Reducing food portion size could reduce energy intake. However it is unclear at what point consumers respond to reductions by increasing intake of other foods. We predicted that a change to a served portion size would only result in significant additional eating within the same meal if the resulting portion size was no longer visually perceived as ‘normal’. Participants in two crossover experiments (Study 1: N = 45; Study 2: N = 37; adults, 51% female) were served different sized lunchtime portions on three occasions that were perceived by a previous sample of participants as ‘large-normal’, ‘small-normal’, and ‘smaller than normal’ respectively. Participants were able to serve themselves additional helpings of the same food (Study 1), or dessert items (Study 2). In Study 1 there was a small but significant increase in additional intake when participants were served the ‘smaller than normal’ compared to the ‘small-normal’ portion, m difference = 39 kcal, p = .002, d = 0.35, but there was no significant difference between the ‘small-normal’ and ‘large-normal’ conditions, m difference = 20 kcal, p = .08, d = 0.24. A similar pattern was observed in Study 2: m difference = 36 kcal, p = .06, d = 0.18; m difference = 20 kcal, p = .26, d = 0.10. However, smaller portion sizes were each associated with a significant reduction in total meal intake. The findings provide preliminary evidence that reductions that result in portions appearing ‘normal’ in size may limit additional eating, but confirmatory research is needed. (250/250 words)
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed