Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Anxiety and Vote Decision Making in Winner-Take-All Elections

  • Delia Dumitrescu (a1) and André Blais (a2)
Abstract

We study strategic voting behaviour in winner-take-all elections by means of an original study in which participants vote to collectively decide how much money should be given to an environmental NGO. We find that supporters of the most NGO-friendly party are reluctant to abandon it, despite its poor electoral viability. The poor electoral viability generates significant anxiety among its supporters and the level of anxiety at the time of voting influences their choice. Moderate levels of anxiety increase the probability of defection, but at high levels, anxiety has a paralyzing effect, making voters less likely to abandon their preferred choice.

Nous étudions le vote stratégique dans les élections au scrutin pluralitaire par le biais d'une recherche originale dans le cadre de laquelle les participants votent pour décider combien d'argent sera octroyé à une organisation environnementale. Nous observons que les supporters du parti le plus favorable à l'organisation environnementale hésitent à déserter ce parti, même si ses chances de gagner sont très faibles. La faiblesse électorale du parti génère de l'anxiété chez ses supporters, et cette anxiété à son tour influence leurs choix. Un niveau modéré d'anxiété augmente la propension à déserter le parti, mais un niveau élevé d'anxiété a un effet paralysant, incitant les électeurs à demeurer fidèles à leur parti préféré.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sprängkullsgatan 19, 411 23 Gothenburg, Sweden. Email: delia.dumitrescu@gu.se
Département de science politique, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx, local C-4006, 3150, rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal QC, H3T 1N8, Canada. Email: andre.blais@umontreal.ca
References
Hide All
Alvarez, R. Michael, Boehmke, Frederick J. and Nagler, Jonathan. 2006. “Strategic voting in British elections.Electoral Studies 25: 119.
Beckmann, Nadin, Beckmann, Jens F., Minbashian, Amirali and Birney, Damian P.. 2013. “In the heat of the moment: On the effect of state neuroticism on task performance.Personality and Individual Differences 54: 447–52.
Blais, André. 2002. “Why Is There So Little Strategic Voting in Canadian Plurality Rule Elections?Political Studies 50: 445–54.
Blais, André and Nadeau, Richard. 1996. “Measuring strategic voting: A two-step procedure.Electoral Studies 15: 3952.
Blais, André, Dostie-Goulet, Eugénie and Bodet, Marc André. 2009Voting Strategically in Canada and Britain.” In Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States, ed. Grofman, Bernard, Blais, André and Bowler, Shaun. New York: Springer.
Blais, André, Laslier, Jean-François, Laurent, Annie, Sauger, Nicolas and Van der Straeten, Karine. 2007. “One-round vs Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study.French Politics 5: 278–86.
Blais, André, Labbé-St-Vincent, Simon, Jean-François, Laslier, Sauger, Nicolas and Van der Straeten, Karine. 2011. “Strategic Vote Choice in One-Round and Two-Round Elections.Political Research Quarterly 64: 637–45.
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions.American Journal of Political Science 49: 388405.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Derakshan, Nazanin and Eysenck, Michael W.. 2009. “Anxiety, Processing Efficiency, and Cognitive Performance.European Psychologist 14:168–76.
Druckman, James N. and McDermott, Rose. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.Political Behavior 30: 297321.
Duffy, John and Tavits, Margit. 2008. “Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voter Model.American Journal of Political Science 52: 603–18.
Dumitrescu, Delia and Blais, André. 2011. “Increased Realism at Lower Cost: The Case for the Hybrid Experiment.PS: Political Science & Politics 44: 521–23.
Eysenck, Michael W. and Calvo, Manuel G.. 1992. “Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory.Cognition & Emotion 6: 409–34.
Groenendyk, Eric. 2011. “Current Emotion Research in Political Science: How Emotions Help Democracy Overcome its Collective Action Problem.Emotion Review 3: 455–63.
Herzberg, Roberta Q. and Wilson, Rick K.. 1988. “Results on Sophisticated Voting in an Experimental Setting.Journal of Politics 50: 471–86.
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, Taber, Charles and Lahav, Gallya. 2005. “Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies.American Journal of Political Science 49: 593608.
MacKuen, Michael, Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell and Keele, Luke. 2007. “The third way: The theory of affective intelligence and American democracy.” In The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior, ed. Neuman, W. R., Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael and Crigler, Ann. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke and Marcus, George E.. 2010. “Civic engagements: resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation.American Journal of Political Science 54: 440–58.
Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael and Neuman, W. Russell. 2011. “Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence.Political Psychology 32: 323–36.
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neuman, W. Russell, ed. 2007. The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Öhman, Arne. 2008. “Fear and anxiety. Overlaps and dissociations.” In The Handbook of Emotions, ed. Michael, Lewis, Jeannette M., Haviland-Jones and Lisa Feldman, Barrett. New York: Gilford Press.
Palfrey, Thomas R. 2009. “Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy.The Annual Review of Political Science 12: 379–88.
Parker, Michael T. and Isbell, Linda M.. 2010. “How I Vote Depends on How I Feel: The Differential Impact of Anger and Fear on Political Information Processing.Psychological Science 21: 548–50.
Rietz, Thomas. 2003. “Three-way experimental election results: Strategic voting, coordinated outcomes and Duverger's law.” In The handbook of experimental economics results, ed. Charles, R. Plott and Smith, Vernon L.. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Van der Straeten, Karine, Jean-François, Laslier, Nicolas, Sauger and André, Blais. 2010. “Strategic, Sincere, and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study.Social Choice and Welfare 35: 435–72.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Dumitrescu and Blais Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (183 KB)
183 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 51 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 300 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.