Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:15:45.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shedding Light on Canada's Foreign Policy Alignment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Jonathan Paquin  and
Philippe Beauregard
Jonathan Paquin*
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Philippe Beauregard*
Affiliation:
Université Laval
*
Jonathan Paquin, Department of Political Science, Université Laval, Pavillon Charles-De Koninck, 1030, av. des Sciences-Humaines, Québec (Québec) G1V 0A6
Philippe Beauregard, Department of Political Science, Université Laval, Pavillon Charles-De Koninck, 1030, av. des Sciences-Humaines, Québec (Québec) G1V 0A6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of this article is to explore the issue of alignment in Canadian foreign policy. The main research question is whether Canada's responses to foreign crises aligned with those of its allies, and if so, which allies and why. The study proceeds in two steps. First, it tests four major theoretical perspectives that could explain Canada's behaviour: continentalism, transatlantism, the Anglosphere argument and unilateralism. By performing a computer-generated content analysis, the article assesses these propositions by focusing on and comparing Canada's official declarations to those of the United States, France and Britain to six foreign crises that occurred between 2004 and 2011. Second, the analysis identifies whether there is a difference between the Harper and Martin governments' responses to foreign crises. The research provides quantitative and qualitative evidence suggesting that Canada's foreign policy alignment primarily tends toward a transatlantic orientation. It also shows that the Harper government was less in line with Washington than was the previous Liberal government of Paul Martin, which challenges the conventional wisdom of Canadian foreign policy.

Résumé. Cet article explore l'enjeu de l'alignement en politique étrangère canadienne et pose la question de recherche suivante : est-ce qu'à l'égard des crises étrangère le Canada s'aligne sur les positions de ses alliés et, si oui, lesquels et pourquoi? Tout d'abord, l'article présente quatre perspectives théoriques susceptibles d'expliquer le comportement du Canada : le continentalisme, le transatlantisme, la thèse de l'anglosphère et celle de l'unilatéralisme. En ayant recours à une analyse de contenu assistée par ordinateur, cet article teste la validité de ces propositions en comparant les déclarations officielles du Canada à celles des États-Unis, de la France et de l'Angleterre à l'égard de six crises survenues entre 2004 et 2011. Ensuite, l'analyse cherche à identifier s'il y a une différence entre les réponses des gouvernements Harper et Martin à l'égard de ces crises. L'étude fournit des données empiriques de type qualitatif et quantitatif qui suggèrent que le Canada a eu une orientation transatlantique lors de la gestion de ces crises internationales. Elle montre également que le gouvernement Harper est moins aligné sur les positions de Washington que ne le fut le précédent gouvernement libéral, ce qui ébranle certaines idées communément admises en politique étrangère canadienne.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 617 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jeff, Ikenberry, G. John and Risse, Thomas, eds. 2008. The End of the West? Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, Jean-Christophe. 2009. “Selling Afghanistan: A discourse analysis of Canada's military intervention, 2001–08.” International Journal 64 (3): 717–33.Google Scholar
Bow, Brian. 2008–2009. “Parties and Partisanship in Canadian Defence Policy.” In Electoral Politics and Policy, Annual John W. Holmes Issue on Canadian Foreign Policy. International Journal 64 (1): 67–88.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher S. and Tonra, Ben. 2010. “Beyond the West and towards the Anglosphere?” In The Struggle for the West: A Divided and Contested Legacy, ed. Browning, Christopher S. and Lehti, Marko. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael. 2008. “From rogue nation to world leader: Nation needs to cast off neo-conservatism and lead on human rights and the environment.” Toronto Star, January 1, 2008http://www.thestar.com/opinion/2008/01/01/from_rogue_nation_to_world_leader.html (accessed May 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Cannon, Lawrence. 2011a. “Statement by Minister Cannon on Egypt to House of Commons.” Foreign Affairs and Trade Canada, February 3, 2011.Google Scholar
Cannon, Lawrence. 2011b. “Minister Cannon Concludes Meeting with G-8 Foreign Ministers.” Foreign Affairs and Trade Canada, March 15, 2011.Google Scholar
Cannon, Lawrence. 2011c. “Minister Cannon to Speak to UN Human Rights Council and Conference on Disarmament”, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada. February 26, 2011.Google Scholar
Chapnick, Adam. 2011–2012. “A diplomatic counter-revolution.” International Journal 67 (1): 137–54.Google Scholar
Clinton, Hillary. 2011. “Press Statement, Holding the Qadhafi Government Accountable”, U.S. Department of State. February 26, 2011.Google Scholar
DeBardeleben, Joan and Leblond, Patrick. 2010–2011. “The other transatlantic relationship: Canada, the EU, and 21st century challenges.” International Journal 66 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Deblock, Christian and Rioux, Michèle. 2010–2011. “From Economic Dialogue to CETA.” International Journal 66 (1): 39–56.Google Scholar
Fehl, Caroline. 2012. Living with a Reluctant Hegemon: Explaining European Responses to US Unilateralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gotlieb, Allan. 2005. “Romanticism and Realism in Canada's Foreign Policy.” Policy Options 26 (2): 16–27.Google Scholar
Granatstein, Jack L. 2007. Whose War Is It? Toronto: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Haglund, David G. and Mérand, Frédéric. 2010–2011. “Transatlantic relations in the new strategic landscape: Implications for Canada.” International Journal 66 (1): 23–38.Google Scholar
Harper, Stephen. 2011a. “Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on the current situation in Libya.” February 25, 2011.Google Scholar
Harper, Stephen. 2011b. “Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on implementing sanctions against Libya.” February 27, 2011.Google Scholar
Harper, Stephen. 2011c. “Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on implementing sanctions against Libya”, Prime Minister of Canada. February 27, 2011.Google Scholar
Hart, Michael. 2002–2003. “Lessons from Canada's History as a Trading Nation.” International Journal 58 (1): 25–42.Google Scholar
Hart, Michael. 2008. From Pride to Influence. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 2012. Anglo-America and its Discontents: Civilizational Identities beyond West and East. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keating, Tom. 1993. Canada and World Order: The Multilateralist Tradition in Canadian Foreign Policy. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” The American Political Science Review 97 (2): 311–31.Google Scholar
Lennox, Patrick. 2009. At Home and Abroad: The Canada-US Relationship and Canada's Place in the World. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Long, David. 2003. “Transatlantic Relations and Canadian Foreign Policy.” International Journal 58 (4): 591–614.Google Scholar
Mace, Gordon. 2007. “Introduction.” In Regionalism and the State: NAFTA and Foreign Policy Convergence, ed. Mace, Gordon. Aldershot UK: Ashgate Publications.Google Scholar
Martin, Lawrence. 1993. Pledge of Allegiance: The Americanization of Canada in the Mulroney Years. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul. 2004. “Canada Congratulates Winner of Ukraine's Presidential Election.” December 30, 2004.Google Scholar
Massie, Justin. 2014 (forthcoming). “Towards Greater Opportunism: Balancing and Bandwagoning in Canadian-American Relations.” In Game Changer: The Impact of 9/11 on North American Security, ed. Paquin, Jonathan and James, Patrick. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric and Vandemoortele, Antoine. 2011. “Europe in Canada's Strategic Culture, 1949–2009.” International Journal 66 (2): 419–40.Google Scholar
Narizny, Kevin. 2012. “Anglo-American Primacy and the Global Spread of Democracy: An International Genealogy.” World Politics 64 (2): 341–73.Google Scholar
Nossal, Kim Richard. 2011. “America's ‘Most Reliable Ally’? Canada and the Evanescence of the Culture of Partnership.” In Forgotten Partnership Redux: Canada–US Relations in the 21st Century, ed. Anderson, Greg and Sands, Christopher. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Paquin, Jonathan. 2012. “Is Ottawa Following Washington's Lead in Foreign Policy? Evidence from the Arab Spring.” International Journal 67 (4): 1001–28.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2006. “The alive and well transatlantic security community: A theoretical reply to Michael Cox.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 119–27.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on US Foreign Policy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, Colin. 2011. “Harper's World View.” Policy Options 12 (9): 18–21.Google Scholar
Sarkozy, Nicolas. 2011. “Conférence de presse conjointe du président de la République, Nicolas Sarkozy et du président de la république de Turquie, Abdullah Gul”, President of the French Republic. February 25, 2011.Google Scholar
Sharp, Mitchell. 1972. “Canada–U.S. Relations: Options for the Future.” International Perspectives, special issue, Autumn.Google Scholar
Thomson, David. 1965. “General de Gaulle and the Anglo-Saxons.” International Affairs 41 (1): 11–21.Google Scholar
Vucetic, Srdjan. 2011. The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Warnock, John W. 1970. Partner to behemoth: The military policy of a satellite Canada. Chicago: New Press.Google Scholar