Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Has Simeon's Vision Prevailed among Canadian Policy Scholars?

  • Éric Montpetit (a1), Christine Rothmayr Allison (a1) and Isabelle Engeli (a2)
Abstract

Concerned by the proliferation of idiosyncratic prescriptive case studies in the nascent subfield of policy studies, Richard Simeon, in his seminal 1976 article, asked scholars to produce more comparative policy research that aimed at explaining general events and contributing to theory building. The extent to which Simeon's vision materialized remains debated. With a view to informing this debate, we conducted a systematic content analysis of the articles published in five major generalist public policy journals from 1980 to 2015. The analysis reveals that Canadian policy scholars took a comparative turn, publishing more territorial, sector and time comparisons than in the past. We also found evidence that theoretical knowledge accumulation is more important today for Canadian authors than it was when Simeon wrote his article.

Préoccupé par la prolifération d’études de cas prescriptives et idiosyncratiques, Richard Simeon, dans son article classique de 1976 appelait les chercheurs en politiques publiques à développer la recherche comparative dans le but d'expliquer des phénomènes généraux et de produire des théories. Jusqu’à quel point la vision de Simeon s'est elle matérialisée demeure sujet à débat. Dans le but de contribuer à ce débat, nous avons réalisé une analyse systématique du contenu des articles publiés entre 1980 et 2015 dans cinq revues majeures à caractère généraliste dans le domaine des politiques publiques. L'analyse révèle que les spécialistes canadiens des politiques publiques ont pris un tournant comparatif, publiant plus de comparaisons de territoires, de secteurs et de périodes que dans le passé. Des indicateurs nous permettent aussi de conclure que l'accumulation de connaissances théoriques est plus importante aujourd'hui pour les chercheurs canadiens qu'elle ne l’était à l’époque où Simeon a rédigé son article

Copyright
References
Hide All
Adams, William C., Infeld, Donna Lind, Minnichelli, Laura F. and Ruddell, Michael W.. 2014. “Policy Journal Trends and Tensions: JPAM and PSJ.” Policy Studies Journal 42 (April): S11837. doi:10.1111/psj.12051.
Anderson, Charles W. 1971. “Comparative Policy Analysis: The Design of Measures.” Comparative Politics 4 (1): 117. doi:10.2307/421437.
Atkinson, Michael M. 2013. “Policy, Politics and Political Science.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 46 (04): 751–72. doi:10.1017/S000842391300084X.
Baumgartner, Frank and Jones, Bryan. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R. 2016. “Creating an Infrastructure for Comparative Policy Analysis.” Governance, August. doi:10.1111/gove.12243.
Béland, Daniel and Waddan, Alex. 2015. “Breaking Down Ideas and Institutions: The Politics of Tax Policy in the USA and the UK.” Policy Studies 36 (2): 176–95. doi:10.1080/01442872.2014.1000845.
Bennett, Colin J. 1990. “The Formation of a Canadian Privacy Policy: The Art and Craft of Lesson-Drawing.” Canadian Public Administration 33 (4): 551–70. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1990.tb01417.x.
Cairney, Paul. 2013. “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: How Do We Combine the Insights of Multiple Theories in Public Policy Studies?Policy Studies Journal 41 (1): 121. doi:10.1111/psj.12000.
Cairns, Alan C. 2008. “Conclusion: Are We on the Right Track?” In The Comparative Turn in Canadian Political Science, ed. White, Linda, Simeon, Richard, Vipond, Robert and Wallner, Jennifer. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Cashore, Benjamin and Howlett, Michael. 2007. “Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 532–51. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x.
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (04): 823–30. doi:10.1017/S1049096511001429.
Cyr, Arthur, and deLeon, Peter. 1975. “Comparative Policy Analysis.” Policy Sciences 6 (4): 375–84. doi:10.1007/BF00142380.
Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elkins, David J. and Simeon, Richard E. B.. 1979. “A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain?Comparative Politics 11: 127–45.
Engeli, Isabelle and Allison, Christine Rothmayr, eds. 2014. Comparative Policy Studies: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. Houndmills, Basingstoke; New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Feldman, Elliot J., Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Heclo, Hugh, Adams, Carolyn Teich, Smith, T. Alexander, Hayward, Jack and Watson, Michael. 1978. “Comparative Public Policy: Field or Method?Comparative Politics 10 (2): 287. doi:10.2307/421650.
Fischer, Frank and Forester, John. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: UCL Press.
Fisher, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, Frank, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnová, and Orsini, Michael, eds. 2016. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Handbooks of Research on Public Policy Series. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fourot, Aude-Claire, Sarrasin, Rachel and Holly, Grant. 2011. “Comparer le Québec: approches, enjeux, spécificités.” Politique et Sociétés 30 (1): 3. doi:10.7202/1006056ar.
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hajer, Maarten A. and Wagenaar, Hendrik, eds. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism.” Political Studies 44: 936–57.
Hofferbert, Richard I. 1974. The Study of Public Policy. The Bobbs-Merrill Policy Analysis Series. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Kristof, Nicholas. 2014. “Professors, We Need You!” The New York Times, February 15.
Leichter, Howard. 1977. “Comparative Public Policy: Problems and Prospects.” Policy Studies Journal 5 (s1): 583–96. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1977.tb01116.x.
Leichter, Howard M. 1979. A Comparative Approach to Policy Analysis: Health Care Policy in Four Nations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lemieux, Vincent. 2002. L’étude Des Politiques Publiques: Les Acteurs et Leur Pouvoir. 2. éd. rev. et augm. Sainte-Foy PQ: Presses de l'Université Laval.
Levy, Jack. 2008. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 118. doi:10.1080/07388940701860318.
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the. Comparative Method.” The American Political Science Review 6 (3): 682–93.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1968. The Policy Making Proces. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Montpetit, Éric, Blais, André and Foucault, Martial. 2008. “What Does It Take for a Canadian Political Scientist to Be Cited?Social Science Quarterly 89: 802–16.
Noël, Alain. 2014. “Studying Your Own Country: Social Scientific Knowledge for Our Times and Places.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 47 (04): 647–66. doi:10.1017/S0008423914001085.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Panitch, Leo, ed. 1977. The Canadian State: Political Economy and Political Power. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rose, Richard. 1973a. “Concepts for Comparison.” Policy Studies Journal 1 (3): 122–27. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1973.tb00083.x.
Rose, Richard. 1973b. “Comparing Public Policy: An Overview.” European Journal of Political Research 1 (1): 6794. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1973.tb01283.x.
Sabatier, Paul A. 1987. “Knowledge, Policy Oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8: 649–92.
Sabatier, Paul A., ed. 2007. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder CO.: Westview Press.
Schlager, Edella and Weible, Christopher M.. 2013. “New Theories of the Policy Process: Policy Process.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 389–96. doi:10.1111/psj.12030.
Simeon, Richard. 1976. “Studying Public Policy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 9: 548–80.
Simeon, Richard. 1989. “We Are All Smiley's People: Some Observations on Donald Smiley and the Study of Federalism.” In Federalism and Political Community: Essays in Honour of Donald Smiley, ed. Shugarman, David P and Whitaker, Reg. Perterborough: Broadview Press.
Smith, Miriam Catherine and Orsini, Michael. 2007. Critical Policy Studies. Vancouver: UBC Press. http://www.deslibris.ca/ID/408591.
Sproule-Jones, Mark. 1993. Governments at Work: Canadian Parliamentary Federalism and Its Public Policy Effects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Stone, Deborah A. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104: 281300.
Stone, Deborah A . 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.
Stritch, Andrew. 2015. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework and Nascent Subsystems: Trade Union Disclosure Policy in Canada: ACF and Nascent Subsystems.” Policy Studies Journal 43 (4): 437–55. doi:10.1111/psj.12112.
Taylor, Zack and Eidelman, Gabriel. 2010. “Canadian Political Science and the City: A Limited Engagement.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (04): 961–81. doi:10.1017/S0008423910000715.
Turgeon, Luc, Papillon, Martin, Wallner, Jennifer and White, Stephen, eds. 2014. Comparing Canada: Methods and Perspectives on Canadian Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.
White, Linda A., Simeon, Richard, Vipond, Robert and Wallner, Jennifer, eds. 2008. The Comparative Turn in Canadian Political Science. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Wilder, Matt, and Howlett, Michael. 2014. “The Politics of Policy Anomalies: Bricolage and the Hermeneutics of Paradigms.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (2): 183202. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.901175.
Yanow, Dvora. 2007. “Interpretation in Policy Analysis: On Methods and Practice.” Critical Policy Studies 1: 110–22.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 80 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 264 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th January 2017 - 21st June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.