Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

The Axiom of Infinity and Transformations j: V → V

  • Paul Corazza (a1)
Abstract

We suggest a new approach for addressing the problem of establishing an axiomatic foundation for large cardinals. An axiom asserting the existence of a large cardinal can naturally be viewed as a strong Axiom of Infinity. However, it has not been clear on the basis of our knowledge of ω itself, or of generally agreed upon intuitions about the true nature of the mathematical universe, what the right strengthening of the Axiom of Infinity is—which large cardinals ought to be derivable? It was shown in the 1960s by Lawvere that the existence of an infinite set is equivalent to the existence of a certain kind of structure-preserving transformation from V to itself, not isomorphic to the identity. We use Lawvere's transformation, rather than ω, as a starting point for a reasonably natural sequence of strengthenings and refinements, leading to a proposed strong Axiom of Infinity. A first refinement was discussed in later work by Trnková–Blass, showing that if the preservation properties of Lawvere's tranformation are strengthened to the point of requiring it to be an exact functor, such a transformation is provably equivalent to the existence of a measurable cardinal. We propose to push the preservation properties as far as possible, short of inconsistency. The resulting transformation VV is strong enough to account for virtually all large cardinals, but is at the same time a natural generalization of an assertion about transformations VV known to be equivalent to the Axiom of Infinity.

Copyright
References
Hide All
[1] Bernays, P., Zur Frage der Unendlichkeitsschemata in der axiomatischen Mengenlehre, Essays on the foundations of mathematics (Bar-Hillel, Y., Poznanski, E. I. J., Rabin, M.O., and Robinson, A., editors), Magnes Press, Jerusalem, 1961, pp. 349.
[2] Blass, A., Exact functors and measurable cardinals, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 63 (1976), no. 2, pp. 335346.
[3] Corazza, P., Laver sequences for extendible and super-almost-huge cardinals, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 963983.
[4] Corazza, P., The wholeness axiom and laver sequences, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 105 (2000), pp. 157260.
[5] Corazza, P., Consistency of V = HOD with the wholeness axiom, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 39 (2000), pp. 219226.
[6] Corazza, P., The gap between I3 and the wholeness axiom, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 179 (2003), pp. 4360.
[7] Corazza, P., The spectrum of elementary embeddings j: V → V, Annals of Pure And Applied Logic, vol. 139 (2006), pp. 327399.
[8] Corazza, P., The wholeness axiom, Consciousness-based education: A foundation for teaching and learning in the academic disciplines (Corazza, P., editor), Consciousness-Based Education and Mathematics, vol. 5, MUM Press, 2009, revised and updated from 1994 original manuscript.
[9] Corazza, P., Indestructibility of wholeness, in preparation.
[10] Dehornoy, P., Seminaire Bourbaki, exposé 915, 03 2003, (English translation available at http://www.math.unicaen.fr/~dehornoy/surveys.html.).
[11] Eklof, P. C. and Mekler, A. H., Almost-free modules, set-theoretic methods, North Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 46, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, 1990.
[12] Feferman, S., Friedman, H., Maddy, P., and Steel, J., Does mathematics need new axioms?, this Bulletin, vol. 6 (2000), no. 4, pp. 401433.
[13] Freyd, P., Aspects of topoi, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 7 (1972), pp. 176.
[14] Gitik, M. and Shelah, S., On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal, Archives of Mathematical Logic, vol. 28 (1989), pp. 3542.
[15] Hallett, M., Cantorian set theory and the limitation of size, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.
[16] Hamkins, J. D., Canonical seeds and Prikry trees, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 62 (1997), no. 2, pp. 373396.
[17] Hamkins, J. D., The wholeness axioms and V = HOD, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 40 (2001), pp. 18.
[18] Hausdorff, F., Grundzüge einer Theorie der geordneten Mengen, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 65 (1908), pp. 435505.
[19] Jech, T., Set theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
[20] Kanamori, A., The higher infinite, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
[21] Kanamori, A.,, Gödel and set theory, this Bulletin, vol. 13 (2007), no. 2, pp. 153188.
[22] Kunen, K., Elementary embeddings and infinitary combinatorics, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 36 (1971), pp. 407413.
[23] Kunen, K., Saturated ideals, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, (1978), pp. 6576.
[24] Laver, R., Making the supercompactness of k indestructible under k-directed closed forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29 (1978), no. 4, pp. 385388.
[25] Lawvere, F. W., Adjointness in foundations, Dialectica, vol. 23 (1969), pp. 281296.
[26] Lane, S. Mac, Categories for the working mathematician, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
[27] Maddy, P., Believing the axioms, I, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 53 (1988), no. 2, pp. 481511.
[28] Maddy, P., Believing the axioms, II, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 53 (1988), no. 3, pp. 736764.
[29] Mahlo, P., Über lineare transfinite Mengen, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematische–Physische Klasse, vol. 63 (1911), pp. 187225.
[30] Martin, D. A., Infinite games, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Helsinki, (1978) (Lehto, Olli, editor), vol. 1, Academia Scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki, 1980, pp. 269273.
[31] Reinhardt, W. N., Remarks on reflection principles, large cardinals, and elementary embeddings, Axiomatic set theory (Jech, T. J., editor), American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1974, (Part 2), pp. 189205.
[32] Trnková, V., On descriptive classification of set-functors II, Commentationes Mathematicai Universitatis Carolinae, vol. 2 (1971), pp. 345357.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
  • ISSN: 1079-8986
  • EISSN: 1943-5894
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-symbolic-logic
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed