Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T10:27:19.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of the degradability of dietary protein in the sheep rumen by in vivo and in vitro procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. C Siddons ,
J Paradine ,
D. L. Gale  and
R. T. Evans
R. C Siddons
Affiliation:
The Animal and Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
J Paradine
Affiliation:
The Animal and Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
D. L. Gale
Affiliation:
The Animal and Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
R. T. Evans
Affiliation:
The Animal and Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Estimates of degradability of nitrogen in the sheep rumen for a basal hay diet and for soya-bean meal (SBM), groundnut meal (GNM) and fish meal (FM), when given together with the hay, were determined from measurements of (1) duodenal N flow, (2) ammonia kinetics and (3) rumen N disappearance from polyester bags and rumen outflow rate. The ability of various in vitro procedures to predict in vivo N degradability was also examined.

2. Four sheep were given a basal hay diet (800 g dry matter (DM) and 19 g N/d) either alone or supplemented with isonitrogenous amounts (15 g N/d) of SBM, GNM or FM. Duodenal non-ammonia-N flow (g/d) was increased more by FM (8.0) than by GNM (5.9) and SBM (5.8), whilst microbial N flow (g/d) was increased more by SBM (3.9) than by GNM (2.3) and FM (1.6). N degradability values calculated from these results were 0.88, 0.76 and 0.57 for the SBM, GNM and FM respectively. The corresponding value for hay was calculated to be 0.76.

3. The irreversible loss of ammonia in the forestomachs (g N/d) was increased more by SBM (11.9) than by GNM (7.2) and FM (5.8) whilst ammonia outflow from the rumen (g N/d) was increased to a similar extent by all supplements ( I.1, 0.9 and 0.8 respectively), as was the amount of microbial N (g/d) synthesized from sources other than rumen ammonia (1.8, 2.0 and 1.9 respectively). N degradability values calculated from these results were 0.84, 0.54 and 0.45 for the SBM, GNM and FM respectively.

4. The fractional rate of N disappearance (/h) when the feedstuffs were incubated in polyester bags in the rumen of sheep receiving the basal hay diet (800 g DM/d) was the highest for SBM (0,145) and lowest for FM (0.037), with the hay (0.082) and GNM (0.071) intermediate, whilst the fractional outflow rates from the rumen (/h) of the three supplements were similar (0.034, 0.038 and 0,030 for SBM, GNM and FM espectively). N degradability values calculated from these results were 0.82, 0.67 and 0.60 for the SBM, GNM and FM respectively; the value for the hay was 0.73.

5. Of a number of in vitro procedures tested, only N solubility in sodium hydroxide and ammonia or total non-protein-N (NPN) production during incubation with rumen fluid in the absence of hydrazine sulphate ranked the supplements, although not the hay, in the same order as the in vivo degradability procedures. In terms of absolute values, N solubility in NaOH, at room temperature, gave estimates similar to those derived from the duodenal flow measurements; estimates derived from ammonia and total NPN production were lower.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 545 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Aitchison, T. E., Mertens, D. R. & Jacobson, N. L. (1976). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 2056–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F. (1956). Biochemical Journal 64, 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, H. D., Montgomery, M. J., Waldo, D. R. & Owens, J. R. (1983). Journal of Dairy Science 66, 2093–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, G. A. & Balthrop, J. E. Jr (1979). Journal of Animal Science 49, 1101–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G. & Thomas, P. C. (1979). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38, 138A.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, V. W. & Hauffe, R. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 216–230 [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: the University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, G., Ørskov, E. R. & Smart, R. (1979). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, G. W., Kaiser, K. E. & Ussary, J. P. (1968). Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 51, 200–211.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrop, C. J. F. (1974). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M., Christopherson, R. J. & Milligan, L. P. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M., Hazelwood, G. P. & Milligan, L. P. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 52, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. (1981). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, E. I. (1948). Biochemical Journal 43, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 261–276 [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C., Horton, C. M. & Miller, E. L. (1977). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 37A.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Miller, E. L. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 45, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1977). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. G. (1966). Simultaneous Statistical Inference. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1974). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 33, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ørskov, E. R. (1977). Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, pp. 110–114. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Mehrez, A. Z. (1977). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 78A.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F. & Siddons, R. C. (1980). Annales Zootechnie 29, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, F. N. (1978). Feedstuffs 50, 23–24, 39.Google Scholar
Pichard, G. & Van Soest, P. J. (1977). Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference pp. 91–98.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Beever, D. E. & Nolan, J. V. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddons, R. C. & Paradine, J. (1981). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 973–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddons, R. C. & Paradine, J. (1983). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, P., Colucci, P. E. & Van Soest, P. J. (1980). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1967). Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. (1978). Proceedings of the Georgia Nutrition Conference for the Feed Industry, pp. 13–20.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. & Goering, H. K. (1979). Journal of Animal Science 49, 1560–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanapat, M., Erickson, D. O. & Slanger, W. D. (1982). Journal of Animal Science 54, 625–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlt, J. E., Sniffen, C. J. & Hoover, W. H. (1973). Journal of Dairy Science 56, 1052–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlt, J. E., Sniffen, C. J., Hoover, W. H., Johnson, L. L. & Walker, C. K. (1976). Journal of Animal Science 42, 1280–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar