Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T22:51:12.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endocrine control of energy metabolism in the cow: the effect on milk yield and levels of some blood constituents of injecting growth hormone and growth hormone fragments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2008

J. A. Bines
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, Berkshire
I. C. Hart
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, Berkshire
S. V. Morant
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, Berkshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Circulating concentrations of some hormones and metabolites and nitrogen balance were measured in lactating beef and dairy cows given daily injections of growth hormone (GH) and were compared to values before injection. Changes in milk yield and composition were recorded in these cows and in additional cows injected with GH fragments.

2. GH, but not GH fragments, raised milk yield while milk composition did not change. GH injection caused a large, rapid increase in the level of the hormone in blood and slower, smaller increases in the concentrations of insulin, prolactin and thyroxine. Blood metabolite levels were unaltered except for a rise in glucose concentration in beef cows during GH injection and a fall in 3-hydroxybutyrate concentration in the same cows after the injections ceased. An increase in N output in milk was partly balanced by a reduction in urinary N so that N retention did not change significantly.

3. GH caused a reduction in food intake in the beef cows.

4. The results are discussed in relation to control of partition of nutrients in the lactating cow, where GH is considered to play an important role. It was concluded that this role may be in increasing the supply of energy metabolites for milk synthesis, rather than a direct effect on the activity of the mammary gland.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

REFERENCES

Akerblom, H. K., Martin, J. M. & Gary, G. L. (1973). Hormone Mefab. Res. 5, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baile, C. A. & Martin, F. H. (1971). J. Dairy Sci. 54, 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, J. M. & Wallace, A. L. C. (1966). Metabolism 15, 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. (1979). In Feeding Strategy for the High-Yielding Dairy Cow, p. 23 [Broster, W. H. and Swan, H., editors]. London: Granada Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. & Balch, C. C. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 29, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. & Hart, I. C. (1978). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumby, P. J. & Hancock, J. (1955). N.Z. Jl. Sci. Technol. 36A, 417.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. D., Linzell, J. L. & Greenwood, F. C. (1970). Hormones 1, 26.Google Scholar
Bullis, D. D., Bush, L. J. & Barto, P. B. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). In Experimental Designs, 2nd ed.London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Driver, P. M. & Forbes, J. M. (1978). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37, 100A.Google Scholar
Hart, I. C., Bines, J. A. & Morant, S. V. (1979). J. Dairy Sci. 62, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, I. C., Bines, J. A., Morant, S. V. & Ridley, J. L. (1978). J. Endocr. 77, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, J. B. (1957). J. Endocr. 16, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannadha, A. & Ramachandran, J. (1977). In Hormonal Proteins and Peptides, p. 43 [Li, C. H., editor]. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kostyo, J. L. (1973). In Methods in Investigative and Diagnostic Endocrinology, p. 279 [Berson, S. A. and Yalow, R. S., editors]. Amsterdam and London: North Holland.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. (1976). Adv. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 7, 5.Google Scholar
Kumaresan, P. & Turner, C. W. (1966). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 121, 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAtee, J. W. & Trenkle, A. (1971). Endocrinology 89, 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlin, L. J. (1973). J. Dairy Sci. 56, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merimee, T. J. & Rabin, D. (1973). Metabolism 21, 1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, K., Yasui, T., Sugimoto, E. & Ashida, K. (1977). Nutr. Rep. Int. 15, 373.Google Scholar
Raben, M. S. (1973). In Methods in Investigative and Diagnostic Endocrinology, p. 261 [Berson, S. A. and Yalow, R. S., editors]. Amsterdam and London: North HollandGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, D., Merimee, T. J. & Burgess, J. A. (1966). Diabetes 15, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sönksen, P. H. (1975). Proc. R. Soc. Med. 68, 707.Google Scholar
Wallis, M. (1975). Biol. Rev. 50, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, W. F., Lee, S. D., Head, H. H. & Lynch, J. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yudaev, N. A., Pankov, Yu.A., Keda, Yu.M., Schvachkin, Yu.P., Ryabtsev, M. N. & Chukashev, S. G. (1976). Biochemistry, N.Y. 41, 691.Google Scholar