“Please Don’t Tell Me”
The Right Not to Know
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2011
Knowledge is generally a good thing. People who know lots of bits of information are generally admired. Some of them win prizes in TV competitions. If you were offered the gift of having an entire encyclopedia wired into your brain, you would probably accept, without thinking. But we should be wary of assuming that all knowledge is good. Too much knowledge can inhibit rather than enable thought.
- Special Section: Open Forum
- Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 20 - 29
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
1. Chadwick, R, Levitt, M, Shickle, D, eds. The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know. Aldershot: Avebury; 1997Google Scholar; Andorno, R. The right not to know: An autonomy based approach. Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30:435–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. World Health Organization. Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics and the Provision of Genetic Services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997Google Scholar, at 2.
3. See Foster, C.Autonomy should chair, not rule. The Lancet 2010;375(9712)Google Scholar:368–9 For further examples.
6. Foster, C.Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law. Oxford: Hart; 2009Google Scholar, at chapter 1.
9. Wilson, J.To know or not to know? Genetic ignorance, autonomy and paternalism. Bioethics 2005;19:492–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Laurie, G.Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002, at 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Suter, S.Disentangling privacy from property. George Washington Law Review 2004;72:737–814.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Sperling, S.Knowledge rites and the right not to know. PoLAR 2007;269–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 282.
17. American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics, Opinion 8.08, Informed Consent. Washington, DC: American Medical Council; 2006; available at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion808.page.Google Scholar
18. General Medical Council. Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions Together. London: General Medical Council; 2008, at paras. 14–15.Google Scholar
20. Fortin, J.Children’s rights to know their origins—too far, too fast? Child and Family Law Quarterly 2009;21:336–55.Google Scholar
21. Re T (Paternity: Ordering Blood Tests)  2 Family Law Reports 1190.
22. Smart, C.Family secrets: Law and understandings of openness in everyday relationships. Journal of Social Policy 2009;38:551–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 558.
24. Harris, J, Keywood, K.Ignorance, information and autonomy. Theoretical Medicine 2001;22:415–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Rhodes, R.Genetic links, family ties and social bonds: Rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1998;23:10–30, at 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. E.g., Asscher, E, Koops, B-J.Genetic diagnosis for Huntington’s disease: The right not to know and pre-implantation genetic testing. Journal of Medical Ethics 2010;36:30–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Gilbar, R.Communicating genetic information in the family: The familial relationship as the forgotten factor. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:390–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed