Skip to main content

Research Note: “Negative” Personalization: Party Leaders and Party Strategy

  • Scott Pruysers (a1) and William Cross (a2)

While the negative campaigning literature has witnessed tremendous growth in recent years, the precise targets of campaign negativity have not been fully explored, as candidates and their parties are largely treated as the same target. Likewise, although scholars are increasingly writing about the personalization of politics, this literature has not considered whether parties can “personalize” their opponents by focusing their messaging and attacks more on individual leaders than the parties they lead. In an attempt to bridge the gap between these two literatures, we develop the concept of negative personalization. Negative personalization, as we define it, is an emphasis on opposing party leaders in campaign communication more so than on the parties that they lead. Exploring recent election campaigns in Canada's largest province, we document the extent to which parties engage in negative personalization and suggest hypotheses for the factors leading to increased negative personalization.


Bien que la littérature sur les campagnes negatives ait enregistré une très forte croissance ces dernières années, les cibles précises d'une campagne négative n'ont pas été étudiées à fond, car les candidats et leurs partis sont largement traités comme constituant la même cible. De même, quoique les chercheurs publient de plus en plus sur la personnalisation de la politique, cette littérature n'a pas examiné si les partis peuvent « personnaliser » leurs opposants en focalisant leurs messages et leurs attaques davantage sur les chefs politiques que sur les partis qu'ils dirigent. Dans une tentative de combler l’écart entre ces deux littératures, nous développons le concept de personnalisation négative. La personnalisation négative, telle que nous la définissons, est un accent mis dans la communication de la campagne davantage sur les chefs du parti opposant que sur les partis qu'ils dirigent. En examinant les campagnes électorales récentes dans la plus grande province du Canada, nous documentons la mesure dans laquelle les partis s'engagent dans une personnalisation négative et suggérons des hypothèses pour rendre compte des facteurs qui contribuent à une personnalisation négative accrue.

Corresponding author
Department of Political Science, University of Calgary. 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Email:
Department of Political Science, Carleton University. 1125 Colonel By Drive. Ottawa, Ontario K1S5B6, Email:
Hide All
Aarts Kees, Blais André and Schmitt Hermann., eds. 2011. Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adam Silke and Maier Michaela. 2010. “Personalization of Politics: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research.” In Communication Yearbook 34, ed. Salmon C.. London: Routledge.
Angus Reid Public Opinion. 2011. “Tory Lead Down to Four Points as Three Party Race Develops in Ontario.” (November 13, 2015).
Balmas Meital, Rahat Gideon, Sheafer Tamir and Shenhav Shaul. 2014. “Two Routes to Personalized Politics. Centralized and Decentralized Personalization.” Party Politics 20: 3751.
Bartolini Stefano and Mair Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability. The Stability of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bittner Amanda. 2011. Platform or Personality? The Role of Party Leaders in Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brians Craig and Wattenberg Martin P.. 1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 172–93.
Emmett Buell, and Sigelman Lee. 2008. Attack Politics: Negativity in Presidential Campaigns since 1960. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Caramani Danielle. 2006. “Is There a European Electorate and What Does It Look Like? Evidence from Electoral Volatility Measures, 1976–2004.” West European Politics 29: 127.
Clarke Harold, Jenson Jane, LeDuc Lawrence and Pammett Jon. 1991. Absent Mandate: Interpreting Change in Canadian Elections. Toronto: Gage.
Cross William. 2004. Political Parties. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Cross William and Young Lisa. 2015. “Personalization of Campaigns in an SMP system: The Canadian Case.” Electoral Studies 39: 306315.
Cross William, Malloy Jonathan, Small Tamara and Stephenson Laura. 2015. Fighting for Votes: Parties, the Media, and Voters in an Ontario Election. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Dalton R.J. and Wattenberg Martin P.. 2000. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton Russell, McAllister Ian and Wattenberg Martin P.. 2000. “The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Dalton Russell and P Martin. Wattenberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Damore David. 2002. “Candidate Strategy and the Decision to Go Negative.” Political Research Quarterly 55: 669–85.
De Winter Lieven and Baudewyns Pierre. 2015. “Candidate Centred Campaigning in a Party Centred Context: The Case of Belgium.” Electoral Studies 39: 295305.
DiStaso Marcia. 2012. “The Annual Earnings Press Release's Dual Role: An Examination of Relationships with Local and National Media Coverage and Reputation.” Journal of Public Relations Research 24: 123–43.
Druckman James, Kifer Martin and Parkin Michael. 2010. “Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002–2006.” Political Communication 27: 88103.
Eder Nikolaus, Jenny Marcelo and Muller Wolfgang. 2015. “Winning Over Voters or Fighting Party Comrades? Personalized Constituency Campaigning in Austria.” Electoral Studies 39: 316–28.
Foley Michael. 2000. The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Research Forum. 2014. “PCs Start Ontario Campaign with Leader.” (November 13, 2015).
Fowler Erika and Ridout Travis. 2013. “Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012.” The Forum 10: 5161.
Geer John. 1998. “Campaigns, Competition, and Political Advertising.” In New Perspectives on Party Politics, ed. Geer John. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Geer John. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gidengil Elisabeth, Blais André, Nadeau Richard and Nevitte Neil. 2000. “Are Party Leaders Becoming More Important to Vote Choice in Canada?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.
Hansen Kasper and Pedersen Rasmus. 2008. “Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31: 408–27.
Hassell Hans and Oeltjenbruns Kelly. 2015. “When to Attack: The Trajectory of Congressional Campaign Negativity.American Politics Research 44 (2):, 222–46.
Audrey Haynes and Rhine Stacie. 1998. “Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated Negative Messages Against Opponents.” Political Research Quarterly 51: 691721.
Johnston Richard. 2003. “Prime Ministerial Contenders in Canada.” In Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, ed. King Anthony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaid Lynda. 1997. “Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton.” American Behavioral Scientist 40: 1085–94.
Kaid Lynda, and Johnston Anne. 1991. “Negative Versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–1988.” Journal of Communication 41: 5364.
Karlsen Rune and Skogerbø Eli. 2013. “Candidate Campaigning In Parliamentary Systems: Individualized vs. Localized Campaigning.Party Politics 21: 428–39.
Karvonen Lauri. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester UK: ECPR Press.
Kriesi Hanspeter. 2012. “Personalization of National Election Campaigns.” Party Politics 18: 825–44.
Krupnikov Yanna. 2011. “When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 796812.
Lau Richard and Pomper Gerald. 2004. Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lau Richard and Rovner Ivy. 2009. “Negative Campaigning.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 285306.
Lau Richard, Sigelman Lee and Rovner Ivy. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69: 176209.
McAllister Ian. 2015. “The Personalization of Politics in Australia. Party Politics 21: 337345.
Mendelsohn Matthew. 1993. “Television's Frames in the 1988 Canadian Election.” Canadian Journal of Communication 18: 149171.
Mendelsohn Matthew. 1996. “Television News Frames in the 1993 Canadian Election.” In Seeing Ourselves: Media Power and Policy in Canada, ed. Holmes Helen and Taras David. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
Peterson David and Djupe Paul. 2005. “When Primary Campaigns Go Negative: The Determinants of Campaign Negativity.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 4554.
Poguntke Thomas and Webb Paul, eds. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics: a Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rahat Gideon and Sheafer Tamir. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003.” Political Communication 24: 6580.
Reinnemann Carsten, and Wilke Jurgen. 2007. “It's the Debates, Stupid! How the Introduction of Televised Debates Changed the Portrayal of Chancellor Candidates in the German Press, 1949–2005.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12: 92111.
Sanders David and Norris Pippa. 2005. “The Impact of Political Advertising in the UK General Election.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 525–36.
Schulz Winifred and Zeh Reimar. 2005. “The Changing Election Coverage of German Television. A Content Analysis: 1990–2002.” Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 30: 385407.
Skaperdas Stergios and Grofman Bernard. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89: 4961.
Taras David. 2001. Power and Betrayal in the Canadian Media. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Walter Annemarie and Vliegenthart Rens. 2010. “Negative Campaigning Across Different Communication Channels: Different Ball Games?The International Journal of Press/Politics 5: 441–61.
Ware Alan. 2002. The American Direct Primary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wattenberg Martin. 1995. The Rise Of Candidate-Centered Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg Martin and Brians Craig. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?American Political Science Review 93: 891–99.
Zittel Thomas. 2015. “Constituency Candidates in Comparative Perspective: How Personalized Are Constituency Campaigns, Why, and Does it Matter?Electoral Studies 39: 286–94.
Zittel Thomas and Gschwend Thomas. 2008. “Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections.” West European Politics 31: 9781003.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique
  • ISSN: 0008-4239
  • EISSN: 1744-9324
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 117 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 495 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th October 2016 - 18th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.