Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-7jw6s Total loading time: 0.61 Render date: 2022-12-03T08:10:20.797Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Plant microbiota: implications for human health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2015

Leena von Hertzen*
Affiliation:
Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Yrjönkatu 11 D 19, 00120 Helsinki, Finland Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, 00029 HUS Helsinki, Finland email leena.vonhertzen@kolumbus.fi
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015 

In their excellent review recently published in this journal, Minihane et al.( Reference Minihane, Vinoy and Russell 1 ) outline chronic inflammation as an ever-growing health problem globally and discuss how diet composition and early-life nutrition may be related to inflammatory status. Efforts to halt the rising trends in the prevalence of chronic inflammatory diseases have thus far been mostly ineffective, as the mechanisms underlying immune dysfunction and broken tolerance have been only partially understood( Reference Haahtela, Holgate and Pawankar 2 ).

Recent research has revealed a close interplay between the living environment, human indigenous microbiota and health( Reference Hanski, von Hertzen and Fyhrquist 3 ). Urbanisation has led to a sedentary lifestyle and to environments with little green space. The consequences of these changes, together with an energy-dense, nutrient-poor Western diet( Reference Minihane, Vinoy and Russell 1 ), have been unexpected and far-reaching. Alterations in the composition of the human indigenous microbiota, particularly its shrinking diversity, have consistently been linked to a number of chronic inflammatory diseases, including asthma and allergic diseases, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory bowel disease and even depression( Reference West, Renz and Jenmalm 4 , Reference Belkaid and Hand 5 ). Most of these data are obtained from the gut communities, but increasingly also from skin and respiratory tract microbiota. Environmental conditions may also have effects that extend beyond generations( Reference Burton and Metcalfe 6 ). Transfer of microbes or microbial components to the child by the mother begins as early as during pregnancy, suggesting that adequate microbial stimulation, not only postnatally but also prenatally, may be necessary for normal immune development( Reference West, Renz and Jenmalm 4 , Reference Rautava, Luoto and Salminen 7 ). Indeed, we are losing many ancient, vertically and environmentally derived species that have had a significant role in combating against inflammation and in fine-tuning immune responses( Reference von Hertzen, Beutler and Bienenstock 8 ).

By the year 2050, two-thirds of the world’s population is projected to be urban, and in developed countries the respective figure will be nearly 85 %( 9 ). A growing proportion of populations globally is thus less exposed to green, diverse environments but more to asphalt-covered, microbiologically poor environments with greatly reduced immunostimulatory capacity. Simple things, such as spending time in nature or consuming fermented food, may enrich the indigenous microbiota and endorse immune tolerance( Reference Haahtela, Holgate and Pawankar 2 ). Comparative studies of different populations have corroborated the significance of diet and the environment (microbial richness) in shaping the gut communities( Reference De Filippo, Cavalieri and Di Paola 10 Reference Martinez, Stegen and Maldonado-Gomez 12 ). Clearly, all that we eat, drink, touch and breathe is reflected in our indigenous microbiota( Reference von Hertzen, Beutler and Bienenstock 8 ).

Urban living is in this respect challenging: how can one acquire and maintain healthy skin and mucosal microbiota in environments covered with asphalt and concrete? Could the composition of the indigenous communities be modified towards more healthy and diverse ones and in this way decrease the risk of disease?

The many beneficial health effects of diets rich in fresh fruits, berries and vegetables, including Mediterranean and Baltic/New Nordic diets, are well established( Reference Minihane, Vinoy and Russell 1 ). One further beneficial but still unrecognised effect of fresh food may be the vast amount of (environmental) microbes on and within them. The fact that fruits, vegetables and berries (as well as leaves and other parts of plants) are densely covered with microbiota (ectophytes)( Reference Jackson, Randolph and Osborn 13 ) is not new, but the idea that these fresh products harbour a microbial world within (endophytes) has been only recently shown using non-culture techniques( Reference Leff and Fierer 14 ). Surprisingly, every plant studied has been found to harbour endophytic bacteria, the ‘plant microbiota’. Spoiled vegetables and contaminated berries have been reported as a source of food-borne infections, but hardly any attention has been devoted to the ‘friendly’ plant bacteria, which may play a pivotal role as an everyday source of microbial exposure, particularly in urban environments. The endophytic communities are diverse and abundant. For example, the number of bacteria within surface-sterilised salad leaves was up to 4·9×107 in a typical serving of 85 g salad. The total number of bacteria (endo- and ectophytes together) was about 100-fold more, 4·7×109 bacteria that are consumed in a salad serving( Reference Leff and Fierer 14 ).

Endophytic bacteria in plants are mainly found in intercellular spaces and vascular tissues and are assumed to originate from the leaf surface or from soil around the roots. Bacteria from the lineages of Proteobacteria, particularly Gammaproteobacteria, appeared to dominate in most cases( Reference Jackson, Randolph and Osborn 13 , Reference Leff and Fierer 14 ). Some members of Gammaproteobacteria, particularly, have shown significant anti-inflammatory properties( Reference Hanski, von Hertzen and Fyhrquist 3 ). Prolonged storage at +4°C decreases the diversity and richness of bacteria on the surfaces of the products. Whether storage reduces the number and diversity of endophytic bacteria is not known, although bacteria need not to be alive to exert their immunobiological properties( Reference Hessle, Andersson and Wold 15 ). Nonetheless, locally produced products with minimal storage time should be preferred. Fresh fruits, berries and vegetables are not only fibre and vitamin rich but may also be an important source of commensals necessary for our health.

To summarise, urbanisation has led to a sedentary lifestyle, deprivation of environmental microbes and shrunk diversity of our indigenous microbiota. Fresh fruits, berries and vegetables harbour significant amounts of environmental bacteria and could serve as an easily available daily source of these important bacteria with immunomodulatory potential. The beneficial effects of eating more ‘green’ are undisputable, but one more, thus far poorly recognised, health-promoting component in fruits, berries and vegetables may be their indigenous microbial content, the plant microbiota.

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Tari Haahtela is acknowledged for inspiring discussions.

The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

1. Minihane, AM, Vinoy, S, Russell, WR, et al. (2015) Low-grade inflammation, diet composition and health: current research evidence and its translation. Br J Nutr 114, 9991012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Haahtela, T, Holgate, S, Pawankar, R, et al. (2013) The biodiversity hypothesis and allergic disease: a statement paper of the World Allergy Organization. World Allergy Organ J 6, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hanski, IA, von Hertzen, L, Fyhrquist, N, et al. (2012) Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota and allergy are interrelated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 83348339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. West, CE, Renz, H, Jenmalm, MC, et al. (2015) The gut microbiota and inflammatory noncommunicable diseases: associations and potentials for gut microbiota therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 135, 313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Belkaid, Y & Hand, TW (2014) Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 157, 121141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Burton, T & Metcalfe, NB (2014) Can environmental conditions experienced in early life influence future generations? Proc Biol Sci 281, 20140311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Rautava, S, Luoto, R, Salminen, S, et al. (2012) Microbial contact during pregnancy, intestinal colonization and human disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9, 565576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. von Hertzen, L, Beutler, B, Bienenstock, J, et al. (2015) Helsinki alert of biodiversity and health. Ann Med 47, 218225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. United Nation (2015) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. Highlights. http://esa.un.org/unup/ (accessed May 2015).Google Scholar
10. De Filippo, C, Cavalieri, D, Di Paola, M, et al. (2010) Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 1469114696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Yatsunenko, T, Rey, FE & Manary, MJ (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222227.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Martinez, I, Stegen, JC, Maldonado-Gomez, MX, et al. (2015) The gut microbiota of rural Papua New Guineans: composition, diversity patterns, and ecological processes. Cell Rep 11, 527538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Jackson, CR, Randolph, KC, Osborn, SL, et al. (2013) Culture dependent and independent analysis of bacterial communities associated with commercial salad leafy vegetables. BMC Microbiol 13, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Leff, JW & Fierer, N (2013) Bacterial communities associated with the surfaces of fresh fruits and vegetables. PLOS ONE 8, e59310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Hessle, C, Andersson, B & Wold, AE (2000) Gram-positive bacteria are potent inducers of monocytic interleukin-12 (IL-12) while gram-negative bacteria preferentially stimulate IL-10 production. Infect Immun 68, 35813586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You have Access
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Plant microbiota: implications for human health
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Plant microbiota: implications for human health
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Plant microbiota: implications for human health
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *