Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-2r2wp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-11T21:59:19.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VIRGIL'S CARTHAGINIANS AT AEN. 1.430–6: CYCLOPES IN BEES’ CLOTHING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2014

Elena Giusti
Elena Giusti*
Affiliation:
King's College, Cambridge
*
*E-mail: egiusti382@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Virgil's poetry has long been recognised as delving into a poetics of comparison which employs sudden shifts from the miniature to the gigantic. So too have Virgilian similes long been singled out as a privileged locus where complex inter- and intra-textual allusions serve to highlight the primary role that these similes play in the narrative and poetic context of Virgil's work. Along these lines, this paper addresses one such simile at Aene.d 1.430–6, where the Tyrians building Carthage are compared to busy bees working at their hive. The paper explores the impact that the recognition of the simile's inter- and intra-textual connections may have on the interpretation of the scene of Aeneas’ arrival at Carthage, and on certain long-debated aspects of the poem as a whole.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 60 , 30 April 2014 , pp. 37 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This paper originated from a 2008 undergraduate commentary thesis. Since then, I have no words to describe my gratitude for the Cyclopean labour offered by Alessandro Schiesaro, Victoria Rimell, Philip Hardie, Ellen Oliensis and Emily Gowers, not to mention the invaluable help of various anonymous referees. Francesca Bellei, Siobhan Chomse, John Henderson and Fiachra Mac Góráin were the industrious bees who helped me with the article's labor limae. For its waxy nature, I am solely responsible.

References

Works Cited

Anderson, W. S. (1968) ‘ Pastor Aeneas: on pastoral themes in the Aeneid ’, TAPA 99, 1–17.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber quartus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1971) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber primus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1994) ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell'Eneide’, Antike und Abendland 40, 109–24 = (1999) ‘Representations of suffering and interpretation in the Aeneid ’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.) Virgil: Critical assessments of classical authors, vol. III, London/New York, 324–44 [page nos cited from 1999 translation].Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. (1962) Nevio Epico, Padova.Google Scholar
Betensky, A. (1979) ‘The bees and the Cyclopes in the fourth Georgic ’, Vergilius 25, 26–31.Google Scholar
Briggs, Jr. W. W. (1980) Narrative and simile from the Georgics in the Aeneid, Mnemosyne Supplement 58, Leiden.10.1163/9789004327757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, J. P. (1969) ‘Carthage et le fatum ’, in Bibauw, J., J. (ed.) Hommages à Marcel Renard, Bruxelles, 163–73.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (1999) ‘Facta impia (Virgil, Aeneid 4.596–9)’, CQ 49, 203–11.10.1093/cq/49.1.203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casali, S. (2006) ‘The making of the shield: inspiration and repression in the Aeneid ’, G&R 53, 185–204.Google Scholar
Chew, K. (2002) ‘ Inscius pastor: ignorance and Aeneas’ identity in the Aeneid ’, Latomus 61, 616–27.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (1993) The best of the Argonauts, Berkeley.10.1525/9780520313804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. (1988) ‘The archaeology of the temple to Juno in Carthage (Aen. 1.446–93.)’, CPh 83, 195–205.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. (1961) ‘The subject matter of Vergil's similes’, BICS 8, 63–75.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (2009) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis, Berlin.Google Scholar
Conway, R. S. (1935) Vergil Aeneid I, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. (2012), Publio Virgilio Marone: Le Bucoliche, Roma.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (2001) The raft of Odysseus: the ethnographic imagination of Homer's Odyssey, Oxford.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (2001) ‘The similes of Apollonius Rhodius: intertextuality and epic innovation’, in Papanghelis, T., Rengakos, A. (eds.) A companion to Apollonius Rhodius, Leiden/Boston/Köln, 147–69.Google Scholar
Egan, R. B. (1998) ‘The signs of the horse's head: Aeneid 1.442–5’, PVS 23, 193–207.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the traditions of ancient epic: the art of allusion in literary history, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1954) ‘The giants in the poem of Naevius’, JRS 44, 14–17.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, H. (1921) Die homerischen Gleichnisse, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, H. (1935) ‘Griechische Bildung in altrömischen Epen II’, Hermes 70, 59–72.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, H. (1953) Review of: M. Hügi, Vergils Aeneis und die hellenistische Dichtung, Gnomon 25, 379–89.Google Scholar
Frank, E. (1974) ‘Works of art in the epics of Valerius Flaccus and Silius Italicus’, RIL 108, 837–44.Google Scholar
Fucecchi, M. (2013) ‘Looking for the giants: mythological imagery and discourse on power in Flavian epic’, in Manuwald, G., Voigt, A. (eds.) Flavian epic interactions, Berlin and Boston, 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, J. (1971) ‘Mezentius and Polyphemus’, AJP 92, 129–55.Google Scholar
Grant, J. N. (1969) ‘Dido Melissa’, Phoenix 23, 380–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. (1979) ‘The Fourth “Georgic”, Virgil, and Rome’, G&R 26, 61–80.Google Scholar
Gross, N. P. (1976) ‘Nausicaa: a feminine threat’, CW 69, 311–17.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: cosmos and imperium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2006) ‘Virgil's Ptolemaic relations’, JRS 96, 25–41.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2012) Rumour and renown: representations of Fama in Western literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. L. (1972–3) ‘Why did Venus wear boots? – Some reflections on Aeneid 1.314f.’, PVS 12, 10–25.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. L. (1984) ‘The Aeneid and Carthage’, in Woodman, T., West, D. (eds.) Poetry and politics in the age of Augustus, Cambridge, 95–115.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. L. (1985) ‘Foundation prodigies in the Aeneid ’, PLLS 5, 131–64.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2010) ‘Picturing the future again: proleptic ekphrasis in Silius’ Punica ’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.) Brill's companion to Silius Italicus, Leiden and Boston, 279–92.Google Scholar
Henry, J. (1889) Aeneidea, vol. III, Dublin.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A. (1983) Odissea IX–XII, Milano.Google Scholar
Hornsby, R. A. (1970) Patterns of action in the Aeneid: an interpretation of Virgil's epic similes, Iowa City.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1973–4) ‘Dido in the light of history’, PVS 13, 1–13 = (1990) in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) Oxford readings in Vergil's Aeneid, Oxford, 127–44.Google Scholar
Hügi, M. (1952) Vergils Aeneis und die hellenistische Dichtung, Noctes Romanae 4, Bern/Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness visible: a study of Vergil's Aeneid, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knauer, G. N. (1964) Die Aeneis und Homer, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kraggerud, E. (1963) ‘Vergil über die Gründung Karthagos’, SO 38, 32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, M. (1983) ‘Iliadisches im ersten Buch der Aeneis’, Gymnasium 90, 203–39.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1977) ‘ Sedes apibus: from the Georgics to the Aeneid ’, Vergilius 23, 2–16.Google Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. (2009) ‘Microcosm and the Virgilian persona’, in Nau, F. (ed.) Autoportraits de poètes: les paratopies romaines et leur postérité, Camenae 7: http://www.paris-sorbonne.fr/IMG/pdf/MAC_GORAIN_MICROCOSM_AND_THE_VIRGILIAN_PERSONA.pdf Google Scholar
Mariotti, S. (1955) Il Bellum Poenicum e l'arte di Nevio: saggio con edizione dei frammenti del Bellum Poenicum, Roma.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1986) John Milton and the transformation of ancient epic, London and Sydney.Google Scholar
Morley, N. (2007) ‘Civil war and succession crisis in Roman beekeeping’, Historia 56, 462–70.Google Scholar
Moskalew, W. (1988) ‘The Cyclops, Achaemenides, and the permutations of the guest–host relationship in Aeneid 1–4’, Vergilius 34, 25–34.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1969) P. Vergili Maronis Opera recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit R. A. B. Mynors, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Y. (1984) ‘The lover and the statesman: a study in apiculture (Virgil, Georgics 4.281–558)’, in Woodman, T., West, D. (eds.) Poetry and politics in the age of Augustus, Cambridge, 59–82.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Y. (1989) ‘Aristaeus: Augustus: Berenice: Aeneas’, Mnemosyne 42, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelis, D. (1992) ‘The Aristaeus episode and Aeneid 1’, in Haan, E. A. M. (ed.) From erudition to inspiration: a booklet for Michael (Michael McGann), Belfast, 3–18.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2001) Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, Leeds.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1965) A commentary on Livy Books 1–5, Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman epic: studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otis, B. (1964) Virgil, a study in civilized poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. (1935) Aeneidos liber quartus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Perutelli, A. (1972) ‘Similitudini e stile “soggettivo” in Virgilio’, Maia 24, 42–60.Google Scholar
Polleichtner, W. (2005) ‘The bee simile: how Vergil emulated Apollonius in his use of Homeric poetry’, Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 8, 115–60: http://gfa.gbv.de/dr,gfa,008,2005,a,07.pdf Google Scholar
Polleichtner, W. (2009) Emotional questions: Vergil, the emotions, and the transformation of epic poetry: an analysis of select scenes, Trier.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1965) The poetry of the Aeneid, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936) The philosophy of rhetoric, London.Google Scholar
Rieks, R. (1981) ‘Die Gleichnisse Vergils’, ANRW II.31.2, 1011–110.Google Scholar
Rose, G. P. (1969) ‘The unfriendly Phaeacians’, TAPA 100, 387–406.Google Scholar
Schell, K. C. (2009) Vergil's self-referential simile: thematic construction through internal allusion in the Aeneid , PhD thesis, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2008) ‘Furthest voices in Virgil's Dido’, SIFC 100, 60–109 and 194–245.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1962) ‘The Phaeacians and the symbolism of Odysseus’ return’, Arion 1, 17–64.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1981) ‘Art and the hero: participation, detachment, and narrative point of view in Aeneid 1’, Arethusa 14, 67–83.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Q. Ennius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stocks, C. A. (forthcoming) The Roman Hannibal: remembering the enemy in Silius Italicus’ Punica, Liverpool.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strzelecki, W. (1964) Cn. Naeuii Belli Punici carminis quae supersunt, Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. (2012) Virgil Aeneid Book XII, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Nortwick, T. (1992) Somewhere I have never travelled: the second self and the hero's journey in ancient epic, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. (1981) ‘Land and sacrifice in the Odyssey ’, in Gordon, R. L. (ed.) Myth, religion and society, Cambridge, 80–94.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1943) ‘Alcaeus of Messene, Philip V, and Rome (concluded)’, CQ 37.1, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1973) Livy Book XXI, Bristol.Google Scholar
West, D. (1969) ‘Multiple-correspondence similes in the Aeneid ’, JRS 59, 40–9.Google Scholar
West, D. (1970) ‘Virgilian multiple-correspondence similes and their antecedents’, Philologus 114, 262–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigodsky, M. (1972) Vergil and early Latin poetry, Hermes Einzelschriften 24, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Winter, I. J. (1995) ‘Homer's Phoenicians: history, ethnography, or literary trope? [A perspective on early orientalism]’ in Carter, J. B., Morris, S. P. (eds.) The ages of Homer, Austin, 247–71.Google Scholar