Skip to main content
×
Home

Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005

  • Maeve A. Kerr (a1), Kirsten L. Rennie (a1), Tracy A. McCaffrey (a1), Julie M. W. Wallace (a1), Mary P. Hannon-Fletcher (a1) and M. Barbara E. Livingstone (a1)...
Abstract

Despite the potential link between snack food intake and obesity and the reportedly high prevalence of snacking among adolescents, adolescent snack food patterns (types of foods consumed, frequency and portion size) have not been extensively examined. This study examines these issues using data on the snacking patterns of adolescents aged 13–16 years who took part in the 1997 National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) and that from a Northern Irish (NI) cohort of adolescents collected 8 years later, in 2005. Overall energy intake was significantly higher in the NI adolescents in 2005 compared with the NDNS adolescents in 1997 (P < 0·01). Consequently, energy intake from snacks was significantly higher in the NI cohort (P < 0·01) and a trend for a higher % energy intake from snacks compared with the NDNS group was observed (median 32·5 % v. 29·8 %, respectively). Sugar-sweetened carbonated and soft drinks remained the most popular choice of snack over this 8-year period; however, both the portion size consumed and frequency of consumption were significantly higher among the adolescents in 2005 compared with those in 1997 (P = 0·022 and P = 0·014, respectively). Despite the lower popularity, and correspondingly lower frequency of milks and beverages, the portion size of both food groups was significantly higher among the adolescents in 2005 compared with those in 1997 (P < 0·001 and P = 0·007, respectively). These findings may provide scope for policy interventions to place particular emphasis on reducing typical portion sizes consumed of popular snack choices, in particular high-energy carbonated and soft drinks, among UK adolescents.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Professor M. B. E. Livingstone, fax +44 28 703 23023, email mbe.livingstone@ulster.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1McPherson K, Marsh T & Brown M (2007) Modelling future trends in obesity and the impact on health. Foresight tackling obesities: Future choices. http://www.foreslight.gov.uk.
2Jebb SA, Rennie KL & Cole TJ (2004) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among young people in Great Britain. Public Health Nutr 7, 461465.
3Zizza C, Siega-Riz AM & Popkin BM (2001) Significant increase in young adults' snacking between 1977–1978 and 1994–1996 represents a cause for concern! Prev Med 32, 303310.
4de Graaf C (2006) Effects of snacks on energy intake: an evolutionary perspective. Appetite 47, 1823.
5Jahns L, Siega-Riz AM & Popkin BM (2001) The increasing prevalence of snacking among US children from 1977 to 1996. J Pediatr 138, 493498.
6Sebastian R, Cleveland L, Goldmad J & Moshfegh A (2007) Snacking behaviour of children and teenagers in the United States. FASEB 20, A189A190.
7Nielsen SJ & Popkin BM (2003) Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977–1998. JAMA 289, 450453.
8Ovaskainen ML, Reinivuo H, Tapanainen H, Hannila ML, Korhonen T & Pakkala H (2006) Snacks as an element of energy intake and food consumption. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 494501.
9Summerbell CD, Moody RC, Shanks J, Stock MJ & Geissler C (1995) Sources of energy from meals versus snacks in 220 people in four age groups. Eur J Clin Nutr 49, 3341.
10Gregory J & Lowe S (2000) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4 to 18 Years, Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey, vol. 1. London: Stationery Office.
11McGloin AF, Livingstone MB, Greene LC, et al. (2002) Energy and fat intake in obese and lean children at varying risk of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26, 200207.
12Bates CJ, Prentice AM, Jackson LV, Smithers G, Wenlock R & Farron M (2002), Appendix C. Feasibility Study Report. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4–18 Years, Volume 1: Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: Social Survey Division of the Office of National Statistics.
13Food Standards Agency (2002) McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, Sixth summary edition. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
14Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM & Dietz WH (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. Br Med J 320, 12401243.
15Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2002) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
16Rennie KL, Coward A & Jebb SA (2007) Estimating under-reporting of energy intake in dietary surveys using an individualised method. Br J Nutr 97, 11691176.
17Rennie KL, Jebb SA, Wright A & Coward WA (2005) Under-reporting of energy intake in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of young people. Br J Nutr 93, 241247.
18Black AE & Cole TJ (2000) Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 386394.
19Nielsen SJ, Siega-Riz AM & Popkin BM (2002) Trends in food locations and sources among adolescents and young adults. Prev Med 35, 107113.
20Berkey CS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Gillman MW & Colditz GA (2004) Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obes Res 12, 778788.
21Malik VS, Schulze MB & Hu FB (2006) Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 274288.
22DiMeglio DP & Mattes RD (2000) Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 794800.
23Raben A, Vasilaras TH, Moller AC & Astrup A (2002) Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 721729.
24Gibson S & Neate D (2007) Sugar intake, soft drink consumption and body weight among British children: further analysis of National Diet and Nutrition Survey data with adjustment for under-reporting and physical activity. Int J Food Sci Nutr 58, 445460.
25Livingstone MB & Black AE (2003) Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr 133, Suppl. 3, 895S920S.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 46
Total number of PDF views: 275 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 405 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.