Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:33:34.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuropsychological Functioning in PLS: A Comparison with ALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2018

Gloria M. Grace ,
J. B. Orange ,
Ann Rowe ,
Karen Findlater ,
Morris Freedman  and
Michael J. Strong
Gloria M. Grace
Affiliation:
Clinical Neurological Sciences and Psychological Services
J. B. Orange
Affiliation:
London Health Sciences Centre; School of Communication Sciences and Disorders
Ann Rowe
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences
Karen Findlater
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences
Morris Freedman
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London; Behavioural Neurology Program. Division of Neurology and Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest; Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Mt. Sinai Hospital, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Michael J. Strong*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences
*
Room C7-120, UH-LHSC, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

In order to characterize the nature and extent of neuropsychological dysfunction in primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), we studied prospectively cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning in PLS, and compared performances to functioning in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods:

Eighteen patients with PLS and 13 patients with ALS completed a neuropsychological test battery assessing both cognitive skills and emotional/behavioral functioning.

Results:

Both PLS and ALS groups scored broadly within normal limits (mean T-scores greater than 40) on all cognitive measures and no significant between-group differences were found with the exception of one variable. However, when examined on a case by case basis, the data revealed considerable heterogeneity amongst patients in both groups. Overall, 39% of PLS patients and 31% of ALS patients were considered cognitively impaired. A higher than expected frequency of abnormal scores was noted for several tests of executive function in both groups, and a majority of PLS patients also exhibited abnormal behavioural symptoms. There was no relationship in PLS or ALS groups between cognitive functioning and disease duration, current site of disease, site of onset, functional status, and respiratory variables. Comparison between the PLS and ALS groups indicated virtually no differences in cognitive test scores and overall emotional/behavioural symptoms.

Conclusions:

We observed deficits in cognition and behaviour in a significant proportion of PLS patients which were comparable to those observed in ALS cases. Although deficits were not in the range of frontotemporal dementia, both ALS and PLS cases demonstrated deficits most prominently on tests of executive functioning.

Résumé:

Résumé:Objectif:

Nous avons étudié prospectivement le fonctionnement cognitif, émotionnel et comportemental dans la sclérose latérale primaire (SLP) afin de caractériser la nature et l'étendue de la dysfonction neuropsychologique et nous l'avons comparé au fonctionnement dans la sclérose latérale amyotrophique (SLA).

Méthodes:

Dix-huit patients atteints de SLP et 13 patients atteints de SLA ont complété une batterie de tests neuropsychologiques évaluant les habiletés cognitives et le fonctionnement émotionnel/comportemental.

Résultats:

Les scores dans les deux groupes étaient dans les limites normales (scores T moyen > 40) pour toutes les mesures cognitives et nous n'avons pas observé de différences significatives entre les groupes à l'exception d'une variable. Cependant, à l'examen cas par cas, nous avons constaté une hétérogénéité considérable des données chez les patients des deux groupes. Globalement, 39% des patients atteints de SLP et 31 % des patients atteints de SLA avaient un déficit cognitif. Nous avons noté une fréquence plus élevée qu'attendue de scores anormaux pour plusieurs tests de fonction exécutive dans les deux groupes et une majorité de patients atteints de SLP avaient également des symptômes comportementaux anormaux. Il n'y avait pas de relation dans le groupe SLP ou dans le groupe SLA entre le fonctionnement cognitif et la durée de la maladie, la localisation actuelle de la maladie, la localisation de début de la maladie, l'état fonctionnel et les variables respiratoires. La comparaison des deux groupes n'a pas révélé de différences dans les scores aux teste cognitifs et dans les symptômes émotionnels/comportementaux globaux.

Conclusions:

Nous avons observé des déficits cognitifs et comportementaux chez une proportion significative de patients atteints de SLP qui étaient comparables à ceux observés chez les patients atteints de SLA. Bien que les déficits n'étaient pas dans l'écart de la démence frontotemporale, tant les patients atteints de SLA que les patients atteints de SLP présentaient des déficits plus évidents aux tests de fonctionnement exécutif.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 88 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 2011

References

1. Pringle, CE, Hudson, AJ, Munoz, DG. et al. Primary lateral sclerosis. Clinical features, neuropathology and diagnostic criteria. Brain. 1992;115:495–520.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Strong, MJ, Gordon, PH. Primary lateral sclerosis, hereditary spastic paraplegia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--discrete entities or spectrum? Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2005;6(1):8-16.Google Scholar
3. Beal, MF, Richardson, EP. Jr. Primary lateral sclerosis: a case report. Arch Neurol. 1981;38:630–3.Google Scholar
4. Gastaut, JI, Michel, B, Figarella-Branger, D. et al. Chronic progressive spinobulbar spasticity: a rare form of primary lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:509–13.Google Scholar
5. Sotaniemi, KA, Myllylä, VV. Primary lateral sclerosis: a debated entity. Acta Neurol Scand. 1985;71:334–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Engel, PA, Grunnet, M. Atypical dementia and spastic paraplegia in a patient with primary lateral sclerosis and numerous neocortical beta amyloid plaques: new disorder of Alzheimer's disease variant. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2000;13(2):60–4.Google Scholar
7. Mackenzie, IR, Feldman, H. Neurofilament inclusion body disease with early onset frontotemporal dementia and primary lateral sclerosis. Clin Neuropath. 2004;23:183–93.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Mochizuki, A, Komatsuzaki, Y, Iwamoto, H. et al. Frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitinated neuronal inclusions presenting with primary lateral sclerosis and parkinsonism: clinicopathological report of an autopsy case. Acta Neuropathol. 2004;107:377–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Tan, C-F, Kakita, A, Piao Y-S. et al. Primary lateral sclerosis: a rare upper-motor-predominant form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis often accompanied by frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitinated inclusions? Report of an autopsy case and a review of the literature. Acta Neuropathol. 2003;105:615–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Caselli, RJ, Smith, BE, Osborne, D. Primary lateral sclerosis: a neuropsychological study. Neurology. 1995;45:2005–9.Google Scholar
11. Le Forestier, N, Maisonobe, T, Piquard, A. et al. Does primary lateral sclerosis exist? A study of 20 patients and a review of the literature. Brain. 2001;124:1989–99.Google Scholar
12. Piquard, A, Le Forestier, N, Baudoin-Madec, V. et al. Neuropsychological changes in patients with primary lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2006;7:150–60.Google Scholar
13. Swash, M, Desai, J, Misra, VP. What is primary lateral sclerosis? J Neurol Sci. 1999;170:5-10.Google Scholar
14. Hudson, AJ, Keirnan, JA, Munoz, DA. et al. Clinicopathological features of primary lateral sclerosis are different from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Res Bull. 1993;30:359–64.Google Scholar
15. Le Forestier, N, Maisonobe, T, Spelle, L. et al. Primary lateral sclerosis: further clarification. J Neurol Sci. 2001;185(2):95-100.Google Scholar
16. Brooks, BR. El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 1994;124(Suppl):96-107.Google Scholar
17. The ALS CNTF Treatment study (ACTS) Phase I-II Study Group. Assessment of activities of daily living in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:141-7.Google Scholar
18. Axelrod, BN, Jiron, CC, Henry, RR. Performance of adults ages 20 to 90 on the abbreviated Wisconsin card sorting test. Clin Neuropsych. 1993;7:205–9.Google Scholar
19. Ruff, RM, Light, RH, Parker, SB. et al. Benton controlled word association test: reliability and updated norms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(4):329-38.Google Scholar
20. Heaton, RK, Miller, SW, Taylor, MJ. et al. Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Causcasian Adults, professional manual. Lutz Psychological Assessment resources; 2004. Google Scholar
21. Freedman, M, Oscar-Berman, M. Bilateral frontal lobe disease and selective delayed response deficits in humans. Behav Neurosci 1986;100:337-42.Google Scholar
22. Freedman, M, Black, S, Ebert, P. et al. Orbitofrontal function, object alternation and perseveration. Cerebral Cortex. 1998;8(1): 18-27.Google Scholar
23. Stuss, DT, Stethem, LL, Pelchat, G. Three tests of attention and rapid information processing: an extension. Clin Neuropsych. 1988;2: 246-50. Google Scholar
24. Colarusso, RP, Hammill, DD. Motor-free visual perception test-revised. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 1996.Google Scholar
25. Wechsler, D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.Google Scholar
26. Geffen, G, Moar, KJ, O'Hanlon, AP. et al. Performance measures of 16- to 86- year old males and females on the auditory verbal learning test. Clin Neuropsych. 1990;4:45–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Warrington, EK. Recognition memory test manual. Windsor: NFER-Nelson Publishing Company; 1984.Google Scholar
28. Yesavage, JA, Brink, TL, Rose, TL. et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983;17(1):37-49.Google Scholar
29. Cummings, JL, Mega, M, Gray, K. et al. The Neuropsychiatry inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994; 44(12):2308-14.Google Scholar
30. Kertesz, A, Davidson, W, Fox, H. Frontal behavioral inventory: diagnostic criteria for frontal lobe dementia. Can J Neurol Sci. 1997;24:29–36.Google Scholar
31. Massman, PJ, Sims, J, Cooke, N. et al. Prevalence and correlates of neuropsychological deficits in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 1996;61:450–5.Google Scholar
32. Murphy, JM, Henry, RG, Langmore, S. et al. Continuum of frontal lobe impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:530–4.Google Scholar
33. Wheaton, MW, Salamone, AR, Mosnik, DM. et al. Cognitive impairment in familial ALS. Neurology. 2007;69:1411–7.Google Scholar
34. Strong, MJ, Grace, GM, Freedman, M. et al. Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of frontotemporal cognitive and behavioural syndromes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2009;10(3):131-46.Google Scholar
35. Schretlen, DJ, Testa, SM, Winicki, JM. et al. Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing. JINS. 2008;14:436–45.Google Scholar
36. Ingraham, LJ, Aiken, CB. An empirical approach to determining criteria for abnormality in test batteries with multiple measures. Neuropsych. 1996;10(1): 120-4.Google Scholar
37. Abrahams, S, Goldstein, LH, Simmons, A. et al. Word retrieval in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain. 2004;127:1507–17.Google Scholar
38. Zakzanis, KK. Neurocognitive deficit in fronto-temporal dementia, Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1998;11(3): 127-35.Google Scholar
39. Lezak, MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed. New York: New Oxford Press; 1995.Google Scholar
40. Lomen-Hoerth, C, Murphy, J, Langmore, S. et al. Are amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients cognitively normal? Neurology. 2003; 60:1094-7. Google Scholar
41. Rippon, GA, Goldstein, S, Scarmeas, M. et al. An observational study of cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(3):345-52.Google Scholar
42. Gordon, PH, Cheng, B, Katz, IB. et al. The natural history of primary lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2006;66(5):647-53.Google Scholar
43. Kuipers-Upmeijer, J, de Jager AEJ, Hew, JM. et al. Primary lateral sclerosis: clinical, neurophysiological, and magnetic resonance findings. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 2001;71:615–20.Google Scholar
44. Rosenfeld, J, Swash, M. What's in a name? Lumping or splitting ALS, PLS, PMA and the other motor neuron diseases. Neurology. 2006;66:624–5.Google Scholar