Skip to main content

Anxiety and Vote Decision Making in Winner-Take-All Elections

  • Delia Dumitrescu (a1) and André Blais (a2)

We study strategic voting behaviour in winner-take-all elections by means of an original study in which participants vote to collectively decide how much money should be given to an environmental NGO. We find that supporters of the most NGO-friendly party are reluctant to abandon it, despite its poor electoral viability. The poor electoral viability generates significant anxiety among its supporters and the level of anxiety at the time of voting influences their choice. Moderate levels of anxiety increase the probability of defection, but at high levels, anxiety has a paralyzing effect, making voters less likely to abandon their preferred choice.


Nous étudions le vote stratégique dans les élections au scrutin pluralitaire par le biais d'une recherche originale dans le cadre de laquelle les participants votent pour décider combien d'argent sera octroyé à une organisation environnementale. Nous observons que les supporters du parti le plus favorable à l'organisation environnementale hésitent à déserter ce parti, même si ses chances de gagner sont très faibles. La faiblesse électorale du parti génère de l'anxiété chez ses supporters, et cette anxiété à son tour influence leurs choix. Un niveau modéré d'anxiété augmente la propension à déserter le parti, mais un niveau élevé d'anxiété a un effet paralysant, incitant les électeurs à demeurer fidèles à leur parti préféré.

Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sprängkullsgatan 19, 411 23 Gothenburg, Sweden. Email:
Département de science politique, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx, local C-4006, 3150, rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal QC, H3T 1N8, Canada. Email:
Hide All
Alvarez R. Michael, Boehmke Frederick J. and Nagler Jonathan. 2006. “Strategic voting in British elections.Electoral Studies 25: 119.
Beckmann Nadin, Beckmann Jens F., Minbashian Amirali and Birney Damian P.. 2013. “In the heat of the moment: On the effect of state neuroticism on task performance.Personality and Individual Differences 54: 447–52.
Blais André. 2002. “Why Is There So Little Strategic Voting in Canadian Plurality Rule Elections?Political Studies 50: 445–54.
Blais André and Nadeau Richard. 1996. “Measuring strategic voting: A two-step procedure.Electoral Studies 15: 3952.
Blais André, Dostie-Goulet Eugénie and Bodet Marc André. 2009Voting Strategically in Canada and Britain.” In Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States, ed. Grofman Bernard, Blais André and Bowler Shaun. New York: Springer.
Blais André, Laslier Jean-François, Laurent Annie, Sauger Nicolas and Van der Straeten Karine. 2007. “One-round vs Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study.French Politics 5: 278–86.
Blais André, Labbé-St-Vincent Simon, Jean-François Laslier, Sauger Nicolas and Van der Straeten Karine. 2011. “Strategic Vote Choice in One-Round and Two-Round Elections.Political Research Quarterly 64: 637–45.
Brader Ted. 2005. “Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions.American Journal of Political Science 49: 388405.
Cox Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Derakshan Nazanin and Eysenck Michael W.. 2009. “Anxiety, Processing Efficiency, and Cognitive Performance.European Psychologist 14:168–76.
Druckman James N. and McDermott Rose. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.Political Behavior 30: 297321.
Duffy John and Tavits Margit. 2008. “Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voter Model.American Journal of Political Science 52: 603–18.
Dumitrescu Delia and Blais André. 2011. “Increased Realism at Lower Cost: The Case for the Hybrid Experiment.PS: Political Science & Politics 44: 521–23.
Eysenck Michael W. and Calvo Manuel G.. 1992. “Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory.Cognition & Emotion 6: 409–34.
Groenendyk Eric. 2011. “Current Emotion Research in Political Science: How Emotions Help Democracy Overcome its Collective Action Problem.Emotion Review 3: 455–63.
Herzberg Roberta Q. and Wilson Rick K.. 1988. “Results on Sophisticated Voting in an Experimental Setting.Journal of Politics 50: 471–86.
Huddy Leonie, Feldman Stanley, Taber Charles and Lahav Gallya. 2005. “Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies.American Journal of Political Science 49: 593608.
MacKuen Michael, Marcus George E., Neuman W. Russell and Keele Luke. 2007. “The third way: The theory of affective intelligence and American democracy.” In The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior, ed. Neuman W. R., Marcus George E., MacKuen Michael and Crigler Ann. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacKuen Michael, Wolak Jennifer, Keele Luke and Marcus George E.. 2010. “Civic engagements: resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation.American Journal of Political Science 54: 440–58.
Marcus George E., MacKuen Michael and Neuman W. Russell. 2011. “Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence.Political Psychology 32: 323–36.
Marcus George E., Neuman W. Russell and MacKuen Michael. 2000. Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neuman W. Russell, ed. 2007. The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Öhman Arne. 2008. “Fear and anxiety. Overlaps and dissociations.” In The Handbook of Emotions, ed. Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones and Lisa Feldman Barrett. New York: Gilford Press.
Palfrey Thomas R. 2009. “Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy.The Annual Review of Political Science 12: 379–88.
Parker Michael T. and Isbell Linda M.. 2010. “How I Vote Depends on How I Feel: The Differential Impact of Anger and Fear on Political Information Processing.Psychological Science 21: 548–50.
Rietz Thomas. 2003. “Three-way experimental election results: Strategic voting, coordinated outcomes and Duverger's law.” In The handbook of experimental economics results, ed. Charles R. Plott and Smith Vernon L.. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Van der Straeten Karine, Jean-François Laslier, Nicolas Sauger and André Blais. 2010. “Strategic, Sincere, and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study.Social Choice and Welfare 35: 435–72.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Dumitrescu and Blais Supplementary Material

 Word (183 KB)
183 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 173 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.