Toprak, Mustafa 2017. Mismatch between teachers’ need for change and change in practice: what if what they see is not what they want?. International Journal of Leadership in Education, p. 1.
Applequist, Janelle Miller-Day, Michelle Cronholm, Peter F. Gabbay, Robert A. and Bowen, Deborah S. 2017. “In Principle We Have Agreement, But in Practice It Is a Bit More Difficult”: Obtaining Organizational Buy-In to Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation. Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 27, Issue. 6, p. 909.
Visser, Max 2017. Pragmatism, Critical Theory and Business Ethics: Converging Lines. Journal of Business Ethics,
Bhupendra, Kumar Verma and Sangle, Shirish 2017. What Drives Successful Implementation of Product Stewardship Strategy? The Role of Absorptive Capability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 186.
Ventura, Jose and Jauregui, Kety 2017. Business-Community Relationships for Extractive Industries: A Case Study in Peru. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 2,
Abaza, Wasseem 2017. Comparing internal and external impacts of sustainable innovation: an exploratory study. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Vol. 7, Issue. 1,
Masoud, Najeb 2017. How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,
Woermann, Minka and Engelbrecht, Schalk 2017. The Ubuntu Challenge to Business: From Stakeholders to Relationholders. Journal of Business Ethics,
Kannan, Devika 2017. Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Economics,
Del Giudice, Manlio Khan, Zaheer De Silva, Muthu Scuotto, Veronica Caputo, Francesco and Carayannis, Elias 2017. The microlevel actions undertaken by owner-managers in improving the sustainability practices of cultural and creative small and medium enterprises: A United Kingdom-Italy comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
Orlitzky, Marc 2017. How Cognitive Neuroscience Informs a Subjectivist-Evolutionary Explanation of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 144, Issue. 4, p. 717.
Balakrishnan, Jaydeep Malhotra, Ayesha and Falkenberg, Loren 2017. Multi-Level Corporate Responsibility: A Comparison of Gandhi’s Trusteeship with Stakeholder and Stewardship Frameworks. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 141, Issue. 1, p. 133.
The purpose of this paper is to suggest that at least one strain of what has come to be called “stakeholder theory” has roots that are deeply libertarian. We begin by explicating both “stakeholder theory” and “libertarian arguments.” We show how there are libertarian arguments for both instrumental and normative stakeholder theory, and we construct a version of capitalism, called “stakeholder capitalism,” that builds on these libertarian ideas. We argue throughout that strong notions of “freedom” and “voluntary action” are the best possible underpinnings for stakeholder theory, and in doing so, seek to return “stakeholder theory” to its managerial and libertarian roots found in Freeman (1984).
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.