Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commonly consumed foods in the United Arab Emirates

  • Ayesha S. Al Dhaheri (a1), C. Jeyakumar K. Henry (a2), Maysm N. Mohamad (a1), Eric O. Ohuma (a3) (a4), Leila Cheikh Ismail (a5), Fatima T. Al Meqbaali (a1) and Amjad H. Jarrar (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

Glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) values of some commonly consumed foods in the United Arab Emirates were determined with an aim of adding these values to the existing international table of GI and GL values. In all, eighteen test foods categorised into breads (n 5), entrée dishes (n 3), main dishes (n 5) and sweet dishes (n 5) were tested. For each test food, at least fifteen healthy participants consumed 25 or 50 g available carbohydrate portions of a reference food (glucose), which was tested three times, and a test food after an overnight fast, was tested once, on separate occasions. Capillary blood samples were obtained by finger-prick and blood glucose was measured using clinical chemistry analyser. A fasting blood sample was obtained at baseline and before consumption of test foods. Additional blood samples were obtained at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the consumption of each test food. The GI value of each test food was calculated as the percentage of the incremental area under the blood glucose curve (IAUC) for the test food of each participant divided by the average IAUC for the reference food of the same participant. The GI values of tested foods ranged from low (55 or less) to high (70 or more). The GI values of various breads and rice-containing dishes were comparable with previously published values. This study provides GI and GL values of previously untested traditional Emirati foods which could provide a useful guide on dietary recommendations for the Emirati population.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commonly consumed foods in the United Arab Emirates
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commonly consumed foods in the United Arab Emirates
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commonly consumed foods in the United Arab Emirates
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: A. S. Al Dhaheri, fax +971 3 7671596, email ayesha_aldhaheri@uaeu.ac.ae
References
Hide All
3. J Salmerón , A Ascherio , EB Rimm , et al. (1997) Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care 20, 545550.

5. DS Ludwig (2002) The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 287, 24142423.

6. R Van Dam , A Visscher , E Feskens , et al. (2000) Dietary glycemic index in relation to metabolic risk factors and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 726731.

11. RCG Alfenas & RD Mattes (2005) Influence of glycemic index/load on glycemic response, appetite, and food intake in healthy humans. Diabetes Care 28, 21232129.

12. L Schwingshackl & G Hoffmann (2013) Long-term effects of low glycemic index/load vs. high glycemic index/load diets on parameters of obesity and obesity-associated risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 23, 699706.

14. G Radulian , E Rusu , A Dragomir , et al. (2009) Metabolic effects of low glycaemic index diets. Nutr J. 8, 1.

15. F Brouns , I Bjorck , KN Frayn , et al. (2005) Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 18, 145171.

18. FS Atkinson , K Foster-Powell & JC Brand-Miller (2008) International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care 31, 22812283.

20. BH Dashti , F Al-Awadi , MS Khalafawi , et al. (2001) Nutrient contents of some traditional Kuwaiti dishes: proximate composition and phytate content. Food Chem 74, 169175.

27. R Arvidsson-Lenner , N-G Asp , M Axelsen , et al. (2004) Glycaemic index. Relevance for health, dietary recommendations and food labelling. Food Nutr Res 48, 8494.

28. HN Englyst , J Veenstra & GJ Hudson (1996) Measurement of rapidly available glucose (RAG) in plant foods: a potential in vitro predictor of the glycaemic response. Br J Nutr 75, 327337.

29. HH Pfeifer , DA Lyczkowski & EA Thiele (2008) Low glycemic index treatment: implementation and new insights into efficacy. Epilepsia 49, 4245.

31. A Hassan , T Elobeid , A Kerkadi , et al. (2010) Glycemic index of selected carbohydrate-based foods consumed in Qatar. Int J Food Sci Nutr 61, 512518.

32. A Ali , HAS Al-Nassri , B Al-Rasasi , et al. (2010) Glycemic index and chemical composition of traditional Omani breads. Int J Food Prop 13, 198208.

34. M De Angelis , CG Rizzello , G Alfonsi , et al. (2007) Use of sourdough lactobacilli and oat fibre to decrease the glycaemic index of white wheat bread. Br J Nutr 98, 11961205.

35. D Novotni , D Ćurić , M Bituh , et al. (2011) Glycemic index and phenolics of partially-baked frozen bread with sourdough. Int J Food Sci Nutr 62, 2633.

36. M Gobbetti , CG Rizzello , R Di Cagno , et al. (2014) How the sourdough may affect the functional features of leavened baked goods. Int J Food Microbiol 37, 3040.

37. C Henry , H Lightowler , F Kendall , et al. (2006) The impact of the addition of toppings/fillings on the glycaemic response to commonly consumed carbohydrate foods. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 763769.

38. A Flint , BK Moller , A Raben , et al. (2004) The use of glycaemic index tables to predict glycaemic index of composite breakfast meals. Br J Nutr 91, 979989.

39. KA Hatonen , J Virtamo , JG Eriksson , et al. (2011) Protein and fat modify the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to a mashed potato-based meal. Br J Nutr 106, 248253.

41. TP Trinidad , DH Valdez , AS Loyola , et al. (2003) Glycaemic index of different coconut (Cocos nucifera)-flour products in normal and diabetic subjects. Br J Nutr 90, 551556.

42. G Fernandes , A Velangi & TM Wolever (2005) Glycemic index of potatoes commonly consumed in North America. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 557562.

43. N Soh & J Brand-Miller (1999) The glycaemic index of potatoes: the effect of variety, cooking method and maturity. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 249254.

45. KL Ek , J Brand-Miller & L Copeland (2012) Glycemic effect of potatoes. Food Chem 133, 12301240.

48. TM Wolever , L Katzman-Relle , AL Jenkins , et al. (1994) Glycaemic index of 102 complex carbohydrate foods in patients with diabetes. Nutr Res 14, 651669.

49. R Tahvonen , R Hietanen , J Sihvonen , et al. (2006) Influence of different processing methods on the glycemic index of potato (Nicola). J Food Comp Anal 19, 372378.

50. H Liljeberg & I Björck (1998) Delayed gastric emptying rate may explain improved glycaemia in healthy subjects to a starchy meal with added vinegar. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 368371.

52. M Frei , P Siddhuraju & K Becker (2003) Studies on the in vitro starch digestibility and the glycemic index of six different indigenous rice cultivars from the Philippines. Food Chem 83, 395402.

53. DA Jenkins , A Jenkins , TS Wolever , et al. (1984) The glycaemic response to carbohydrate foods. Lancet 324, 388391.

55. B Kaur , V Ranawana & J Henry (2016) The glycemic index of rice and rice products: a review, and table of GI values. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56, 215236.

56. S Pirasath , K Thayaananthan , S Balakumar , et al. (2010) Effect of dietary curries on the glycaemic index. Ceylon Med J 55, 118122.

57. J Juansang , C Puttanlek , V Rungsardthong , et al. (2012) Effect of gelatinisation on slowly digestible starch and resistant starch of heat-moisture treated and chemically modified canna starches. Food Chem 131, 500507.

59. HM Habib , HI Ali , WH Ibrahim , et al. (2011) Nutritional value of 10 traditional dishes of the United Arab Emirates. Ecol Food Nutr 50, 526538.

61. JM Alkaabi , B Al-Dabbagh , S Ahmad , et al. (2011) Glycemic indices of five varieties of dates in healthy and diabetic subjects. J Nutr 10, 1.

62. MC Carreira , FM Lajolo & EW de Menezes (2004) Glycemic index: effect of food storage under low temperature. Braz Arch Biol Technol 47, 569574.

63. P Burton & H Lightowler (2008) The impact of freezing and toasting on the glycaemic response of white bread. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 594599.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 45
Total number of PDF views: 199 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 475 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd May 2017 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.