Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Research Note: “Negative” Personalization: Party Leaders and Party Strategy

  • Scott Pruysers (a1) and William Cross (a2)
Abstract

While the negative campaigning literature has witnessed tremendous growth in recent years, the precise targets of campaign negativity have not been fully explored, as candidates and their parties are largely treated as the same target. Likewise, although scholars are increasingly writing about the personalization of politics, this literature has not considered whether parties can “personalize” their opponents by focusing their messaging and attacks more on individual leaders than the parties they lead. In an attempt to bridge the gap between these two literatures, we develop the concept of negative personalization. Negative personalization, as we define it, is an emphasis on opposing party leaders in campaign communication more so than on the parties that they lead. Exploring recent election campaigns in Canada's largest province, we document the extent to which parties engage in negative personalization and suggest hypotheses for the factors leading to increased negative personalization.

Bien que la littérature sur les campagnes negatives ait enregistré une très forte croissance ces dernières années, les cibles précises d'une campagne négative n'ont pas été étudiées à fond, car les candidats et leurs partis sont largement traités comme constituant la même cible. De même, quoique les chercheurs publient de plus en plus sur la personnalisation de la politique, cette littérature n'a pas examiné si les partis peuvent « personnaliser » leurs opposants en focalisant leurs messages et leurs attaques davantage sur les chefs politiques que sur les partis qu'ils dirigent. Dans une tentative de combler l’écart entre ces deux littératures, nous développons le concept de personnalisation négative. La personnalisation négative, telle que nous la définissons, est un accent mis dans la communication de la campagne davantage sur les chefs du parti opposant que sur les partis qu'ils dirigent. En examinant les campagnes électorales récentes dans la plus grande province du Canada, nous documentons la mesure dans laquelle les partis s'engagent dans une personnalisation négative et suggérons des hypothèses pour rendre compte des facteurs qui contribuent à une personnalisation négative accrue.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, University of Calgary. 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Email: scott.pruysers@ucalgary.ca
Department of Political Science, Carleton University. 1125 Colonel By Drive. Ottawa, Ontario K1S5B6, Email: Bill_Cross@Carleton.ca
References
Hide All
Aarts, Kees, Blais, André and Schmitt, Hermann., eds. 2011. Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adam, Silke and Maier, Michaela. 2010. “Personalization of Politics: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research.” In Communication Yearbook 34, ed. Salmon, C.. London: Routledge.
Angus Reid Public Opinion. 2011. “Tory Lead Down to Four Points as Three Party Race Develops in Ontario.” http://www.angusreidglobal.com/polls/tory-lead-down-to-four-points-as-three-party-race-develops-in-ontario/ (November 13, 2015).
Balmas, Meital, Rahat, Gideon, Sheafer, Tamir and Shenhav, Shaul. 2014. “Two Routes to Personalized Politics. Centralized and Decentralized Personalization.” Party Politics 20: 3751.
Bartolini, Stefano and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability. The Stability of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bittner, Amanda. 2011. Platform or Personality? The Role of Party Leaders in Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brians, Craig and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 172–93.
Emmett, Buell, and Sigelman, Lee. 2008. Attack Politics: Negativity in Presidential Campaigns since 1960. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Caramani, Danielle. 2006. “Is There a European Electorate and What Does It Look Like? Evidence from Electoral Volatility Measures, 1976–2004.” West European Politics 29: 127.
Clarke, Harold, Jenson, Jane, LeDuc, Lawrence and Pammett, Jon. 1991. Absent Mandate: Interpreting Change in Canadian Elections. Toronto: Gage.
Cross, William. 2004. Political Parties. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2015. “Personalization of Campaigns in an SMP system: The Canadian Case.” Electoral Studies 39: 306315.
Cross, William, Malloy, Jonathan, Small, Tamara and Stephenson, Laura. 2015. Fighting for Votes: Parties, the Media, and Voters in an Ontario Election. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 2000. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, Russell, McAllister, Ian and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 2000. “The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Dalton, Russell and P, Martin. Wattenberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Damore, David. 2002. “Candidate Strategy and the Decision to Go Negative.” Political Research Quarterly 55: 669–85.
De Winter, Lieven and Baudewyns, Pierre. 2015. “Candidate Centred Campaigning in a Party Centred Context: The Case of Belgium.” Electoral Studies 39: 295305.
DiStaso, Marcia. 2012. “The Annual Earnings Press Release's Dual Role: An Examination of Relationships with Local and National Media Coverage and Reputation.” Journal of Public Relations Research 24: 123–43.
Druckman, James, Kifer, Martin and Parkin, Michael. 2010. “Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002–2006.” Political Communication 27: 88103.
Eder, Nikolaus, Jenny, Marcelo and Muller, Wolfgang. 2015. “Winning Over Voters or Fighting Party Comrades? Personalized Constituency Campaigning in Austria.” Electoral Studies 39: 316–28.
Foley, Michael. 2000. The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Research, Forum. 2014. “PCs Start Ontario Campaign with Leader.” http://www.forumresearch.com/forms/NewsArchives/NewsReleases/26292_ON_Horserace_News_Release_%282014.05.03%29_Forum_Research.pdf (November 13, 2015).
Fowler, Erika and Ridout, Travis. 2013. “Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012.” The Forum 10: 5161.
Geer, John. 1998. “Campaigns, Competition, and Political Advertising.” In New Perspectives on Party Politics, ed. Geer, John. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Geer, John. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nadeau, Richard and Nevitte, Neil. 2000. “Are Party Leaders Becoming More Important to Vote Choice in Canada?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.
Hansen, Kasper and Pedersen, Rasmus. 2008. “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31: 408–27.
Hassell, Hans and Oeltjenbruns, Kelly. 2015. “When to Attack: The Trajectory of Congressional Campaign Negativity.American Politics Research 44 (2):, 222–46.
Audrey, Haynes and Rhine, Stacie. 1998. “Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated Negative Messages Against Opponents.” Political Research Quarterly 51: 691721.
Johnston, Richard. 2003. “Prime Ministerial Contenders in Canada.” In Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, ed. King, Anthony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaid, Lynda. 1997. “Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton.” American Behavioral Scientist 40: 1085–94.
Kaid, Lynda, and Johnston, Anne. 1991. “Negative Versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–1988.” Journal of Communication 41: 5364.
Karlsen, Rune and Skogerbø, Eli. 2013. “Candidate Campaigning In Parliamentary Systems: Individualized vs. Localized Campaigning.Party Politics 21: 428–39.
Karvonen, Lauri. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester UK: ECPR Press.
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2012. “Personalization of National Election Campaigns.” Party Politics 18: 825–44.
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2011. “When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 796812.
Lau, Richard and Pomper, Gerald. 2004. Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lau, Richard and Rovner, Ivy. 2009. “Negative Campaigning.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 285306.
Lau, Richard, Sigelman, Lee and Rovner, Ivy. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69: 176209.
McAllister, Ian. 2015. “The Personalization of Politics in Australia. Party Politics 21: 337345.
Mendelsohn, Matthew. 1993. “Television's Frames in the 1988 Canadian Election.” Canadian Journal of Communication 18: 149171.
Mendelsohn, Matthew. 1996. “Television News Frames in the 1993 Canadian Election.” In Seeing Ourselves: Media Power and Policy in Canada, ed. Holmes, Helen and Taras, David. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
Peterson, David and Djupe, Paul. 2005. “When Primary Campaigns Go Negative: The Determinants of Campaign Negativity.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 4554.
Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul, eds. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics: a Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rahat, Gideon and Sheafer, Tamir. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003.” Political Communication 24: 6580.
Reinnemann, Carsten, and Wilke, Jurgen. 2007. “It's the Debates, Stupid! How the Introduction of Televised Debates Changed the Portrayal of Chancellor Candidates in the German Press, 1949–2005.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12: 92111.
Sanders, David and Norris, Pippa. 2005. “The Impact of Political Advertising in the UK General Election.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 525–36.
Schulz, Winifred and Zeh, Reimar. 2005. “The Changing Election Coverage of German Television. A Content Analysis: 1990–2002.” Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 30: 385407.
Skaperdas, Stergios and Grofman, Bernard. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89: 4961.
Taras, David. 2001. Power and Betrayal in the Canadian Media. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Walter, Annemarie and Vliegenthart, Rens. 2010. “Negative Campaigning Across Different Communication Channels: Different Ball Games?The International Journal of Press/Politics 5: 441–61.
Ware, Alan. 2002. The American Direct Primary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wattenberg, Martin. 1995. The Rise Of Candidate-Centered Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg, Martin and Brians, Craig. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?American Political Science Review 93: 891–99.
Zittel, Thomas. 2015. “Constituency Candidates in Comparative Perspective: How Personalized Are Constituency Campaigns, Why, and Does it Matter?Electoral Studies 39: 286–94.
Zittel, Thomas and Gschwend, Thomas. 2008. “Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections.” West European Politics 31: 9781003.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed