Skip to main content Accessibility help

Beyond nutrition and agriculture policy: collaborating for a food policy

  • Derek Stewart (a1) (a2), Anne Kennedy (a3) and Anthony Pavel (a4)


Global interest in food policy is emerging in parallel with mounting challenges to the food supply and the rising prevalence of diet-related chronic health conditions. Some of the foundational elements of food policies are agricultural practices, finite resources, as well as economic burdens associated with a growing and ageing population. At the intersection of these interests is the need for policy synchronisation and a better understanding of the dynamics within local, regional and national government decision-making that ultimately affect the wellness of the populous and the safety, quality, affordability and quantity of the food supply. Policies, synchronised or not, need to be implemented and, for the food industry, this has seen a myriad of approaches with respect to condensing complex nutritional information and health claims. These include front and/or back of pack labelling, traffic light systems, etc. but in general there is little uniformity at the more regional and global scales. This translation of the nutritional and health-beneficial messages accompanying specific products to the consumer will undoubtedly be an area of intense activity, and hopefully interaction with policy makers, as the food industry continues to become a more global industry.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Beyond nutrition and agriculture policy: collaborating for a food policy
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Beyond nutrition and agriculture policy: collaborating for a food policy
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Beyond nutrition and agriculture policy: collaborating for a food policy
      Available formats


Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: D. Stewart, fax +44 844 928 5429, email


Hide All
1 Ogden, CL, Carroll, MD, Kit, BK, et al. (2012) Prevalence of Obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. NCHS Data Brief No. 82 2012, 18.
2 de Onis, M, Blössner, M & Borghi, E (2010) Global prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 12571264.
3 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012) Obesity Update 2012. OECD, Paris, France. (accessed accessed September 2013).
4 Gotay, CC, Katzmarzyk, PT, Janssen, I, et al. (2013) Updating the Canadian obesity maps: an epidemic in progress. Can J Public Health 104, e64e88.
5 Nugent, R (2011) Bringing Agriculture to the Table: How Agriculture and Food Can Play a Role in Preventing Chronic Disease. Chicago, IL: Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
6 Kessler, D (1995) The evolution of national nutrition policy. Annu Rev Nutr 15, xiiixxvi.
7 US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 7th ed. USAD, Alexandria, USA. (accessed accessed May 2013).
8 Caraher, M, Crawley, H & Lloyd, S (2009) Nutrition Across the UN: A Briefing Paper. The Caroline Walker Trust: Abbots Langley, UK. (accessed accessed August 2014).
9 European Commission (2013) The EU Health Policy Forum (accessed accessed September 2013).
10 Stewart, D & McDougall, G (2014) Oat agriculture, cultivation and breeding. Br J Nutr 112, S50S57.
11 Beets, MW (2011) Nutritional policies and standards for snacks served in after-school programmes: a review. Public Health Nutr 14, 18821890.
12 FDA (2007) Guidance for Industry: Evidence-Based Review System for the Scientific Evaluation of Health Claims. Food and Drink Administration, College Park, USA. (accessed accessed August 2013).
13 Health Canada (2010) Oat Products and Blood Cholesterol Lowering – Summary of Assessment of a Health Claim about Oat Products and Blood Cholesterol Lowering. Ottawa: Health Canada.
14 European Commission (2010) Regulation 1926/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. (accessed accessed January 2013).
15 Food and Drug Administration (2008) §101.81 Health Claims: Soluble Fiber from Certain Foods and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), chapter I . Washington, DC: US Access Board (4 January 2008 Edition, 21 CFR).
16 JHCI (Joint Health Claims Initiative), 2006. Generic Claims–Oats and Reduction of Blood Cholesterol. JHCI, Leatherhead, UK. (accessed accessed August 2014).
17 USDA (2010) Tree Nuts: World Markets and Trade. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington DC, USA. (accessed accessed May 2013).
18 Crowe, KM & Francis, C (2013) Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: functional foods. J Acad Nutr Diet 113, 10961103.
19 Shimizu, T (2003) Health claims on functional foods: the Japanese regulations and an international comparison. Nutr Res Rev 16, 241252.
20 International Association of Consumer Food Organisations (1999) Functional Foods: 21st Century Health Boon or 21st Century Quackery?. Washington, DC: IACFO.
21 Whole Grains Council (2006) (accessed accessed June 2013).
22 Nocella, G & Kennedy, O (2012) Food health claims – what consumers understand. Food Policy 5, 571580.
23 FDA (2009) Smart Choices Letter. (accessed accessed August 2014).
24 Institute of Medicine (2012) A Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Promoting Healthier Choices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (accessed accessed September 2013).
25 Ellen, A, Wartella, EA, Lichtenstein, AH, et al. (2013) Committee on Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols (Phase II). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (Institute of Medicine). = 12957 (accessed accessed September 2013).
26 European Food Information Council (EUFIC) (2005) EUFIC Review 4/2005, The Determinants of Food Choices . The European Food Information Council, Brussels, Belgium. (accessed accessed August 2014).
27 Mintel (2012) Global New Products Database. Mintel Group Ltd London, UK. (accessed accessed August 2014).
28 Barilla Centre for Food and Nutrition (2012) Double Pyramid 2012: Enabling Sustainable Food Choices. Fondazione Barilla centre for Food and Nutrition, Parma, Italy. (accessed accessed August 2014).
29 International Food Information Council (2013) (accessed accessed June 2013).
30 Pretty, J, Sutherland, WJ, Ashby, J, et al. (2010) The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. Int J Agric Sustain 8, 219236.
31 USDA (2012) FY 2012 Budget Summary and Annual Performance Plan. USDA Washington DC, USA. (accessed accessed August 2014).
32 USDA Economic Research Service (2013) Background: Corn. USDA Washington DC, USA. (accessed accessed August 2014).
33 Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA (2012) Nutrition standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. Final rule. Fed Reg 77, 4088.
34 European Commission (2011) Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. European Commission COM(2011) 808 Final. Brussels, Belgium. = fit&pagemode = none (accessed accessed August 2014).
35 European Innovation Partnership (2012) Agricultural productivity and sustainability. (accessed accessed September 2013).
36 Ingram, JSI, Gregory, PG & Izac, A-M (2008) The role of agronomic research in climate change and food security policy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 26, 412.
37 Foley, JA, Ramankutty, N, Brauman, KA, et al. (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337342.
38 Masip, G, Sabalza, M, Pérez-Massot, E, et al. (2013) Paradoxical EU agricultural policies on genetically engineered crops. Trends Plant Sci 18, 312324.
39 Cioloş, D (2013) Political Agreement on a New Direction for Common Agricultural Policy. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium. IP/13/613. (accessed accessed August 2014).
40 Modelling European Agriculture with Climate Change for Food Security (MACSUR). (accessed accessed August 2014).
41 Willets, D, de Mauley, R & Greening, J (2013) A UK Strategy for Agricultural Technologies. London: HM Government.
42 Godfray, HC, Beddington, JR, Crute, IR, et al. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812818.
43 The Conference Board of Canada (2012) Improving Health Outcomes: The Role of Food in Addressing Chronic Disease. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada. (accessed accessed September 2013).
44 International Food Information Council Foundation (2013) 2013 Food & Health Survey: Consumer Attitudes toward Food Safety, Nutrition & Health. International Food Information Council Foundation, Washington DC, USA. (accessed accessed August 2014).
45 Winkler, J (2013) A brutally pragmatic approach to food. Br Med J 346, 26.
46 Burrows, V (2011) Hulless oat development, applications, and opportunities. In Oats: Chemistry and Technology, 2nd ed., pp. 3150 [Webster, FH and Wood, PJ, editors]. St Paul, MN: American Association of Cereal Chemists.
47 Institute of Food Technologists (2012) Pilot Projects for Improving Product Tracing along the Food Supply System – Final Report. Institute of Food Technologists, Chicago, USA. (accessed accessed August 2014).
48 Thompson, TN (2004) Gluten contamination of commercial oat products in the United States. N Engl J Med 351, 20212022.
49 Campbell's (2012) Help Hunger Disappear. (accessed accessed August 2014).
50 Rashid, M, Butzner, D, Burrows, V, et al. (2007) Consumption of pure oats by individuals with celiac disease: a position statement by the Canadian Celiac Association. Can J Gastroenterol 21, 649651.
51 Groenewegen, J, Culhane, CT, Thompson, S, et al. (2008) The Nature and Magnitude of Economic, Business and Market Value Activity Generated by Health Claims along the Agri-Food Value Chain. Goverment of Canada, Ottawa. = 12356553056543 (accessed accessed January 2013).
52 Advertising Standards Canada (2010) The Canadian Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative. (accessed accessed May 2013).
53 Responsibility Deal. (accessed accessed September 2013).
54 Treasury Board of Canada Secretariate (2012) Government Implements One of Many Red Tape Reduction Measures. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Ontario, Canada. (accessed accessed August 2014).
55 Birt, C, Maryon-Davis, A, Stewart, L, et al. (2007) The Impact of the EU Common Agricultural Policy on Public Health. London: Faculty of Public Health.
56 European Commission (2013) CAP Reform – An Explanation of the Main Elements. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium. (MEMO/13/621) (accessed August 2014).
57 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1981) Food Policy. Paris: OECD.
58 Sparling, D & Uzea, N (2013) A Different Future for Agriculture – Six Years that Changed Agriculture 2005–2010. Ivey Business School, London, Canada. (accessed accessed August 2014).
59 Scottish Government (2009) Recipe For Success – Scotland's National Food and Drink Policy. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
60 Sparling, D (2012) A Pathway to a Healthy and Prosperous Future. London, Ontario: CAPI.
61 Government of South Australia (2011) South Australia's Strategic Plan. Government of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. (accessed accessed August 2014).
62 The Government Office for Science, London (2011) The Future of Food and Farming, Final Project Report. Government Office for Science, London. (accessed accessed August 2014).
63 CONSORT (2010) CONSORT (CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) 2010 Statement. (accessed accessed August 2014).
64 Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2010) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Canada. (accessed accessed August 2014).
65 FDA (1997) Food Labeling: health claims; oats and coronary heart disease. Final rule. Fed Reg 62, 35833601.
66 EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (2011) Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to β-glucans from oats and barley and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations (ID 1236, 1299), increase in satiety leading to a reduction in energy intake (ID 851, 852), reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses (ID 821, 824), and ‘digestive function’ (ID 850) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J 9, 2207.
67 Food Standards Agency Australia and New Zealand (2013) Standard 1.2.7 – nutrition, health and related claims. Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2013L00054. (accessed accessed September 2013).
68 Asp, N-G (2002) Health claims within the Swedish Code. Scand J Nutr 46, 131136.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed