Skip to main content Accessibility help

Imperious Temptations: Democratic Legitimacy and Indigenous Consent in Canada

  • Toby Rollo (a1)


Canadian courts and governments increasingly invoke principles of mutual consent and nation-to-nation negotiation as central to the goal of addressing colonial injustices in a democratic society. However, Canada continues to interpret its obligations according to the Crown's fiduciary obligation to merely consult and accommodate Aboriginal peoples on infringement of their rights. In this article, I argue that there are conceptual resources available within existing Canadian law and politics for reconstructing a democratic consensual resolution to the problem of Indigenous exclusion and dispossession. I demonstrate that meeting the basic threshold of mutual consent would first require Canadian institutions to abjure the imperious temptation to impose parochial standards of free, prior and informed consent. Second, the Crown would refuse to ensnare Indigenous communities in unconscionable bargains, agreements that they would not otherwise view as reasonable, fair or equitable. And finally, Canada would accept rights of jurisdiction over land rooted in vital relations of health and well-being, as well as a corollary right of refusal or veto over decisions deemed by affected parties to be unwanted.

Les tribunaux et les gouvernements canadiens invoquent de plus en plus les principes du consentement mutuel et de la négociation de nation à nation, jugés essentiels dans le but de réparer les injustices coloniales dans une société démocratique. Toutefois, le Canada continue d'interpréter ses obligations en fonction de l'obligation fiduciaire de la Couronne de simplement consulter et accommoder les peuples autochtones au sujet de la violation de leurs droits. Dans cet article, je soutiens qu'il existe dans les lois et les politiques canadiennes en vigueur des ressources conceptuelles pour réinventer une solution démocratique consensuelle au problème de l'exclusion et de la dépossession des autochtones. Je démontre qu'atteindre le seuil fondamental du consentement mutuel exigerait en tout premier lieu que les institutions canadiennes renoncent à la tentation impérieuse d'imposer des normes étriquées de consentement libre, préalable et éclairé. Deuxièmement, la Couronne refuserait de piéger les communautés autochtones dans des négociations indéfendables, des ententes qu'elles ne considéreraient pas autrement comme raisonnables, justes ou équitables. Enfin, le Canada accepterait des droits de juridiction sur des terres ancrées dans des relations vitales de santé et de bien-être, ainsi qu'un droit corollaire de refus ou de veto sur des décisions jugées indésirables par les parties concernées.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Altamirano-Jiménez, Isabel. 2013. Indigenous Encounters with Neoliberalism: Place, Women, and Environment in Canada and Mexico. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Anderson, Kim. 2010. “Aboriginal Women, Water and Health: Reflections from Eleven First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Grandmothers.” Halifax and Winnipeg: Atlantic Centre of Excellence for Women's Health and Prairie Women's Health Centre of Excellence.
Asch, Michael. 2014. On Being Here to Stay: Treaties and Aboriginal Rights in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Barker, Adam, Rollo, Toby and Lowman, Emma Battell. 2016. “Settler Colonialism and the Consolidation of Canada in the 20th Century.” In The Handbook of the History of Settler Colonialism, ed. Edward Cavanagh and Lorenzo Veracini. New York: Routledge.
Bogden, John-Paul F. 1998. “On the Agreement ‘Most Foul’: A Reconsideration of the Doctrine of Unconscionability.” Manitoba Law Journal 25 (1): 187214.
Borrows, John. 1997. “Wampum at Niagara: The Royal Proclamation, Canadian Legal History, and Self-Government.” In Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada, ed. Asch, Michael. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Bryant, Michael J. 2016. “The Case for an Aboriginal Veto.” In From Recognition to Reconciliation: Essays on the Constitutional Entrenchment of Aboriginal and Treaty Rights, ed. Macklem, Patrick and Sanderson, Douglas. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Castillo, R.C.A., and Alvarez-Castillo, Fatima. 2009. “The Law is not Enough: Protecting Indigenous Peoples' Rights Against Mining Interests in the Philippines.” In Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons from the San-Hoodia Case, ed. Wynberg, R., Schroeder, Doris and Chennells, Roger. New York: Springer.
Coulthard, Glen. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Eyford, D.R. 2015. “A New Direction: Advancing Aboriginal and Treaty Rights,” Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development. Ottawa. (May 15, 2017).
Fox-Decent, Evan and Dahlman, Ian 2015. “Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16 (2): 507–33.
Getzler, Joshua. 2014. “Ascribing and Limiting Fiduciary Obligations: Understanding the Operation of Consent.” In Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law, ed. Gold, Andrew S. and Miller, Paul B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, Robert. 2007. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its AlternativesPhilosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1): 4068.
Gover, Kirsty. 2016. “Liberal and Tribal Membership Boundaries: Descent, Consent, and Section 35,” In From Recognition to Reconciliation: Essays on the Constitutional Entrenchment of Aboriginal and Treaty Rights, ed. Macklem, Patrick and Sanderson, Douglas. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Government of Canada. 2014. “Canada's Statement on the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples Outcome Document.” Ottawa. (May 20, 2017).
Government of Canada. 2016. “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” Ottawa. (May 17, 2017).
Government of Canada. 2017. “Speech for the Honourable Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Indigenous and Northern Affairs at the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues 16th Session.” (Oct. 26, 2017).
Henderson, James Youngblood. 1994. “Empowering Treaty Federalism.” Saskatchewan Law Review 58: 241329.
Hoover, Elizabeth, Cook, Katsi, Plain, Ron, Sanchez, Kathy, Waghiyi, Vi, Miller, Pamela, Dufault, Renee, Sisli, Caitlin and Carpenter, David O.. 2012. “Indigenous Peoples of North America: Environmental Exposures and Reproductive Justice.” Environmental Health Perspectives 120 (12): 1645–49.
Imai, Shin. 2017. “Consult, Consent and Veto: International Norms and Canadian Treaties.” In The Right Relationship, ed. Coyle, Michael and Borrows, John. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Joffe, Paul. 2016. “‘Veto’ and ‘Consent’: Significant Differences.” (May 15, 2017).
Johnston, Darlene. 1989. The Taking of Indian Lands in Canada: Consent or Coercion. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan Native Centre.
Koshan, Jennifer. 2010. “The Legal Treatment of Marital Rape and Women's Equality: An Analysis of the Canadian Experience.” The Equality Effect. (Oct. 25, 2017).
Kuokkanen, Rauna. 2011. “From Indigenous Economies to Market-Based Self-Governance: A Feminist Political Economy Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 275–97.
Kuokkanen, Rauna. 2016. “Indigenous women's rights and international law.” In The Handbook of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights, ed. Leonard, Corrine and Short, Damien. New York: Routledge.
Lightfoot, Sheryl. 2012. “Selective endorsement without intent to implement: Indigenous rights and the Anglosphere.” The International Journal of Human Rights 16 (1): 100–22.
Lima, Augusto. 2008. “When Harry met Kreutziger: A Look in Unconscionability Through the Lens of Culture.” Paper presented at the Canadian Law and Economics Association meeting, Toronto.
Macklem, Patrick. 2011. “The Impact of Treaty 9 on Natural Resource Development in Northern Ontario.” In Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference, ed. Asch, Michael. Vancouver: UBC Press.
McCrossan, Michael and Ladner, Kiera. 2016. “Eliminating Indigenous Jurisdictions: Federalism, the Supreme Court of Canada, and Territorial Rationalities of Power.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 411–31.
McNeil, Kent. 2008. “Fiduciary Obligations and Aboriginal Peoples.” In The Law of Trusts: A Contextual Approach, ed. Berryman, Jeffrey Bruce, R, Mark. Gillen, and Woodman, Faye. 2nd ed. Toronto: Emond Montgomery.
Mohanty, Sango and McDermott, Constance L.. 2013. “How does ‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent’ (FPIC) impact social equity? Lessons from mining and forestry and their implications for REDD+,” Land Use Policy 35: 205416.
Napoleon, Val. 2010Living Together: Gitksan Legal Reasoning as a Foundation for Consent.” In Between Consenting Peoples, ed. Webber, Jeremy and McLeod, Colin. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Nason, Dory. 2013. “We Hold Our Hands Up: On Indigenous Women's Love and Resistance.” (May 17, 2017).
Premier of Alberta, Notley, Rachel. 2015. “Premier Notley's letter to Cabinet Ministers.” Edmonton, Alberta. (Oct. 26, 2017).
Premier of British Columbia, Horgan, John. 2017. “Statement from Premier John Horgan on the 10th anniversary of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” Vancouver BC. (Oct. 26, 2017).
Prime Minister of Canada, Trudeau, Justin. 2015. “Prime Minister Justin Trudeau delivers a speech to the Assembly of First Nations Special Chiefs Assembly.” Gatineau, Quebec. (Oct. 26, 2017)
Rollo, Toby. 2014. “Mandates of the State: Canadian Sovereignty, Democracy and Indigenous Claims.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 27 (1): 225–38.
Rollo, Toby. 2017. “Everyday Deeds: Protest, Exit, and Silence in Deliberative Systems.” Political Theory 45 (5): 587609.
Santos, Carlos. 1983. 2nd Session - 32nd Legislature. Legislative Assembly of Manitoba Debates and Proceedings 31 (1028).
Simpson, Audra. 2016. “Consent's Revenge,” Cultural Anthropology 31 (3): 326–33.
Simpson, Leanne. 2011. Dancing on Our Turtle's Back: Stories of Nishnaabeg Re-Creation, Resurgence, and a New Emergence. Peterborough: ARP Press.
Simpson, Leanne. 2014. “Honour the Apology.” (May 19, 2017).
Simpson, Leanne. 2016. “Indigenous Resurgence and Co-resistance.” Critical Ethnic Studies 2 (2): 1934.
Tully, James. 2001. “Introduction.” In Multinational Democracies, eds. Gagnon, A.G. and Tully, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tully, James. 2011. “Dialogue.” Political Theory 39 (1): 45160.
Turpel, Mary Ellen. 1993. “Patriarchy and Paternalism: The Legacy of the Canadian State for First Nations Women.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 6 (1): 174–92.
Warren, Mark. 2011. “Voting with Your Feet: Exit-Based Empowerment in Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 683701.
Webber, Jeremy. 2010. “The Meanings of Consent.” In Between Consenting Peoples, ed. Webber, Jeremy and McLeod, Colin M.. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Whitelaw, Graham S., McCarthy, Daniel D. and Tsuji, Leonard J. S.. 2009. “The Victor Diamond Mine environmental assessment process: A critical First Nation perspective.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 27 (3): 205–15.
Williams, Melissa. 2004. “Sharing the River: Aboriginal Representation in Canadian Political Institutions.” In Representation and Democratic Theory, ed. Laycock, David. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Young, Iris. 1989. “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal CitizenshipEthics 99: 250–74.
Canada (Governor General in Council) v. Mikisew Cree First Nation (2017) 3 FCR 298, 2016 FCA 311.
R. v. Delgamuukw (1998) 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.).
Guerin v. The Queen (1984) 2 SCR 335.
Harry v. Kreutziger (1978) 95 DLR (3d) 231 (BC CA).
Hodgkinson v. Simms (1994) 3 S.C.R. 377.
Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2013) SCC 14, 1 S.C.R. 623.
Norberg v. Wynrib (1992) 2 S.C.R. 226.
Saramaka People v. Suriname (2007). Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
R v. Sparrow (1990) 1 S.C.R. 1075.
Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia (2014) SCC 44.
Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada (2002) 4 S.C.R. 245, 2002 SCC 79.
Canada. 1996. Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP), vol.1.
Canada. 2015. Executive Summary of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Ishkonigan, Inc., The Phare Law Corp., and North Raven. 2015. “Collaborative Consent: A Nation-to-Nation Path to Partnership with Indigenous Governments.” (May 20, 2017).
United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. 2005. “Report of the International Workshop on Methodologies regarding Free, Prior and Informed Consent and Indigenous Peoples.”
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 2007. (April 4, 2018).
Women's Earth Alliance and Native Youth Sexual Health Network (WEA and NYSHN). 2013. “Violence on the Land, Violence on Our Bodies: Building an Indigenous Response to Environmental Violence.” (May 15, 2017).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Imperious Temptations: Democratic Legitimacy and Indigenous Consent in Canada

  • Toby Rollo (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.