Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T17:36:30.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Spectrum of Electrophysiological Abnormalities in Bell's Palsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Michael D. Hill*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, ON, Canada
Gyl Midroni
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, ON, Canada
Warren C. Goldstein
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, York Central Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Shelley L. Deeks
Affiliation:
Field Epidemiology Training Program, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Donald E. Low
Affiliation:
Toronto Medical Laboratories, and Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Microbiology, and University of Toronto, ON, Canada
Andrew M. Morris
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital/University Health Network, ON, Canada
*
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, MRG005, Foothills Hospital, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

As part of an investigation of a suspected "outbreak" of Bell's palsy in the Greater Toronto Area, a population-based sample of patients with Bell's palsy was investigated electrophysiologically to help understand the spectrum of abnormalities that can be seen in this setting.

Methods:

Two hundred and twenty-four patients were surveyed, of whom 91 underwent formal neurological assessment. Of the latter, 44 were studied electrophysiologically using standard techniques. Thirty-two of the 44 patients fulfilled clinical criteria for Bell's palsy.

Results:

A wide range of electrophysiological changes was observed. Blink responses were the most useful test showing diagnostic sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 94% compared to the contralateral control side. Needle electromyography was additionally helpful in only one patient of six with normal conduction studies.

Conclusions:

There is a wide spectrum of electrophysiological abnormalities in Bell's palsy. Blink reflex latencies may be under-utilized in the assessment of the facial nerve in Bell's palsy. Facial EMG is not generally useful in routine assessment.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:Introduction:

Dans le cadre d'une investigation motivée par ce qui semblait être une éclosion de cas de paralysie de Bell dans la région de Toronto, un échantillon de patients atteints de la paralysie de Bell, tirés de la population de Toronto, a subi une investigation électrophysiologique afin d'aider à comprendre la gamme des anomalies qui peuvent être observées dans ce contexte.

Méthodes:

Deux cent vingt-quatre patients ont été dénombrés et 91 d'entre eux ont subi une évaluation neurologique. Parmi ceux-ci, 44 ont subi une évaluation électrophysiologique selon les techniques standards. Trente-deux des 44 patients satisfaisaient aux critères cliniques de la paralysie de Bell.

Résultats:

Une grande variété de changements électrophysiologiques a été observée. La réaction de clignotement était le test le plus utile avec une sensibilité diagnostique de 81% et une spécificité de 94% en prenant le côté opposé comme contrôle. L'électromyographie à l'aiguille a été utile chez seulement un patient sur six dont les études de conduction étaient normales.

Conclusions:

Il existe une vaste gamme d'anomalies électrophysiologiques dans la paralysie de Bell. Les temps de latence du réflexe de clignotement à la menace sont peut-être sous-utilisés dans l'évaluation du nerf facial dans la paralysie de Bell. En général, l'ÉMG facial n'est pas utile dans l'évaluation de routine de ces cas.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2001

References

REFERENCES

1. Olsen, PZ. Prediction of recovery in Bell’s palsy. Acta Neurol Scand 1975;52(suppl 61):1120.Google Scholar
2. Danielides, V, Skevas, A, Van Cauwenberge, P. A comparison of electroneurography with facial nerve latency testing for prognostic accuracy in patients with Bell’s palsy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996;253:3538.Google Scholar
3. Sinha, PK, Keith, RW, Pensak, ML. Predictability of recovery from Bell’s palsy using evoked electromyography. Am J Otol 1994;15: 769771.Google Scholar
4. Bouhanna, S, Hagen, R, Chabert, R, Roumieux, JL, Lallemant, JG. Valeur prognostique de l’électroneurographie et du réflexe trigémino-facial dans la paralyse faciale a frigore. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1996;117:353356.Google Scholar
5. Heath, JP, Cull, RE, Smith, M, Murray, JAM. The neurophysiological investigation of Bell’s palsy and the predictive value of the blink reflex. Clin Otolaryngol 1988;13:8592.Google Scholar
6. Peitersen, E. The natural history of Bell’s palsy. Am J Otol 1982;4: 107111.Google Scholar
7. May, M, Klein, SR, Taylor, FH. Idiopathic (Bell’s) facial palsy: natural history defies steroid or surgical treatment. Laryngoscope 1985;95:406409.Google Scholar
8. Katusic, SK, Beard, M, Wiederholt, WC, Bergstralh, EJ, Kurland, LT. Incidence, clinical features and prognosis in Bell’s palsy, Rochester, Minnesota, 1968–1982. Ann Neurol 1986;622627.Google Scholar
9. Hanner, P, Badr, G, Rosenhall, U, Edstrom, S. Trigeminal dysfunction in patients with Bell’s palsy. Acta Otolaryngol 1986;101:224230.Google Scholar
10. Kimura, J, Giron, LT, Young, SM. Electrophysiological study of Bell’s palsy. Arch Otolaryngol 1976;102:140144.Google Scholar