Gibney MJ & Walsh MC (2013) The future direction of personalised nutrition: my diet, my phenotype, my genes. Proc Nutr Soc
Franks PW, Pearson E & Florez JC (2013) Gene-environment and gene-treatment interactions in type 2 diabetes: progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Diabetes Care
Nielsen DE & El-Sohemy A (2014) Disclosure of genetic information and change in dietary intake: a randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE
McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, et al. (2010) The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors?
Annu Rev Public Health
Grant RW, Hivert M, Pandiscio JC, et al. (2009) The clinical application of genetic testing in type 2 diabetes: a patient and physician survey. Diabetologia
Strecher VJ & Rosenstock IM (1997) The health belief model. In Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, pp. 113–117 [A Baum, S Newman, C McManus and K Wallston, editors]. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Saukko P (2013) State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation. Proc Nutr Soc
Fallaize R, Macready AL, Butler LT, et al. (2013) An insight into the public acceptance of nutrigenomic-based personalised nutrition. Nutr Res Rev
Schneider KI & Schmidtke J (2014) Patient compliance based on genetic medicine: a literature review. J Community Genet
Marteau TM, French DP, Griffin SJ, et al. (2010) Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group (2013) Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: does genomic profiling to assess type 2 diabetes risk improve health outcomes?
Bloss CS, Madlensky L, Schork NJ, et al. (2011) Genomic information as a behavioral health intervention: can it work?
Vernarelli JA (2013) Impact of genetic risk assessment on nutrition-related lifestyle behaviours. Proc Nutr Soc
Bloss CS, Schork NJ & Topol EJ (2011) Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med
Stewart-Knox BJ, Bunting BP, Gilpin S, et al. (2009) Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers. Br J Nutr
Rafiq M, Ianuale C, Ricciardi W, et al. (2015) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of European guidelines, recommendations, and position statements. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers
Stewart L, Moher D & Shekelle P (2012) Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Syst Rev
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ
Persky S, Kaphingst KA, Condit CM, et al. (2007) Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative review. Genet Med
Higgins J & Green S (editors) (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org (accessed January 2015).
Wang C, Gordon ES, Stack CB, et al. (2014) A randomized trial of the clinical utility of genetic testing for obesity: design and implementation considerations. Clin Trials
Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CFM, et al. (2015) Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr
Voils CI, Coffman CJ, Grubber JM, et al. (2015) Does type 2 diabetes genetic testing and counseling reduce modifiable risk factors? A randomized controlled trial of veterans. J Gen Intern Med
Hietaranta-Luoma H-L, Tahvonen R, Iso-Touru T, et al. (2014) An intervention study of individual, apoe genotype-based dietary and physical-activity advice: impact on health behavior. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics
Grant RW, O’Brien KE, Waxler JL, et al. (2013) Personalized genetic risk counseling to motivate diabetes prevention: a randomized control trail. Diabetes Care
Marteau T, Senior V, Humphries SE, et al. (2004) Psychological impact of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia within a previously aware population: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med Genet A
Frosch DL, Mello P & Lerman C (2005) Behavioral consequences of testing for obesity risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
Sanderson SC, Persky S & Michie S (2010) Psychological and behavioral responses to genetic test results indicating increased risk of obesity: does the causal pathway from gene to obesity matter?
Public Health Genomics
Meisel SF, Beeken RJ, van Jaarsveld CHM, et al. (2015) Genetic susceptibility testing and readiness to control weight: results from a randomized controlled trial. Obesity
Smerecnik CMR, Mesters I, de Vries NK, et al. (2009) Alerting the general population to genetic risks: the value of health messages communicating the existence of genetic risk factors for public health promotion. Health Psychol
Food4Me (2015) Personalised nutrition: paving a way to better population health. A White Paper from the Food4Me project, Dublin.
Dar-Nimrod I, Cheung BY, Ruby MB, et al. (2014) Can merely learning about obesity genes affect eating behavior?
Vorderstrasse AA, Cho A, Voils CI, et al. (2013) Clinical utility of genetic risk testing in primary care: the example of type 2 diabetes. Pers Med
Hollands GJ, French DP, Griffin SJ, et al. (2016) The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ
Markowitz SM, Park ER, Delahanty LM, et al. (2011) Perceived impact of diabetes genetic risk testing among patients at high phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care
Gordon ES, Griffin G, Wawak L, et al. (2012) ‘It’s not like judgment day’: public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information. J Genet Couns
Ostergren JE, Gornick MC, Carere DA, et al. (2015) How well do customers of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing services comprehend genetic test results? Findings from the impact of personal genomics study. Public Health Genomics
Vassy JL, O’Brien KE, Waxler JL, et al. (2013) Impact of literacy and numeracy on motivation for behavior change after diabetes genetic risk testing. Med Decis Mak
Haga SB, Barry W, Mills R, et al. (2014) Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes. Public Health Genomics
Lachance CR, Erby LAH, Ford BM, et al. (2010) Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers. Genet Med
Skirton H, Goldsmith L, Jackson L, et al. (2012) Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations. Clin Genet
Lundahl BW, Kunz C, Brownell C, et al. (2010) A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing: twenty-five years of empirical studies. Res Soc Work Pract
Bloss CS, Wineinger NE, Darst BF, et al. (2013) Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up. J Med Genet
Weinberg DS, Myers RE, Keenan E, et al. (2014) Genetic and environmental risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening in an average-risk population: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med
Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, et al. (2015) Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell
Arkadianos I, Valdes AM, Marinos E, et al. (2007) Improved weight management using genetic information to personalize a calorie controlled diet. Nutr J
Strecher VJ, DeVellis BM, Becker MH, et al. (1986) The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Q
Hivert M-F, Vassy JL & Meigs JB (2014) Susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus – from genes to prevention. Nat Rev Endocrinol
Talmud PJ, Hingorani AD, Cooper JA, et al. (2010) Utility of genetic and non-genetic risk factors in prediction of type 2 diabetes: Whitehall II Prospective Cohort Study. BMJ
Leventhal H, Diefenbach M & Leventhal EA (1992) Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognit Ther Res
Collins RE, Wright AJ & Marteau TM (2011) Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: a systematic review. Genet Med
Meisel SF, Walker C & Wardle J (2012) Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study. Obesity (Silver Spring)
Gallagher P, King H a, Haga SB, et al. (2015) Patient beliefs and behaviors about genomic risk for type 2 diabetes: implications for prevention. J Health Commun
Willett WC (2013) Nutritional Epidemiology, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Godino JG, van Sluijs EMF, Marteau TM, et al. (2012) Effect of communicating genetic and phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes in combination with lifestyle advice on objectively measured physical activity: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health
Silarova B, Lucas J, Butterworth AS, et al. (2015) Information and Risk Modification Trial (INFORM): design of a randomised controlled trial of communicating different types of information about coronary heart disease risk, alongside lifestyle advice, to achieve change in health-related behaviour. BMC Public Health
Ronteltap A, Van Trijp H, Berezowska A, et al. (2013) Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model?
Green ED, Guyer MS; National Human Genome Research Institute (2011) Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside. Nature
Collins J, Bertrand B, Hayes V, et al. (2013) The application of genetics and nutritional genomics in practice: an international survey of knowledge, involvement and confidence among dietitians in the US, Australia and the UK. Genes Nutr
Li SX, Collins J, Lawson S, et al. (2014) A preliminary qualitative exploration of dietitians’ engagement with genetics and nutritional genomics: perspectives from international leaders. J Allied Heal