Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T20:33:06.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of table sugar and non-caloric sweeteners in Brazil: associated factors and changes across a decade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Iuna Arruda Alves*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Nutrição, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Luana Silva Monteiro
Affiliation:
Instituto de Alimentação e Nutrição, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Marina Campos Araújo
Affiliation:
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Departamento de Epidemiologia e Métodos Quantitativos em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Amanda de Moura Souza
Affiliation:
Instituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Bruna Kulik Hassan
Affiliation:
Departamento de Epidemiologia e Bioestatística, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Paulo Rogério Melo Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil
Edna Massae Yokoo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Epidemiologia e Bioestatística, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Rosely Sichieri
Affiliation:
Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Rosangela Alves Pereira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrição Social e Aplicada, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
*
*Corresponding author: Iuna Arruda Alves, email iunaarrudanut@gmail.com

Abstract

This study evaluated changes in the use of sweeteners over one decade and the relationship between socio-demographics, diet and weight status with the type of sweetener. Data came from the Brazilian National Dietary Surveys of 2008–2009 and 2017–2018, including ≥ 10-year-old individuals (n 32 749; n 44 744, respectively, after excluding pregnant and lactating women). The use of table sugar, non-caloric sweeteners (NCS), both or none was reported through a specific question. Food consumption was assessed using two non-consecutive food records (2008–2009) and 24-h recalls (2017–2018). For the last survey, means of energy, macro and micronutrient intake, food groups’ contribution (%) to daily energy intake and age- and energy-adjusted nutrient intake were estimated according to the type of sweetener used. Differences in means and proportions across the categories of sweeteners used were evaluated based on the 95 % CI. All analyses were stratified by sex and considered sample design and weights. Over 10 years, the use of table sugar decreased by 8 %, while the habit of not using any sweetener increased almost three times, and the use of NCS remained stable. Larger reductions in the use of table sugar were observed in the highest income level and among men. Regardless of sex, compared with NCS users, table sugar users had greater mean intake of energy, carbohydrates and added sugar and lower micronutrient intake means. Although table sugar is still the most used sweetener, the increased choice of ‘no sweetener’ is noteworthy in Brazil.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization (2015) Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028 Google Scholar
Moores, CJ, Kelly, SAM & Moynihan, PJ (2022) Systematic review of the effect on caries of sugars intake: ten-year update. J Dent Res 101, 10341045.10.1177/00220345221082918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rios-Leyvraz, M & Montez, J (2022) Health Effects of the Use of Non-Sugar Sweeteners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240046429 Google Scholar
Toews, I, Lohner, S, Küllenberg de Gaudry, D, et al. (2019) Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ 364, k4718.10.1136/bmj.k4718CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bueno-Hernández, N, Esquivel-Velázquez, M, Alcántara-Suárez, R, et al. (2020) Chronic sucralose consumption induces elevation of serum insulin in young healthy adults: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial. Nutr J 19, 32.10.1186/s12937-020-00549-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suez, J, Cohen, Y, Valdés-Mas, R, et al. (2022) Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance. Cell 185, 33073328.10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herforth, A, Arimond, M, Álvarez-Sánchez, C, et al. (2019) A global review of food-based dietary guidelines. Adv Nutr 10, 590605.10.1093/advances/nmy130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2020) Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. 9th ed. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov (accessed July 2023).Google Scholar
Cámara, M, Giner, RM, González-Fandos, E, et al. (2021) Food-based dietary guidelines around the world: a comparative analysis to update AESAN scientific committee dietary recommendations. Nutrients 13, 3131.10.3390/nu13093131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, J, Bell, H, Re, R, et al. (2023) Current perspectives on global sugar consumption: definitions, recommendations, population intakes, challenges and future direction. Nutr Res Rev 36, 122.10.1017/S095442242100024XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittekind, A & Walton, J (2014) Worldwide trends in dietary sugars intake. Nutr Res Rev 27, 330345.10.1017/S0954422414000237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castro-Quezada, I, Ruano-Rodríguez, C, Ribas-Barba, L, et al. (2015) Misreporting in nutritional surveys: methodological implications. Nutr Hosp 31, 119127.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitton, C, Ramos-García, C, Kirkpatrick, SI, et al. (2022) A systematic review examining contributors to misestimation of food and beverage intake based on short-term self-report dietary assessment instruments administered to adults. Adv Nutr 13, 26202665.10.1093/advances/nmac085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylvetsky, AC & Rother, KI (2016) Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. Physiol Behav 164, 446450.10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newens, KJ & Walton, J (2016) A review of sugar consumption from nationally representative dietary surveys across the world. J Hum Nutr Diet 29, 225240.10.1111/jhn.12338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunford, EK, Miles, DR, Ng, SW, et al. (2020) Types and amounts of nonnutritive sweeteners purchased by US households: a comparison of 2002 and 2018 Nielsen Homescan purchases. J Acad Nutr Diet 120, 16621671.e10.10.1016/j.jand.2020.04.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, SH, Zhao, L, Park, S, et al. (2023) High added sugars intake among US adults: characteristics, eating occasions, and top sources, 2015–2018. Nutrients 15, 265.10.3390/nu15020265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grech, A, Kam, CO, Gemming, L, et al. (2018) Diet-quality and socio-demographic factors associated with non-nutritive sweetener use in the Australian population. Nutrients 10, 833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YF, Chiavaroli, L, Roke, K, et al. (2020) Canadian adults with moderate intakes of total sugars have greater intakes of fibre and key micronutrients: results from the Canadian community health survey 2015 public use microdata file. Nutrients 12, 1124.10.3390/nu12041124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, LS, Hassan, BK, Rodrigues, PRM, et al. (2018) Use of table sugar and artificial sweeteners in Brazil: National Dietary Survey 2008–2009. Nutrients 10, 295.10.3390/nu10030295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2011) Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008–2009: Análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil (Household Budget Survey 2008–2009: Analysis of Personal Food Consumption in Brazil). Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv50063.pdf Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Diretoria de Pesquisas & Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento (2020) Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2017–2018: Análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil (Household Budget Survey 2017–2018: Analysis of Personal Food Consumption in Brazil). Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101742.pdf Google Scholar
Rodrigues, RM, Souza, AM, Bezerra, IN, et al. (2021) Most consumed foods in Brazil: evolution between 2008–2009 and 2017–2018. Rev Saude Publica 55, 4s.10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003406CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, RM, De Carli, E, Araújo, MC, et al. (2021) Limitations in the comparison between the Brazilian National Dietary Surveys of 2008–2009 and 2017–2018. Rev Saude Publica 55, 3s.Google ScholarPubMed
Conway, JM, Ingwersen, LA & Moshfegh, AJ (2004) Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 595603.10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verly-Junior, E, Marchioni, DM, Araujo, MC, et al. (2021) Evolution of energy and nutrient intake in Brazil between 2008–2009 and 2017–2018. Rev Saude Publica 55, 5s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezerra, IN, Cavalcante, JB, Vasconcelos, TM, et al. (2022) Evolution of food intake estimates in Brazil: the 2008–2009 and 2017–2018 National Dietary Surveys. Rev Nutr 35, e210132.10.1590/1678-9865202235e210132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuntini, EB, Coelho, KS, Grande, F, et al. (2019) 12th IFDC 2017 Special issue – Brazilian nutrient intake evaluation database: an essential tool for estimating nutrient intake data. J Food Compos Anal 83, 103286.10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooze, JA, Midthune, D, Dodd, KW, et al. (2006). A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 15751587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tooze, JA, Kipnis, V, Buckman, DW, et al. (2010) A mixed-effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: the NCI method. Stat Med 29, 28572868.10.1002/sim.4063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, W (2012) Implications of Total Energy Intake for Epidemiologic Analyses. Nutritional Epidemiology, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 161286.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199754038.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Onis, M (2007) Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 85, 660667.10.2471/BLT.07.043497CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1998) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Cohen, J (1998) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Park, S, Thompson, FE, McGuire, LC, et al. (2016) Sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with added sugars intake among US adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 116, 15891598.10.1016/j.jand.2016.04.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand-Miller, JC & Barclay, AW (2017) Declining consumption of added sugars and sugar-sweetened beverages in Australia: a challenge for obesity prevention. Am J Clin Nutr 105, 854863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, J, Bell, H, Re, R, et al. (2021) Current perspectives on global sugar consumption: definitions, recommendations, population intakes, challenges and future direction. Nutr Res Rev 36, 122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095442242100024X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators (2017) Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 393, 19581972.Google Scholar
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde & Departamento de Atenção Básica (2014) Guia alimentar para a população brasileira (Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian population). Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica, 2nd ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_brasileira_2ed.pdf Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/924120916X Google Scholar
Martyn, D, Darch, M, Roberts, A, et al. (2018) Low-/no-calorie sweeteners: a review of global intakes. Nutrients 10, 357.10.3390/nu10030357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanini, RV, Araújo, CL & Martínez-Mesa, J (2011) Utilização de adoçantes dietéticos entre adultos em Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: um estudo de base populacional (Use of diet sweeteners by adults in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil: a population-based study). Cad Saude Publica 27, 924934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrais, PSD, Vianna, MPN, Zaccolo, AV, et al. (2019) Utilização de adoçantes no Brasil: uma abordagem a partir de um inquérito domiciliar (Use of artificial sweeteners in Brazil: a household survey approach). Cad Saude Publica 35, e00010719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewnowski, A & Rehm, CD (2016) The use of low-calorie sweeteners is associated with self-reported prior intent to lose weight in a representative sample of US adults. Nutr Diabetes 6, e202.10.1038/nutd.2016.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiFrancesco, L, Fulgoni, VL III, Gaine, PC, et al. (2022) Trends in added sugars intake and sources among U.S. adults using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2018. Front Nutr 9, 897952.10.3389/fnut.2022.897952CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daher, M, Fahd, C, Nour, AA, et al. (2022) Trends and amounts of consumption of low-calorie sweeteners: a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr ESPEN 48, 427433.10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.01.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louie, JC, Moshtaghian, H, Boylan, S, et al. (2015) A systematic methodology to estimate added sugar content of foods. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 154161.10.1038/ejcn.2014.256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scapin, T, Louie, JCY, Pettigrew, S, et al. (2021) The adaptation, validation, and application of a methodology for estimating the added sugar content of packaged food products when total and added sugar labels are not mandatory. Food Res Int 144, 110329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litman, EA, Gortmaker, SL, Ebbeling, CB, et al. (2018) Source of bias in sugar-sweetened beverage research: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 21, 23452350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, P, Li, Q, Zhao, Y, et al. (2020) Sugar and artificially sweetened beverages and risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and all-cause mortality: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol 35, 655671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcaraz, A, Pichon-Riviere, A, Palacios, A, et al. (2021) Sugar sweetened beverages attributable disease burden and the potential impact of policy interventions: a systematic review of epidemiological and decision models. BMC Public Health 21, 1460.10.1186/s12889-021-11046-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, LP, Gigante, DP, Delpino, FM, et al. (2022) Sugar sweetened beverages intake and risk of obesity and cardiometabolic diseases in longitudinal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis with 1·5 million individuals. Clin Nutr ESPEN 51, 128142.10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.08.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, CD, Arsenault, JE, Arnold, CD, et al. (2021) Variance components of nutrient intakes data working group. within-person variation in nutrient intakes across populations and settings: implications for the use of external estimates in modeling usual nutrient intake distributions. Adv Nutr 12, 429451.10.1093/advances/nmaa114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Alves et al. supplementary material

Alves et al. supplementary material
Download Alves et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.1 KB