Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-01T05:12:50.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passage through the rumen and the large intestine of sheep estimated from faecal marker excretion curves and slaughter trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. de Vega ,
J. Gasa ,
C. Castrillo  and
J. A. Guada
A. de Vega*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
J. Gasa
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
C. Castrillo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
J. A. Guada
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Dr A. de Vega, fax +34 76 76 15 90, email avega@posta.unizar.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

External digesta markers (Yb-labelled diets and Co-EDTA) were given orally as a pulse dose to four pairs of Rasa Aragonesa twin ewe lambs, fed on either chopped or ground and pelleted lucerne hay, in order to estimate slow (k1) and fast (k2) rates of passage of liquid and solid phase from faecal marker excretion curves. After the faecal sampling period daily doses of the same markers were infused continuously for 5 d and the animals slaughtered. Concentrations of markers in the different compartments of the gut were determined and used to calculate mean retention times. The results showed that the rumen and the large intestine were the two main mixing compartments of the gut, accounting for more than 95% of total mean retention time. Rates of passage estimated from faecal marker excretion did not accurately represent marker kinetics in the compartments of the gut derived from slaughter data. Accuracy in the estimation of fractional outflow rate from rumen (kR) by k1 was higher for low values of kR whereas k2consistently overestimated large intestine outflow rate (kLI), especially for high values of kR. The relationship between outflow rates from the main two mixing compartments was important in influencing the accuracy of prediction of faecal estimates.

Keywords

Rate of passageGastrointestinal tractSheep

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 80 , Issue 4 , October 1998 , pp. 381 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1998

References

Aharoni, Y, Brosh, A & Holzer, Z (1994) Double marker digestive tract model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 166, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1985) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 14th ed. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Blaxter, KL, Graham, NMcC & Wainman, FW (1956) Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep, and on related problems. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cafe, LM & Poppi, DP (1994) The fate and behaviour of imbibed water in the rumen of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruickshank, GJ, Poppi, DP & Sykes, AR (1989) Theoretical considerations in the estimation of rumen fractional outflow rate from various sampling sites in the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 62, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vega, A, Gasa, J, Castrillo, C & Guada, JA (1994 a) Ruminal and hindgut digesta kinetic parameters in sheep estimated from faecal marker excretion and slaughter trials. Annales de Zootechnie 43, Suppl. 1, 33S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vega, A, Gasa, J, Castrillo, C & Guada, JA (1994 b) A new approach to the interpretation of rumen and hindgut digesta outflow rate estimations from faecal marker excretion curves. Proceedings of the Society of Nutrition Physiology 3, 57.Google Scholar
Dhanoa, MS, Siddons, RC, France, J & Gale, DL (1985) A multi-compartmental model to describe marker excretion patterns in ruminant faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, RM, Nolan, JV & Milligan, LP (1982) Studies in the large intestine of sheep. 2. Kinetics of liquid and solid markers in the caecum and proximal colon. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, WC (1978) Determinants of grazed forage intake and digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science 61, 1828–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, WC, Matis, JH & Lascano, C (1979) Quantitating ruminal turnover. Federation Proceedings 38, 2702–2706.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, WC, Matis, JH, Pond, KR, Lascano, CE & Telford, JP (1984) Dietary influences on flow rate and digestive capacity. In Herbivore Nutrition in the Subtropics and Tropics, pp. 269–293 [Gilchrist, FMC and Mackie, RI, editors]. Craighall, South Africa: The Science Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
Evans, EW, Pearce, GR, Burnett, J & Pillinger, SL (1973) Changes in some physical characteristics of the digesta in the reticulorumen of cows fed once daily. British Journal of Nutrition 29, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faichney, GJ (1975) The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 277–291 [McDonald, IW and Warner, ACI, editors]. Armidale, Australia: The University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Faichney, GJ & Boston, RC (1983) Interpretation of the faecal excretion patterns of solute and particle markers introduced into the rumen of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasa, J, de Vega, A, Castrillo, C, Balcells, J & Guada, JA (1993) The behaviour of Co-EDTA and Yb-labelled hay in the gastrointestinal tract of the sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 52, 178A.Google Scholar
Gasa, J & Sutton, JD (1991) Empleo de marcadores en estudios de cinética de paso a través del tracto digestivo de vacas lecheras (The use of markers to study passage kinetics through the digestive tract of dairy cows). Investigación Agraria: Producción y Sanidad Animal 6, 39–50.Google Scholar
Goering, HK & Van Soest, PJ (1970) Forage Fiber Analysis. Agricultural Handbook no. 379. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.Google Scholar
Grovum, WL & Williams, VJ (1973) Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, PM (1984) Summary and conclusions from discussion. In Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants, pp. 184–186 [Kennedy, PM, editor]. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Society of Animal Science.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, RJ & Ørskov, ER (1980) Measurement and factors affecting outflow rates of protein supplements in sheep and cattle. Animal Production 30, 486–487.Google Scholar
Mira, JJF & MacRae, JC (1982) Comparison of rumen and faecal sampling procedures of calculating the retention time of digesta markers in the rumen of steers. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 77A.Google Scholar
Mudgal, VD, Dixon, RM, Kennedy, PM & Milligan, LP (1982) Effect of two intake levels on retention time of liquid, particle and microbial markers in the rumen of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 54, 1051–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, KR, Tolley, EA, Ellis, WC & Matis, JH (1984) A method for describing the weight distribution of particles from sieved forage. In Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants, pp. 123–133 [Kennedy, PM, editor]. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Society of Animal Science.Google Scholar
Ross, GJS (1987) MLP: Maximum Likelihood Program (A Manual). Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd.Google Scholar
Shaver, RD, Nytes, AJ, Satter, LD & Jorgensen, NA (1986) Influence of amount of feed intake and forage physical form on digestion and passage of prebloom alfalfa hay in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 1545–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, RGD & Torrie, JH (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Book Company Inc.Google Scholar
Udèn, P, Colucci, PE & Van Soest, PJ (1980) Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulyatt, MJ, Dellow, DW, John, A, Reid, CSW & Waghorn, GC (1986) Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the ruminoreticulum. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 498–515 [Milligan,, LP, Grovum, WL Dobson, A, editors]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Woodford, ST & Murphy, MR (1988) Effect of forage physical form on chewing activity, dry matter intake and rumen function of dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 674–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed