Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:01:43.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INCREDVLVS ODI: HORACE AND THE SUBLITERARY AESTHETIC OF THE AUGUSTAN STAGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2019

Ismene Lada-Richards*
Affiliation:
King's College London, UK

Abstract

Starting from the comparative standpoint of elite hostility to nineteenth-century British melodrama, this article posits pantomime's ‘melodramatic’ mode of exhibitionist excess as one of the missing links in the landscape against which Horace composed his Ars poetica. It suggests that lines 182–8 of the Ars that disapprove the display of death, violence and physical impossibilities on the tragic stage may be better understood as Horace's hostile response to pantomime's increasing prominence in Roman theatrical life, more precisely to the dislocation of ‘horror’ and ‘marvel’ from the realm of the ‘heard’ to that of the ‘seen’ favoured by the pantomime genre.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works cited

Babcock, B. A. (1978) ‘Introduction’, in id. (ed.), The reversible world: symbolic inversion in art and society, London, 1336.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays, ed. Holquist, M., trans. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., Austin.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997) The poet and the prince: Ovid and Augustan discourse, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London (Italian edn 1994).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘Masculinity in the 90's: the education of Achilles in Statius and Quintilian’, in Paschalis, M. (ed.), Roman and Greek imperial epic, Rethymnon Classical Studies 2, Herakleion, 4775.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2006) ‘Music for monsters: Ovid's Metamorphoses, bucolic evolution, and bucolic criticism’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.), Brill's companion to Greek and Latin pastoral, Leiden, 403–25.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2015) Persius: a study in food, philosophy, and the figural, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Beer, G. (1977) ‘“Coming wonders”: uses of theatre in the Victorian novel’, in Axton, M. and Williams, R. (eds.), English drama: form and development, Cambridge, 164–85.Google Scholar
Ben-Porat, Z. (1976) ‘The poetics of literary allusion’, PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature 1, 105–28.Google Scholar
Bonaria, M. (1955–6) Mimorum romanorum fragmenta, Genova.Google Scholar
Booth, M. R. (1965) English melodrama, London.Google Scholar
Booth, M. R. (1981) Victorian spectacular theatre 1850–1910, London.Google Scholar
Booth, M. R. (1991) Theatre in the Victorian age, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste, trans. Nice, R., London.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. (2004) Juvenal and Persius, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on poetry: prolegomena to the literary Epistles, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1982) Horace on poetry: Epistles book ii. The letters to Augustus and Florus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. (1993) Body work: objects of desire in modern narrative, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. (1995) The melodramatic imagination: Balzac, Henry James, melodrama and the mode of excess, 2nd edn, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Cadario, M. (2009) ‘L'immagine di una vedette del pantomimo: l'altare funebre di Teocritus Pylades (CIL v 5889) tra Lodi e Milano’, Stratagemmi 9, 1162.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2009) ‘Young Achilles in the Roman world’, JRS 99, 122.Google Scholar
Chamay, J. and Cambitoglou, A. (1980) ‘La folie d'Athamas par le peintre de Darius’, Antike Kunst 23, 3543.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2009) ‘Horace's Ars poetica and the marvellous’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), Paradox and the marvellous in Augustan literature and culture, Oxford, 1940.Google Scholar
Cox, J. N. (1996) ‘The ideological tack of nautical melodrama’, in Hays and Nikolopoulou (1996) 167–90.Google Scholar
Cyrino, M. S. (1998) ‘Heroes in d(u)ress: transvestism and power in the myths of Herakles and Achilles’, Arethusa 31.2, 207–41.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. C. and François-Garelli, M-H. (1998) Le théâtre à Rome, Paris.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. (2004) ‘Some tragic newsbringers’, Mediterranean Archaeology 27, 131–8.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. and Hall, E. (eds.) (2002) Greek and Roman actors: aspects of an ancient profession, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2007) ‘Philostratus visualizes the tragic: some ecphrastic and pictorial receptions of Greek tragedy in the Roman era’, in Kraus, C., Goldhill, S., Foley, H. P. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Visualizing the tragic: drama, myth, and ritual in Greek art and literature. Essays in Honour of Froma Zeitlin, Oxford, 309–37.Google Scholar
Falkner, T. (2002) ‘Scholars versus actors: text and performance in the Greek tragic scholia’, in Easterling and Hall (2002) 342–61.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1989) ‘Mime: the missing link in Roman literary history’, CW 82, 153–63.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Orator and/et Actor’, in Easterling and Hall (2002) 362–76.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004) Ovid's Metamorphoses, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2013) Roman literary culture: from Plautus to Macrobius, 2nd edn, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (2012) Achilles in love: intertextual studies, Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2002) ‘Una cum scriptore meo: poetry, principate, and the traditions of literary history in the Epistle to Augustus’, in Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and contexts in the poetry of Horace, Cambridge, 172–87.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2004) ‘Tenuilatens discrimine: spotting the differences in Statius’ Achilleid’, MD 52, 85105.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2009) ‘Becoming an authority: Horace on his own reception’, in Houghton, L. and Wyke, M. (eds.), Perceptions of Horace: a Roman poet and his readers, Cambridge, 1638.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (1998) Spectacle and society in Livy's history, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997) ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39, 1334.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2001) Satires of Rome: threatening poses from Lucilius to Juvenal, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1975) Ovid's Metamorphoses: an introduction to the basic aspects, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1996) Augustan culture: an interpretive introduction, Princeton.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1999) ‘Ovid's Metamorphoses and Augustan cultural thematics’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. E. (eds.), Ovidian transformations: essays on Ovid's Metamorphoses and its reception, Cambridge, 103–11.Google Scholar
Garelli, M.-H. (2004) ‘La pantomime antique ou les mythes revisités: le répertoire de Lucien (Danse, 38–60)’, Dioniso 3, 108–19.Google Scholar
Garelli, M.-H. (2006) ‘Pantomime, tragédie et patrimoine littéraire sous l'Empire’, Pallas 71, 113–25.Google Scholar
Garelli, M-H. (2007) Danser le mythe: la pantomime et sa réception dans la culture antique, Louvain.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1996) ‘The fall and rise of Roman tragedy’, TAPhA 126, 265–86.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2005) Constructing literature in the Roman Republic: poetry and its reception, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Green, J. R. (1999) ‘Tragedy and the spectacle of the mind: messenger speeches, actors, narrative, and audience imagination in fourth-century BCE vase-painting’, in Bergmann, B. and Kondoleon, C. (eds.), The art of ancient spectacle, New Haven and London, 3764.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (1998) ‘Discovering the body in Roman oratory’, in Wyke, M. (ed.), Parchments of gender: deciphering the bodies of antiquity, Oxford, 169–89.Google Scholar
Gunning, T. (1989) ‘An aesthetic of astonishment: early film and the (in)credulous spectator’, Art and Text 34, 114–33.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (2002) ‘Ovid and empire’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Ovid, Cambridge, 4661.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (2005) The world of Roman song: from ritualized speech to social order, Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Haight, G. S. (ed.) (1954) The George Eliot letters, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2007) ‘Greek tragedy 430–380 BC’, in Osborne, R. (ed.), Debating the Athenian cultural revolution: art, literature, philosophy, and politics 430–380 BC, Cambridge, 264–87.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2008) ‘Is the “Barcelona Alcestis” a Latin pantomime libretto?’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 258–82.Google Scholar
Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.) (2008) New directions in ancient pantomime, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993) ‘Ut pictura poesis? Horace and the visual arts’, in Rudd, N. (ed.), Horace 2000: a celebration. Essays for the bimillennium, London, 120–39.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2000) ‘Coming to terms with the empire: poetry of the later Augustan and Tiberian period’, in Taplin, O. (ed.), Literature in the Greek and Roman worlds: a new perspective, Oxford, 403–37.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2007) Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hays, M. and Nikolopoulou, A. (eds.) (1996) Melodrama: the cultural emergence of a genre, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. (2005) The transvestite Achilles: gender and genre in Statius’ Achilleid, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1998) Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (2000) ‘Essential epic: genre and gender from Macer to Statius’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Matrices of genre: authors, canons, and society, Cambridge, MA, 221–46.Google Scholar
Hunt, Y. (2008) ‘Roman pantomime libretti and their Greek themes: the role of Augustus in the romanization of the Greek classics’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 169–84.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2004) ‘Hellenistic drama’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (eds.), Tradition and innovation in Hellenistic poetry, Cambridge, 404–43.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (1989) ‘Augustan critics’, in Kennedy, G. (ed.), The Cambridge history of literary criticism. Vol. i: Classical criticism, Cambridge, 245–73.Google Scholar
John, J. (2001) Dickens's villains: melodrama, character, popular culture, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1986) Culture and society in Lucian, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Jory, J. (1981) ‘The literary evidence for the beginnings of imperial pantomime’, BICS 28, 147–61.Google Scholar
Jory, J. (1995) ‘Ars ludicra and the ludus talarius’, in Griffiths, A. (ed.), Stage directions: essays in ancient drama in honour of E.W. Handley, BICS Suppl. 66, 139–52.Google Scholar
Jory, J. (2004) ‘Pylades, pantomime, and the preservation of tragedy’, MeditArch 17, 147–56.Google Scholar
Jory, J. (2008) ‘The pantomime dancer and his libretto’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 157–68.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, R. S. 1990. The poetry of criticism: Horace Epistles ii and Ars poetica, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
Kokolakis, M. (1976) Philologika meletēmata, Athens.Google Scholar
Kozak, D. (2014) ‘Si forte reponis Achillem: Achilles in the Ars poetica, the Metamorphoses, and the Achilleid’, MD 72, 207–21.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (1950) ‘Orazio, Augusto e la questione del teatro latino’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Lettere, Storia e Filosofia, Serie ii, 19.3/4, 143–54.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2003a) ‘“A worthless feminine thing”? Lucian and the “optic intoxication” of pantomime dancing’, Helios 30.1, 2175.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2003b) ‘“Mobile statuary”: refractions of pantomime dancing from Callistratus to Emma Hamilton and Andrew Durcrow’, IJCT 10.1, 337.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2004) ‘Mythōn eikōn: pantomime dancing and the figurative arts in imperial and late antiquity’, Arion 2.2, 1746.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2006) ‘“Becoming mad on stage”: Lucian on the perils of acting and spectating’, BICS 49, 155–74.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2007) Silent eloquence: Lucian and pantomime dancing, London.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2008) ‘Was pantomime “good to think with” in the ancient world?’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 285–313.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2013) ‘Mutata corpora: Ovid's changing forms and the metamorphic bodies of pantomime dancing’, TAPhA 143, 105–52.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2016) ‘Dancing trees: Ovid's Metamorphoses and the imprint of pantomime dancing’, AJPh 137.1, 131–69.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2018) ‘“Closing up” on animal metamorphosis: Ovid's micro-choreographies in the Metamorphoses and the corporeal idioms of pantomime dancing’, CW 111.3, 371404.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2014) ‘The Ars poetica’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Horace, Cambridge, 132–43.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, performance, and authority in Augustan Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2014) ‘Politics by other means in Horace's Ars poetica’, MD 72, 121–42.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2011) Roman Republican theatre, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2004) ‘Alcestis and the ancient rehearsal process (P.Oxy. 4546)’, Arion 11.3, 2745.Google Scholar
McAuley, M. (2010) ‘Ambiguous sexus: epic masculinity in transition in Statius’ Achilleid’, Akroterion 55, 3760.Google Scholar
Meisel, M. (1983) Realizations: narrative, pictorial, and theatrical arts in nineteenth-century England, Princeton.Google Scholar
Meisel, M. (2007) How plays work: reading and performance, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mignogna, E. (1997) ‘Leucippe in Tauride (Ach. Tat. 3, 15–22): mimo e “pantomimo” tra tragedia e romanzo’, MD 38, 225–36.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. C. T. (2002) ‘Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture’, Journal of Visual Culture, 1.2, 165–81.Google Scholar
Moody, J. (2000) Illegitimate theatre in London, 1770–1840, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (2015) ‘Ambiguus vultus: Horatian echoes in Statius’ Achilleid’, MD 75, 179–88.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M and Hubbard, M. (1978) A commentary on Horace: Odes book ii, Oxford.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1998) Horace and the rhetoric of authority, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2013) ‘The Ars poetica’, in Günther, H.-C. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Horace, Leiden, 499526.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992) ‘Reading Ovid's rapes’, in ead. (ed.), Pornography and representation in Greece and Rome, Oxford, 158–79.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1997) ‘Gender and rhetoric: producing manhood in the schools’, in Dominik, W. J. (ed.), Roman eloquence: rhetoric in society and literature, London, 90110.Google Scholar
Robert, L. (1930) ‘Pantomimen im griechischen Orient’, Hermes 65, 106–22.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (1992) ‘L'Achilleide di Stazio, un epica dell'ambiguità’, Maia 44, 233–66.Google Scholar
Rotolo, V. (1957) Il pantomimo: studi e testi, Palermo.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1983) ‘Horace’, in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge history of classical literature. Volume ii: Latin literature. Part 3: The age of Augustus, Cambridge, 74108.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1989) Horace: Epistles Book ii and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, C. M. (2014) ‘The most unkindest cut: gender, genre, and castration in Statius’ Achilleid and Silvae 3.4’, AJPh 135.1, 87121.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1989. ‘Horace: The art of poetry’, in Russell and Winterbottom (1989) 98–110.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (2006) ‘Ars poetica’, in Laird, A. (ed.), Oxford Readings in ancient literary criticism, Oxford, 325–45 (originally published in Costa, C. D. N. (ed.), Horace, Cambridge 1973, 113–34).Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M. (1989) (eds.) Classical literary criticism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Slaney, H. (2013) ‘Seneca's chorus of one’, in Billings, J., Budelmann, F. and Macintosh, F. (eds.), Choruses, ancient and modern, Oxford, 99116.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (2007) Pots & plays: interactions between tragedy and Greek vase-painting of the fourth century BC, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1978) ‘Senecan drama and its antecedents’, HSCPh 82, 213–63.Google Scholar
Watson, L. and Watson, P. (eds.) (2014) Juvenal: Satire 6, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2008a) ‘Inside the mask: pantomime from the performers’ perspective’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 43–60.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2008b) Demons and dancers: performance in late antiquity, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Weinreich, O. (1948) Epigrammstudien. Volume i: Epigram und Pantomimus, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
White, P. (1993) Promised verse: poets in the society of Augustan Rome, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1991) ‘Film bodies: gender, genre, and excess’, Film Quarterly 44, 213.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1989) ‘Horace: A letter to Augustus’, in Russell and Winterbottom (1989) 91–7.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1988) ‘Satyrs in Rome? The background to Horace's Ars poetica’, JRS 78, 113.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2008a) ‘Ovid and the stage’, in id. (ed.), Unwritten Rome, Exeter 210–30 (originally published 2002).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2008b) ‘“Mime” and “pantomime”: some problematic texts’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 146–53.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2014) ‘Suetonius and the origin of pantomime’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the biographer: studies in Roman lives, Oxford, 256–72.Google Scholar
Wright, F. W. (1931) Cicero and the theater, Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
Wüst, E. (1949) ‘Pantomimus’, in RE 18.3: cols. 833–69.Google Scholar
Zanobi, A. (2008) ‘The influence of pantomime on Seneca's tragedies’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 227–57.Google Scholar
Wüst, E. (2014) Seneca's tragedies and the aesthetics of pantomime, London.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. (2008) ‘Seneca and Pantomime’, in Hall and Wyles (2008) 218–26.Google Scholar