Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice

  • Tamara Bucher (a1) (a2), Clare Collins (a1) (a2), Megan E. Rollo (a1) (a2), Tracy A. McCaffrey (a3), Nienke De Vlieger (a1) (a2), Daphne Van der Bend (a1) (a2), Helen Truby (a3) and Federico J. A. Perez-Cueto (a4)...
Abstract
Abstract

Nudging or ‘choice architecture’ refers to strategic changes in the environment that are anticipated to alter people’s behaviour in a predictable way, without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives. Nudging strategies may be used to promote healthy eating behaviour. However, to date, the scientific evidence has not been systematically reviewed to enable practitioners and policymakers to implement, or argue for the implementation of, specific measures to support nudging strategies. This systematic review investigated the effect of positional changes of food placement on food choice. In total, seven scientific databases were searched using relevant keywords to identify interventions that manipulated food position (proximity or order) to generate a change in food selection, sales or consumption, among normal-weight or overweight individuals across any age group. From 2576 identified articles, fifteen articles comprising eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. This review has identified that manipulation of food product order or proximity can influence food choice. Such approaches offer promise in terms of impacting on consumer behaviour. However, there is a need for high-quality studies that quantify the magnitude of positional effects on food choice in conjunction with measuring the impact on food intake, particularly in the longer term. Future studies should use outcome measures such as change in grams of food consumed or energy intake to quantify the impact on dietary intake and potential impacts on nutrition-related health. Research is also needed to evaluate potential compensatory behaviours secondary to such interventions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: T. Bucher, email tamara.bucher@newcastle.edu.au
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. JO Hill , HR Wyatt , GW Reed , et al. (2003) Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science 299, 853855.

4. C Bamia , D Trichopoulos , P Ferrari , et al. (2007) Dietary patterns and survival of older Europeans: the EPIC-Elderly study (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition). Public Health Nutr 10, 590598.

7. EJ Johnson , SB Shu , GC Benedict , et al. (2012) Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Mark Lett 23, 487504.

9. SK Riebl , PA Estabrooks , JC Dunsmore , et al. (2015) A systematic literature review and meta-analysis: the theory of planned behavior’s application to understand and predict nutrition-related behaviors in youth. Eat Behav 18, 160178.

10. J Brambila-Macias , B Shankar , S Capacci , et al. (2011) Policy interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of what works, what does not, and what is promising. Food Nutr Bull 32, 365375.

11. S Capacci , M Mazzocchi , B Shankar , et al. (2012) Policies to promote healthy eating in Europe: a structured review of policies and their effectiveness. Nutr Rev 70, 188200.

17. LR Skov , S Lourenco , GL Hansen , et al. (2012) Choice architecture as a means to change eating behaviour in self-service settings: a systematic review. Obes Rev 14, 187196.

18. E Libotte , M Siegrist & T Bucher (2014) The influence of plate size on meal composition. Literature review and experiment. Appetite 82, 9196.

19. B Wansink , JE Painter & YK Lee (2006) The office candy dish: proximity’s influence on estimated and actual consumption. Int J Obesity (Lond) 30, 871875.

21. SE Sinclair , M Cooper & ED Mansfield (2014) The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet 114, 13751388.

23. GJ Hollands , I Shemilt , TM Marteau , et al. (2013) Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health 13, 1218.

25. BE Kahn & B Wansink (2004) The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. J Consum Res 30, 519533.

28. DR Musher-Eizenman , KM Young , K Laurene , et al. (2010) Children’s sensitivity to external food cues: how distance to serving bowl influences children’s consumption. Health Educ Behav 37, 186192.

29. D Engell , M Kramer , T Malafi , et al. (1996) Effects of effort and social modeling on drinking in humans. Appetite 26, 129138.

30. B Wansink & AS Hanks (2013) Slim by design: serving healthy foods first in buffet lines improves overall meal selection. PLOS ONE 8, e77055.

31. AW Meyers , AJ Stunkard & M Coll (1980) Food accessibility and food choice. A test of Schachter’s externality hypothesis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37, 11331135.

33. DE Levy , J Riis , LM Sonnenberg , et al. (2012) Food choices of minority and low-income employees: a cafeteria intervention. Am J Prev Med 43, 240248.

34. AN Thorndike , L Sonnenberg , J Riis , et al. (2012) A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. Am J Public Health 102, 527533.

35. HL Meiselman , D Hedderley , SL Staddon , et al. (1994) Effect of effort on meal selection and meal acceptability in a student cafeteria. Appetite 23, 4355.

36. J Schwarz , J Riis , B Eibel , et al. (2012) Inviting consumers to downsize fast-food portions significantly reduces calorie consumption. Health Aff 31, 399407.

37. B Wansink & AS Hanks (2014) Calorie reductions and within-meal calorie compensation in children’s meal combos. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22, 630632.

38. J Maas , DT de Ridder , E de Vet , et al. (2012) Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption. Psychol Health 27, Suppl. 2, 5973.

39. TM Marteau , D Ogilvie , M Roland , et al. (2011) Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health? BMJ 342, d228.

40. F Strack & R Deutsch (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8, 220247.

42. JS Blumenthal-Barby & H Burroughs (2012) Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the ’nudge’. Am J Bioeth 12, 110.

44. CJ Huang & ML Baum (2012) Nudge ethics: Just a game of billiards? Am J Bioeth 12, 2224.

45. M Potts , JL Verheijde & MY Rady (2012) When a nudge becomes a shove. Am J Bioeth 12, 4042.

46. C Hoefkens , C Lachat , P Kolsteren , et al. (2011) Posting point-of-purchase nutrition information in university canteens does not influence meal choice and nutrient intake. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 562570.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Bucher supplementary material
Table S1

 Word (28 KB)
28 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 110
Total number of PDF views: 1097 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2429 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.