helm.
Cameron N (1986) The methods of auxological anthropometry. In Human Growth: a Comprehensive Treatise, vol. 3, pp. 346 [Falkner F and Tanner JM, editors]. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Cameron N, Hiernaux J, Jarman S, Marshall WA, Tanner JM & Whitehouse RH (1981) Anthropometry. In Practical Human Biology, pp. 2752 [Weiner JS and Lourie JA, editors]. London: Academic Press.
Carter JEL & Schmidt PK (1990) A simple method for calibrating skinfold calipers. In Proceedings of the Commonwealth and International Conference on Physical Education, Sport, Health, Dance, Recreation and Leisure, vol. 3, part 1, pp. 4953. Auckland, New Zealand: ?????.
Chumlea WC, Guo, SKuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL & Leahy CK (1990) Reliability for anthropometric measurements in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES 1982–1984). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51, 902S907S.
Chumlea WC, Roche AF & Rogers E (1984) Replicability for anthropometry in the elderly. Human Biology 56, 329337.
Dangour A (1998) Growth of body proportion in two Amerindian tribes in Guyana. PhD Thesis, University of London.
Ferrario M, Carpenter MA & Chambless LE (1995) Reliability of body fat distribution measurements. The ARIC study baseline cohort results. International Journal of Obesity 19, 449457.
Frisancho AR (1990) Anthropometric Standards for the Assessment of Growth and Nutritional Status. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Gerber L, Schwartz JE, Schnall PL & Pickering TG (1995) Body fat and fat distribution in relation to sex differences in blood pressure. American Journal of Human Biology 7, 173182.
Gibson RS (1990) Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gordon-Larsen P, Zemel BS & Johnston FE (1997) Secular changes in stature, weight, fatness, overweight, and obesity in urban African American adolescents from the mid-1950's to the mid-1990's. American Journal of Human Biology 9, 675688.
Gore C, Norton K, Olds T, Whittingham N, Birchall K, Clough M, Dickerson B & Downie L (1996) Accreditation in anthropometry: an Australian model. In Anthropometrica, pp. 395411 [Norton K and Olds T, editors]. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Gore CJ, Woolford SM & Carlyon RG (1995) Calibrating skinfold calipers. Journal of Sports Sciences 13, 355360.
Gruber JJ, Pollock ML, Graves JE, Colvin AB & Braith RW (1990) Comparison of Harpenden and Lange calipers in predicting body composition. Research Quarterly 61, 184190.
Habicht J-P, Yarbrough C & Martorell R (1979) Anthropometric field methods: criteria for selection. In Nutrition and Growth, pp. 365387 [Jelliffe DBM and Jelliffe EFP, editors]. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Heymsfield SB, McManus CB, Seitz SB, Nixon DW & Andrews JS (1984) Anthropometric assessment of adult protein–energy malnutrition. In Nutritional Assessment, pp. 2781 [Wright RA, Heymsfield S and McManus CB, editors]. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications Inc.
Himes JH, Roche AF & Siervogel RM (1979) Compressibility of skinfolds and the measurement of subcutaneous fatness. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 17341740.
Jackson AS, Pollock ML & Gettman LR (1978) Intertester reliability of selected skinfold and circumference measurements and percent fat estimates. Research Quarterly 4, 546551.
Jelliffe DB & Jelliffe EFP (1989) Community Nutritional Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnston FE, Dechow PC & MacVean RB (1975) Age changes in skinfold thickness among upper class school children of differing ethnic backgrounds residing in Guatamala. Human Biology 47, 251262.
Johnston FE, Hamill PVV & Lemeshow S (1972) Skinfold thickness of children 6–11 years, United States. National Health Survey Series II, no. 120, DHEW Publication no. (HSM) 73-1602. Rockville, ML: National Center for Health Statistics.
Johnston FE, Hamill PVV & Lemeshow S (1974) Skinfold thicknesses in a national probability sample of U.S. males and females aged 6 through 17 years. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 40, 321324.
Johnston FE & Mack RW (1985) Interobserver reliability of skinfold measurements in infants and young children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 67, 285289.
Kaur B & Singh R (1994) One year follow-up study of stature, weight, emergence of dentition, and sexual maturation of well-nourished Indian girls from birth to 20 years. American Journal of Human Biology 6, 425436.
