Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:58:14.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors that modify the effect of excess calcium on skeletal development in puppies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2011

Britta Dobenecker*
Affiliation:
Chair of Animal Nutrition and Dietetics, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Schönleutnerstrasse 8, D-85764Oberschleißheim, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: B. Dobenecker, fax +49 89 218078702. email dobenecker@lmu.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Developmental skeletal problems are often connected to mistakes in feeding, i.e. a deficiency or excess supply of nutrients, especially minerals. The energy consumption, the resulting growth intensity and the breed of animals are also known as factors that influence developmental orthopaedic diseases. In most clinical trials, excess Ca was connected to alterations in normal, healthy skeletal development, which led to severe clinical symptoms in some dogs, subclinical changes in the radiographic or histological examinations in other animals, or even no observable symptoms. These results correspond to practical experience in the field of clinical nutrition consultation, since excess Ca has been shown to have various impacts in growing dogs. The present review of results published in the literature and from my own trials led to the hypothesis that P is an important co-factor that can alleviate or aggravate the development of skeletal problems in growing dogs.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2011

Excess Ca is considered detrimental to the growing skeletons of dogs(1). Practical experience in nutrition consultation shows that not all dogs under Ca excess develop skeletal problems. The same is true for own research work where the effects of feeding diets with excess Ca to growing dogs were not identical in all individuals(Reference Dobenecker, Kasbeitzer and Flinspach2). The present review was undertaken to identify co-factors that alleviate or aggravate the effect of excess Ca on developmental orthopaedic diseases (DOD). Therefore, a literature review was performed to investigate the effects of excess Ca in growing dogs(1Reference Voorhout and Hazewinkel14). The parameters of special interest were the Ca and P intakes, Ca:P ratio, clinical and subclinical symptoms of DOD, breed, age and plasma P concentration, if available.

Literature review and discussion

In 1931, Marek & Wellmann published their historical data on the effects of Ca and P supply in growing dogs. They summarised their findings about the detrimental effects of excess Ca, concluding that the symptoms such as lameness or deviation of limb axes were more detrimental when the P content in the diet was not increased concurrently. It has been reported that two German Shepherd puppies developed severe clinical signs of skeletal problems, confirmed by radiological and histological findings, as well as hypophosphataemia after being fed excess Ca and a normal amount of P (calculated: 2·2 % Ca; 0·9 % P(Reference Marek and Wellmann10)). Severe clinical signs of DOD were observed in a Fox Terrier puppy after adding CaCO3 to its diet, and these signs disappeared after CaCO3 was exchanged with bone meal, which led to an increase in the P supply and a balanced Ca:P ratio. The underlying reason for these clinical signs might be the decreased availability of P in cases with a wide Ca:P ratio caused by a high Ca content of the diet, as described previously(Reference Jenkins and Phillips15). This effect of selective Ca excess on the apparent digestibility of P was also observed in Beagles during the own experiments(Reference Dobenecker16). The results of Nap et al. (Reference Nap, Hazewinkel and van den Brom11) can help explain the sometimes inconsistent findings published more recently by various laboratories (Table 1).

Table 1 Effects of excess calcium on growing dogs

n.e., not examined; n.m., not mentioned.

* In one sentence, severe skeletal abnormalities were mentioned.

Constant supplementation of 2·3 g Ca/d per dog.

Clinical symptoms disappeared when one of the dogs received P in addition to excess Ca.

§ Supply with low P and normal Ca for comparison.

