Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Zinc metabolism in pregnant and lactating rats and the effect of varying iron: Zn in the diet

  • Susan J. Fairweather-Tait (a1), A. J. A. Wright (a1) and Christine M. Williams (a1)

Abstract

1. Pregnant rats were given control (46 mg iron/kg, 61 mg zinc/kg), low-Zn (6.9 mg Zn/kg) or low-Zn plus Fe (168 mg Fe/kg) diets from day 1 of pregnancy. The animals were allowed to give birth and parturition times recorded. Exactly 24 h after the end of parturition the pups were killed and analysed for water, fat, protein, Fe and Zn contents and the mothers' haemoglobin (Hb) and packed cell volume (PCV) were measured.

2. There were no differences in weight gain or food intakes throughout pregnancy. Parturition times were similar (mean time 123 (SE 15) min) and there were no differences in the number of pups born. Protein, water and fat contents of the pups were similar but the low-Zn Fe-supplemented group had higher pup Fe than the low-Zn unsupplemented group, and the control group had higher pup Zn than both the low-Zn groups. The low-Zn groups had a greater incidence of haemorrhaged or deformed pups, or both, than the controls.

3. Pregnant rats were given diets of adequate Zn level (40 mg/kg) but with varying Fe:Zn (0.8, 1.7, 2.9, 3.7). Zn retention from the diet was measured using 65Zn as an extrinsic label on days 3, 10 and 17 of pregnancy with a whole-body gamma-counter. A group of non-pregnant rats was also included as controls. The 65Zn content of mothers and pups was measured 24–48 h after birth and at 14, 21 and 24 d of age.

4. In all groups Zn retention was highest from the first meal, fell in the second meal and then rose in the third meal of the pregnant but not the non-pregnant rats. There were no differences between the groups given diets of varying Fe:Zn level. Approximately 25% of the 65Zn was transferred from the mothers to the pups by the time they were 48 h old, and a further 17% during the first 14 d of lactation. The pup 65Zn content did not significantly increase after the first 20 d of lactation but the maternal 65Zn level continued to fall gradually.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Zinc metabolism in pregnant and lactating rats and the effect of varying iron: Zn in the diet
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Zinc metabolism in pregnant and lactating rats and the effect of varying iron: Zn in the diet
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Zinc metabolism in pregnant and lactating rats and the effect of varying iron: Zn in the diet
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Fairweather-Tait, S. J., Payne, V. & Williams, C. M. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 52, 7986.
Fairweather-Tait, S. J. & Wright, A. J. A. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 185191.
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265275.
Masters, D. G., Keen, C. L., Lönnerdal, B. & Hurley, L. S. (1983). Journal of Nutrition 113, 14481451.
Meadows, N. J., Ruse, W., Smith, M. F., Day, J., Keeling, P. W. N., Scopes, J. W., Thompson, R. P. H. & Bloxam, D. L. (1981). Lancet ii, 11351137.
Menard, M. P. & Cousins, R. J. (1983). Journal of Nutrition 113, 14341442.
Moser, P. B. & Reynolds, R. D. (1983). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 38, 101108.
Snedecor, G. W. (1957). Statistical Methods, 5th ed., p. 287.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
Solomons, N. W., Pineda, O., Viteri, F. & Sandstead, H. H. (1983). Journal of Nutrition 113, 337349.
Williams, R. B., Davies, N. T. & McDonald, I. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 407416.
Williams, R. B., Demertzis, P. & Mills, C. F. (1973). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 3A4A.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed