Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose

  • Klaus N. Englyst (a1), Sophie Vinoy (a2), Hans N. Englyst (a1) and Vincent Lang (a2)
Abstract

Elucidating the role of carbohydrate quality in human nutrition requires a greater understanding of how the physico-chemical characteristics of foods relate to their physiological properties. It was hypothesised that rapidly available glucose (RAG) and slowly available glucose (SAG), in vitro measures describing the rate of glucose release from foods, are the main determinants of glycaemic index (GI) and insulinaemic index (II) for cereal products. Twenty-three products (five breakfast cereals, six bakery products and crackers, and twelve biscuits) had their GI and II values determined, and were characterised by their fat, protein, starch and sugar contents, with the carbohydrate fraction further divided into total fructose, RAG, SAG and resistant starch. Relationships between these characteristics and GI and II values were investigated by regression analysis. The cereal products had a range of GI (28–93) and II (61–115) values, which were positively correlated (r2 0·22, P<0·001). The biscuit group, which had the highest SAG content (8·6 (sd 3·7) g per portion) due to the presence of ungelatinised starch, was found to have the lowest GI value (51 (sd 14)). There was no significant association between GI and either starch or sugar, while RAG was positively (r2 0·54, P<0·001) and SAG was negatively (r2 0·63, P<0·001) correlated with GI. Fat was correlated with GI (r2 0·52, P<0·001), and combined SAG and fat accounted for 73·1 % of the variance in GI, with SAG as the dominant variable. RAG and protein together contributed equally in accounting for 45·0 % of the variance in II. In conclusion, the GI and II values of the cereal products investigated can be explained by the RAG and SAG contents. A high SAG content identifies low-GI foods that are rich in slowly released carbohydrates for which health benefits have been proposed.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr Klaus N. Englyst, fax +44 23 8076 9654, email Klaus@Englyst.co.uk
References
Hide All
Bellisle F (2001) Glycaemic Index and Health: the Quality of the Evidence. Montrouge, France: John Libbey Eurotext.
Biliaderis CG, Maurice TJ & Vose JR (1980) Starch gelatinisation phenomena studied by scanning differential calorimetry. Journal of Food Science 45, 16691675.
Biliaderis CG (1991) The structure and interactions of starch with food constituents. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 69, 6078.
Björck I, Liljeberg H & Ostman E (2000) Low glycaemic-index foods. British Journal of Nutrition 83, Suppl., S149S155.
Bornet FRJ, Fontvielle AM, Rizkalla S, Colonna P, Blayo A, Mercier C & Slama G (1989) Insulin and glycaemic responses in healthy humans to native starches processed in different ways: correlation with in vitro α-amylase hydrolysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 50, 315323.
Brand-Miller JC (1994) Importance of glycaemic index in diabetes. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 59, Suppl., 747S752S.
Brand-Miller J, Pang E & Broomhead L (1995) The glycaemic index of foods containing sugars: comparison of foods with naturally occurring v. refined sugars. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 613623.
Collier GR, Greenberg GR, Wolever TMS & Jenkins DJA (1988) The acute effect of fat on insulin secretion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 66, 323326.
Colonna P, Leloup V & Buleon A (1992) Limiting factors of starch hydrolysis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46, Suppl., S17S32.
Crowe TC, Seliman SA & Copeland L (2000) Inhibition of enzymatic digestion of amylose by free fatty acids in vitro contributes to resistant starch formation. Journal of Nutrition 130, 20062008.
Daly ME, Vale C, Walker M, Alberti KG & Mathers JC (1997) Dietary carbohydrates and insulin sensitivity: a review of the evidence and clinical implications. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 66, 10721085.
Englyst HN & Hudson GJ (1996) The classification and measurement of dietary carbohydrates. Food Chemistry 57, 1521.
Englyst HN, Kingman SM & Cummings JH (1992) Classifications and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46, Suppl., S33S50.
Englyst HN, Quigley ME & Hudson GJ (1994) Determination of dietary fibre as non-starch polysaccharides with gas-liquid chromatographic, high-performance liquid chromatographic or spectrophotometric measurement of constituent sugars. Analyst 119, 14971509.
Englyst KN, Englyst HN, Hudson GJ, Cole TJ & Cummings JH (1999) Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycaemic response. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 69, 448454.
Englyst KN, Hudson GJ & Englyst HN (2000) Starch analysis in food. In Encyclopaedia of Analytical Chemistry, pp. 42464262 [Meyers RA, editor]. Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Food and Agriculture Organizatio/orld Health Organization (1998) Expert Consultation: Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition, Food and Agriculture Organization Food and Nutrition Paper no. 66. Geneva: FA/HO.
Gannon MC, Nuttall FQ, Westpal SA & Seaquist ER (1993) The effect of fat and carbohydrate on plasma glucose, insulin C-peptide and triglycerides in normal male subjects. Journal of American College of Nutrition 12, 3641.
Gallant DJ, Bouchet B, Buleon A & Perez S (1992) Physical characteristics of starch granules and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46, Suppl., S3S16.
Granfeldt Y, Björck AI, Drews A & Tovar J (1992) An in vitro procedure based on chewing to predict metabolic response to starch in cereal and legume products. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46, 649660.
Heaton KW, Marcus SN, Emmett PM & Bolton CH (1988) Particle size of wheat, maize, and oat test meals: effects on plasma glucose and insulin responses and on the rate of starch digestion in vitro. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 675682.
Heijene MLA, van Amelsvoort JMM & Westrate JA (1995) Interaction between physical structure and amylose:amylopectin ratio of foods on postprandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy subjects. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 49, 446457.
Holm J, Lundquist I, Björck I, Eilasson AC & Asp NG (1988) Degree of starch gelatinization, digestion rate of starch in vitro, and metabolic response in rats. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 10101016.
Holt SHA & Brand-Miller JC (1994) Particle size, satiety and the glycaemic response. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48, 496502.
Holt SHA, Brand-Miller JC & Petocz P (1997) An insulin index of foods: the insulin demand generated by 1000 kJ portions of common foods. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 66, 12641276.
Jenkins DJA, Ghafari H, Wolever TMS, Taylor RH, Jenkins AL, Barker HM, Fielden H & Bowling AC (1982) Relationship between rate of digestion of foods and post-prandial glycaemia. Diabetologia 22, 450455.
Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS, Leeds AR, Gassule MA, Dilawari JB, Goff DV, Metz GL & Alberti KGMM (1978) Dietary fibres, fibre analogues and glucose tolerance: importance of viscosity. British Medical Journal 1, 13921394.
Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS & Taylor RH (1981) Glycaemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 134, 362366.
Kabadi UM (1991) Dose-kinetics of pancreatic α- and β-cell responses to a protein meal in normal subjects. Metabolism 40, 236240.
Lee BM & Wolever TMS (1998) Effect of glucose, sucrose and fructose on plasma glucose and insulin responses in normal humans: comparison with white bread. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 52, 924928.
Normand S, Khalfallah Y, Louche-Pelissier C, Pachiaudi C, Antoine J-M, Blanc S, Desage M, Riou JP & Laville M (2001) Influence of dietary fat on postprandial glucose metabolism (exogenous and endogenous) using intrinsically 13C-enriched durum wheat. British Journal of Nutrition 86, 311.
O'Dea K, Snow P & Nestel P (1981) Rate of starch hydrolysis in vitro as a predictor of metabolic responses to complex carbohydrate in vivo. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 19911993.
Prochaska LJ, Nguyen XT, Donat N & Piekutowski WV (2000) Effect of food processing on the thermodynamic and nutritive value of foods: literature and database survey. Medical Hypotheses 54, 254262.
Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL & Willett WC (1997) Dietary fiber, glycaemic load and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. Journal of American Medical Association 277, 472477.
Thomsen C, Rasmussen OW, Christiansen C, Andreasen F, Poulsen PL & Hermansen K (1994) The glycaemic index of spaghetti and gastric emptying in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48, 776780.
Trout DL, Behall KM & Osilesi O (1993) Prediction of glycaemic index for starchy foods. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58, 873878.
van Loon LJC, Saris WHM, Verhagen H & Wagemakers AJM (2000) Plasma insulin responses of different amino acid or protein mixtures with carbohydrate. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 72, 96105.
Welch I McL, Bruce C, Hill SE & Read NW (1987) Duodenal and ileal lipid suppresses postprandial blood glucose and insulin responses in man: possible implications for the management of diabetes mellitus. Clinical Science 72, 209216.
Wolever TMS (1991) The glycaemic index: Methodology and clinical implications. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 54, 846854.
Wolever TMS (1997) The glycaemic index: flogging a dead horse? Diabetes Care 20, 452456.
Wolever TMS (2000) Dietary carbohydrates and insulin action in humans. British Journal of Nutrition 83, Suppl., S97S102.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 497 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 774 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.