Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T22:44:33.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Canadian Epileptologists’ Counseling of Drivers Amidst Guideline Inconsistencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2014

Jeffrey Jirsch*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton
Donald W. Gross
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton
Nathalie Jette
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Community Health Sciences and Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Paolo Federico
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Community Health Sciences and Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Francois Dubeau
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University
Jose F. Tellez-Zenteno
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewn
Bernd Pohlmann-Eden
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
Jorge G. Burneo
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London
Richard McLachlan
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London
Syed N. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton
Charles Deacon
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec
Manouchehr Javidan
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Dang K. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Montreal, Montreal
R. Mark Sadler
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
Allison Spiller
Affiliation:
Division of Neurogy, Queen’s University, Kingston
Tiffany Townsend
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Martin Veilleux
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University
Richard A. Wennberg
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
Samuel Wiebe
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Community Health Sciences and Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Alexei Yankovsky
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
*
2e3-31 WMC, 8440-112 St, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Email: jeff.jirsch@ualberta.ca.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Epilepsy is a common medical condition for which physicians perform driver fitness assessments. The Canadian Medical association (CMA) and the Canadian Council of Motor transportation administrators (CCMTA) publish documents to guide Canadian physicians’ driver fitness assessments.

Objectives:

We aimed to measure the consistency of driver fitness counseling among epileptologists in Canada, and to determine whether inconsistencies between national guidelines are associated with greater variability in counseling instructions.

Methods:

We surveyed 35 epileptologists in Canada (response rate 71%) using a questionnaire that explored physicians’ philosophies about driver fitness assessments and counseling practices of seizure patients in common clinical scenarios. Of the nine scenarios, CCMTA and CMA recommendations were concordant for only two. Cumulative agreement for all scenarios was calculated using Kappa statistic. Agreement for concordant (two) vs. discordant (seven) scenarios were split at the median and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test.

Results:

Overall the agreement between respondents for the clinical scenarios was not acceptable (Kappa=0.28). For the two scenarios where CMa and CCMta guidelines were concordant, specialists had high levels of agreement with recommendations (89% each). A majority of specialists disagreed with CMa recommendations in three of seven discordant scenarios. The lack of consistency in respondents’ agreement attained statistical significance (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

Canadian epileptologists have variable counseling practices about driving, and this may be attributable to inconsistencies between CMa and CCMta medical fitness guidelines. This study highlights the need to harmonize driving recommendations in order to prevent physician and patient confusion about driving fitness in Canada.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2014

References

1.Gray, C, Sullivan, P.MDs still the key to eliminating unfit drivers, jury decides. CMAJ. 2002;166(9):1196.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Redelmeier, DA, Vinkatesh, V, Stanbrook, MB.Mandatory reporting by physicians of patients potentially unfit to drive. Open Med. 2008;2(1):e8–17.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Redelmeier, DA, Yarnell, CJ, Thiruchelvam, D, Tibshirani, RJ.Physicians' warnings for unfit drivers and the risk of trauma from road crashes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1228–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Gilliam, F, Kuzniecky, R, Faught, E, Black, L, Carpenter, G, Schrodt, R.Patient-validated content of epilepsy-specific quality-of-life measurement. Epilepsia. 1997;38(2):233–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Jang, RW, Man-Son-Hing, M, Molnar, FJ, et al. Family physicians' attitudes and practices regarding assessments of medical fitness to drive in older persons. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(4):531–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Marshall, SC, Gilbert, N.Saskatchewan physicians' attitudes and knowledge regarding assessment of medical fitness to drive. CMAJ. 1999;160(12):1701–4.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators. CCMTA medical standards for drivers. Ottawa (ON): The Council; 2011.Google Scholar
8.Canadian Medical Association. Determining medical fitness to operate motor vehicles. CMA driver's guide. 8th ed. Toronto (ON): The Association; 2012.Google Scholar
9.Gross, DW.CMA driver's guide. CMAJ. 2007;177(1):64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Krumholz, A.Driving issues in epilepsy: past, present, and future. Epilepsy Curr. 2009;9(2):31–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles. British Columbia Driver Fitness Handbook for Medical Professionals 2010. Victoria (BC): The Ministry; 2010.Google Scholar
12.Règlement sur les conditions d'accès à la conduite d'un véhicule routier relatives à la santé des conducteurs : Code de la securite routiere Quebec de 2009, Pub.L. c-24.2, a.619, par.2 et 8.Google Scholar
13.World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2013: Supporting a decade of action 2013. Geneva (Switzerland): The Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
14.Devlin, A, Odell, M, L Charlton, J, Koppel, S.Epilepsy and driving: current status of research. Epilepsy Res. 2012;102(3):135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.King, D, Benbow, SJ, Barrett, JA.The law and medical fitness to drive–a study of doctors' knowledge. Postgrad Med J. 1992;68(802):624–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Kelly, R, Warke, T, Steele, I.Medical restrictions to driving: the awareness of patients and doctors. Postgrad Med J. 1999;75(887):537–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Drazkowski, JF, Neiman, ES, Sirven, JI, McAbee, GN, Noe, KH.Frequency of physician counseling and attitudes toward driving motor vehicles in people with epilepsy: comparing a mandatory-reporting with a voluntary-reporting state. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;19(1):52–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Shareef, YS, McKinnon, JH, Gauthier, SM, Noe, KH, Sirven, JI, Drazkowski, JF.Counseling for driving restrictions in epilepsy and other causes of temporary impairment of consciousness: how are we doing? Epilepsy Behav. 2009;14(3):550–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Harvey, P, Hopkins, A.Views of British neurologists on epilepsy, driving, and the law. Lancet. 1983;1(8321):401–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.McLachlan, RS, Jones, MW.Epilepsy and driving: a survey of Canadian neurologists. Can J Neurol Sci. 1997;24(4):345–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Andermann, F, Rémillard, GM, Zifkin, BG, Trottier, AG, Drouin, P.Epilepsy and driving. Can J Neurol Sci. 1988;15(4):371–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Farquhar, CM, Kofa, EW, Slutsky, JR.Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Med J Austr. 2002;177:502–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Wiebe, S.Still an elusive target: guiding practice for epilepsy surgery. Neurology. 2010;75:678–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Winston, GP, Jaiser, SR.Western driving regulations for unprovoked first seizures and epilepsy. Seizure. 2012;21(5):371–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Eur-lex.Europa.eu. Brussels: European Union Amending Counsel Directive 91/439/EEC on driving licenses; [updated 2009 Aug 25; cited 2009 Aug 26] Available from: http://eurex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:223:0026:01:EN:HTML.Google Scholar
26.Butcher, D.CMA driver's guide. CMAJ. 2007;177(1):64–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar