Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-03T20:07:51.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Branched-chain amino acid oxidation in relation to catabolic enzyme activities in rats given aprotein-free diet at different stages of development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

R. D. Sketcher  and
W. P. T. James
R. D. Sketcher
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, 4 St Pancras Way, London NWI 2PE
W. P. T. James
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, 4 St Pancras Way, London NWI 2PE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The capacity of animals to conserve branched-chain amino acids was assessed during 3 weeks on a protein-free (PF) diet in groups of female rats at three stages of development, i.e. at weaning (35 g), in a period of rapid growth (85 g) and at maturity (200 g).

2. Leucine and valine oxidation was assessed by monitoring the evolution of 14CO2 from a tracer dose of the [1-14C]-labelled L-amino acid given intragastrically. Activities of the L-leucine:2-ketoglutarate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.6) and α-keto acid dehydrogenase enzymes in leucine and valine metabolism were also determined in muscle and liver at weekly intervals.

3. All three groups of rats given a normal protein intake excreted the same proportion of the dose of labelled leucine and valine. In rats given PF diet there was a consistent reduction in 14CO2 output from both L-[1-14C]leucine and L-[1-14C]valine, but valine was not conserved as efficiently as leucine.

4. Muscle dehydrogenase responded to a PF diet in all three groups of rats, but the most marked changes occurred in the youngest group. In addition, there was a decrease in hepatic dehydrogenase activities for leucine and valine catabolism in the weanling group; in older animals there was little change in the α-keto-isovalerate, but a consistent decrease in the activity of the α-keto-isocaproic acid dehydrogenase. The difference in the responsiveness of the dehydrogenases, therefore, matched the difference between leucine and valine oxidation rates in vivo.

5. Weanling animals responded rather more efficiently than the older animals to the need to conserve amino acids and there was no evidence of a poorly developed system for adapting to PF intake at this early stage of development.

6. Despite reduced catabolism of the amino acids, aminotransferase activities in liver and muscle rose in the first 1–2 weeks on a PF regimen. Aminotransferase activity as such is unlikely to control acid oxidation.

Information

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , November 1974 , pp. 615 - 623
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1974

References

REFERENCES

Aguilar, T. S., Harper, A. E. & Benevenga, N. J. (1972). J. Nutr. 102, 1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, I. M., Owens, F. N. & Garrigus, U. S. (1972). J. Nutr. 102, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. L., Houghton, B. J., Souhami, R. L. & Richards, P. (1972). Clin. Sci. 43, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buse, M. G., Biggers, H. F., Friderici, K. H. & Buse, J. F. (1972). J. biol. Chem. 247, 8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, J. L., Danner, D. J. & Bowden, J. A. (1968). J. biol. Chem. 243, 1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, A. G., Hird, F. J. R. & Morton, D. J. (1967). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 122, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherston, W. R. & Horn, G. W. (1973). J. Nutr. 103, 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlick, P. J., Millward, D. J. & James, W. P. T. (1973). Biochem.J. 136, 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. L. (1972). In Muscle Biology Vol. 1, p. 98 [Cassens, R. G., editor]. New York: M. Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Grimble, R. F. & Whitehead, R. G. (1970). Br.J. Nutr. 24, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichihara, A., Noda, C. & Ogawa, K. (1973). In Advances in Enzyme Regulation Vol. 11, p. 155 [Weber, G., editor]. New York: M. Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
James, W. P. T., Garlick, P. J. & Sender, P. M. (1974). Clin. Sci. mol. Med. 46, 8p.Google Scholar
McFarlane, I. G. & Von Holt, C. (1969 a). Biochem.J. 111, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, I. G. & Von Holt, C. (1969 b). Biochem. J. 111, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. L. (1962). In Amino Acid Pools p. 708 [Holden, J. T., editor]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Millward, D. J. (1970). Clin. Sci. 39, 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimura, R., Yamada, C. & Swendseid, M. E. (1968). J. Nutr. 95, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, R. J. (1971). Nature New Biol. 231, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, R. J. (1972). Biochim. biophys. Acta 273, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, R. J. & Waterlow, J. C. (1974). Br.J. Nutr. 32, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, V. M. & Manchester, K. L. (1970). Biochem.J. 118, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, P. R. & Stewart, R. J. C. (1972). Lab. Anim. 6, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picou, D. & Taylor-Roberts, T. (1969). Clin. Sci. 36, 283.Google Scholar
Read, W. W. C., McLaren, D. S. & Tchalian, M. (1971). Clin. Sci. 40, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeds, P. J. (1974). Br.J. Nutr. 31, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruderman, N. B. & Lund, P. (1972). Israel J. med. Sci. 8, 295.Google Scholar
Sketcher, R. D., Fern, E. B. & James, W. P. T. (1974). Br.J. Nutr. 31, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walser, M., Lund, P., Ruderman, N. B. & Coulter, A. W. (1973). J. clin. Invest. 52, 2865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolhueter, R. M. & Harper, A. E. (1970). J. biol. Chem. 245, 2391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H. & Bishop, C. W. (1959). J. appl. Physiol. 14, I.Google Scholar
Young, V. R. (1970). In Mammalian Protein Metabolism Vol. 4, p. 612 [Munro, H. N., editor]. New York and London: Academic press.Google Scholar