Skip to main content

How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes?

  • Danielle Ferriday (a1) and Jeffrey M. Brunstrom (a1)

Exposure to the sight and smell of food influences our momentary desire to consume it. This study explored the process by which cue exposure promotes greater consumption of food. Three hypotheses were explored, cue exposure: (i) increases the planned consumption of food; (ii) increases tolerance of larger portion sizes; (iii) arrests the development of satiety. Female participants (n 50) were each tested in two conditions. In a ‘cue condition’ they were exposed to the sight and smell of pizza for 60 s. Before and after this period they provided information about prospective and maximum tolerated portion sizes and their desire to eat pizza and other non-cued foods. Participants then consumed a fixed portion of pizza, rated their hunger and were finally offered ad libitum access to pizza. In the ‘no-cue condition’, cue exposure was replaced with a cognitive task. Cueing had little effect on tolerance of larger portion sizes or on hunger after consuming the fixed portion. Instead, it increased prospective pizza portion size and subsequent intake of pizza. Together, these results suggest that cueing increases the amount of food that people actively plan to eat. This plan is then executed, leading to greater intake. Pizza cueing also increased prospective portion size of other foods. Thus, contrary to previous reports, effects of exposure may generalise to other foods. Finally, we found evidence that restrained eaters are less ‘cue reactive’ than unrestrained eaters. In future, our approach might be adapted to consider whether heightened ‘cue reactivity’ represents a risk factor for obesity.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes?
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes?
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes?
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Danielle Ferriday, fax +44 117 928 8588, email
Hide All
1Carter, BL & Tiffany, ST (1999) Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 94, 327340.
2Sobik, L, Hutchison, K & Craighead, L (2005) Cue-elicited craving for food: a fresh approach to the study of binge eating. Appetite 44, 253261.
3Carter, FA, Bulik, CM, McIntosh, VV & Joyce, PR (2002) Cue reactivity as a predictor of outcome with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 31, 240250.
4Rogers, PJ & Blundell, JE (1989) Separating the actions of sweetness and calories – effects of saccharin and carbohydrates on hunger and food-intake in human subjects. Physiol Behav 45, 10931099.
5Fedoroff, IC, Polivy, J & Herman, CP (1997) The effect of pre-exposure to food cues on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite 28, 3347.
6Oakes, ME & Slotterback, CS (2000) Self-reported measures of appetite in relation to verbal cues about many foods. Curr Psychol 19, 137142.
7Teff, KL, Mattes, RD & Engelman, K (1991) Cephalic phase insulin release in normal weight males – verification and reliability. Am J Physiol 261, E430E436.
8Nederkoorn, C, Smulders, FTY & Jansen, A (2000) Cephalic phase responses, craving and food intake in normal subjects. Appetite 35, 4555.
9Brunstrom, JM, Yates, HM & Witcomb, GL (2004) Dietary restraint and heightened reactivity to food. Physiol Behav 81, 8590.
10Mattes, RD (1997) Physiologic responses to sensory stimulation by food: nutritional implications. J Am Diet Assoc 97, 406413.
11Rodin, J (1985) Insulin levels, hunger, and food-intake – an example of feedback loops in body-weight regulation. Health Psychol 4, 124.
12Brunstrom, JM, Shakeshaft, N & Scott-Samuel, NEMeasuring ‘expected satiety’ in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite (In the Press).
13Weingarten, HP (1985) Stimulus-control of eating – implications for a 2-factor theory of hunger. Appetite 6, 387401.
14Fedoroff, I, Polivy, J & Herman, CP (2003) The specificity of restrained versus unrestrained eaters' responses to food cues: general desire to eat, or craving for the cued food? Appetite 41, 713.
15Cornell, CE, Rodin, J & Weingarten, H (1989) Stimulus-induced eating when satiated. Physiol Behav 45, 695704.
16Nederkoorn, C & Jansen, A (2002) Cue reactivity and regulation of food intake. Eat Behav 3, 6172.
17Van Strien, T, Frijters, JER, Vanstaveren, WA, Defares, PB & Deurenberg, P (1986) The predictive-validity of the Dutch Restrained Eating Scale. Int J Eat Disord 5, 747755.
18Herman, CP & Polivy, J (1975) Anxiety, restraint and eating behaviour. J Abnorm Psychol 6, 666672.
19Tetley, AC (2007) Individual differences in food-cue reactivity. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Loughborough University.
20Burton, P, Smit, HJ & Lightowler, HJ (2007) The influency of restrained and external eating patterns on overeating. Appetite 49, 191197.
21Gregory, J (1990) The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults: A Survey of the Dietary Behaviour, Nutritional Status and Blood Pressure of Adults Aged 16 to 64 Living in Great Britain. Commissioned jointly by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Department of Health. London: HMSO.
22Watt, RJ & Andrews, DP (1981) APE: adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions. Curr Psychol Rev 1, 205214.
23Eysenck, HJ & Eysenck, SBG (1975) Manual of Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: EDITS.
24Cepeda-Benito, A, Gleaves, DH, Williams, TL & Erath, SA (2000) The development and validation of the state and trait food-cravings questionnaires. Behav Ther 31, 151173.
25Stunkard, AJ & Messick, S (1985) The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 29, 7183.
26Watson, D, Clark, LA & Tellegen, A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect – the PANAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54, 10631070.
27Higgs, S (2005) Memory and its role in appetite regulation. Physiol Behav 85, 6772.
28Wansink, B, Painter, JE & North, J (2005) Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res 13, 93100.
29Wickens, DD (1943) Studies of response generalization in conditioning. I. Stimulus generalization during response generalization. J Exp Psychol 33, 221227.
30Rolls, BJ, Vanduijvenvoorde, PM & Rolls, ET (1984) Pleasantness changes and food-intake in a varied 4-course meal. Appetite 5, 337348.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed