Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T20:25:26.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of plane of nutrition and environmental temperature on the energy metabolism of the growing pig

2*. Growth rate, including protein and fat deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

W. H. Close ,
L. E. Mount  and
D. Brown
W. H. Close
Affiliation:
ARC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT
L. E. Mount
Affiliation:
ARC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT
D. Brown
Affiliation:
ARC Statistics Group, Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DX
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Measurements of energy and nitrogen balances were made on thirty-eight individually housed pigs (initial body-weights 21–38 kg) at environmental temperatures of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30° with four levels of feeding at each temperature. Values for energy retention (ER), protein (P) and fat (F) deposition and body weight gain (δW) were calculated at each temperature at metabolizable energy (me) intakes equivalent to once (M; 440 kJ/kg0.75 per d), twice (2M), three (3M) and four (4M) times the thermoneutral maintenance energy requirement.

2. ER at each plane of nutrition increased with temperature to maximal values between approximately 20 and 25° ER was negative at four of the five environmental temperatures at M.

3. P increased significantly with increase in me intake but was dependent on environmental temperatures only at intakes of M and 2M. The increase in P per unit increment in me intake decreased from 0.16 at 10° to 0.12 at 30°. The net efficiency of protein utilization also decreased with increase in environmental temperature from 0.54 at 10° to 0.39 at 30°.

4. F increased significantly with increase in me intake, but was more temperature-dependent than P, increasing to maximum values estimated to be between 20 and 25° at each level of intake; F at 30° was less than that at 25°. The increase in F per unit increment in me intake decreased from 0.63 at 10° to 0.51 at 30°.

5. The optimum temperature for ΔW was dependent upon me intake, varying from above 30° at M to less than 20° at 4M. The reduction in ΔW per 1° at 15° was also dependent upon the level of intake decreasing from 1.63 g/kg0.75 per d at M to -0.09 at 4M.

6. For a 35 kg pig the reduction in P, as a result of a 1° decrease in temperature at 15° at an intake corresponding to 2.5M, was equivalent to a 4 g/d reduction in food intake; the corresponding equivalent for F was 28 g/d.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , November 1978 , pp. 423 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Blair, R., Dent, J. B., English, P. R. & Raeburn, J. R. (1969). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1977). In Nutrition and the Climatic Environment, p. 1 [Haresign, W., H., Swan and Lewis, D. editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 441.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. (1970). Nutrition – environmental interactions of growing pigs. PhD Thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1971). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30, 33A.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1976 a). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 60A.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1976 b). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., no. 19, p. 173.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 40, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, R., Lodge, G. A. & Lewis, D. (1972). Anim. Prod. 14, 219.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F. & Boyne, A. W. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 25, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Webster, A. J. F., MacPherson, R. M. & Smith, J. S. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 19, p. 177.Google Scholar
Gray, R. & McCracken, K. J. (1974). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 14, p. 161.Google Scholar
Kotarbinska, M. (1969). Wydaw. wlasne Inst. Zootech., Wroclaw, no. 238.Google Scholar
Lund, A. (1935). Beretn. 5 Kongr. Nord. Jordbrf., Køhenhavn.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G. (1975). Beretn. Forsøgslab. no. 424.Google Scholar
van Es, A. J. H. (1972). In Handback der Tierennahrung, Vol. 2, p. 1 [Lenkeit, W. and Breirem, K., editors]. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Verstegen, M. W. A., Close, W. H., Start, I. B. & Mount, L. E. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 21.Google Scholar
Waterlow, J. C., Hill, A. A. & Spady, D. W. (1976). In Early Nutrition and Later Development, p. 175 [Wilkinson, A. W., editor]. Tunbridge Wells: Pitman Medical.Google Scholar