Skip to main content Accessibility help

Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice

  • Tamara Bucher (a1) (a2), Clare Collins (a1) (a2), Megan E. Rollo (a1) (a2), Tracy A. McCaffrey (a3), Nienke De Vlieger (a1) (a2), Daphne Van der Bend (a1) (a2), Helen Truby (a3) and Federico J. A. Perez-Cueto (a4)...


Nudging or ‘choice architecture’ refers to strategic changes in the environment that are anticipated to alter people’s behaviour in a predictable way, without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives. Nudging strategies may be used to promote healthy eating behaviour. However, to date, the scientific evidence has not been systematically reviewed to enable practitioners and policymakers to implement, or argue for the implementation of, specific measures to support nudging strategies. This systematic review investigated the effect of positional changes of food placement on food choice. In total, seven scientific databases were searched using relevant keywords to identify interventions that manipulated food position (proximity or order) to generate a change in food selection, sales or consumption, among normal-weight or overweight individuals across any age group. From 2576 identified articles, fifteen articles comprising eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. This review has identified that manipulation of food product order or proximity can influence food choice. Such approaches offer promise in terms of impacting on consumer behaviour. However, there is a need for high-quality studies that quantify the magnitude of positional effects on food choice in conjunction with measuring the impact on food intake, particularly in the longer term. Future studies should use outcome measures such as change in grams of food consumed or energy intake to quantify the impact on dietary intake and potential impacts on nutrition-related health. Research is also needed to evaluate potential compensatory behaviours secondary to such interventions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice
      Available formats


Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: T. Bucher, email


Hide All
1. Hill, JO, Wyatt, HR, Reed, GW, et al. (2003) Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science 299, 853855.
2. Mikkelsen, BE (2011) Images of foodscapes: introduction to foodscape studies and their application in the study of healthy eating out-of-home environments. Perspect Public Health 131, 209216.
3. Hill, JO & Peters, JC (1998) Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science 280, 13711374.
4. Bamia, C, Trichopoulos, D, Ferrari, P, et al. (2007) Dietary patterns and survival of older Europeans: the EPIC-Elderly study (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition). Public Health Nutr 10, 590598.
5. Wills, J & Grunert, K (2007) A review of research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels in Europe from 2003–2006. Ann Nutr Metab 51, 3738.
6. Perez-Cueto, FJA, Aschemann-Witzel, J, Shankar, B, et al. (2012) Assessment of evaluations made to healthy eating policies in Europe: a review within the EATWELL Project. Public Health Nutr 15, 14891496.
7. Johnson, EJ, Shu, SB, Benedict, GC, et al. (2012) Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Mark Lett 23, 487504.
8. List, JA & Samek, AS (2015) The behavioralist as nutritionist: leveraging behavioral economics to improve child food choice and consumption. J Health Econ 39, 135146.
9. Riebl, SK, Estabrooks, PA, Dunsmore, JC, et al. (2015) A systematic literature review and meta-analysis: the theory of planned behavior’s application to understand and predict nutrition-related behaviors in youth. Eat Behav 18, 160178.
10. Brambila-Macias, J, Shankar, B, Capacci, S, et al. (2011) Policy interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of what works, what does not, and what is promising. Food Nutr Bull 32, 365375.
11. Capacci, S, Mazzocchi, M, Shankar, B, et al. (2012) Policies to promote healthy eating in Europe: a structured review of policies and their effectiveness. Nutr Rev 70, 188200.
12. Hansen, PG & Jespersen, A (2013) Nudge and the manipulation of choice. A framework for the responsible use of nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. Eur J Risk Regul 1, 328.
13. Rozin, P, Scott, S, Dingley, M, et al. (2011) Nudge to nobesity I: minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgm Decis Mak 6, 323332.
14. Wansink, B (2007) Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think. New York, NY: Bantam.
15. Thaler, RH & Sunstein, CR (2008) Nudge Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. House of Lords (2011) Behaviour Change. Science and Technology Select Committee. 2nd Report of Session 2010–12. London: The Authority of the House of Lords.
17. Skov, LR, Lourenco, S, Hansen, GL, et al. (2012) Choice architecture as a means to change eating behaviour in self-service settings: a systematic review. Obes Rev 14, 187196.
18. Libotte, E, Siegrist, M & Bucher, T (2014) The influence of plate size on meal composition. Literature review and experiment. Appetite 82, 9196.
19. Wansink, B, Painter, JE & Lee, YK (2006) The office candy dish: proximity’s influence on estimated and actual consumption. Int J Obesity (Lond) 30, 871875.
20. Bar-Hillel, M & Dayan, E (2011) Nudge to nobesity II: menu positions influence food orders. Judgm Decis Mak 6, 333342.
21. Sinclair, SE, Cooper, M & Mansfield, ED (2014) The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet 114, 13751388.
22. Campos, S, Doxey, J & Hammond, D (2011) Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 14, 14961506.
23. Hollands, GJ, Shemilt, I, Marteau, TM, et al. (2013) Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health 13, 1218.
24. Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6, e1000100.
25. Kahn, BE & Wansink, B (2004) The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. J Consum Res 30, 519533.
26. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (2012) Evidence Analysis Manual: Steps in the Academy Evidence Analysis Process. Chicago: Research and Strategic Business Development, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
27. Levitz, LS (1976) The susceptibility of human feeding behavior to external controls. In Obesity in Perspective, NIH publication no. 75–708, pp. 53–60 [G Bray, editor]. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
28. Musher-Eizenman, DR, Young, KM, Laurene, K, et al. (2010) Children’s sensitivity to external food cues: how distance to serving bowl influences children’s consumption. Health Educ Behav 37, 186192.
29. Engell, D, Kramer, M, Malafi, T, et al. (1996) Effects of effort and social modeling on drinking in humans. Appetite 26, 129138.
30. Wansink, B & Hanks, AS (2013) Slim by design: serving healthy foods first in buffet lines improves overall meal selection. PLOS ONE 8, e77055.
31. Meyers, AW, Stunkard, AJ & Coll, M (1980) Food accessibility and food choice. A test of Schachter’s externality hypothesis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37, 11331135.
32. van Kleef, E, Otten, K & van Trijp, HC (2012) Healthy snacks at the checkout counter: a lab and field study on the impact of shelf arrangement and assortment structure on consumer choices. BMC Public Health 12, 1072.
33. Levy, DE, Riis, J, Sonnenberg, LM, et al. (2012) Food choices of minority and low-income employees: a cafeteria intervention. Am J Prev Med 43, 240248.
34. Thorndike, AN, Sonnenberg, L, Riis, J, et al. (2012) A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. Am J Public Health 102, 527533.
35. Meiselman, HL, Hedderley, D, Staddon, SL, et al. (1994) Effect of effort on meal selection and meal acceptability in a student cafeteria. Appetite 23, 4355.
36. Schwarz, J, Riis, J, Eibel, B, et al. (2012) Inviting consumers to downsize fast-food portions significantly reduces calorie consumption. Health Aff 31, 399407.
37. Wansink, B & Hanks, AS (2014) Calorie reductions and within-meal calorie compensation in children’s meal combos. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22, 630632.
38. Maas, J, de Ridder, DT, de Vet, E, et al. (2012) Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption. Psychol Health 27, Suppl. 2, 5973.
39. Marteau, TM, Ogilvie, D, Roland, M, et al. (2011) Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health? BMJ 342, d228.
40. Strack, F & Deutsch, R (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8, 220247.
41. Ducrot, P, Julia, C, Méjean, C, et al. (2015) Impact of different front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer purchasing intentions: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med.
42. Blumenthal-Barby, JS & Burroughs, H (2012) Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the ’nudge’. Am J Bioeth 12, 110.
43. Gold, A & Lichtenberg, P (2012) Don’t call me ’nudge’: the ethical obligation to use effective interventions to promote public health. Am J Bioeth 12, 1820.
44. Huang, CJ & Baum, ML (2012) Nudge ethics: Just a game of billiards? Am J Bioeth 12, 2224.
45. Potts, M, Verheijde, JL & Rady, MY (2012) When a nudge becomes a shove. Am J Bioeth 12, 4042.
46. Hoefkens, C, Lachat, C, Kolsteren, P, et al. (2011) Posting point-of-purchase nutrition information in university canteens does not influence meal choice and nutrient intake. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 562570.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Bucher supplementary material
Table S1

 Word (28 KB)
28 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed