Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:29:43.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An implicit function theorem with symmetries and its application to nonlinear eigenvalue equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

E.N. Dancer
E.N. Dancer
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we prove a G-invariant implicit function theorem and indicate how it can be used to improve an earlier result of the author on the bifurcation of solutions of nonlinear equations in the presence of continuous groups of symmetries. We also use our theorem to show that, under reasonable hypotheses, the method of looking for solutions in invariant subspaces yields all solutions. This can be used to answer a question raised by Sattinger [J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978), 1729]. The abstract result is also of interest because it provides a theorem which should be of use in other symmetric situations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 81 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1980

References

[1]Bourbaki, N., Éléments de mathématique. Fascicule XXXVII: Groupes et algèbres de Lie. Chapitre II: Algèbres de Lie libres; Chapitre III: Groupes de Lie (Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, 1349. Hermann, Paris 1972).Google Scholar
[2]Böhme, Reinhold, “Nichtlineare Störung der isolierten Eigenwerte selbstadjungierter Operatoren”, Math. Z. 123 (1971), 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bredon, Glen E., Introduction to compact transformation groups (Pure and Applied Mathematics, 46. Academic Press, New York and London, 1972).Google Scholar
[4]Dancer, E.N., “On the existence of bifurcating solutions in the presence of symmetries”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, (to appear).Google Scholar
[5]Boldberg, Seymour, Unbounded linear operators (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
[6]Greub, Werner, Halperin, Stephen, and Vanstone, Ray, Connections, curvature, and cohomology. Volume I: De Wham cohomology of manifolds and vector bundles (Pure and Applied Mathematics, 47. Academic Press, New York and London, 1972).Google Scholar
[7]Sattinger, D.H., “Group representation theory, bifurcation theory and pattern formation”, J. Funct. Anal. 28 (1978), 58–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Sattinger, D.H., “Bifurcation from rotationally invariant states”, J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978), 1720–1732.Google Scholar
[9]Stokes, A., “Invariant subspaces, symmetry and alternative problems”, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 3 (1975), no. 1, 7–14.Google Scholar
[10]Vanderbauwhede, A., “Alternative problems and invariant subspaces”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 63 (1978), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Vilenkin, N.Ja., Special functions and the theory of group represents, representations (translated by Singh, V.N.. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 22. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar