Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilization of grass silage by growing cattle: 2. Nutrient supply and energy partition

  • D. E. Beever (a1), S. B. Cammell (a1), C. Thomas (a1), M. C. Spooner (a1), M. J. Haines (a1) and D. L. Gale (a1)...
Abstract

1. The effect of harvesting date of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on the nutritive value of the resultant silage and the effect of substitution of late-cut silage with barley was examined in growing cattle. The diets comprised early-cut (H) and late-cut (L) silage offered alone or with 280 (LCI) or 560 (LC2) g rolled barley/kg total dry matter (DM) substituted for late-cut silage.

2. Both silages were prepared with the addition of formic acid (850 g/l; 2.4 litres/t fresh weight) to a partially wilted crop, and were judged to be well fermented (pH 3.9, 3.8) with lactic acid contents of 108 and 73 g/kg DM, total nitrogen contents of 24.6 and 18.4 g/kg DM and ammonia-N contents of 121 and 124 g/kg total N (values for early- and late-cut silages respectively).

3. Two experiments were conducted to measure duodenal non-NH3-N (NAN) supply in relation to N intake on the four diets (feeding level 18 g DM/kg live weight (LW)) and to examine the partition of the metabolizable energy (ME) supply from the four diets using open-circuit indirect calorimetry (three feeding levels, 14, 17 and 20 g DM/kg LW). The experiments were undertaken with eight and nine Friesian male castrates respectively with a mean starting weight of 300 kg and age 12 months. The animals used in Expt 1 had been previously fitted with cannulas into the dorsal rumen and the proximal duodenum.

4. NAN supply was significantly higher on diet H than all other diets which were similar irrespective of the level of barley inclusion. Mean ME contents (MJ/kg DM) of the two silages differed markedly (H 11.9, L 9.7) and barley addition (LCI and LC2) restored values to 10.7 and 11.1 MJ/kg DM respectively. Estimated NAN absorption in relation to energy supply was significantly higher for diet H (1.47 g/MJ ME) than for all other diets (mean 1.25 g/MJ ME).

5. Partition of ME supply using conventional linear analysis indicated dietary differences with respect to estimated ME for maintenance (L > H, LCI and LC2) and efficiency of utilization of ME supplied above maintenance (L > H, LCI and LC2), but difficulties in biological interpretation of these findings led to the use of exponential curve analysis. This provided an improved description of the findings, and whilst dietary differences were apparent, none were statistically significant. It was concluded that a single exponential equation could be used satisfactorily to describe all values.

6. The consequence of these findings in relation to the carcass retentions of energy. fat and protein reported by Thomas et al. (1988) is discussed and possible reasons for the discrepancies in energy retention measured by comparative slaughter balance and open-circuit indirect calorimetry are considered.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilization of grass silage by growing cattle
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilization of grass silage by growing cattle
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilization of grass silage by growing cattle
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock no. 2, Ruminants. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock no. 2, Ruminants, Suppl. no. 1. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
Beever, D. E. (1980). In Forage Conservation in the 80's. Proceedings of European Grassland Federation Meeting, Brighton. British Grassland Society Occasional Publication no. 11, pp. 131143 [Thomas, C. editor]. Hurley, Maidenhead, British Grassland Society.
Beever, D. E., Cammell, S. B., Haines, M. J., Gale, D. L. & Thomas, C. (1984). Animal Production 37, 533.
Beever, D. E., Dhanoa, M. S., Losada, H. R., Evans, R. T., Cammell, S. B. & France, J. (1986 a). British Journal of Nutrition 56, 439454.
Beever, D. E., Kellaway, R. C., Thomas, D. J., MacRae, J. C., Evans, C. C. & Wallace, A. S. (1978). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 157163.
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Cammell, S. B. & Harrison, D. G. (1977). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 6170.
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Pfefler, E. & Armstrong, D. G. (1971). Brirish Journal of Nutrition 26, 123134.
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Siddons, R. C. & Thomas, C. (1986 b). Journal of Dairy Science 69, 219.
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Ulyatt, M. J., Cammell, S. B., Austin, A. R. & Spooner, M. C. (1985). British Journal of Nutrition 54, 763775.
Bibby, J. & Tentenburg, H. (1977). Prediction and Improved Estimation in Linear Models. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Brouwer, E. (1965). In Energy Metabolism, European Association for Animal Production Publication no. II, pp. 441443. [Blaxter, K. L., editor]. London and New York: Academic Press.
Bull, L. S., Tyrrell, H. F. & Reid, J. T. (1976). Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 19, p. 137140.
Cammell, S. B. (1977). Technical Report no. 24. Hurley, Maidenhead: Grassland Research Institute.
CammellS, B. S, B., Beever, D. E., Skelton, K. V. & Spooner, M. C. (1981). Laboratory Practice 30, 115119.
Cammell, S. B., Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Haines, M. J., Dhanoa, M. S. & Spooner, M. C. (1986). British Journal of Nutrition 55, 669680.
Evans, R. T., Hayes, D. G. & Beever, D. E. (1981 a). Laboratory Practice 30, 591593.
Evans, R. T., Skelton, K. V. & Beever, D. E. (1981 b). Laboratory Practice 30, 9971000.
Faichney, G. J. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminanl, pp. 277291 [McDonald, I.W., Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.
Graham, N. McC. (1982). Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 29, pp. 108111.
Graham, N. McC. & Searle, T. W. (1972). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 97.
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 474485 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.
Kelly, N. C., Thomas, P. C. & Chamberlain, D. G. (1978). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 37, 34A.
Møller, P. D. & Thomson, K. V. (1977). Institut for Husdjurens Uffordring och vard, Rapport no. 54, pp. 2754.
National Research Council (1970). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 5th ed. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Siddons, R. C., Evans, R. T. & Beever, D. E. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 42, 535545.
Theil, H. (1966). Applied Economic Forecasting, Chapter 2. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Thomas, C., Gibbs, B. G., Beever, D. E. & Thurnham, B. R. (1988). British Journal of Nutrition 60, 297306.
Thomson, D. J. & Beever, D. E. (1980). In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 291308. [Ruckebusch, Y., Thivend, P., editors.] Lancaster: MTP Press Ltd.
Thomson, D. J., Fenton, J. S. & Cammell, S. B. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 223229.
Turner, H. G. & Tayler, C. S. (1983). World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 42, 135190.
Ulyatt, M. J., Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Evans, R. T. & Haines, M. J. (1988). Briti.sh Journal of Nutrition 60, I37149.
Woodward, C. J. H., Trayhurn, P. & James, W. P. T. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 36, 567570.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed