Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.28 Render date: 2022-09-25T12:28:59.995Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

How to Make Dutiful Citizens and Influence Turnout: the Effects of Family and School Dynamics on the Duty to Vote

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2018

Carol Galais*
Affiliation:
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
*
Grup GADE. Administració i Democràcia Electrònica, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Av., Carl Friedrich Gauss, Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia 08860, Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain, email: carolgalais@gmail.com

Abstract

Existing literature assumes a link between voting and individuals’ political socialization, but no study has explored how political upbringing affects the most important attitudinal predictor of turnout: the duty to vote. Following previous research about the formation of attitudes related to the electoral process and social norms, this study focuses on the socialization agencies and dynamics that might first instill the belief during childhood that voting is a duty. The study also intends to contribute to political socialization theory by adopting a longitudinal perspective, by building upon developmental psychology theory and by simultaneously considering the two main childhood socialization agencies: family and school. A series of multivariate models confirms the role of family's socioeconomic status, parental engagement with children's education and non-authoritarian parenting styles, a positive effect that appears stronger than the effects on duty observed for Catholic schools and schools with democratic governance.

Résumé

La littérature actuelle présume qu'il existe un lien entre le vote et la socialisation politique des individus, mais aucune étude n'a exploré comment l’éducation politique affecte le prédicteur comportemental le plus important de la participation : le devoir de voter. D'après les études sur la formation d'attitudes liées au processus électoral et aux normes sociales, cette étude se concentre sur les organismes de socialisation et les dynamiques qui pourraient d'abord faire croire que le vote est un devoir instillé au cours de l'enfance. L’étude vise également à contribuer à la théorie de la socialisation politique en adoptant une perspective longitudinale, en s'appuyant sur la théorie de la psychologie du développement et en considérant simultanément les deux principaux organismes de socialisation de l'enfance: la famille et l’école. Une série de modèles multivariés confirme le rôle du statut socio-économique de la famille, de l'engagement parental dans l’éducation des enfants et des styles parentaux non autoritaires; un effet positif qui semble plus fort que les effets observés pour les écoles catholiques et les écoles à gouvernance démocratique.

Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, C.H. 2002. “Parental socialization and rational party identification.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, G. and Verba, S.. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, G.A. 1960. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Amnå, E., Ekström, M., Kerr, M., and Stattin, H.. 2009. “Political socialization and human agency: The development of civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood.” Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 111 (1): 2740.Google Scholar
Battistich, Victor, Solomon, Daniel, Kim, Dong-il, Watson, Marilyn and Schaps, Eric. 1995. “Schools as Communities, Poverty Levels Of Student Populations, And Students’ Attitudes, Motives, And Performance: A Multilevel Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 32 (3): 627–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumrind, Diana. 1991. “The Influence of Parenting Style on Adolescent Competence and Substance Use.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 11 (1): 5695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A. 2000. To vote or not to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André and Achen, Christopher H.. 2010. “Taking Civic Duty Seriously: Political Theory and Voter Turnout.” Working paper, Princeton University. https://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Achen031110/Achen031110.pdf (March 21, 2015).Google Scholar
Blais, André and Galais, Carol. 2016. “Measuring the civic duty to vote: A proposal.” Electoral Studies 41: 6069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André and Rubenson, Daniel. 2013. “The Source of Turnout Decline New Values or New Contexts?Comparative Political Studies 46 (1), 95117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André and St-Vincent, Simon Labbé. 2011. “Personality Traits, Political Attitudes, and the Propensity to Vote.European Journal of Political Research 50: 395417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nevitte, Neil. 2004. “Where Does Turnout Decline Come From?European Journal of Political Research 43 (2): 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction.” In Power and Ideology in Education, ed. Karabel, J. and Halsey, A. H.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun and Donovan, Todd. 2013. “Civic Duty and Turnout in the UK Referendum on AV: What Shapes the Duty to Vote?Electoral Studies 32 (2): 265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtonwood, Neil. 2003. “Social Cohesion, Autonomy and the Liberal Defence of Faith Schools.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 37 (3), 415–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. and Donald, E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2008. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies 56 (1): 7698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Don't Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dennis, Jack and Webster, Carol. 1975. “Children's Images of the President and of Government in 1962 and 1974.” American Politics Quarterly 3 (4): 386405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, Jack. 1968. “Major problems of Political Socialization Research.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 12: 85114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, Kevin and Doyle, Orla. 2008. “Political Interest, Cognitive Ability and Personality: Determinants of Voter Turnout in Britain.British Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 291–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, Keith. 2005. “Is it rational to vote? Five types of answer and a suggestion.The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (3): 442–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, R.L. and Gitelson, A.R.. 2002. “Political literacy, civic education, and civic engagement: a return to political socialization?Applied Developmental Science 6 (4): 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, Jeremy D. 1989. “Withdrawing from School.” Review of Educational Research 59 (2): 117–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Constance A., Bowes, Jennifer M., Jonsson, Britta, Csapo, Beno and Sheblanova, Elena. 1998. “Ties that Bind.” Journal of Social Issues 54 (3): 457–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H. and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.The Journal of Politics 70 (3): 579–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., Celeste Lay, J. and Schuknecht, Jason E.. 2003. Cultivating Democracy: Civic Environments and Political Socialization in America. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Nosek, Brian A., Haidt, Jonathan, Iyer, Ravi, Koleva, Spassena and Ditto, Peter H.. 2011. “Mapping the Moral Domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2): 366–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenstein, Fred I. 1965. Children and Politics. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Funk, Carolyn L., Medland, Sarah E., Maes, Hermine M., Silberg, Judy L., Martin, Nicholas G. and Eaves, Lindon J.. 2009. “Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Attitudes over a Life Time.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, Robert D. and Torney-Purta, Judith V.. 1967. The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hyman, Herbert. 1959. Political Socialization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura and Bower, Jake. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 782–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Avril and Janmaat, Jan Germen. 2016. “Education through Citizenship at School: Do School Activities Have a Lasting Impact on Youth Political Engagement?Parliamentary Affairs 69 (2): 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiousis, Spiro and McDevitt, Michael. 2008Agenda Setting in Civic Development Effects of Curricula and Issue Importance on Youth Voter Turnout.Communication Research 35 (4): 481502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemmensen, Robert, Hatemi, Peter K., Hobolt, Sara Binzer, Petersen, Inge, Skytthe, Axel and Nørgaard, Asbjørn S.. 2012. “The Genetics of Political Participation, Civic Duty, and Political Efficacy across Cultures: Denmark and the United States.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 24 (3): 409–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen and Kropf, Martha E.. 1998. “For Shame! The Effect of Community Cooperative Context on the Probability of Voting.” Political Psychology 19 (3): 585–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. and Alwin, Duane F.. 1989. “Aging and Susceptibility to Attitude Change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (3): 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M.E. (Ed.). (1986). The changing roles of fathers. The fathers' role: Applied perspectives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Landry, Susan H., Smith, Karen E., Swank, Paul R., Assel, Mike A. and Vellet, Sonya. 2001. “Does Early Responsive Parenting Have a Special Importance for Children's Development or is Consistency across Early Childhood Necessary?Developmental Psychology 37 (3): 387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linimon, Amy and Joslyn, Mark R.. 2002. “Trickle Up Political Socialization: The Impact of Kids Voting USA on Voter Turnout in Kansas.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (1): 2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, Peter John and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2012. “The Heritability of Duty and Voter Turnout.” Political Psychology 33 (3), 363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaluso, Theodore F. and Wanat, John. 1979. “Voting Turnout and Religiosity.Polity 12: 158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMullen, Ian. 2004. “Education for Autonomy: The Role of Religious Elementary Schools.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (4): 601–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Hugh, Hart, Daniel and Youniss, James. 2007. “The Influence of Family Political Discussion on Youth Civic Development: Which Parent Qualities Matter?PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (3): 495–99.Google Scholar
Mosher, Ralph. 1994. Preparing for Citizenship. Teaching Youth Live Democratically. Westport and London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. “Public Choice: an Introduction.” In The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, ed. Rowley, Charles K. and Schneider, Friedrich. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Niemi, R.G. and Hepburn, M.A.. 1995. “The rebirth of political socialization.” Perspectives on Political Science 24 (1): 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterman, Karen. F. 2000. “Students’ Need for Belonging in the School Community.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3): 323–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Diana. 2008. “Political socialization in the twenty-first century: Recommendations for researchers.” Paper presented at the conference, Future of Civic Education in the 21st Century, James Madison Montpelier.Google Scholar
Owen, Guillermo and Grofman, Bernard. 1984. “To Vote or Not to Vote: The Paradox of Nonvoting.” Public Choice 42 (3): 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna Sandell and Plutzer, Eric. 2008. “Political Participation and Cumulative Disadvantage: the Impact of Economic and Social Hardship on Young Citizens.Journal of Social Issues 64 (3): 571–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, Jaak. 1986. “The anatomy of emotions.” In Emotion: Theory, research and experience, ed. Plutchik, Robert and Kellerman, Henry. vol. 3. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Pasek, Josh, Feldman, Lauren, Romer, Daniel and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2008. “Schools as Incubators of Democratic Participation: Building Long-term Political Efficacy with Civic Education.” Applied Developmental Science 12 (1): 236–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Bill E., Smirles, Kimberly A. and Wentworth, Phyllis A.. 1997. “Generativity and Authoritarianism: Implications for Personality, Political Involvement, and Parenting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (5): 1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 2002. “Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 4156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintelier, Ellen. 2014. “Intergenerational Transmission of Political Participation Intention.” Acta Politica 48: 92116.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothbart, Mary K., Ahadi, Stephan A. and Evans, David E.. 2000. “Temperament and Personality: Origins and Outcomes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (1): 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, Mary Klevjord and Derryberry, Douglas. 1981. “Development of Individual Differences in Temperament.” In Advances in Developmental Psychology ed. Lamb, M. E. and Brown, A. L.. vol. 1. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sagvolden, Terje, Johansen, Espen Borga, Aase, Heidi and Russell, Vivienne Ann. 2005. “A Dynamic Developmental Theory of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Predominantly Hyperactive/Impulsive and Combined Subtypes.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3): 397418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarkadi, Anna, Kristiansson, Robert, Oberklaid, Frank and Bremberg, Sven. 2008. “Fathers’ involvement and children's developmental outcomes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.” Acta paediatrica 97 (2): 153–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapiro, V. 2004. “Not Your Parents’ Political Socialization: Introduction for a New Generation.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, D.D., Schwartz, J.J. and Lind, A.E.. 1973. “The structuring principle: Political socialization and belief systems.” American Political Science Review 67 (2): 415–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, Carl P. and Speer, Leslie K.. 1979. “Whites’ Opposition to ‘Busing’: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?American Political Science Review 73 (2): 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J.L., Fried, A. and Dietz, M.G.. 1992. “Patriotism, politics, and the presidential election of 1988.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 200–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedin, Kent L. 1974. “The Influence of Parents on the Political Attitudes of Adolescents.American Political Science Review 68 (4): 1579–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiss-Morse, E. 1993. “Conceptualizations of good citizenship and political participation.” Political Behavior 15 (4): 355–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torney-Purta, Judith, Lehmann, Rainer, Oswald, Hans and Schulz, Wolfram. 2001. Citizenship and Education in Twenty-Eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Uhlaner, Carole Jean. 1986. “Political Participation, Rational Actors, and Rationality: A New Approach.” Political Psychology 7 (3): 551–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Deth, Jan W., Abendschön, Simone and Vollmar, Meike. 2011. “Children and Politics: An Empirical Reassessment of Early Political Socialization.Political Psychology 32 (1): 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Burns, Nancy. 2005. “Family Ties: Understanding the Intergenerational Transmission of Participation.” In The Social Logic of Politics ed. Zuckerman, Alan. Philaelphia PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Weinschenk, Aaron C. 2014. “Personality Traits and the Sense of Civic Duty.” American Politics Research 42 (1): 90113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S., Kotler-Berkowitz, Laurence A. and Swaine, Lucas A.. 1998. “Anchoring Political Preferences: the Structural Bases of Stable Electoral Decisions and Political Attitudes in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 33 (3): 285321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How to Make Dutiful Citizens and Influence Turnout: the Effects of Family and School Dynamics on the Duty to Vote
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

How to Make Dutiful Citizens and Influence Turnout: the Effects of Family and School Dynamics on the Duty to Vote
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

How to Make Dutiful Citizens and Influence Turnout: the Effects of Family and School Dynamics on the Duty to Vote
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *