Skip to main content
×
Home

Ballot Order in Cueless Elections: A Comparison of Municipal and Provincial Elections in Québec

  • Charles Tessier (a1) and Alexandre Blanchet (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

This paper studies the prevalence of ballot order effects in two different types of Canadian elections which differ greatly by the strength of party cues they provide to voters. Provincial elections are best described as a typical competition between well established and institutionalized parties, hence providing voters with strong party cues. Alternatively, municipal politics provide voters with much weaker party cues. We use electoral results from recent provincial and municipal elections in Québec and find ballot order effects in municipal elections but not in provincial ones. Although ballot order effects may also be the product of alphabetic preference bias, we argue that in any case these are cognitive biases that are ultimately the product of insufficient cues that voters need in order to cast well-informed votes. The paper, therefore, sheds some light on an understudied type of election in political science.

Résumé

Cet article étudie l'impact de l’ordre des candidats sur les bulletins de vote lors des élections municipales et provinciales au Québec. Les élections provinciales québécoises sont le lieu d’une compétition entre des partis bien établis et offrent donc des signaux partisans forts aux électeurs. À l’inverse, la politique municipale québécoise offre des signaux partisans beaucoup plus faibles. Nos analyses démontrent que les résultats des candidats sont influencés par leur position sur le bulletin de vote lors des élections municipales, mais pas lors des élections provinciales. Bien qu’il soit possible que des biais de préférences alphabétiques soient à l’origine de ces résultats, nous arguons qu'ils sont le produit de biais cognitifs qui résultent de la faiblesse des signaux partisans qui sont nécessaires à la prise de décision des électeurs. L’article apporte également un nouvel éclairage sur des élections qui demeurent peu étudiées en science politique.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Université Laval, Département de Science politique, Pavillon Charles-De Koninck, 1030 Avenue des Sciences humaines, Québec G1V 0A6, email: charles.tessier.1@ulaval.ca
McGill University, Department of Political Science, Room 24-5, 3610 rue McTavish, Montréal, Québec H3A 1Y2, email: alexandre.blanchet@umontreal.ca
Footnotes
Hide All

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Laura Stephenson and the reviewers for their comments. They would also like to thank the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et culture for their financial support and the Ministère des Affaires municipales et de l'Occupation du territoire for providing the election data.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Althaus Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bartels Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40:194230.
Bartels Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Blais André, Gidengil Elisabeth, Fournier Patrick and Nevitte Neil. 2009. “Information, visibility and elections: Why electoral outcomes differ when voters are better informed.” European Journal of Political Research 48: 256–80.
Campbell Angus, Converse Philip E., Miller Warren E. and Stokes Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Chen Eric, Simonovits Gàbor, Krosnick Jon A. and Pasek Josh. 2014. “The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes in North Dakota.” Electoral Studies 35:115–22.
Converse Philip E. 1964. “The nature of belief systems in mass publics.” In Ideology and discontent, ed. Apter David E.. New York: Free Press.
Cowan Nelson, Scott Saults J., Elliott Emily M. and Moreno Matthew V.. 2002. “Deconfounding Serial Recall.” Journal of Memory and Language 46: 153–77.
Cribari-Neto Francisco and Zeileis Achim. 2010. “Beta Regression in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 34: 124.
Delli Carpini Michael X. and Keeter Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Erikson Robert S., MacKuen Michael and Stimson James A. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Forgas Joseph P. 2011. “Can Negative Affect Eliminate the Power of First Impressions? Affective Influences on Primacy and Recency Effects in Impression Formation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47: 425–29.
Gidengil Elisabeth, Blais André, Nevitte Neil and Nadeau Richard. 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Hansen Kasper M. 2009. “Changing Patterns in the Impact of Information on Party Choice in a Multiparty System.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21: 525–46.
Haugtvedt Curtis P. and Wegener Duane T.. 1994. “Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Research 21: 205–18.
Ho Daniel E. and Imai Kosuke. 2006. “Randomization Inference With Natural Experiments: An Analysis of Ballot Effects in the 2003 California Recall Election.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 101: 888900.
Ho Daniel E. and Imai Kosuke. 2008. “Estimating causal effects of ballot order from a randomized natural experiment the California alphabet lottery, 1978–2002.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 216–40.
Kim Nuri, Krosnick Jon and Casasanto Daniel. 2014. “Moderators of Candidate Name-Order Effects in Elections: An Experiment.” Political Psychology 36 : 52542.
Koppell Jonathan GS and Steen Jennifer A.. 2004. “The Effects of Ballot Position on Election Outcomes.” The Journal of Politics 66: 267–81.
Krosnick Jon A and Alwin Duane F. 1987. “An evaluation of a cognitive theory of responseorder effects in survey measurement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 201–19.
Li Cong. 2010. “Primacy Effect or Recency Effect? A Long-Term Memory Test of Super Bowl Commercials.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 9: 3244.
Lupia Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” The American Political Science Review 88: 6376.
Lupia Arthur and McCubbins Mathew D.. 1998. The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
Malhotra Neil. 2008. “Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 914–34.
Miller Joanne M. and Krosnick Jon A.. 1998. “The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 291330.
Miller Nicholas R. 1986. “Information, Electorates and Democracy: Some Extensions and Interpretations of the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” In Information Pooling and Group Decision Making, ed. Grofman B. and Owen G.. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
Oscarsson Henrik. 2007. “A Matter of Fact? Knowledge Effects on the Vote in Swedish General Elections, 1985–2002.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30: 301–22.
Page Benjamin I. and Shapiro Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Pasek Josh, Schneider Daniel, Krosnick Jon A., Tahk Alexander, Ophir Eyal and Milligan Claire. 2014. “Prevalence and Moderators of the Candidate Name-Order Effect: Evidence from Statewide General Elections in California.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78: 416–39.
Popkin Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sniderman Paul M., Brody Richard A. and Tetlock Phillip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tóka Gábor and Popescu Marina. 2007. “Inequalities of Political Influence in New Democracies.” International Journal of Sociology 37: 6793.
Webstera Donna M., Richterb Linda and Kruglanskib Arie W.. 1996. “On Leaping to Conclusions When Feeling Tired: Mental Fatigue Effects on Impressional Primacy.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32: 181–95.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 288 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd November 2017 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.