Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

An Editor Recalls Some Hopeless Papers

  • Wilfrid Hodges (a1)
Abstract

§1. Introduction. I dedicate this essay to the two-dozen-odd people whose refutations of Cantor's diagonal argument (I mean the one proving that the set of real numbers and the set of natural numbers have different cardinalities) have come to me either as referee or as editor in the last twenty years or so. Sadly these submissions were all quite unpublishable; I sent them back with what I hope were helpful comments. A few years ago it occurred to me to wonder why so many people devote so much energy to refuting this harmless little argument—what had it done to make them angry with it? So I started to keep notes of these papers, in the hope that some pattern would emerge.

These pages report the results. They might be useful for editors faced with similar problem papers, or even for the authors of the papers themselves. But the main message to reach me is that there are several points of basic elementary logic that we usually teach and explain very badly, or not at all.

In 1995 an engineer named William Dilworth, who had published a refutation of Cantor's argument in the Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, sued for libel a mathematician named Underwood Dudley who had called him a crank ([9] pp. 44f, 354).

Copyright
References
Hide All
[1] Aristotle, Metaphysics X–XIV, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1935.
[2] BarrowJohn D., Theories of everything: the quest for ultimate explanation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990.
[3] BarwiseJon and EtchemendyJohn, The liar, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987.
[4] BenacerrafPaul, What numbers could not be, Philosophy of mathematics, Selected readings (BenacerrafPaul and PutnamHilary, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd ed., 1983, pp. 272294.
[5] BethE.W., Semantic entailment and formal derivability, The philosophy of mathematics (HintikkaJaakko, editor), Oxford University Press, 1969, pp. 941.
[6] CantorGeorg, Über eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffes aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, vol. 77 (1874), pp. 258262.
[7] CantorGeorg, Über eine elementare Frage der Mannigfaltigkeitslehre, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, vol. I (1891), pp. 7578.
[8] CarrollLewis, What the tortoise said to Achilles, Mind, vol. 4 (1895), pp. 278280.
[9] DudleyUnderwood, Mathematical cranks, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1992.
[10] DummettMichael, Frege, philosophy of language, Duckworth, London, 1973.
[11] FisherAlec, The logic of real arguments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
[12] FraenkelAbraham A., Abstract set theory, 4th ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976, revised by Azriel Lévy.
[13] GelernterH., Realization of a geometry theorem-proving machine, Proceedings of international conference on information processing, UNESCO House, Paris, 1959, pp. 273282.
[14] GödelKurt, Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte Erweiterung des finiten Standpunktes, Collected works (FefermanS. et al., editors), vol. II, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990, pp. 240251.
[15] HodgesWilfrid, Critical commentary on P. Johnson-Laird and R. Byrne, ‘Deduction’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 16 (1993), p. 353f.
[16] Johnson-LairdP. N. and ByrneRuth M. J., Deduction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, 1991.
[17] KampHans and ReyleUwe, From discourse to logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.
[18] KleeneStephen Cole, Introduction to metamathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1952.
[19] RipsLance J., The psychology of proof, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1994.
[20] RussellBertrand, The principles of mathematics, George Allen and Unwin, London, 1903.
[21] SmithD. E., History of mathematics, vol. II, Dover, New York, 1958.
[22] WittgensteinLudwig, Remarks on the foundations of mathematics, Blackwell, Oxford, 1956.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
  • ISSN: 1079-8986
  • EISSN: 1943-5894
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-symbolic-logic
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 164 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.