Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense


The purpose of this paper is to suggest that at least one strain of what has come to be called “stakeholder theory” has roots that are deeply libertarian. We begin by explicating both “stakeholder theory” and “libertarian arguments.” We show how there are libertarian arguments for both instrumental and normative stakeholder theory, and we construct a version of capitalism, called “stakeholder capitalism,” that builds on these libertarian ideas. We argue throughout that strong notions of “freedom” and “voluntary action” are the best possible underpinnings for stakeholder theory, and in doing so, seek to return “stakeholder theory” to its managerial and libertarian roots found in Freeman (1984).

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. L. Barton , S. C. Hill , and S. Sundaram 1989. “An Empirical Test of Stakeholder Theory Predictions of Capital Structure.” Financial Management 18(1): 3644.

John R. Boatright 1994. “What’s So Special About Shareholders.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4): 393408.

Shawn L. Berman , Andrew C. Wicks , Kotha Suresh , and Thomas M. Jones 1999. “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 488506.

B. K. Burton , and C. P. Dunn 1996. “Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory.” Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2): 133148.

A. B. Carroll , and Ann K. Buchholtz 2000. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 4th ed. (Cincinnati: South-Western).

M. B. E. Clarkson 1995. “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.” Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92117.

M. Deutsch 1975. “Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used As the Basis for Distributive Justice?” Journal of Social Issues 31(3): 137149.

Thomas Donaldson , and L. E. Preston 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20(1): 6591.

R. Edward. Freeman 2000. “Business Ethics at the Millenium.” Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1): 169180.

R. Edward. Freeman 1999. “Divergent Stakeholder Theory.” Academy of Management Review 24(2): 233236.

R. Edward. Freeman 1994. “The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409422.

R. Edward Freeman , and Evan. William 1990. “Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation.” The Journal of Behavioral Economics 19 (4): 337359.

J. Frooman 1999. “Stakeholder Influence Strategies.” Academy of Management Review 24(2): 191205.

K. E. Goodpaster 1991. “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.” Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1): 5373.

C. W. L. Hill , and T. M. Jones 1992. “Stakeholder-agency Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 29: 131154.

Thomas M. Jones 1995. “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics.” Academy of Management Review, 20(2), pp. 404437.

Marc. Lampe 2001. “Mediation as an Ethical Adjunct of Stakeholder TheoryJournal of Business Ethics 31: 165173.

R. K. Mitchell , B. R. Agle , and D. J. Wood 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853886.

Robert A. Phillips 1997. “Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness.” Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1): 5166.

R. A. Phillips , and J. M. Margolis 1999. “Toward an Ethics of Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 619638.

Timothy. Rowley 1997. “Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder InfluencesAcademy of Management Review 22(4): 887910.

Mark. Starik 1995. “Should Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature.” Journal of Business Ethics 14: 207217.

Harry J. Van Buren III 2001. “If Fairness is the Problem, Is Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stakeholder Theory.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3).

J. Wang , and H. D. Dewhirst 1992. “Boards of Directors and Stakeholder Orientation.” Journal of Business Ethics 11: 115123.

Andrew C. Wicks , Daniel R. Gilbert Jr., and R. Edward Freeman 1994. “A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4): 475498.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *