Skip to main content
×
Home

Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations

  • Grant D. Brinkworth (a1), Manny Noakes (a1), Peter M. Clifton (a1) and Anthony R. Bird (a1)
Abstract

Very low-carbohydrate diets are often used to promote weight loss, but their effects on bowel health and function are largely unknown. We compared the effects of a very low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LC) diet with a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre, low-fat (HC) diet on indices of bowel health and function. In a parallel study design, ninety-one overweight and obese participants (age 50·6 (sd 7·5) years; BMI 33·7 (sd 4·2) kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either an energy-restricted (about 6–7 MJ, 30 % deficit) planned isoenergetic LC or HC diet for 8 weeks. At baseline and week 8, 24 h urine and faecal collections were obtained and a bowel function questionnaire was completed. Compared with the HC group, there were significant reductions in the LC group for faecal output (21 (sd 145) v. − 61 (sd 147) g), defecation frequency, faecal excretion and concentrations of butyrate ( − 0·5 (sd 10·4) v. − 3·9 (sd 9·7) mmol/l) and total SCFA (1·4 (sd 40·5) v. − 15·8 (sd 43·6) mmol/l) and counts of bifidobacteria (P < 0·05 time × diet interaction, for all). Urinary phenols and p-cresol excretion decreased (P ≤ 0·003 for time) with no difference between diets (P ≥ 0·25). Faecal form, pH, ammonia concentration and numbers of coliforms and Escherichia coli did not change with either diet. No differences between the diets were evident for incidences of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, which suggests that both diets were well tolerated. Under energy-restricted conditions, a short-term LC diet lowered stool weight and had detrimental effects on the concentration and excretion of faecal SCFA compared with an HC diet. This suggests that the long-term consumption of an LC diet may increase the risk of development of gastrointestinal disorders.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr Tony Bird, fax +61 8 8303 8899, email tony.bird@csiro.au
References
Hide All
1 Astrup A, Meinert Larsen T & Harper A (2004) Atkins and other low-carbohydrate diets: hoax or an effective tool for weight loss? Lancet 364, 897899.
2 Westman EC, Feinman RD, Mavropoulos JC, et al. (2007) Low-carbohydrate nutrition and metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 276284.
3 US Department of Health Services, Public Health Service (1988) The Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
4 Anderson JW, Smith BM & Gustafson NJ (1994) Health benefits and practical aspects of high-fiber diets. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 1242S1247S.
5 Freedman M, King J & Kennedy E (2001) Popular diets: a scientific review. Obes Res 9, 1S40S.
6 Gordon DT (2007) Dietary fibre definitions at risk. Cereal Foods World 52, 112123.
7 Topping DL & Clifton PM (2001) Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev 81, 10311064.
8 Topping DL & Bird AR (1999) Food, nutrients and digestive health. Aust J Nutr Dietet 56, S22S34.
9 Cummings JH (1997) The Large Intestine in Nutrition and Disease. Brussels, Belgium: Institut Danone.
10 Young GP (2000) Colorectal disorders: a dietary management perspective. Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 9, S76S82.
11 O'Keefe SJ (2008) Nutrition and colonic health: the critical role of the microbiota. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 24, 5158.
12 Crowe TC (2005) Safety of low-carbohydrate diets. Obes Rev 6, 235245.
13 Kang HC, Chung DE, Kim DW, et al. (2004) Early- and late-onset complications of the ketogenic diet for intractable epilepsy. Epilepsia 45, 11161123.
14 Baron JA, Schori A, Crow B, et al. (1986) A randomized controlled trial of low carbohydrate and low fat/high fiber diets for weight loss. Am J Public Health 76, 12931296.
15 Yancy WS Jr, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al. (2004) A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 140, 769777.
16 Duncan SH, Belenguer A, Holtrop G, et al. (2007) Reduced dietary intake of carbohydrates by obese subjects results in decreased concentrations of butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria in feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 10731078.
17 Halyburton AK, Brinkworth GD, Wilson CJ, et al. (2007) Low- and high-carbohydrate weight-loss diets have similar effects on mood but not cognitive performance. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 580587.
18 Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. (2005) Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome. An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation 112, 27352752.
19 Lewis SJ & Heaton KW (1997) Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 32, 920924.
20 Hodge A, Patterson AJ, Brown WJ, et al. (2000) The Anti Cancer Council of Victoria FFQ: relative validity of nutrient intakes compared with weighed food records in young to middle-aged women in a study of iron supplementation. Aust N Z J Public Health 24, 576583.
21 Murray KE & Adams RF (1988) Determination of simple phenols in faeces and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 431, 143149.
22 Yoshikawa M, Taguchi Y, Arashidani K, et al. (1986) Determination of cresols in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 362, 425429.
23 Vreman HJ, Dowling JA, Raubach RA, et al. (1978) Determination of acetate in biological material by vacuum microdistillation and gas chromatography. Anal Chem 50, 11381141.
24 Bird AR, Vuaran MS, King RA, et al. (2008) Wholegrain foods made from a novel high-amylose barley variety (Himalaya 292) improve indices of bowel health in human subjects. Br J Nutr 99, 10321040.
25 Chaney AL & Marbach EP (1962) Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem 8, 130132.
26 National Health and Medical Research Council (2005) Dietary fibre. In Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand, pp. 4549. Canberra, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council.
27 Cummings JH, Hill MJ, Jivraj T, et al. (1979) The effect of meat protein and dietary fiber on colonic function and metabolism. I. Changes in bowel habit, bile acid excretion, and calcium absorption. Am J Clin Nutr 32, 20862093.
28 Cummings JH, Wiggins HS, Jenkins DJ, et al. (1978) Influence of diets high and low in animal fat on bowel habit, gastrointestinal transit time, fecal microflora, bile acid, and fat excretion. J Clin Invest 61, 953963.
29 Burkitt DP, Walker AR & Painter NS (1972) Effect of dietary fibre on stools and the transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet ii 14081412.
30 Spiller GA (1978) Interaction of dietary fiber with other dietary components: a possible factor in certain cancer etiologies. Am J Clin Nutr Suppl. 10, 31, S231S232.
31 Birkett AM, Jones GP, de Silva AM, et al. (1997) Dietary intake and faecal excretion of carbohydrate by Australians: importance of achieving stool weights greater than 150 g to improve faecal markers relevant to colon cancer risk. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, 625632.
32 Cummings JH, Bingham SA, Heaton KW, et al. (1992) Fecal weight, colon cancer risk, and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fiber). Gastroenterology 103, 17831789.
33 Lewis SJ & Heaton KW (1997) Increasing butyrate concentration in the distal colon by accelerating intestinal transit. Gut 41, 245251.
34 Kiefer J, Beyer-Sehlmeyer G & Pool-Zobel BL (2006) Mixtures of SCFA, composed according to physiologically available concentrations in the gut lumen, modulate histone acetylation in human HT29 colon cancer cells. Br J Nutr 96, 803810.
35 Bingham SA (1999) High-meat diets and cancer risk. Proc Nutr Soc 58, 243248.
36 Cummings JH & Bingham SA (1987) Dietary fibre, fermentation and large bowel cancer. Cancer Surv 6, 601621.
37 Muir JG, Yeow EG, Keogh J, et al. (2004) Combining wheat bran with resistant starch has more beneficial effects on fecal indexes than does wheat bran alone. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 10201028.
38 Silvester KR & Cummings JH (1995) Does digestibility of meat protein help explain large bowel cancer risk? Nutr Cancer 24, 279288.
39 Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, et al. (2005) Resistant starch attenuates colonic DNA damage induced by higher dietary protein in rats. Nutr Cancer 51, 4551.
40 Birkett A, Muir J, Phillips J, et al. (1996) Resistant starch lowers fecal concentrations of ammonia and phenols in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 63, 766772.
41 Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, et al. (2007) Differential effects of dietary whey, casein and soya on colonic DNA damage and large bowel SCFA in rats fed diets low and high in resistant starch. Br J Nutr 97, 535543.
42 Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, et al. (2007) High red meat diets induce greater numbers of colonic DNA double-strand breaks than white meat in rats: attenuation by high-amylose maize starch. Carcinogenesis 28, 23552362.
43 Bingham SA (2000) Diet and colorectal cancer prevention. Biochem Soc Trans 28, 1216.
44 Le Leu RK, Brown IL, Hu Y, et al. (2005) A synbiotic combination of resistant starch and Bifidobacterium lactis facilitates apoptotic deletion of carcinogen-damaged cells in rat colon. J Nutr 135, 9961001.
45 Gibson GR, Probert HM, van Loo JAE, et al. (2004) Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr Res Rev 17, 259275.
46 Meijer-Severs GJ & van Santen E (1987) Short-chain fatty acids and succinate in feces of healthy human volunteers and their correlation with anaerobe cultural counts. Scand J Gastroenterol 22, 672676.
47 Heavey PM & Rowland IR (2004) Microbial-gut interactions in health and disease. Gastrointestinal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18, 323336.
48 Guarner F & Malagelada JR (2003) Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 361, 512519.
49 Hill MJ, Drasar BS, Hawksworth G, et al. (1971) Bacteria and aetiology of cancer of large bowel. Lancet i 95100.
50 Mai V & Morris JG Jr (2004) Colonic bacterial flora: changing understandings in the molecular age. J Nutr 134, 459464.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 75
Total number of PDF views: 617 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 981 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.