Klipstein-Grobusch K, Georg T & Boeing H (1997) Interviewer variability in anthropometric measurements and estimates of body composition. International Journal of Epidemiology 26, S174S180.
Lampl M (1993) Evidence of saltatory growth in infancy. American Journal of Human Biology 5, 641652.
Lee MMC & Ng CK (1967) Postmortem studies of skinfold caliper measurement and actual thickness of skin and subcutaneous tissue. Human Biology 37, 91103.
Lohman TG, Boileau RA & Massey BH (1975) Prediction of lean body mass in young boys from skinfold thickness and body weight. Human Biology 47, 245262.
Lohman TG, Roche AF & Martorell R (1988) Anthropometric Standardisation Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
Lopez-Blanco M, Izaguirre-Espinoza I, Macias-Tomei C & Saab-Verardy L (1995) Growth in stature in early, average, and late maturing children of the Caracas mixed-longitudinal study. American Journal of Human Biology 7, 517527.
Lourie JA & Ulijaszek SJ (1992) Observer error in anthropometry: age dependence of technical error of measurement. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Suppl. 14, 113.
Malina RM (1995) Anthropometry. In Physiological Assessment of Human Fitness, pp. 205219 [Maud PJ and Foster C, editors]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
Malina RM & Buschang PH (1984) Anthropometric asymmetry in normal and mentally retarded males. Annals of Human Biology 11, 515531.
Malina RM, Hamill PVV & Lemeshow S (1973) Selected body measurements of children 6–11 years, United States. Vital and Health Statistics, series 11, no. 123. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Malina RM & Moriyama M (1991) Growth and motor performance of black and white children 6–10 years of age: A multivariate analysis. American Journal of Human Biology 3, 599611.
Marks GC, Habicht J-P & Mueller WH (1989) Reliability, dependability, and precision of anthropometric measurements: The Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1976–1980. American Journal of Epidemiology 130, 578587.
Martin AD, Drinkwater DT, Clarys JP, Daniel M & Ross WD (1992) Effects of skin thickness and skinfold compressibility on skinfold thickness measurement. American Journal of Human Biology 4, 453460.
Martine T, Claessens AL, Vlietinck R, Marchal G & Beunen G (1997) Accuracy of anthropometric estimation of muscle cross-sectional area of the arm in males. American Journal of Human Biology 9, 7386.
Martorell R, Habicht J-P, Yarbrough C, Guzman G & Klein RE (1975) The identification and evaluation of measurement variability in the anthropometry of preschool children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 43, 347352.
Meleski BW (1980) Growth, maturity, body composition and familial characteristics of competitive swimmers 8 to 18 years of age. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Mueller WH (1975) Parent-child and sibling correlations and heritability of body measurements in a rural Colombian population. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Mueller WH & Kaplowitz HJ (1994) The precision of anthropometric assessment of body fat distribution in children. Annals of Human Biology 21, 267274.
Mueller WH & Malina RM (1987) Relative reliability of circumferences and skinfolds as measures of body fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 72, 437439.
Mueller WH & Martorell R (1988) Reliability and accuracy of measurement. In Anthropometric Standardisation Manual, pp. 8386 [Lohman TG, Roche AF and Martorell R, editors]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
Mueller WH, Taylor WC, Chan W, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Snider SA & Hsu H (1996) Precision of measuring body fat distribution in adolescent African American girls from the 'Healthy Growth Study'. American Journal of Human Biology 8, 325329.
Norton K & Olds T (editors) (1996) Anthropometrica. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Ohsawa S, Ji C-Y & Kasai N (1997) Age at menarche and comparison of the growth and performance of pre- and post-menarcheal girls in China. American Journal of Human Biology 9, 205212.
Pederson D & Gore C (1996) Anthropometry measurement error. In Anthropometrica, pp. 7796 [Norton K and Olds T, editors]. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
Pelletier DL, Low JW & Msukwa LAH (1991) Sources of measurement variation in child anthropometry in the Malawi maternal and child nutrition survey. American Journal of Human Biology 3, 227237.
Pham CL, Mueller WH, Wear ML, Emerson JB, Hanis CL & Schull WJ (1995) Precision of the one- versus two-handed method of skinfold measurement in the obese. American Journal of Human Biology 7, 617621.
Pheasant S (1988) Bodyspace. Anthropometry, Ergonomics and Design. London: Taylor & Francis.
Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Chute CG, Litin LB & Willett W (1990) Validity of self-reported waist and hip circumferences in men and women. Epidemiology 1, 466473.
Rocha Ferreira MB (1987) Growth, physical performance and psychological characteristics of eight year old Brazilian school children from low socio-economic background. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Roebuck JA, Kroemer KHE & Thomson WG (1975) Engineering Anthropometry Methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
Rosique J, Rebato E, Apraiz AG & Pacheco JL (1994) Somatotype related to centripetal fat patterning of 8- to 19-year old Basque boys and girls. American Journal of Human Biology 6, 171181.
Ross WD, Kerr DA, Carter JEL, Ackland TR & Bach TM (1994) Anthropometric techniques: precision and accuracy. In Kinanthropometry in Aquatic Sports. A Study of World Class Athletes, Human Kinetics Sport Science Monograph Series vol. 5, pp. 158173 [Carter JEL and Ackland TR, editors]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
Schmidt PK & Carter JEL (1990) Static and dynamic differences among five types of skinfold calipers. Human Biology 62, 369388.
Sloan AW & Shapiro M (1972) A comparison of skinfold measurements with three standard calipers. Human Biology 44, 2936.
Smith WDF, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH & Koval JJ (1995) Body mass indices and skeletal size in 394 Canadians aged 55–86 years. Annals of Human Biology 22, 305314.
Sonnenschein EG, Kim MY, Pasternack S & Toniolo PG (1993) Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women. American Journal of Epidemiology 138, 301309.
Strickland SS & Tuffrey VR (1997) Form and Function. A Study of Nutrition, Adaptation and Social Inequality in Three Gurung Villages of the Nepal Himalayas. London: Smith-Gordon.
Strickland SS, Tuffrey VR, Gurung GM & Ulijaszek SJ (1993) Micro-economic Consequences of Physique and Physical Performance in South Asia. Overseas Development Administration Project Report R4568. London: Overseas Development Administration.
Tomkins AM (1994) Growth monitoring, screening and surveillance in developing countries. In Anthropometry: the Individual and the Population, pp. 108116 [Ulijaszek SJ and Mascie-Taylor CGN, editors]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ulijaszek SJ (1997) Anthropometric measures. In Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology, pp. 289311 [Margetts BM and Nelson M, editors]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ulijaszek SJ & Lourie JA (1994) Intra- and inter-observer error in anthropometric measurement. In Anthropometry: the Individual and the Population, pp. 3055 [Ulijaszek SJ and Mascie-Taylor CGN, editors]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ulijaszek SJ & Mascie-Taylor CGN (editors) (1994) Anthropometry: the Individual and the Population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voss LD, Bailey BJR, Cumming K, Wilkin TJ & Betts PR (1990) The reliability of height measurement (the Wessex growth study). Archives of Disease in Childhood 65, 13401344.
Ward R & Anderson G (1993) Examination of the skinfold compressibility and skinfold thickness relationship. American Journal of Human Biology 5, 541548.
Weiner JS & Lourie JA (1981) Practical Human Biology. London: Academic Press.
Wellens RE (1989) Activity as a temperamental trait: relationship to physique, energy expenditure and physical activity habits in young adults. PhD Thesis, University of Texas.
Williamson DF, Kahn HS, Worthman CM, Burnette JC & Russell CM (1993) Precision of recumbent anthropometry. American Journal of Human Biology 15, 159167.
Wong WW, Cochran WJ, Klish WJ, Smith EO, Lee LS, Fiorotto ML & Klein PD (1988) Body fat in normal adults estimated by oxygen-18- and deuterium-dilution and by anthropometry: a comparison. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 42, 233242.
World Health Organization (1995) Physical Status: the Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 854. Geneva: WHO.
Zavaleta AN & Malina RM (1982) Growth and body composition of Mexican-American boys 9 through 14 years of age. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 57, 261271.
Zerfas AJ (1985) Checking Continuous Measures: Manual for Anthropometry. Los Angeles, CA: Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
Zillikens MC & Conway JM (1990) Anthropometry in blacks: applicability of generalised skinfold equations and differences in fat patterning between blacks and whites. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 52, 4551.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 3030 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2630 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.