Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:29:14.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of dietary fibre isolates on gastric secretion, acidity and emptying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. Tadesse
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Guy's Hospital Medical School, London SE1 9RT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In six volunteers, the effect of intragastric administration of different water-soluble chemical isolates of dietary fibre on gastric secretion, acidity and emptying was studied.

2. At 30 min after administration of the test meals, the stomach contents were completely aspirated and the volume, pH, phenol red concentration, total titratable acidity and different electrolytes were measured.

3. Compared with the control meal, the pH and unionized (combined) hydrogen concentrations were significantly higher (P < 0.05) following most of the fibre-containing meals, while the total titratable acid concentration was not significantly different. None of the fibre-containing meals appreciably altered the volume or type of gastric secretion but had a low-grade variable effect on gastric emptying.

4. It is concluded that most dietary fibre isolates, although having a definite and notable buffering effect on the acid in the stomach, have a minimal effect on gastric secretion and a variable and small effect on gastric emptying.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Carryer, P. W., Brown, M. L., Malagelada, J.-R., Carlson, G. L. & McCall, J. T. (1982). Gastroenterology 82, 13891394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. H. (1976). In Fiber in Human Nutrition, pp. 130 [Spiller, G. A. and Amen, R. J., editors]. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlein, H.-J. & Prove, J. (1982). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 67, 419425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausa, D. & Skalhegg, B. A. (1974). Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 9, 249254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. M., Prescott, R. J. & Sircus, W. (1972). British Medical Journal iv, 458461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, D. S. & Goddard, J. (1977). Gut 18, 725729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, M. A. & Hobsley, M. (1970). British Medical Journal i, 458460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, S., Heading, R. C., Carter, D. C., Prescott, L. F. & Tothill, P. (1979). Lancet i, 636639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. N. (1951). Journal Of PhysioIogy 113, 169184.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. N. (1954). Lancet i, 1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. N. & Spurrell, W. R. (1951). Journal of Physiology 113, 157168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalan, K. N., Mahalanabis, D., Maitra, T. K. & Agarwal, S. K. (1979). Gut 20, 389393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalan, K. N., Maitra, T. K., Mahalanabis, D., Agarwal, S. K., Chakraborty, M. L., Chattoraj, D. K. & Moulik, S. P. (1977). Journal of Food Science 42, 16751676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, D. J. A., Wolever, T. M. S., Leeds, A. R., Gassull, M. A., Haisman, P., Dilawari, J., Goff, D. V., Metz, G. L. & Alberti, K. G. M. M. (1978). British Medical Journal i, 13921394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, A. R., Ralphs, D. N. L., Ebied, F., Metz, G. & Dilawari, J. B. (1981). Lancet i, 10751078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennard-Jones, J. E., Fletcher, J. & Shaw, D. G. (1968). Gut 9, 177182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A., Prior, R. M. & Widdowson, E. M. (1953). British Journal of Nutrition 98, 98104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, A. A., Eastwood, M. A. & Mitchell, W. D. (1974). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25, 14571464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malagelada, J.-R. (1977). Gastroenterology 72, 12641267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, S. L. (1978). Postgraduate Medical Journal 54, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, E. W. & Scarlata, R. W. (1965). Gastroenterology 49, 178188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, N., Tredyer, J. & Morgan, L. (1981). Diabetologia 20, 612615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Physicians of London (1980). Report on Medical Aspects of Dietary Fibre. Kent: Pitman Medical.Google Scholar
Rydning, A., Berstad, A., Aadland, E. & Ødegaard, B. (1982). Lancet ii, 736738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolever, T. M. S., Taylor, R. & Goff, D. V. (1978). Lancet ii, 1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar