Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T02:58:13.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Black Hunter revisited1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Pierre Vidal-Naquet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Memory of Moses and Mary Finley

Like many of its brothers in ambiguity, ‘the Black Hunter’ has a double birthday. Like the First international, it is a French child educated in England. As ‘Le Chasseur Noir’, this paper was first given in Paris, on 6 February 1967, at the Association pour l'Encouragement des Etudes Grecques, and, a year later (15 February 1968), in Cambridge at the Philological Society. I owe it to the truth to say that in Paris the audience remained mute. In Cambridge, on the contrary, there was a lively discussion, not only among the classicists but also with no less an anthropologist than Edmund Leach, now Sir Edumnd. A few months later the paper was first published in Cambridge, on the initiative of the late Denys Page, in a translation by Janet Lloyd and with a dedication to the late Moses Finley, and a little later in Paris. One may easily note here a structural opposition in the form of a chiasmus: in Cambridge, in the University where eminent classicists – Jane Harrison, Francis MacDonald Cornford – were also anthropologists, it was in a purely philological publication, the Proceedings, that the paper was published. In Paris, where the anthropological tradition of classical studies remained, with Louis Gernet and Henri Jeanmaire, and, more recently, with Jean-Pierre Vernant, outside the University proper, it was in the Annales that the paper was published.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 32 , 1986 , pp. 126 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2. ‘The black hunter and the origin of the Athenian ephebeia’, PCPS n.s. 14 (1968) 49–64Google Scholar; ‘Le chasseur noir et l'origine de l'éphébie athénienne’, Annales E.S.C. 23 (1968) 947–64Google Scholar.

3. Guerra, agoni e culti nella Grecia arcaica (1961).

4. Rome, 1969.

5. Jeanmaire, H., ‘La cryptie lacédémonienne’, REG 26 (1913) 121–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Couroi et courètes (1939).

6. One could quote J. P. Vernant's work on Hestia and Hermes; cf. now his Mythe et pensée chez les grecs2 (1985) 155–201Google Scholar.

7. Cf. Le chasseur noir ed. 2 (1983) 19 ( = The black hunter (1986) xxiv).

8. Cf. Jeanmaire (n.5) 142; Cartledge, P., ‘Hoplites and heroes: Sparta's contribution to the technique of ancient warfare’, JHS 97 (1977) 11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar ( = Sparta (WB Darmstadt, 1986( 387-425, 470); Loraux, N., ‘La belle mort spartiate’, Ktema 2 (1977) 105–20Google Scholar.

9. The major work was Manns, O., Über die Jagd bei den Griechen (Progr. Kassel 1888) 7–38Google Scholar; 1889, 3-20; 1890, 3-21. We have now Anderson, J. K., Hunting in the ancient world (1985)Google Scholar, and we shall soon have Alain Schnapp's doctoral dissertation. For a very brief presentation cf. Sherratt, A., ‘The chase, from subsistence to sport’, The Ashmolean 10 (summer 1986) 4–7Google Scholar.

10. Athenaeus 18a.

11. Laws 7.822d-4a.

12. Faure, Paul, La vie quotidienne en Grèce au temps de la guerre de Troie (1975) 148Google Scholar.

13. For the sources cf. ‘Black Hunter’ (n.2) 51-4.

14. Vv. 781-96 (Dickinson's translation).

15. In spite of what is argued by Anderson (n. 9) 159 n. 3; cf. ‘Black Hunter’ (n. 2) 62-3.

16. Cf., e.g., Gordon, R. (ed.), Myth, religion and society (1981) 147–62Google Scholar, with some additional notes by Gordon, R., and my The black hunter (1986)Google Scholar.

17. Cf., e.g., Maxwell-Stuart, P. G., ‘Remarks on the black cloaks of the ephebes’, PCPS n.s. 16 (1970) 113–16Google Scholar.

18. Cf. my essays in Vernant, J. P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., Tragedy and myth in ancient Greece (1981)Google Scholar.

19. Cf. my ‘Recipes for Greek adolescence’, in Gordon (n. 16) and now also in The black hunter (1986).

20. Cf. ‘Flavius Arrien entre deux mondes’ in Arrien, histoire d'Alexandre le grand (1984) 355–65Google Scholar.

21. Cf. Sourvinou-Inwood, C., JHS 91 (1971) 172–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bruhns, H., ‘Initiation in der Antike: Tod, Wiedergeburt und Politik’, Journal für Geschichte 1 (1979) 33–7Google Scholar; Mason, P., The city of men. Ideology, sexual politics and the social formation (1984) 50–8Google Scholar.

22. Reinmuth, O. W., The ephebic inscriptions of the fourth century B.C. (1971) 126Google Scholar.

23. Anderson (n. 9) 159 n.3; di Benedetto, V., ‘Il Filottete e l'efebia secondo Pierre Vidal-Naquet’, Belfagor 33 (1978) 191–207Google Scholar (reprinted in Filologia e marxismo. Contro le mistificazioni (1981)).

24. Cf., e.g., Schmitt, P., ‘Athéna Apatouria et la ceinture. Les aspects féminins des Apatouries à Athènes’, Annales E. S. C. 32 (1977) 1059–73Google Scholar; I shall refer later to important evidence given by B. Bravo and P. Gauthier.

25. ‘Black Hunter’ (n. 2) 54.

26. Cf. n. 17.

27. Cf., e.g., Vernant, J. P., Bérard, Cl. and others, La cité des images (1984)Google Scholar.

28. Cf. The world of Odysseus ed. 2 (1977) 142–58Google Scholar.

29. Bravo, B., ‘Sulân. Représailles et justice privée contre les étrangers dans les cités grecques’, ASNP3 10.3 (1980) 675–987, esp. 954-7Google Scholar.

30. Iliad 11.683-4; here and elsewhere I quote Lattimore's translation.

31. Leaf, W., The Iliad2 I (1900) 465–6Google Scholar.

32. Ibid. 466.

33. This is the title of the unpublished dissertation of my former pupil Ariadni Gartziou-Tatti, (E.H.E.S.S., Paris, 1985).

34. G. S. Kirk on Il.3.17-20; Kirk does little to explain this surprise. Paris' cuirass is borrowed from Lycaon (the wolf-man), cf. 3.333.

35. Ibid.

36. Cf. Schnapp-Gourbeillon, Annie, Lions, héros, masques (1981) 135–48Google Scholar.

37. Son of another Lycaon.

38. Beye, C. R., The Iliad, the Odyssey and the epic tradition (1968) 49Google Scholar.

39. Thanks to François Jouan, I was given access to the documentation analysed by Wathelet, Paul in Les Troyens de L'Illiade. Mythe et histoire (diss. Liege 1986) 263-334, 861–915Google Scholar.

40. Pind. Pyth. 4.96, Thucyd.3.22; cf. Le chasseur noir (n. 7) 101-2, 116, 154-5, Black Hunter (n. 7) 69-70, 72-108.

41. Anderson (n.9) xi.

42. Title of one of my three studies in Tragedy and myth (n.18).

43. Anderson (n.9) 53.

44. Anderson (n.9) 53-4.

45. Beazley, J. D., The development of Attic black-figure (1951) 32Google Scholar, quoted by Anderson 53.

46. Cf. n.8 above, and the comments of Heza, E., Eos 62 (1974)-44Google Scholar and of Saïd, S. and Tredé, M., C&M 36 (1985) 65–85Google Scholar. The main Thucydidean references are 2.39, 3.30.2, 5.8; on ambush and surprise in general cf. Pritchett, W. K., The Greek state at war II (1974) 156–89 and III (1979) 330Google Scholar.

47. Reading Greek tragedy (1986) 57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48. Above, n.27.

49. ‘Repolitiser la cité’, L'Homme 97/8 (1986) 239–55Google Scholar.

50. Le miroir d'Hérodote (1980) 59–79Google Scholar.

51. For a good use of this tool in the ancient field cf. Borgeaud, P., ‘L'animal comme opérateur symbolique’ in L'animal, l'homme, le Dieu dans le Proche-Orient ancien (Cahiers du C.E.P.O.A., 1986) 13–19Google Scholar.

52. s.v. συνέφηβος.

53. Lissarrague, F., Archers, peltasts et cavaliers. Aspects de l'iconographie attique du guerrier (diss. E.H.E.S.S., Paris 1983)Google Scholar.

54. On the ‘Scythians’ see also Brown, F. S. and Blake Tyrrell, W. M., ‘Ἐκιλώσαντο: A reading of Herodotus' Amazons’, CJ 80 (1985) 297–302Google Scholar.

55. This is the reason why the storie di caccia analysed by Pellizer, E. (Favole d'identita. Favole di paura (1982))Google Scholar seem to me distinct from my work despite some interesting parallels (40-6).

56. I mentioned this point in ‘Black Hunter’ (n.2) 50-1, relying heavily on Labarbe, J., BAB 1953.358–94Google Scholar.

57. For a recent comment cf. Rhodes, P. J., A commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia (1981) 493–5Google Scholar; Rhodes does not, however, seriously discuss the question of origins.

58. Lycurgus, fr. 25 Sauppe.

59. ‘Recipes’ (n.19 above).

60. Cf. Reinmuth (n.22) 123-38.

61. Un commentaire historique des Poroi de Xénophon (1976) 190–5Google Scholar.

62. On the embassy 167.

63. So E. Heza (n.46) 228: ‘Dans la cité, il n'y a ni “classes militaires” ni héros, les uns et les autres maitres de la gloire, mais une communauté dont les membres portent les armes, renoncent à tout exploit individuel et n'agissent au combat que sous forme collective.’

64. Cf. the preface to Mazon's, P. translation of the Iliad (1975) 22–6Google Scholar.

65. Diod. Sic. 12.70; in general cf. Detienne, M., ‘La phalange. Problèmes, et controverses’ in Vernant, J. P. (ed.), Problèmes de la guerre en Grèce ancienne (1968) 119–42Google Scholar, Hoffmann, G., ‘Les choisis: un ordre dans la cité grecque?’, Droit et culture 9/10 (1985) 15–26Google Scholar (with the essential references).

66. Lac. 4.3.

67. Hdt. 7.205; cf. Loraux (n.8) 117.

68. Hdt. 9.21.

69. Thucyd. 6.100.1 (a reference I owe to A. Andrewes).

70. In Syracuse the Athenians had to fight a group of 600 (not 300) λογάδες. Half of them died, which is the traditional function of these elite soldiers (Thucyd. 6.96.3, 97.4).

71. καὶ τῶν ψιλῶν τινας ἐκλεκτὸυς ὡπλισμένους (6.100.1).

72. FGrHist 70 F 149 (in Strabo 10.483), a text commented upon by, among others, Briquel, D., ‘Initiations grecques et idéologie irrdo-européenne’, Annales E.S.C. 37 (1982) 454–69Google Scholar, and Jeanmaire, , Couroi et courètes 450–5Google Scholar.

73. Ibid. 540-52; Cf. Xen. Lac. 4.3. The hippeis were recruited from among the ἡβῶντες.

74. Thucyd. 5.67.2, Diod, Sic. 12.75 (Oldfather's translation except for the detail). This group of 1000 λογάδες has obviously suceeded in Argos to the archaic group of 300 whom Herodotus describes fighting their Spartan counterpart (1.82; cf. Pausanias 2.38.4-5).

75. For Elis, Thucyd. 2.25.3; for Megara, 5.60.3.

76. Pelopidas 14.18-19.

77. Other than Plutarch, the main sources are Diod. Sic. 12.70, Polyaenus 2.51., Athenaeus 13.602a (from Hieronymus the Peripatetic).

78. s.v. τριακάτιοι. οἱ ἐφήβοι καὶ τὸ σύστημα αὐτῶν.

79. For this distinction cf. SEG ix.72, 34-40.

80. The bulk of the evidence is given by Luni, , Quaderni di archeologia della Libia 8 (1976) 223–84Google Scholar, esp. 236-55. For the officers cf. SEG ix.7 (Schwyzer 234), 14 and 51, ix.9.51, ix.742 (the τριακακάρχαι take the name of ὲφήβαρχοι); Eustathius on Il.8.518 mentions the fact that in Cyrene the ephebes were called the three hundred. I owe my knowledge of these documents to Catherine Dobias-Lalou, whose doctoral dissertation will contain a thorough analysis of this evidence.

81. Cf. Le chasseur noir (n.7) 197-9, Black Hunter (n.7) 145-7 and, most recently, Osborne, R., Demos. The discovery of classical Attika (1985) 154–72Google Scholar.

82. Cf. Winkler, J. J., ‘The ephebe's song; tragôida and polis’, Representations 11 (1985) 27–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; esp. 32-5.

83. P. 63 n.3.

84. ‘Le Philoctète de Sophocle et l'ephébie’, Annales E. S. C. 26 (1971) 623–38Google Scholar ( = Tragedy and myth 175-99).

85. This is a suggestion of Yangos Adreadis who has promised to develop it.

86. Cf. Segal, C., Dionysiac poetics and Euripides' Bacchae (1982) 189–201Google Scholar.

87. Cf. di Benedetto (n.23) 115-36; Winnington-Ingram, R. P., ‘Sophoclea’ BICS 16 (1979) 1-12, pp. 10–11Google Scholar. I shall make a detailed reply to these two papers (among others) in a forthcoming essay.

88. ‘Filottete delle galassie’, Sigma 7 (1981) 15–25Google Scholar.

89. This book was translated into both Italian and French, and it is the French version with which I am familiar.

90. I am here indebted to M. Casevitz.

91. Cf. Schol. Pind. Pyth 2.127, Hesychius s.v. πυρρίχα, πυρρίχας, πυρριχίζειν, Diomedes, Ars grammatica 3 (in Grammatici Latini 1.475), Lucian, , De saltatione 9Google Scholar.

92. Andromache 1135; cf. Pouilloux, J. in Pouilloux, J. et Roux, G., Énigmes à Delphes (1963) 117Google Scholar.

93. On Eurypylus cf. Pausanias 3.26.9, Hyginus, , Fab. 112Google Scholar, Strabo 13.584.

94. Laws 7.796b-c; cf. also Athenaeus 14.631c, Άριστόξενος δέ φησιν ώς οἰ παλαιοί γυμναζόμενοι πρῶτον ἐν τῆι γυμνοπαιδίκηι εἰς τὴν πυρρίχην ἐχώρουν πρὸ τοῦ εἰσιέναι εἰς τὸ θέατρον.

95. On the pyrrhikhe cf. Poursat, J. C., BCH 92 (1968) 550–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and particularly Scarpi, P., Dialoghi di archeologia n.s. 1 (1979) 78–97Google Scholar.

96. He was still a νεανίας at the time of his death at Andr. 1104.

97. Morel, J. P., REL 47 (1969) 208–52Google Scholar; cf. also the other papers by Morel, J. P. quoted in The black hunter (n.7) 347–8Google Scholar.

98. Morel relies heavily on Eberle, O., Cenalora. Leben, Glaube, Tanz und Theater der Urvölker (1955)Google Scholar.

99. Cf. n.82 above.

100. I must, however, admit that I am proud to be the originator of such a valiant enterprise.

101. HA 7.581a21-7, GA 5.787b32-8a.

102. Aristotle in fact opposes τραγίζειν to the practice of choral song (HA cited in n. 101).

103. Winkler (n. 82) 47-8.

104. ARV 2 1336, frequently reproduced, e.g. Pickard-Cambridge, A., The dramatic festivals of Athens2 (1968) fig. 49Google Scholar, Seaford, R., Euripides: Cyclops (1984) fig. IIIGoogle Scholar.

105. David Lewis informs me that he believes it to be the description of a dithyrambic chorus.

106. This will be demonstrated in a forthcoming paper by F. Lissarrague.

107. In his valuable edition of the Cyclops (n.104) 3.

108. Winkler (n.82) 39.

109. Cyclops (n. 104) 33-6.

110. So Detienne (n.65) 123.

111. Cf., e.g., Mythe et epopée (1968) 63–5Google Scholar, Heur et malheur du guerrier3 (1985) 140, 161–8Google Scholar.

112. Strangely enough, in Mitra-Varuna2 (1948) 48–54Google Scholar Dumézil draws a parallel between Luperci and Flamines as between iuniores and seniores. He takes it for granted that the Luperci belong to the first function, while quoting Valerius Maximus 2.2 who defines them as equestris ordinis iuuentus (49). I wonder if this should not be reassessed. I thank John Scheid for documentation on these topics.

113. Davidson, O. M., ‘The crown-bestower in the Iranian book of Kings’, Papers in honour of Professor Mary Boyle (1985) 61–148Google Scholar, esp. 81-7.

114. For an attempt to link the Greek data, and particularly the analysis of the ‘Black Hunter’, to Indo-European studies cf. Briquel (n.72).