Hazewinkel and his colleagues(Reference Goodman, Montgomery, Titch, Reinhart and Carey4Reference Hazewinkel, Brom and Van't Kloster7, Reference Schoenmakers, Hazewinkel and Voorhout12) also observed detrimental effects in Great Danes (GD) after feeding the animals excess Ca in a diet with a P supply that fulfilled the minimum requirements (0·9 % DM; wide Ca:P ratio)(17). In some studies of Fox Terrier, German Shepherd, and GD puppies fed an excess amount of Ca, clinically severe symptoms were observed(Reference Hazewinkel, Goedegebuure and Poulos5, Reference Hazewinkel, Brom and Van't Kloster7, Reference Marek and Wellmann10, Reference Schoenmakers, Hazewinkel and Voorhout12). In other studies, mild symptoms have been reported in puppies fed excess Ca, and only subclinical effects were measured in radiographs or through histology(Reference Goedegebuure and Hazewinkel3), or no symptoms have been observed or reported(Reference Hazewinkel, Hackeng and Bosch6, Reference Voorhout and Hazewinkel14). In another trial using Miniature Poodles (MP), the combination of excess Ca and a marginal P supply did not cause signs of DOD(Reference Nap, Hazewinkel and van den Brom11). Therefore, excess Ca alone without a concomitant increase in the P supply (i.e. a wide Ca:P ratio >2/1) seems to trigger signs of DOD in growing dogs of certain breeds, especially GD, and increase the number of severely affected puppies. In dogs with severe clinical symptoms, some authors have reported hypophosphataemia(Reference Hazewinkel, Brom and Van't Kloster7, Reference Marek and Wellmann10), which supported the hypothesis that P deficiency is a major co-factor in the development of skeletal problems in puppies fed excess Ca. Accordingly, trials were performed where P levels were elevated approximately 25 % or more above the minimum requirements or were provided at 0·9 % of the DM to ensure a more balanced Ca:P ratio. These trials led to less severe skeletal changes or, more frequently, to no clinical symptoms at all (GD(4,7,9,12); Beagles(Reference Dobenecker, Kasbeitzer and Flinspach2, Reference Stephens, Norrdin and Benjamin13)). When Foxhound crossbreeds were fed a P supply above the previously published recommended allowance(Reference Meyer and Zentek18), the animals developed no clinical or subclinical symptoms(Reference Dobenecker, Kasbeitzer and Flinspach2). Lauten et al. did not state their clinical findings clearly enough to evaluate their results in this context(Reference Lauten, Cox and Brawner8).

The hypothesis that DOD in growing dogs is related to the co-factor P supply was reinforced by the results of a study of P deficiency in growing Beagles and Foxhound crossbreeds(Reference Dobenecker and Kienzle19). The puppies received a diet providing approximately 40–50 % of the recommended P allowance (approximately 0·35 % DM(Reference Meyer and Zentek18)) while the Ca supply met the requirements, resulting in a Ca:P ratio above the recommended ratio. In this trial, some puppies of both breeds developed severe clinical symptoms of DOD.

Along with evaluating the impact of the nutrient supply, especially the supply of Ca and P, it is important to consider other factors in the study of complex nutritionally triggered DOD. The adult body weight alone might influence the effects of excess Ca through body-weight development or the growth rate, which involves the corresponding hormonal status of the animal. Another potential factor is the susceptibility or sensitivity of the breed to certain nutritional factors. From the literature and from clinical experience, we know that large or giant dog breeds are more likely to develop skeletal problems during growth when they ingest insufficient or excess nutrients. Overall, dogs with an adult body weight of about 30 kg or more are more vulnerable to excess Ca. However, too intensive growth alone can lead to a greater frequency of developmental skeletal disease even when all nutrients are supplied according to the requirements(Reference Zentek, Meyer and Daemmrich20). The breeding of some dog varieties seems to be problematic even when the required energy and nutrient supplies are met. For example, in radiographic examinations(Reference Zentek, Meyer and Daemmrich21), there were diagnosed skeletal changes in GD but not in MP after feeding the animals a balanced diet without an excess of Ca. The authors have reported that the majority of the GD showed abnormally flattened distal ulnar metaphyses with increasing incidence of cartilage cones, and the growth plates were more irregular in the GD than in the MP puppies.

The evidence collected in the present review supports the hypothesis that excess Ca is much more hazardous to growing dogs when it is accompanied by a low or a marginal P supply. Moreover, large and giant dogs are particularly prone to nutritionally triggered developmental skeletal diseases.

Acknowledgements

The present study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or non-profit sectors. No conflicts of interest exist.

References

1NRC (2006) National Research Council. The Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.Google Scholar
2Dobenecker, B, Kasbeitzer, N, Flinspach, S, et al. (2006) Calcium excess causes sub-clinical changes of bone growth in Beagles but not in Foxhound-crossbred dogs, as measured in X-rays. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 90, 394401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Goedegebuure, SA & Hazewinkel, HAW (1986) Morphological findings in young dogs chronically fed a diet containing excess calcium. Vet Pathol 23, 594605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Goodman, SA, Montgomery, RA, Titch, RB, et al. (1998) Serial orthopaedic examinations of growing Great Dane puppies fed three diets varying in calcium and phosphorus. In Recent Advances in Canine and Feline Nutrition, Iams Nutrition Symposium Proceedings, pp. 6370 [Reinhart, GA and Carey, DP, editors]. Wilmington, NC: Orange Frazer Press.Google Scholar
5Hazewinkel, HAW, Goedegebuure, SA, Poulos, PW, et al. (1985) Influences of chronic calcium excess on the skeletal development of growing Great Danes. J Am Anim Hops Assoc 135, 305310.Google Scholar
6Hazewinkel, HAW, Hackeng, WHL, Bosch, R, et al. (1987) Influences of different calcium intakes on calciotropic hormones and skeletal development in young growing-dogs. Front Horm Res 17, 221232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hazewinkel, HAW, Brom, WE & Van't Kloster, A (1991) Calcium metabolism in Great Dane dogs fed diets with various calcium and phosphorus levels. J Nutr 121, S99106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Lauten, SD, Cox, NR, Brawner, WR, et al. (2002) Influence of dietary calcium and phosphorus content in a fixed ratio on growth and development in Great Danes. A J Vet Res 63, 10361047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lepine, AJ (1998) Nutritional influences on skeletal growth of the large breed puppy. In Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference, pp. 1619.Google Scholar
10Marek, J & Wellmann, O (1931) Die Rhachitis – Pathologischer Teil. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
11Nap, RC, Hazewinkel, HAW & van den Brom, WE (1993) 45Ca kinetics in growing miniature poodles challenged by four different dietary levels of Ca. J Nutr 123, 18261833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Schoenmakers, I, Hazewinkel, HAW, Voorhout, G, et al. (2000) Effects of diets with different calcium and phosphorus contents on the skeletal development and blood chemistry of growing Great Danes. Vet Rec 147, 652660.Google ScholarPubMed
13Stephens, LC, Norrdin, RW & Benjamin, SA (1985) Effects of calcium supplement and sunlight exposure on growing beagle dog. Am J Vet Res 46, 20372042.Google Scholar
14Voorhout, G & Hazewinkel, HAW (1987) A radiographic study on the development of the antebrachium in Great Dane pups on different calcium intakes. Vet Radiol 28, 152157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Jenkins, K & Phillips, P (1960) The mineral requirement of the dog. 2. The relation of calcium, phosphorus and fat levels to minimal calcium and phosphorus requirements. J Nutr 70, 241246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Dobenecker, B (2002) Influence of calcium and phosphorus intake on the apparent digestibility of these minerals in growing dogs. J Nutr 132, 1665S1667S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17NRC (1974) National Research Council. The nutrient requirements of dogs and cats. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.Google Scholar
18Meyer, H & Zentek, J (2001) Ernährung des Hundes. Stuttgart, Germany: Ulmer Verlag.Google Scholar
19Dobenecker, B & Kienzle, E (2008) Normal calcium and low phosphorus intake in puppies leads to extremely bowed legs which are reversible by phosphorus repletion. In ESVCN Congress Proceedings, Vienna, pp. 26.Google Scholar
20Zentek, J, Meyer, H, Daemmrich, K, et al. (1995) Development of body-mass and skeleton in growing Great-Danes, as affected by energy supply. 3. Clinical-features and chemical skeletal analyses. J Vet Med 42, 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Tryfonidou, MA, Holl, MS, Vastenburg, M, et al. (2003) Hormonal regulation of calcium homeostasis in two breeds of dogs during growth at different rates. J Anim Sci 81, 15681580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Effects of excess calcium on growing dogs