Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-23T02:33:25.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Delayed Auditory Tone Perception in Multiple Sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Douglas B. Quine ,
David Regan  and
Thomas J. Murray
Douglas B. Quine*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology, Biophysics, Physiology, Otolaryngology and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
David Regan
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology, Biophysics, Physiology, Otolaryngology and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
Thomas J. Murray
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology, Biophysics, Physiology, Otolaryngology and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
*
Quine’s present address is: Pharmacology, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Delays of auditory perception at three frequencies were measured in 30 multiple sclerosis patients using a pscyhophysical technique. Nineteen patients had abnormal delays at one or more tone frequencies, though 15 had normal audiograms at those frequencies. In addition, auditory acuity for left-right asynchrony was abnormally poor in 13 patients, 9 of whom had normal audiograms. Such delays of auditory perception within a restricted frequency band may provide a partial explanation for degraded speech comprehension in some multiple sclerosis patients.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , August 1983 , pp. 183 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1983

References

Citron, L., Dix, M.R., Hallpike, C.S. & Hood, J.D. (1963). A recent clinopathological study of cochlear nerve degeneration resulting from tumour pressure and disseminated sclerosis. Acta Otolaryngology 56:330–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hausler, R. & Levine, R.A. (1980), Brain stem auditory evoked potentials are related to interaural time discrimination in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain Res 191:589–594.Google ScholarPubMed
Heron, J.R., Regan, D. & Milner, B. A. (1974) Delay in visual perception in unilateral optic atrophy after retrobulbar neuritis. Brain 97:69–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerger, J., Weikers, N.J., Sharbrough, F.W. Ill & Jerger, S. (1969) Bilateral lesions of the temporal lobe: A case study. Acta Otolaryngologia Suppl. 258:1–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Julesz, B. (1980) Spatial frequency channels in one-, two- and three-dimensional vision: variations on an auditory theme by Békésy. In Visual coding and adaptability (ed. Harris, C.S.). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
Koles, Z.J. & Rasminsky, M. (1972) A computer simulation of conduction in demyelinated nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 227:351–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtzke, J.F. (1965) Further notes on disability evaluation in multiple sclerosis, with scale modifications. Neurology 15:654–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitt, H. (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 49:467–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, W.I. (1974) Pathophysiology in multiple sclerosis. Brain 97:179–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noffsinger, D., Olsen, W.O., Carhart, R., Hart, C.W. & Sahgal, V. (1972) Auditory and vestibular aberrations in multiple sclerosis. Acta Oto-laryngology Suppl. 303:1–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Regan, D., Milner, B.A. & Heron, J.R. (1976) Delayed visual perception and delayed visual evoked potentials in the spinal form of multiple sclerosis and in retrobulbar neuritis. Brain 99:43–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, K. & Rudge, P. (1975) Auditory evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1:1164–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, A.S., Ellison, G.W., Myers, L.W. & Tourtellotte, W.W. (1976) Criteria for the clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Nerology 26 no. 6 pt. 2:20–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Schumacher, G.A., Beebe, G., Kibler, R.F., Kurland, L.T., Kurtzke, J.F., McDowell, F., Nagler, B., Sibley, W.A., Tourtellotte, W.W. & Willmon, T.L. (1965) Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: Report by the panel on the evaluation of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis. Ann. N.Y Acad. Sci. 122:552–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidtis, J.J., Volpe, B.T. & Gazzaniga, M.S. (1979) Impaired auditory pattern recognition in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 29:597 (Abstract pp. 98).Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, Nwe York.Google Scholar
Swets, J.A. (1973) The relative operating characteristic in psychology. Science 182:990–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetherill, G.B. & Levitt, H. (1965) Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 18:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed