Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:51:10.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soya products and serum lipids: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2015

Oluwabunmi A. Tokede*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Temilola A. Onabanjo
Affiliation:
Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
Alfa Yansane
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
J. Michael Gaziano
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center and Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Boston Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA
Luc Djoussé
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology and Research Information Center and Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Boston Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA
*
*Corresponding author: O. A. Tokede, fax +617 525 7739, email oluwabunmi_tokede@hms.harvard.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soya proteins and isoflavones have been reported to exert beneficial effects on the serum lipid profile. More recently, this claim is being challenged. The objective of this study was to comprehensively examine the effects of soya consumption on the lipid profile using published trials. A detailed literature search was conducted via MEDLINE (from 2004 through February 2014), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register) and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of soya on the lipid profile. The primary effect measure was the difference in means of the final measurements between the intervention and control groups. In all, thirty-five studies (fifty comparisons) were included in our analyses. Treatment duration ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year. Intake of soya products resulted in a significant reduction in serum LDL-cholesterol concentration, –4·83 (95 % CI –7·34, –2·31) mg/dl, TAG, –4·92 (95 % CI –7·79, –2·04) mg/dl, and total cholesterol (TC) concentrations, –5·33 (95 % CI –8·35, –2·30) mg/dl. There was also a significant increase in serum HDL-cholesterol concentration, 1·40 (95 % CI 0·58, 2·23) mg/dl. The I2 statistic ranged from 92 to 99 %, indicating significant heterogeneity. LDL reductions were more marked in hypercholesterolaemic patients, –7·47 (95 % CI –11·79, –3·16) mg/dl, than in healthy subjects, –2·96 (95 % CI –5·28, –0·65) mg/dl. LDL reduction was stronger when whole soya products (soya milk, soyabeans and nuts) were used as the test regimen, –11·06 (95 % CI –15·74, –6·37) mg/dl, as opposed to when ‘processed’ soya extracts, –3·17 (95 % CI –5·75, –0·58) mg/dl, were used. These data are consistent with the beneficial effects of soya proteins on serum LDL, HDL, TAG and TC concentrations. The effect was stronger in hypercholesterolaemic subjects. Whole soya foods appeared to be more beneficial than soya supplementation, whereas isoflavone supplementation had no effects on the lipid profile.

Type
Systematic Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Dyslipidaemia is a primary risk factor for CVD, peripheral vascular disease and stroke. The WHO estimates that over 60 % of CHD and 40 % of ischaemic stroke in developed countries are due to total blood cholesterol levels in excess of the theoretical minimum of 3·8 mmol/l( 1 ). Reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol by about 5–6 %( Reference Sirtori, Anderson and Arnoldi 2 ) has the potential to reduce CHD risk by 7–12 %( Reference Katan, Grundy and Jones 3 ), whereas a 3 % increase in HDL-cholesterol has the potential to lower the risk by 6–9 %( Reference Anderson and Konz 4 , Reference Ashen and Blumenthal 5 ). Fasting serum TAG elevations also increase the risk for CHD( Reference Ginsberg 6 ). The aggregate changes in these three lipoprotein risk factors can, therefore, potentially reduce CHD risk by 12–20 %( Reference Anderson and Bush 7 ). As a result, cholesterol is by far the most studied risk factor for CHD risk( Reference Sacks, Lichtenstein and Van Horn 8 ).

Although what constitutes an optimal dietary regimen remains a matter of controversy, current guidelines recommend diet as a first-line therapy for patients with elevated blood cholesterol concentrations( Reference Ferdowsian and Barnard 9 ). Among the foods being suggested to lower blood lipids are soya products. A meta-analysis published in 1995 concluded that soya protein intake is effective in reducing total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol and TAG and in increasing HDL-cholesterol( Reference Anderson, Johnstone and Cook-Newell 10 ). Following this, in October 1999, the US Food and Drug Administration approved labelling of foods containing soya protein as protective against CHD( 11 ); the American Heart Association released a similar advisory shortly thereafter( Reference Erdman 12 ). The UK Joint Health Claims Initiative also permitted that ‘the inclusion of at least 25 g of soya protein/ d as part of a diet low in saturated fat can help reduce blood cholesterol’. Similar claims were also made in South Africa, the Philippines, Brazil and Indonesia( Reference Xiao 13 ). All these presuppose that the hypolipidaemic effects of soya are due to its soya protein content. Soya products in addition, however, contain isoflavones, which have also been subjects of considerable scientific enquiry. Reports of trials investigating the effect of soya isoflavones on blood lipids have not been consistent( Reference Zhan and Ho 14 ).

Over a 100 randomised controlled trials (RCT) and ten meta-analyses have already been published, which have examined the effects of soya protein and/or isoflavones on lipids. Most of these studies report varying effects of soya proteins and/or soya isoflavones on blood cholesterol. Perhaps the only consensus on the subject is that consumption of soya products may have a more marked hypolipidaemic effect in hypercholesterolaemic individuals than in normocholesterolaemic subjects. Although the ten previously completed meta-analyses have reported beneficial effects of soya protein and/or isoflavone on serum lipids, this favourable effect is being challenged, and a reason may be because some recently completed trials do not report an effect of soya protein on serum lipids. In 2012, the European Food Safety Authority concluded that ‘a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of isolated soya protein and a reduction in blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations’( 15 ). The last published meta-analysis involved studies completed between 1996 and 2008, and examined mainly the effects of soya proteins on LDL-cholesterol( Reference Anderson and Bush 7 ).

In the past 6 years, nine additional clinical trials (involving twelve comparisons and 668 people) on the effects of soya products on lipids have been completed. Based on the availability of more recent high-quality trials, the objective of this review was to re-examine the conclusion that soya protein has proven beneficial effects on blood cholesterol. We also assessed the effects of isoflavones and the combined effect of soya protein and isoflavones on blood cholesterol levels. Specifically, we sought to answer the following question: Does habitual consumption of soya products have a beneficial effect on blood cholesterol level, and if it does what are the predictors of this effect?

Methods

Search strategy and study selection

On 3 March 2014, we searched MEDLINE (through February 2014), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register) and the ClinicalTrials.gov website to identify RCT examining the effect of soya products on blood lipid profile. For the MEDLINE search, we used MeSH (major subject heading) terms (‘soybeans’ OR ‘soybean oil’ OR ‘soybean proteins’ OR ‘soy isoflavones’ OR ‘soy milk’) AND (‘Cholesterol, HDL’ OR ‘Cholesterol, LDL’ OR ‘Triglycerides’). The search was limited to the criteria ‘clinical trials’, ‘English’, ‘human’ and ‘last 10 years’. We limited to the last 10 years because the last published meta-analyses on this subject was completed in 2008. CENTRAL and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were searched using ‘soy’ or ‘soybeans’ as free terms without further restrictions applied to the search. Inspection of the reference list of all identified articles was also conducted. The latter method was repeated until all potentially relevant articles from these sources were identified. Retrieved studies were included if they met the following criteria: (a) were investigating dietary soya products; (b) had a randomised controlled parallel-arm or cross-over design; (c) included subjects aged 18 years and above; (d) reported ‘end of intervention’ mean and standard deviation values of lipid measurements for the active (intervention) and control groups; and (e) provided the intake amount of soya products. We a priori determined that unpublished materials and conference abstracts will be excluded from the review. One-day trials were also excluded because we wanted to report the effects of habitual intake of soya products. Care was taken not to include data from multiple publications of the same population. Furthermore, we excluded studies in which soya intake was mixed with other dietary treatments.

In a sub-study, we searched MEDLINE (through March 2014), CENTRAL and the ClinicalTrials.gov website to identify RCT examining the effect of soya isoflavone supplementation on blood lipid profile. We used the MeSH terms (‘soy isoflavone’ OR ‘daidzein’ OR ‘genistein’ OR ‘glycitein’) AND (‘Cholesterol, HDL’ OR ‘Cholesterol, LDL’ OR ‘Triglycerides’). The search was limited to the criteria ‘clinical trials’, ‘English’ and ‘human’.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Data were extracted by the lead author and subsequently reviewed by one of the co-authors for accuracy. Extracted data included the study characteristics (first author’s name; year of publication; number and age of participants; study design; daily amount of soya product consumed in the active arm; duration of the study; health characteristics of the study population; and location of the study). We also extracted information on the final concentrations of plasma/serum TC, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and TAG in both treatment arms. When the requisite data were not available in the published paper, authors were emailed requesting the appropriate information. All the authors agreed on the eligibility criteria of the included studies. Quality of the studies was evaluated using the validated Jadad score instrument( Reference Jadad, Moore and Carroll 16 ) with criteria that included the following: randomisation, adequacy of sequence generation, double blinding and description of drop-outs. The maximum score obtainable was 5.

Data synthesis and statistical analysis

The effect size used in this investigation was the ‘difference in means’ between the two treatment groups. We utilised plasma/serum cholesterol concentrations obtained at the end of each intervention. Ideally, serum cholesterol concentrations are approximately 3 % higher than the corresponding plasma concentrations( 17 ), but because we were interested in mean differences within each study we analysed plasma and serum concentrations without adjustment for this difference. Studies that reported results in mmol/l were converted to mg/dl using the standard conversion factors (which was a division of the mmol/l value by 0·02586 for TC, LDL and HDL and by 0·01129 for TAG). Estimates of treatment effect on cholesterol in sub-groups defined according to study design features were also carried out. Additional analyses were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ( Reference Higgins and Green 18 ). Heterogeneity across studies was assessed by the Cochran’s Q test, and P<0·10 was considered statistically significant for heterogeneity. The magnitude of heterogeneity was evaluated by the I 2 statistic (percentage of the variability in effect estimates that is due to heterogeneity rather than sampling error). Whenever the test for heterogeneity was statistically significant, the estimate of the difference was calculated using the random effects model, according to DerSimonian & Laird( Reference DerSimonian and Laird 19 ). For the computation of pooled effects, each study was assigned a weight consisting of the reciprocal of its variance. Furthermore, we performed a meta-regression to investigate whether there were any strong predictors of serum lipid changes. The included covariate variables were as follows: (1) initial lipid concentration; (2) duration of intake of soya products (weeks); (3) dose of soya protein consumed measured in grams per day; and (4) study quality (Jadad score). Each coefficient for the meta-regression analysis was estimated using restricted maximum likelihood and the corresponding variances were calculated using the ‘Knapp–Hartung’ variance estimator. Each meta-regression F test was conducted at the significance level of α=0·05, and all meta-regression analyses were performed using Stata/IC 13.1.

Data synthesis and other analyses were completed using Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager 5( 20 ) and Microsoft Office Excel 2010 package (Microsoft Corporation).

Results

A total of sixty-two articles met our inclusion criteria and their complete texts were downloaded and fully reviewed. A flow chart depicting the selection process is depicted in Fig. 1. Two studies were excluded because there was an inappropriate control group( Reference Engelman, Alekel and Hanson 21 , Reference Ahn-Jarvis, Clinton and Riedl 22 ); three because they were 1-d trials( Reference Campbell, Brown and Dufner 23 Reference Hanwell, Kay and Lampe 25 ); five exclusions were due to the administration of a mixed test regimen( Reference Matthan, Welty and Barrett 26 Reference Rideout, Chan and Harding 30 ); and three studies were excluded due to lack of random assignment of the study groups( Reference Jenkins, Kendall and Nguyen 31 Reference Lobato, Iakmiu Camargo Pereira and Lazaretti 33 ). Other studies were excluded for varying reasons (shown in Fig. 1). In all, thirty-five studies with fifty comparisons were included from our final analyses. Values used for the included studies represent the lipid measurements that correspond to the longest follow-up point. The observed I 2 statistic (percentage of the variability in effect estimates that is due to heterogeneity rather than sampling error) ranged from 92 to 99 %.

Fig. 1. Study selection process.

In the sub-study examining the effect of soya isoflavone supplementation on blood lipids, our search produced thirty-two results, including four of the studies already included in our primary study. After exclusion of the twenty-one ineligible studies, we had eleven studies( Reference Hodgson, Puddey and Beilin 34 Reference Qin, Shu and Zeng 44 ) with fifteen comparison groups.

Study and participant characteristics

The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1. Duration of the studies ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with many lasting about 8 weeks. Most RCT were double-blind, described an adequate method of sequence generation and reported details of drop-outs and withdrawals. Overall, twenty-four of the thirty-five studies obtained a Jadad score of ≥3 (high quality).

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

A total of 2670 subjects (aged 28–83 years and 82 % women) were included in the primary analyses. The average intake of soya protein was 30 g/d (range: 14–50 g/d).

Effects of soya on lipid concentration

Intake of soya products resulted in a significant reduction in serum LDL-cholesterol concentration, –4·83 (95 % CI –7·34, –2·31) mg/dl (Fig. 2). The effect quality test (Cochran’s Q) did show significant heterogeneity, and thus the random effects model was used. We also observed statistically significant reduction in serum TAG, –4·92 (95 % CI –7·79, –2·04) mg/dl (Fig. 3), and TC concentrations, –5·33 (95 % CI –8·35, –2·30) mg/dl (Fig. 4). There was also a modest, but highly significant increase in serum HDL-cholesterol concentration, 1·40 (95 % CI 0·58, 2·23) mg/dl (Fig. 5).

Fig. 2. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on LDL-cholesterol. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

Fig. 3. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on serum TAG. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

Fig. 4. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on total cholesterol. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

Fig. 5. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on HDL-cholesterol. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

For the sub-study in which only isoflavone supplementation was administered as the test regimen, all the results (LDL, HDL, TAG and TC) were non-significant.

Sub-group analyses

LDL reductions also appeared to be more marked in hypercholesterolaemic patients, –7·47 (95 % CI –11·79, –3·16) mg/dl, than in healthy subjects, –2·96 (95 % CI –5·28, –0·65) mg/dl. When natural soya products (soya milk, whole soyabeans and soya nuts) were used as the test regimen, we observed a substantial reduction in serum LDL levels, –11·06 (95 % CI –15·74, –6·37) mg/dl, as opposed to when ‘processed’ soya (soya extracts, supplements), –3·17 (95 % CI –5·75, –0·58) mg/dl, was used. Intervention with soya protein alone seemed to exert a more positive effect on LDL and TC levels than intervention combining soya protein and isoflavone (Table 2). Studies adjudged to be of higher quality provided more precise estimates. Details of further analyses in sub-groups of studies defined by these study/participant characteristics are shown in Table 2. Sensitivity analyses conducted by excluding studies that used no control group( Reference Bakhtiary, Yassin and Hanachi 45 ), used soya spread as the test diet( Reference Clifton, Mano and Duchateau 46 ) or that did not have any washout period( Reference Meyer, Larkin and Owen 47 ) did not affect the results.

Table 2 Effects of soya proteins on serum lipids by study design, duration, location, health status and quality of study (Mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals)

* Significant results.

Isoflavone sub-study

The results of the sub-study that focused on the effect of isoflavone supplementation on LDL, HDL, TAG and TC were non-significant (Table 3). Sub-group analyses was also completed for each of these indices using design (cross-over v. parallel-arm), duration (≤12 v. >12 weeks) and health status (Table 3).

Table 3 Effects of soya isoflavone on serum lipids (Mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals)

* Significant results.

Predictors of the effect of soya on blood lipids

The meta-regression analysis suggested that initial serum LDL, TAG and TC concentrations are strong predictors of the effect of soya on serum LDL, TAG and TC concentrations, respectively (Table 4; Fig. 68). Initial HDL concentration did not predict the effect of soya on blood HDL levels. Dose of soya protein, the duration of its consumption and the study quality (Jadad score) also did not predict the effect of soya on blood lipid levels (Table 4).

Fig. 6. Meta-regression plot of the effect of initial LDL concentration on soya’s effect on LDL-cholesterol. Values are in mg/dl.

Fig. 7. Meta-regression plot of the effect of initial TAG concentration on soya’s effect on blood TAG level. Values are in mg/dl.

Fig. 8. Meta-regression plot of the effect of initial total concentration (TC) concentration on soya’s effect on blood TC level. Values are in mg/dl.

Table 4 Meta-regression – predictors of the effects of soya on serum lipids (Coefficients and their standard errors)

*Significant results.

Discussion

Based on baseline lipid concentrations in the study population, our results show a significant 3 % reduction in serum LDL, 4 % reduction in serum TAG and a 2 % reduction in TC concentrations after an intervention with soya products for a period ranging from 4 to 52 weeks. We also observed a significant 3 % increase in serum HDL concentrations. This beneficial effect seemed stronger in individuals with a higher risk of CHD (hypercholesterolaemic, obese and diabetic subjects). It also appears that consumption of natural soya products is more effective in lowering serum cholesterol than intake of processed soya (e.g. soya protein extract preparations or supplements). LDL reduction was significant in the shorter-duration studies (4–8 weeks), whereas TAG reduction was only significant in the longer-lasting studies (10–52 weeks). Isoflavone supplementation only (i.e. without soya proteins) did not appear to significantly influence the serum lipid profile.

Various mechanisms have been suggested by which soya proteins may exert their lipid-lowering effects. Some have proposed the activation of LDL receptors by essential amino acids from soya protein( Reference Gianazza, Lovati and Manzoni 48 ); others have discussed the possibility of a soya protein-based inhibition of endogenous cholesterol synthesis( Reference Tham, Gardner and Haskell 49 ). Water-soluble fibre and other components of soya may also reduce serum lipid levels( Reference Erdman 12 ). Finally, it has been hypothesised that the substitution of soya for animal protein can result in lower saturated fat and cholesterol intakes, thereby indirectly resulting in a more favourable blood cholesterol levels( Reference Lichtenstein 50 ).

As casein has been reported to raise cholesterol levels, the relative increase in cholesterol concentration in the control group may be attributable to the casein content of the milk protein diet fed to the controls; however, when our analysis was restricted to the twenty-two comparisons where non-milk/non-casein-based diets were used as the control diet, the beneficial effect of the soya intervention on serum lipid was even more profound. Change in serum concentration was –6·37 (95 % CI –10·52, –2·22) mg/dl, –9·39 (95 % CI –12·88, –5·90) mg/dl and –9·69 (95 % CI –13·35, –6·04) mg/dl for LDL, TAG and TC, respectively.

Previous meta-analyses have reported on the hypolipidaemic effects of soya proteins( Reference Anderson and Bush 7 , Reference Reynolds, Chin and Lees 51 , Reference Harland and Haffner 52 ), soya isoflavones( Reference Taku, Umegaki and Sato 53 ) and soya proteins in combination with soya isoflavones( Reference Zhan and Ho 14 ). Our results are consistent with analyses that report the cholesterol-lowering effects of soya protein. We, however, observed no effect of soya isoflavones on serum cholesterol levels and a reduced LDL-lowering effect in studies that administered soya proteins in combination with isoflavones (compared with studies that administered soya proteins alone). Soya protein plus isoflavone test diets, however, had a more positive effect on serum TAG concentrations.

Mean daily intake of soya protein is about 30 g in Japan, 20 g in Korea, 8 g in China and <1 g in the USA( Reference Ho, Woo and Leung 54 , Reference Nagata 55 ). The mean daily intake by participants in our analyses was 29·8 g (range: 14–50 g). This potentially means that the cholesterol-reducing effects of soya protein may not be realised by most soya consumers. It is important to note, however, that a dose–response effect of soya protein on cholesterol reduction was not observed in our analyses and is yet to be established.

As soyabeans are grown around the world under many different climatic conditions, there is a wide range of soyabean varieties. Unlike in Europe, GM soyabeans have become the predominant type grown in the Americas. When our results were stratified by study location, the studies completed in Europe, Asia and Australia showed highly significant positive effects. Conversely, the studies completed in North/South America (where >85 % of soyabean produced is GM) showed non-significant results, except for a mild elevation of serum HDL.

In an earlier study, we observed varying effects of flavanols on serum lipids, depending on the matrix with which the flavanols were administered( Reference Tokede, Gaziano and Djoussé 56 ). Consequently, in this analysis, we compared studies that used natural soya products (roasted soyabeans, soya nuts, etc.) with those that used soya extracts or tablets as the test regimen (Table 2). The LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect appeared to be three times stronger when natural soya products were used. A potential explanation may be the differing levels of bioavailability of the active ingredients.

Soya isoflavones have a biological similarity to mammalian oestrogens, which have been shown to exert cholesterol-lowering effects in humans( Reference Rossouw 57 ). Our soya isoflavone sub-study revealed no effects of isoflavone supplementation on serum lipids. In their meta-analysis, Weggemans & Trautwein( Reference Weggemans and Trautwein 58 ) also reported a lack of efficacy of soya isoflavones on changes in LDL or HDL-cholesterol. In contrast, another study has reported positive effects of isoflavone supplementation on cholesterol and endothelial function( Reference Colacurci, Chiantera and Fornaro 39 ). The varying conclusions on the effect of isoflavones may be in part due to the process by which the isoflavones were extracted( Reference Clarkson and Anthony 59 ). Mean isoflavone consumption is 11–47 mg/d in Asian countries and 1–2 mg/d in Western countries( Reference Arai, Watanabe and Kimira 60 , Reference de Kleijn, van der Schouw and Wilson 61 ), but the mean daily isoflavone consumption in the included studies was 76 mg.

Although we observed a high level of heterogeneity, we are still confident in the conclusions of these analyses, as our observations are consistent with many of the other previously published reports.

In conclusion, our findings showed that an intervention with soya proteins increases serum HDL concentration and lowers serum TAG, LDL and TC concentrations. No effect of isoflavones was observed on serum lipids, and natural soya products appear to have a stronger hypolipidaemic effect on serum cholesterol than soya supplements. Finally, initial LDL, TAG and TC concentrations seem to be strong predictors of the effect of soya on blood lipid levels.

Acknowledgements

During the last 3 years, O. A. T. reports that he has received an investigator-initiated grant from the National Institutes of Health; L. D. reports that he has received investigator-initiated grants from the National Institutes of Health, GlaxoSmithKline, Amarin Pharma Inc., California Walnut Commission and Merck, and has received travel re-imbursement from the International Nut & Dried Fruit Council Inc.; J. M. G. reports that he has received investigator-initiated grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Veterans Administration, Amgen and pills and packaging from Pfizer for a research study, and has served as a consultant to Bayer.

L. D. and O. A. T. conceived the study and are responsible for data integrity and accuracy of data analyses. O. A. T. and T. A. O. drafted the manuscript, and along with L. D. have the primary responsibility for final content. O. A. T., A. Y. and T. A. O. completed the statistical analyses; J. M. G. reviewed the manuscript for its scientific content. All the authors have read and approved this final draft.

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

1. World Health Organization (2002) The World Health Report 2002; Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
2. Sirtori, CR, Anderson, JW & Arnoldi, A (2007) Nutritional and nutraceutical considerations for dyslipidemia. Future Med 2, 313339.Google Scholar
3. Katan, MB, Grundy, SM, Jones, P, et al. (2003) Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels. Mayo Clin Proc 78, 965978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Anderson, JW & Konz, EC (2001) Obesity and disease management: effects of weight loss on comorbid conditions. Obes Res 9, 326S334S.Google Scholar
5. Ashen, MD & Blumenthal, RS (2005) Low HDL cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 353, 12521260.Google Scholar
6. Ginsberg, HN (1997) Is hypertriglyceridemia a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease? A simple question with a complicated answer. Ann Intern Med 126, 912914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Anderson, JW & Bush, HM (2011) Soy protein effects on serum lipoproteins: a quality assessment and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled studies. J Am Coll Nutr 30, 7991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Sacks, FM, Lichtenstein, A, Van Horn, L, et al. (2006) Soy protein, isoflavones, and cardiovascular health: an American Heart Association Science Advisory for professionals from the Nutrition Committee. Circulation 113, 10341044.Google Scholar
9. Ferdowsian, HR & Barnard, ND (2009) Effects of plant-based diets on plasma lipids. Am J Cardiol 104, 947956.Google Scholar
10. Anderson, JW, Johnstone, BM & Cook-Newell, ME (1995) Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. N Engl J Med 333, 276282.Google Scholar
11. Food & Administration D (1999) Food labeling health claims; soy protein and coronary heart disease. Fed Regist 64, 5769957733.Google Scholar
12. Erdman, JW (2000) Soy protein and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the AHA. Circulation 102, 25552559.Google Scholar
13. Xiao, CW (2008) Health effects of soy protein and isoflavones in humans. J Nutr 138, 1244S1249S.Google Scholar
14. Zhan, S & Ho, SC (2005) Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein containing isoflavones on the lipid profile. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 397408.Google Scholar
15. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies (2012) Scientific opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to isolated soy protein and reduction of blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal 10, 2555.Google Scholar
16. Jadad, AR, Moore, RA, Carroll, D, et al. (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17, 112.Google Scholar
17. Lipid Research Clinics Laboratory Methods Committee (1977) Cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations in serum/plasma pairs. Clin Chem 23, 6063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Higgins, J & Green, S (2010) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0. 2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
19. DerSimonian, R & Laird, N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7, 177188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Collaboration RTC (2008) Review Manager (RevMan). 5.0. Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.Google Scholar
21. Engelman, HM, Alekel, DL, Hanson, LN, et al. (2005) Blood lipid and oxidative stress responses to soy protein with isoflavones and phytic acid in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 590596.Google Scholar
22. Ahn-Jarvis, J, Clinton, SK, Riedl, KM, et al. (2012) Impact of food matrix on isoflavone metabolism and cardiovascular biomarkers in adults with hypercholesterolemia. Food Funct 3, 10511058.Google Scholar
23. Campbell, CG, Brown, BD, Dufner, D, et al. (2006) Effects of soy or milk protein during a high-fat feeding challenge on oxidative stress, inflammation, and lipids in healthy men. Lipids 41, 257265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Hall, WL, Formanuik, NL, Harnpanich, D, et al. (2008) A meal enriched with soy isoflavones increases nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in healthy postmenopausal women. J Nutr 138, 12881292.Google Scholar
25. Hanwell, HE, Kay, CD, Lampe, JW, et al. (2009) Acute fish oil and soy isoflavone supplementation increase postprandial serum (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids and isoflavones but do not affect triacylglycerols or biomarkers of oxidative stress in overweight and obese hypertriglyceridemic men. J Nutr 139, 11281134.Google Scholar
26. Matthan, NR, Welty, FK, Barrett, PHR, et al. (2004) Dietary hydrogenated fat increases high-density lipoprotein apoA-I catabolism and decreases low-density lipoprotein apoB-100 catabolism in hypercholesterolemic women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24, 10921097.Google Scholar
27. Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Marchie, A, et al. (2005) Direct comparison of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods with a statin in hypercholesterolemic participants. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 380387.Google Scholar
28. Verhoeven, MO, Teerlink, T, Kenemans, P, et al. (2007) Effects of a supplement containing isoflavones and Actaea racemosa L. on asymmetric dimethylarginine, lipids, and C-reactive protein in menopausal women. Fertil Steril 87, 849857.Google Scholar
29. Weidner, C, Krempf, M, Bard, JM, et al. (2008) Cholesterol lowering effect of a soy drink enriched with plant sterols in a French population with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Lipids Health Dis 7, 3542.Google Scholar
30. Rideout, TC, Chan, Y-M, Harding, SV, et al. (2009) Low and moderate-fat plant sterol fortified soymilk in modulation of plasma lipids and cholesterol kinetics in subjects with normal to high cholesterol concentrations: report on two randomized crossover studies. Lipids Health Dis 8, 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, Nguyen, TH, et al. (2008) Effect of plant sterols in combination with other cholesterol-lowering foods. Metabolism 57, 130139.Google Scholar
32. Torres, N, Guevara-Cruz, M, Granados, J, et al. (2009) Reduction of serum lipids by soy protein and soluble fiber is not associated with the ABCG5/G8, apolipoprotein E, and apolipoprotein A1 polymorphisms in a group of hyperlipidemic Mexican subjects. Nutr Res 29, 728735.Google Scholar
33. Lobato, LP, Iakmiu Camargo Pereira, AE, Lazaretti, MM, et al. (2012) Snack bars with high soy protein and isoflavone content for use in diets to control dyslipidaemia. Int J Food Sci Nutr 63, 4958.Google Scholar
34. Hodgson, JM, Puddey, IB, Beilin, LJ, et al. (1998) Supplementation with isoflavonoid phytoestrogens does not alter serum lipid concentrations: a randomized controlled trial in humans. J Nutr 128, 728732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Merz-Demlow, BE, Duncan, AM, Wangen, KE, et al. (2000) Soy isoflavones improve plasma lipids in normocholesterolemic, premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 14621469.Google Scholar
36. Wangen, KE, Duncan, AM, Xu, X, et al. (2001) Soy isoflavones improve plasma lipids in normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 73, 225231.Google Scholar
37. Uesugi, T, Fukui, Y & Yamori, Y (2002) Beneficial effects of soybean isoflavone supplementation on bone metabolism and serum lipids in postmenopausal Japanese women: a four-week study. J Am Coll Nutr 21, 97102.Google Scholar
38. Cheng, SY, Shaw, NS, Tsai, KS, et al. (2004) The hypoglycemic effects of soy isoflavones on postmenopausal women. J Womens Health 13, 10801086.Google Scholar
39. Colacurci, N, Chiantera, A, Fornaro, F, et al. (2005) Effects of soy isoflavones on endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal women. Menopause 12, 299307.Google Scholar
40. Garrido, A, la Maza, D, Pia, M, et al. (2006) Soy isoflavones affect platelet thromboxane A2 receptor density but not plasma lipids in menopausal women. Maturitas 54, 270276.Google Scholar
41. Hall, WL, Vafeiadou, K, Hallund, J, et al. (2006) Soy-isoflavone-enriched foods and markers of lipid and glucose metabolism in postmenopausal women: interactions with genotype and equol production. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 592600.Google Scholar
42. Ho, SC, Chen, YM, Ho, SS, et al. (2007) Soy isoflavone supplementation and fasting serum glucose and lipid profile among postmenopausal Chinese women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause 14, 905912.Google Scholar
43. Rios, DRA, Rodrigues, ET, Cardoso, APZ, et al. (2008) Lack of effects of isoflavones on the lipid profile of Brazilian postmenopausal women. Nutrition 24, 11531158.Google Scholar
44. Qin, Y, Shu, F, Zeng, Y, et al. (2014) Daidzein supplementation decreases serum triglyceride and uric acid concentrations in hypercholesterolemic adults with the effect on triglycerides being greater in those with the GA compared with the GG genotype of ESR-β RsaI. J Nutr 144, 4954.Google Scholar
45. Bakhtiary, A, Yassin, Z, Hanachi, P, et al. (2012) Effects of soy on metabolic biomarkers of cardiovascular disease in elderly women with metabolic syndrome. Arch Iran Med 15, 462468.Google Scholar
46. Clifton, P, Mano, M, Duchateau, G, et al. (2008) Dose-response effects of different plant sterol sources in fat spreads on serum lipids and C-reactive protein and on the kinetic behavior of serum plant sterols. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 968977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Meyer, BJ, Larkin, TA, Owen, AJ, et al. (2004) Limited lipid-lowering effects of regular consumption of whole soybean foods. Ann Nutr Metab 48, 6778.Google Scholar
48. Gianazza, E, Lovati, M, Manzoni, C, et al. (1998) Reduction of serum cholesterol by soy proteins: clinical experience and potential molecular mechanisms. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 8, 334340.Google Scholar
49. Tham, DM, Gardner, CD & Haskell, WL (1998) Potential health benefits of dietary phytoestrogens: a review of the clinical, epidemiological, and mechanistic evidence 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83, 22232235.Google Scholar
50. Lichtenstein, AH (1998) Soy protein, isoflavones and cardiovascular disease risk. J Nutr 128, 15891592.Google Scholar
51. Reynolds, K, Chin, A, Lees, KA, et al. (2006) A meta-analysis of the effect of soy protein supplementation on serum lipids. Am J Cardiol 98, 633640.Google Scholar
52. Harland, JI & Haffner, TA (2008) Systematic review, meta-analysis and regression of randomised controlled trials reporting an association between an intake of circa 25g soya protein per day and blood cholesterol. Atherosclerosis 200, 1327.Google Scholar
53. Taku, K, Umegaki, K, Sato, Y, et al. (2007) Soy isoflavones lower serum total and LDL cholesterol in humans: a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 11481156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Ho, SC, Woo, JL, Leung, SS, et al. (2000) Intake of soy products is associated with better plasma lipid profiles in the Hong Kong Chinese population. J Nutr 130, 25902593.Google Scholar
55. Nagata, C (2000) Ecological study of the association between soy product intake and mortality from cancer and heart disease in Japan. Int J Epidemiol 29, 832836.Google Scholar
56. Tokede, O, Gaziano, J & Djoussé, L (2011) Effects of cocoa products/dark chocolate on serum lipids: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 879886.Google Scholar
57. Rossouw, JE (1999) Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 10, 429434.Google Scholar
58. Weggemans, R & Trautwein, E (2003) Relation between soy-associated isoflavones and LDL and HDL cholesterol concentrations in humans: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 940946.Google Scholar
59. Clarkson, TB & Anthony, MS (1998) Phytoestrogens and coronary heart disease. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 12, 589604.Google Scholar
60. Arai, Y, Watanabe, S, Kimira, M, et al. (2000) Dietary intakes of flavonols, flavones and isoflavones by Japanese women and the inverse correlation between quercetin intake and plasma LDL cholesterol concentration. J Nutr 130, 22432250.Google Scholar
61. de Kleijn, MJ, van der Schouw, YT, Wilson, PW, et al. (2001) Intake of dietary phytoestrogens is low in postmenopausal women in the United States: the Framingham study (1–4). J Nutr 131, 18261832.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Study selection process.

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on LDL-cholesterol. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on serum TAG. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on total cholesterol. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Meta-analysis of the effect of soya on HDL-cholesterol. The sizes of the data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. IV, inverse variance. Random–random effects model. Values are in mg/dl.

Figure 6

Table 2 Effects of soya proteins on serum lipids by study design, duration, location, health status and quality of study (Mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 7

Table 3 Effects of soya isoflavone on serum lipids (Mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Meta-regression plot of the effect of initial LDL concentration on soya’s effect on LDL-cholesterol. Values are in mg/dl.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Meta-regression plot of the effect of initial TAG concentration on soya’s effect on blood TAG level. Values are in mg/dl.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Meta-regression plot of the effect of initial total concentration (TC) concentration on soya’s effect on blood TC level. Values are in mg/dl.

Figure 11

Table 4 Meta-regression – predictors of the effects of soya on serum lipids (Coefficients and their standard errors)